土壤液化所引致的土壤剪力強度損失，為地震災害中眾多大地結構物損壞的主因之一。本研究以中大地工離心機振動台，搭配積層式剪力試驗箱進行一維自由場土壤之離心振動台模型試驗，將30cm高的均質砂土模型試體置於80g重力場情況下，模擬24m厚之乾燥或飽和砂土層的受振反應。於試體基盤處輸入不同振幅大小之1Hz正弦波其延時為16秒，模擬乾燥砂土層受振以及飽和砂土層受振且淺層土壤發生液化的現象，同時利用加速度計陣列與孔隙水壓計陣列，量測不同位置深度的受振反應。
利用加速度計歷時以及孔隙水壓計歷時資料，可計算得到不同深度土層的剪應變、剪應力並進而求得剪力模數。研究中發現，在乾砂試體內有明顯剪力波向上傳遞的現象，並有地盤放大效應的產生。於飽和砂試體內，藉由所量測到的感測計歷時資料變化趨勢可以發現土壤膨脹以及突波情況的發生。

The relationship of shear stress and shear strain of sandy soil is an important parameter and need to determination when soil stiffness and strength degraded as a result of sand liquefaction. Centrifuge modeling tests can provide an alternative source of information and reliable test results for assessing soil mechanism under shaking situation. The centrifuge model was conducted to simulate the seismic response for a 24m thick sandy soil deposit under an artificial gravity field of 80g. The testing models are subjected to different magnitude base-input acceleration of 1Hz and 16 seconds duration. A series of accelerometer and pore water pressure transducer arrays were installed to record the soil seismic response.
Utilizing the acceleration history and the pore pressure history, the shear stress and shear strain at different depths can be obtained. And then the shear modulus can be acquired through calculation. From this research, the phenomenon of shear wave propagating upward is obviously being seen in dry sand, so is the site effect. The soil dilatation and surge can be found in saturated sand.

參考文獻
[1]. Zeghal, M., Elgamal, A.W., Zeng, X., and Arulmoli,K., “Mechanism of liquefaction response in sand-silt dynamic centrifuge tests,” Soil Dynamicand Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 15, issue 8, pp.71-85 (1999).
[2]. Zeghal, M., Elgamal, A.W., “Analysis of Site Liquefaction Using Earthquake Records,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 6, pp.996-1017(1994)
[3]. Zeghal, M., Elgamal, A.W., Tang, H.T., and Stepp, J.C., “Lotung Downgole Array. II: Evaluation of Soil Nonlinear Properties,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 4, pp.363-376(1993)
[4]. Sharp, M.K., Dobry, R., Zeng, X., and Abdoun ,A.M., “Liquefaction centrifuge modeling of sands of different permeability,” Journal of Geotechnicaland Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 129, No.12, pp. 1083-1091 (2003).
[5]. Jahromi, H.F., Jafarzadeh, F., and Torghabeh, E.A., “Dynamic parameters of dry sand using one dimensional shaking table tests,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Hong Kong, pp.279-283(2006)
[6]. Sharp, M.K., Dobry, R., Zeng, X., and Abdoun ,A.M., “Liquefaction centrifuge modeling of sands of different permeability,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 129, No.12, pp. 1083-1091 (2003).
[7]. Chen, H.T., C.J. Lee, and Chen, W.H., “The traveling pluviation appartus for sand specimen preparation,” Proceedings of the International Conference Centrifuge 98, Tokyo, pp.143-148 (1998) .
[8]. Hardin, B.O., and Drnevich V. P., “Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils:Measurement and Parameter Effects,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SM6, pp. 603-624 (1972a).
[9]. Hardin, B.O. and Drenvich, V.P., “Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Design Equations and Curves”, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SM7, pp. 667-692 (1972b).
[10]. Hardin, B.O., and Black W.L., “Vibration Modulus of Normally Consolidated Clay,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, No. SM2, pp. 353-369 (1968).
[11]. Seed, H.B., and Idriss I.M., “Shear Moduli and Damping Factor for Dynamic Response Analysis,” Report No. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, California (1970).
[12]. Seed, H.B., Wong, R.T., Idriss, I.M., and Tokimatsu, K., “Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analysis of Cohesionless Soils,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 112, No. GT11, pp. 1016∼1032 (1986).
[13]. Brennan, A.J., Thusyanthan, N.I., and Madabhushi, S.P.G., “Evaluation of Shear Modulus and Damping in Dynamic Centrifuge Tests,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 12, pp. 1488-1497(2005).
[14]. Laak, P. A. V., Taboada, V. M., Dobry, R. and Elgamal, A. W., “Earthquake Centrifuge Modelling UsingDynamic geotechnical testing II, pp. 370-384.
[15]. Acutronic, Civil Engineering Centrifuge Model 665-1 Installation Manual 5941E, France(1992)
[16]. Acutronic, Geotechnical Centrifuge Model 665-1 Product Description 5933H, France(1993)
[17]. Chen, H.T., C.J. Lee, and Chen, W.H., “The travel- ing pluviation appartus for sand specimen preparation,” Proceedings of the International Conference Centrifuge 98, Tokyo, pp.143-148 (1998) .
[18]. Ko, H.Y., and Daewoolkar, M.M., “Modelling Liquefaction in Centrifuge,” Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, pp. 307-322(1999)
[19]. PVL Technologies, Inc.,Model LB-2814 Laminar Box Model Container for Geotechnical Centrifuge Model Testing(2008)
[20]. J. Yang, J.B. Li, G. Lin, “A Simple Approach to Integration of Acceleration Data for Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis,” Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 26, issue 8, pp. 725-734(2006).
[21]. 吳偉特，「土壤動力特性在大地工程之應用」，地工技術雜誌，第二期，第82∼96 頁 (1983)。
[22]. 吳偉特，「土壤動力學與大地工程」，地工技術雜誌，第九期，第5∼19 頁 (1985)。
[23]. 李崇正，林志棟，林俊雄，「大地工程研究者知新工具：離心模型試驗」，岩盤工程研討會論文集，中壢，第649-669 頁(1994)。
[24]. 魏雨辰，洪汶宜，鄺柏軒，郭玉潔，江國輝，李崇正，「以離心模型試驗模擬均質砂土層之受振反應」，第十三屆大地工程研討會暨國科會成果發表會，宜蘭，台灣(2009)。
[25]. 王金山，「共振柱之土壤動力性質」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢(2004)。
[26]. 陳思宏，「黏土層中未襯砌隧道之破壞機制」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢(1996)。
[27]. 郭玉潔，「探討積層板試驗箱進行動態離心模型試驗之邊界效應」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢(2009)
[28]. 程漢瑋，「振動台大型剪力盒試驗砂土液化後沉陷量之研究」，碩士論文，國立台灣大學土木工程學系，台北（2004）
[29]. 陳泓文，「砂土坡地井樁受側向力之離心機模型試驗」，博士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢 (1999)。