面對現今社會變化快速的時代，人們面臨到的問題越來越複雜，因此與他人合作解決問題變成21世紀的核心能力之一，在教育環境中也越來越多學習活動，透過合作問題解決達到合作學習的目的。而在科學學習中，使用電腦模擬已被證實為有效的學習方式，透過操控參數和觀察模擬變化，可以幫助學生進行知識建構。本研究應用電腦模擬進行合作問題解決的科學學習活動，探討學生在不同操作模式下，合作過程中的行為和感受，使用眼動追蹤、對話分析探討學生在問題解決中的行為模式，透過問卷調查活動時的合作品質，為了進一步了解合作過程中如何互相影響，使用多層次分析中的隨機係數模型，分析個人行為、感受與小組合作過程之間的關聯。結果顯示不同操作模式對學生在活動中的注意力無明顯差異，但在學習行為、合作感受、學習成效皆有不同，進而造成個人與小組的關聯中有明顯差異，在合作上，非同步模式較依賴對話，對話的品質影響到合作的品質；同步模式的學習成效較好，花費的時間較短，但發現在學習上會發生搭便車效應；分工模式的學習成效較差，花費的時間較長，但有較好的合作品質。最後，本研究依照結果提出未來研究的建議。

Living in a fast-changing society, the problems we face is becoming more and more complex, so collaborate with peer to solve problems has become one of the core skill of the 21st century. In the field of science education, more and more instruction activities adopting collaborative problem solving (CPS) conduct collaborative learning. In scientific learning, computer simulation has been proven to be an effective way of learning which can help students to build knowledge when they adjusting simulation variable and observing changes. This study uses computer simulation in science learning activity of CPS, to analyze students behavior and feelings during collaborative in different operating modes. The study using eye tracking and dialogue analysis to analyze students' behavior patterns in problem solving, and using questionnaires to investigate the collaborative quality. In order to understand how the collaboration affects each other, using the random coefficient model in multi-level analysis to find the association between the individual behavior, feelings and group collaborative processes. The results showed that there were no significant differences in students' attention in the activities, but there were differences in learning behavior, collaborative feeling and learning achievements, resulting in significant differences in the association between individuals and groups. In terms of collaborative, asynchronous models rely more on dialogue, and the quality of dialogue affects the quality of the collaborative; The learning achievements of the synchronous mode is better and the time is shorter, but it is found that the free-riding effect will occur in the learning activity; The learning achievements of the division of labor model are poor and take longer, but have a better quality of the collaborative. Finally, the study makes recommendations for future studies based on the results.

王楠鈞（2020）。注意力指引工具於合作電腦模擬問題解決之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學網路學習歌技研究所學位論文，桃園市。
邱秉誠（2016）。個人電腦模擬及合作電腦模擬對於合作科學問題解決之影響。國立中央大學網路學習歌技研究所學位論文，桃園市。
彭郁翔（2018）。不同電腦模擬模式對於合作科學問題解決之影響：以眼動進行分析。國立中央大學網路學習歌技研究所學位論文，桃園市。
黃茂在, & 陳文典. (2004). [問題解決] 的能力. 科學教育月刊.
黃福坤（2006）。透過物理模擬動畫進行物理教學與學習-介紹簡易模擬動畫設計環境Easy Java Simulation。物理雙月刊，28，3，536-543。
謝翌甄（2019）。合作式電腦模擬於科學問題解決之影響：以眼動進行分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學網路學習歌技研究所學位論文，桃園市。
Alkan, S., & Cagiltay, K. (2007). Studying computer game learning experience through eye tracking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 538-542.
Amy, W. (2003). Supporting electronic discourse: Principles of design from a social constructivist perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(2), 167-184.
Baudisch, P., DeCarlo, D., Duchowski, A. T., & Geisler, W. S. (2003). Focusing on the essential: considering attention in display design. Communications of the ACM, 46(3), 60-66.
Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiu, B. C., Liu, C. C., Chiang, S. H. F., Wen, C. T., ... & Wu, S. W. (2017). An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations. Computers & Education, 114, 222-235.
