過去文獻皆指出摩根指數在宣告後，被剔除的成分股會有顯著的負異常報酬，台灣則是在宣告日隔日開盤時向下跳空反應，投資人難以捕捉到這樣的報酬。在研究期間2008年1月至2016年2月中，本研究發現影響成分股被剔除與否最大的可能因素為市值，而本文利用摩根指數編製手冊複製其編製方法，透過模擬的方式可以提前預測即將被剔除的成分股名單，預測成分股被剔除的準確率達64.13%，預測成分股不會被剔除的準確率達99.61%。投資人可以利用這樣的方式，預測接下來可能被剔除的成分股，並提前借券放空，提升投資組合的整體績效。

The previous studies all pointed out that the deleted stocks would have significant negative abnormal returns after the reconstitution of the announcement of MSCI Indices. Stocks deleted from MSCI Taiwan Index gaped down at open price, which is very hard to earn that kind of return. In the sample period from January 2008 to February 2016, we find that the market value is the main cause of deletion. Through the MSCI Global Investable Market Indices Methodology, we can simulate the methodology and predict the deletion list of next reconstitution, which has 64.13 percent of precise rate by predicting the stock which will be deleted and has 99.61 percent of precise rate by predicting the stock which won’t be deleted. Investors can use that method to predict the deletion list in the next reconstitution and sell short the stock to improve the performance of their portfolios.

中文部分：（按姓氏筆劃排列）
1. 許璋慶（2008），「MSCI台灣指數成分股調整，對股票報酬率之影響」，國立政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程財管組碩士論文
2. 黃執剛（2005），「外資證券投資與我國MSCI指數之關係-MSCI指數的高低是造成外資進出股市的原因嗎？」，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文

英文部分：（按英文字母排序）
1. Beneish, M. D., & Whaley, R. E. (1996). An anatomy of the “S&P Game”: The effects of changing the rules. The Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1909-1930.
2. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of financial economics, 14(1), 3-31.
3. Chakrabarti, R., Huang, W., Jayaraman, N., & Lee, J. (2005). Price and volume effects of changes in MSCI indices–nature and causes. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(5), 1237-1264.
4. Chen, H., Noronha, G., & Singal, V. (2004). The price response to S&P 500 index additions and deletions: Evidence of asymmetry and a new explanation. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1901-1930.
5. Denis, D. K., McConnell, J. J., Ovtchinnikov, A. V., & Yu, Y. (2003). S&P 500 index additions and earnings expectations. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1821-1840.
6. Dhillon, U., & Johnson, H. (1991). Changes in the Standard and Poor's 500 List. Journal of Business, 75-85.
7. Elliott, W. B., & Warr, R. S. (2003). Price pressure on the NYSE and NASDAQ: Evidence from S&P 500 index changes. Financial Management, 85-99.
8. Harris, L., & Gurel, E. (1986). Price and volume effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 list: New evidence for the existence of price pressures. The Journal of Finance, 41(4), 815-829.
9. Hegde, S. P., & McDermott, J. B. (2003). The liquidity effects of revisions to the S&P 500 index: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Markets, 6(3), 413-459.
10. Jain, P. C. (1987). The effect on stock price of inclusion in or exclusion from the S&P 500. Financial Analysts Journal, 43(1), 58-65.
11. Kaul, A., Mehrotra, V., & Morck, R. (2000). Demand curves for stocks do slope down: New evidence from an index weights adjustment. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 893-912.
12. Lynch, A. W., & Mendenhall, R. R. (1996). New evidence on stock price effects associated with charges in the S&P 500 Index.
13. Peterson, P. P. (1989). Event studies: A review of issues and methodology. Quarterly journal of business and economics, 36-66.
14. Shleifer, A. (1986). Do demand curves for stocks slope down?. The Journal of Finance, 41(3), 579-590.