| 研究生: |
李惠鈴 Hui-Ling Lee |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業ESG績效與投資人情緒對股利政策影響之研究 A Study on the Impact of Corporate ESG Performance and Investor Sentiment on Dividend Policy |
| 指導教授: |
何柏欣
Po-Hsin Ho |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系在職專班 Executive Master of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 59 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 公司治理 、ESG 、股利政策 、投資人情緒 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Corporate Governance, ESG, Dividend Policy, Investor Sentiment |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:18 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在各國重視環境與社會責任的發展下,ESG績效已成為衡量企業長期價值與經營穩健性的重要指標。企業是否將ESG表現在股利政策中具體反應,以及投資人情緒是否會加強其影響性,本研究以此為出發點,探討ESG績效對企業股利政策之影響,並進一步檢視投資人情緒於此關係中所扮演之調節角色。以2016至2022年間台灣證券交易所上市公司為樣本,探討三大股利政策面向:是否發放股利、股利發放率與股利發放率穩定度。研究發現企業ESG績效與股利政策三大面向均呈顯著關聯,ESG評分越高的企業,越傾向發放股利、提高股利發放率,並展現出更穩定的配息行為。投資人情緒對ESG與股利決策具顯著調節效果,特別是在情緒高漲時,ESG對股利發放傾向與股利發放率的影響更顯著,惟對股利發放率穩定度之調節效果不顯著,顯示穩定配息仍主要取決於企業財務體質與長期策略,而非市場短期情緒波動。
As countries attach importance to environmental and social responsibility, ESG performance has become an important indicator for measuring the long-term value and operational stability of enterprises. Whether enterprises reflect ESG performance in dividend policy and whether investor sentiment will enhance its influence, this study takes this as a starting point to explore the impact of ESG performance on corporate dividend policy and further examine the regulatory role of investor sentiment in this relationship. Using the listed companies on the Taiwan Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2022 as a sample, the three major dividend policy aspects are explored: whether to pay dividends, dividend payout ratio and dividend payout ratio stability. The study found that the ESG performance of enterprises is significantly correlated with the three major aspects of dividend policy. The higher the ESG score of enterprises, the more inclined they are to pay dividends, increase the dividend payout ratio, and show more stable dividend distribution behavior. Investor sentiment has a significant moderating effect on ESG and dividend decisions, especially when the sentiment is high, the impact of ESG on the tendency to pay dividends and the dividend payout ratio is more significant, but the moderating effect on the stability of the dividend payout ratio is not significant, indicating that stable dividends still depend mainly on the financial constitution and long-term strategy of enterprises, rather than short-term market sentiment fluctuations.
參考文獻
中文文獻
王鐘模(2000),「金融、電子、紡織三產業之股利政策與股價變動之研究」,大葉大學,事業經營研究所碩士論文。
池祥麟(2017),「企業社會責任-行為財務學的觀點」,證券市場發展季刊,29(4),63-104。
吳昕樺(2017),「企業社會責任對現金股利影響性之研究」,國立政治大學,財務管理研究所碩士論文。
呂昀潔(2021),「企業社會責任、股利政策與公司財務績效:全球證據分析」,國立東華大學,財務金融學系研究所碩士論文。
周賓凰、池祥萱、周冠男、龔怡霖(2002),「行為財務學:文獻回顧與展望」,證券市場發展季刊, 14(2),1-48。
林穎芬、黃麗津、陳思源(2012),「經理人薪酬、公司治理與現金股利政策」,中山管理評論,20(4),1213-1251。
張修豪(2010),「股利政策的演變、稅制改革以及庫藏股買回-以台灣公司為例」,國立交通大學,財務金融研究所碩士論文。
詹錦宏、林明薰、溫秀英(2017),「台灣上市公司的股利政策與企業價值」,會計學報,7(2),65-94。
鄭桂蕙、林宛瑩、汪瑞芝(2023),「SASB 準則下環境社會治理績效與企業績效之關聯性」,會計審計論叢,13(2),1-40。
簡安寬(2010),「公司特性、投資人情緒與股利政策」,國立中正大學,財務金融研究所碩士論文。
英文文獻
Affandi, F., Sunarko, B., & Yunanto, A. (2019). The impact of cash ratio, debt to equity ratio, receivables turnover, net profit margin, return on equity, and institutional ownership to dividend payout ratio. Journal of Research in Management, 1(4), 1–11.
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609.
Al-Yahyaee, K. H., Pham, T., & Walter, T. S. (2010). Dividend stability in a unique environment. Managerial Finance, 36(10), 903-916.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2004a). A catering theory of dividends. The Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1125–1165.
Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2004b). Appearing and disappearing dividends: The link to catering incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 271–288.
Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and "the bird-in-the-hand" fallacy. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259–270.
Brown, G. W., & Cliff, M. T. (2004). Investor sentiment and the near-term stock market. Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(1), 1–27.
Chen, H.-L., Chow, E. H., & Shiu, C.-Y. (2013). Ex-dividend prices and investor trades: Evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 24, 39–65.
Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review, 74(4), 650–659.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 3–43.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.
Gordon, M. J. (1963). Optimal investment and financing policy. The Journal of Finance, 18(2), 264–272.
Gwilym, O. ap, Morgan, G., & Thomas, S. (2000). Dividend stability, dividend yield and stock returns: UK evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 27(3–4), 261–281.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Jory, S. R., Ngo, T. N., & Sakaki, H. (2017). Institutional ownership stability and dividend payout policy. Managerial Finance, 43(3), 295–316.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33.
Lee, C. M. C., Shleifer, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Investor sentiment and the closed‐end fund puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 75–109.
Lee, K. F. (2020). Peer effects on firm dividend policies in Taiwan. Journal of Financial Studies, 28(3), 113–137.
Lee, Y.-T., Liu, Y.-J., Roll, R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2006). Taxes and dividend clientele: Evidence from trading and ownership structure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(1), 229–246.
Lemmon, M., & Portniaguina, E. (2006). Consumer confidence and asset prices: Some empirical evidence. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1499–1529.
Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. American Economic Review, 46(2), 97–113.
Ludvigson, S. C. (2004). Consumer confidence and consumer spending. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 29-50.
Matos, P. V., Barros, V., & Sarmento, J. M. (2020). Does ESG affect the stability of dividend policies in Europe? Sustainability, 12(21), 8804.
Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411–433.
Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.
Qiu, L., & Welch, I. (2006). Investor sentiment measures. NBER Working Paper No. 10794. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Smith, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1992). The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3), 263–292.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.