Chang, C. J., Liu, C. C., Wu, Y. T., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. F., Chiu, B. C., ... & Wu, S. W. (2016, January). Students' perceptions on problem solving with collaborative computer simulation. In 24th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2016 (pp. 166-168). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Chen, S., CHANG, W. H., LAI, C. H., & TSAI, C. Y. (2014). A comparison of students’ approaches to inquiry, conceptual learning, and attitudes in simulation‐based and microcomputer‐based laboratories. Science Education, 98(5), 905-935.
Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational psychologist, 49(4), 219-243.
de la Torre, L., Heradio, R., Dormido, S., & Jara, C. (2013). Real-time collaboration for web-based labs.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning?.
Dodge, R., & Cline, T. S. (1901). The angle velocity of eye movements. Psychological Review, 8(2), 145.
Drèze, X., & Hussherr, F. X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody watching?. Journal of interactive marketing, 17(4), 8-23.
Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology. Theory and practice, 328(614), 2-3.
Esquembre, F. (2004). Easy Java Simulations: A software tool to create scientific simulations in Java. Computer physics communications, 156(2), 199-204.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer.
Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 1-15). Springer, Dordrecht.
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization science, 12(4), 435-449.
Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. The Macmillan Company.
Hwang, F. K., & Esquembre, F. (2003). Easy java simulations: An interactive science learning tool. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 5(2).
Hyönä, J., Lorch Jr, R. F., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44.
Jermann, P., Nüssli, M. A., & Li, W. (2010). Using dual eye-tracking to unveil coordination and expertise in collaborative Tetris. Proceedings of HCI 2010 24, 36-44.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). The role of eye-fixation research in cognitive psychology. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 8(2), 139-143.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological review, 87(4), 329.
Kim, M., & Tan, H. T. (2013). A collaborative problem-solving process through environmental field studies. International journal of science education, 35(3), 357-387.
Kukkonen, J. E., Kärkkäinen, S., Dillon, P., & Keinonen, T. (2014). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-graders' representations of the greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 406-424.
Liu, C. Y., Wu, C. J., Wong, W. K., Lien, Y. W., & Chao, T. K. (2017). Scientific modeling with mobile devices in high school physics labs. Computers & Education, 105, 44-56.
Martinez-Moyano, I. (2006). Exploring the dynamics of collaboration in interorganizational settings. Creating a culture of collaboration: The International Association of Facilitators handbook, 4, 69.
Marwan, N., & Kurths, J. (2002). Nonlinear analysis of bivariate data with cross recurrence plots. Physics Letters A, 302(5-6), 299-307.
Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 2, 241-267.
OECD. （ 2013） . PISA 2015 Collaborative Problem Solving Framework: OECD
Publishing.
Olsen, J. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2017). Through the (thin-slice) looking glass: An initial look at rapport and co-construction within peer collaboration. Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences..
Pietinen, S., Bednarik, R., Glotova, T., Tenhunen, V., & Tukiainen, M. (2008, March). A method to study visual attention aspects of collaboration: eye-tracking pair programmers simultaneously. In Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications (pp. 39-42).
Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive science, 29(6), 1045-1060.
Rieber, L. P., Tzeng, S. C., & Tribble, K. (2004). Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: Finding the right mix. Learning and instruction, 14(3), 307-323.
Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136-153.
Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International journal of Educational research, 13(1), 89-99.
Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1987). Human factors in engineering and design.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337-1370.
Toet, A. (2006). Gaze directed displays as an enabling technology for attention aware systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(4), 615-647.
Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y., & Yang, F. Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58(1), 375-385.
Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y., & Yang, F. Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58(1), 375-385.
Tsai, M. J., Huang, L. J., Hou, H. T., Hsu, C. Y., & Chiou, G. L. (2016). Visual behavior, flow and achievement in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 98, 115-129.
van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in human behavior, 21(4), 671-688.
Villamor, M., & Rodrigo, M. M. (2017). Impact of Both Prior Knowledge and Acquaintanceship on Collaboration and Performance: A Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference in Computers in Education (pp. 182-187).
Winsberg, E. (2013). Computer simulations in science.
Zhang, Y., Pfeuffer, K., Chong, M. K., Alexander, J., Bulling, A., & Gellersen, H. (2017). Look together: using gaze for assisting co-located collaborative search. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 21(1), 173-186.