近年來轉換型領導於管理領域中備受推崇，觀察發現在以獲利為目標的企業環境下，交易型領導對部屬亦具相當的激勵效果，因此本研究以台灣企業為研究對象，探討員工知覺主管轉換型領導、交易型領導風格對於工作動機，與離職傾向的影響，提供領導者選擇領導方式的參考，以期在管理實務上有所幫助。
本研究以台灣的企業員工為樣本蒐集309份有效問卷，研究結果顯示對金融業務從業人員而言，交易型領導對於工作動機有顯著的影響效果。交易型領導，可經由增加外在工作動機的影響，獲得減少部屬離職傾向的效果，外在工作動機的中介效果成立。交易型領導無法經由內在工作動機，影響離職傾向。轉換型領導對「外在工作動機-薪酬」，有低度顯著負影響效果。轉換型領導，無法經由工作動機的影響，獲得減少部屬離職傾向的效果。

Transformational leadership style has been highly practiced in the field of management over the past decades. It has been observed that transactional leadership style would also enhance employee motivations effectively within profit-oriented organizations. This study examines profit-oriented Taiwanese companies, and the purpose of this research is to explore the motivational effects of both two leadership styles, transformational leadership and transactional leadership, on employees. Also try to find out whether work motivation has a significant impact on turnover intention or not. This study is of vital importance for the management to better understand the importance of motivation in employees and to reduce their turnover.
Using a questionnaire survey, with Taiwanese employees as the research object, a total of 309 valid questionnaires were obtained. The research results indicate that transactional leadership has a significant effect on work motivation in the field of financial industry. Extrinsic motivation mediated the effect of transaction leadership on turnover intention. Transformational leadership has a significant negative effect on the "external motivation-salary" motivation. Work motivation does not mediate the effects of transformational leadership on turnover intention. Transformational leadership does not reduce turnover intention through the impact on work motivation.

一、英文文獻
〔1〕 Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(5), 950.
〔2〕 Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human resource management review, 3(3), 185-201.
〔3〕 Avolio, J. B., & Bass, M. B. (2002). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sample set. Mind garden..
〔4〕 Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2002). Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire (Form 5X). Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden.
〔5〕 Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
〔6〕 Barbuto Jr, J. E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 26-40.
〔7〕 .Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
〔8〕 Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
〔9〕 Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
〔10〕 Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press.
〔11〕 Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. sage
〔12〕 Burns, J. M. G. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
〔13〕 Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. J. M. b. r. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. 40(2), 235-259.
〔14〕 De Charms, R. (2013). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior: Routledge
〔15〕 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Intrinsic motivation. The corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-2.
〔16〕 Deci, E. L. (1972). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational behavior and human performance, 8(2), 217-229.
〔17〕 Fernandez, S., Cho, Y. J., & Perry, J. L. (2010). Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 308-323.
〔18〕 Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A THEORY OF LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS. MCGRAW-HILL SERIES IN MANAGEMENT.
〔19〕 George, L., & Sabhapathy, T. (2010). Work Motivation of Teachers: Relationship with Transformational and Transactional Leadership Behavior of College Principals. Academic Leadership Journal, 8(2), 201-207.
〔20〕 Guzzo, R. A. (1979). Types if rewards, cognitions, and work motivation. Academy of Management, 4(1), 75-86.
〔21〕 Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(2), 159.
〔22〕 Holland, B. K. (1989, September-October). Motivation and job satisfaction. Journal of Property Management, 54(5), 32-36.
〔23〕 House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies: Sage publications.
〔24〕 Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (January 01, 2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 5, 755-68.
〔25〕 Kamery, R. H. (2004). Employee motivation as it relates to effectiveness, efficiency, productivity, and performance. In Proceedings of the Academy of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues (Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 139-144).
〔26〕 Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of educational psychology, 97(2), 184.
〔27〕 Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied psychology, 63(4), 408.
〔28〕 Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 62(2), 237.
〔29〕 Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization science, 11(5), 538-550.
〔30〕 Pintrich, R. P., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation In Education. Theory, Research, and Application. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
〔31〕 Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
〔32〕 Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of applied psychology, 59(5), 603.
〔33〕 Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover James L. Price. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press..
〔34〕 Reid, W. M., & Dold, C. J. (2018). Burns, Senge, and the Study of Leadership. Open Journal of Leadership, 7, 1, 89-116.
〔35〕 Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of general psychology, 8(3), 179-193..
〔36〕 Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (Vol. 4): New Jersey: Pearson Education.
〔37〕 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
〔38〕 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
〔39〕 Schaffer, B. (2008). Leadership and motivation. Supervision, 69(2), 6.
〔40〕 Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research.
〔41〕 Williams, L. J., & O'Boyle Jr, E. H. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 233-242.
〔42〕 White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological review, 66(5), 297.
〔43〕 Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human relations, 43(10), 975-995.

二、中文文獻

〔1〕 方慈霞（2011)。領導風格、工作動機對工作投入之影響-以組織公平為調節變項（未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學。
〔2〕 吳治勳、陳慶餘、許志成、吳英璋（2016)。臺灣老化態度量表之編製與心理計量特性。中華心理衛生學刊，29(2)，159-186。
〔3〕 房美玉（2002)。 台灣半導體產業之組織文化對於內外工作動機與工作績效及工作滿意度間關連性的影響。管理評論，21(3)，69-96。
〔4〕 彭台光、高月慈、 林鉦棽（2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。
〔5〕 彭慧純（2011)。人力資源專業人員之專業職能、工作動機與個人績效之關係探討（未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學
〔6〕 黃英忠、董玉娟、 林義屏（2006)。台商派駐大陸已婚員工離開現職傾向之研究：工作－家庭衝突理論之觀點。管理評論，20(3)，85-122。
〔7〕 施妤璇（2006）。轉換型領導、交易型領導對工作績效與離職傾向之研究-以組織承諾為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學。
〔8〕 張偉豪，鄭時宜（2012），與結構方程式模型共舞－曙光初現，新北市，前程文化。
〔9〕 蔡培村、武文英（2013)。領導學-理論、實務與研究。高雄市：麗文文化。
〔10〕 賴秋芬（2014) 組織鑲嵌及主管領導風格對組織承諾及行員創新行為的影響-以台北地區某銀行為例（未出版之碩士論文)。經國管理暨健康學院。