跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 詹哲綸
Che-Lun Chan
論文名稱: 專利侵權訴訟對企業獲利和創新的影響-臺灣電子業的實證研究
指導教授: 楊志海
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 52
中文關鍵詞: 專利侵權訴訟企業獲利能力企業創新能力事件研究法
外文關鍵詞: Patent infringement litigation, corporate profitability, corporate innovation, event study methodology
相關次數: 點閱:17下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本論文旨在探討專利侵權訴訟對企業獲利與創新的影響,並以臺灣上市櫃電子業為實證對象。專利制度雖被設計用以保護創新與激勵技術研發,但隨著專利侵權訴訟案件日益增加,專利侵權訴訟已成為企業營運中的重大挑戰。本文採用事件研究法與追蹤資料的固定效果模型,蒐集2004年至2023年間之臺灣上市櫃電子業公司資料,分析企業在作為原告與被告之下,專利侵權訴訟事件對其獲利與研發支出的影響。
    實證結果顯示,不論企業為原告或被告,訴訟當期與後兩期對獲利與研發支出均無顯著影響,顯示臺灣電子業對專利侵權訴訟具備一定的風險承受能力與資源調整能力。進一步探討規模異質性後發現,小型與大型企業於訴訟事件下的反應並無顯著差異,整體而言,企業的創新與獲利表現仍主要受內部資源條件如資本密集度、研發強度與國際化程度所影響。


    This thesis investigates the impact of patent infringement litigation on corporate profitability and innovation, using listed electronics firms in Taiwan as the empirical sample. While the patent system is designed to protect innovation and incentivize technological development, the rising number of patent infringement cases has made such litigation a significant challenge for corporate operations. Employing event study methodology and the fixed effect of panel data model, this thesis uses data from Taiwanese listed electronics companies spanning from 2004 to 2023 to assess how litigation, whether as plaintiffs or defendants, affects profitability and R&D expenditures.
    The empirical results indicate that, regardless of whether firms are plaintiffs or defendants, patent litigations have no significant impact on profitability or R&D expenditure in the year of litigation or the subsequent two years. This suggests that Taiwanese electronics firms possess a certain level of resilience and resource flexibility in the face of intellectual property disputes. Further heterogeneous analysis based on firm size reveals no significant differences in their responses to litigation events between small and large firms. Overall, firm performance in profitability and innovation appears to be primarily driven by internal resource conditions such as capital intensity, R&D intensity, and degree of internationalization.

    目錄 中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 謝誌 iii 目錄 iv 表目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究架構 3 第二章 智慧財產法庭與專利訴訟 4 第一節 臺灣智慧財產法庭的介紹 4 第二節 不同國家的智慧財產法庭 7 第三章 文獻回顧 9 第一節 不同國家的專利侵權訴訟之相關文獻 9 第二節 專利侵權訴訟對企業獲利的影響之相關文獻 10 第三節 專利侵權訴訟對企業創新的影響之相關文獻 12 第四章 研究方法與資料來源 14 第一節 實證模型與估計方法 14 第二節 資料來源與敘述統計 19 第五章 實證結果 23 第一節 專利侵權訴訟對臺灣上市櫃電子業獲利的影響 23 第二節 專利侵權訴訟對臺灣上市櫃電子業創新的影響 25 第三節 規模對廠商獲利和創新的影響...............................................................27 第六章 結論 36 參考文獻 37

    Abushammala, S. N., & Sulaiman, J. (2014). Cash holdings and corporate profitability: Some evidences form Jordan. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 8(3), 898.
    Andries, P., & Faems, D. (2013). Patenting activities and firm performance: does firm size matter?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1089-1098.
    Appio, F. P., De Luca, L. M., Morgan, R., & Martini, A. (2019). Patent portfolio diversity and firm profitability: A question of specialization or diversification?. Journal of Business Research, 101, 255-267.
    Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of product innovation management, 27(5), 725-740.
    Batistuta, A. I. F. I., & Safitri, R. (2024). Comparison of Employee Tenure on Employee Productivity. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship, 18(2), 524-532.
    Bessen, J., & Meurer, M. J. (2008). Patent failure: How judges, bureaucrats, and lawyers put innovators at risk. Princeton University Press.
    Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Patents, real options and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 112(478), C97-C116.
    Brent, B.A., and Park, W.G. (2007). The influence of patent protection on firm innovation investment in manufacturing industries, Journal of International Management, 13(2), 91-109.
    Chen, M. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of management journal, 38(2), 453-482.
    Chen, Y. S., Lin, Y. H., Wu, T. H., Hung, S. T., Ting, P. J. L., & Hsieh, C. H. (2019). Re-examine the determinants of market value from the perspectives of patent analysis and patent litigation. Scientometrics, 120, 1-17.
    Chien, C. V. (2013). Patent assertion and startup innovation. New America Foundation, Open Technology Institute White Paper.
    Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
    Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. and Walsh, J. P. (2000), Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not), NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Cremers, K., Ernicke, M., Gaessler, F., Harhoff, D., Helmers, C., McDonagh, L., Schliessler, P., & N. Van Zeebroeck, N. (2017). Patent litigation in Europe. European Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 1-44.
    Deng, Y., Qi, Y., & Guo, Q. (2024). The impact of patent infringement litigation decisions on firms’ innovation performance in China. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 23564.
    Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2008). How strong are weak patents?. American Economic
    Review, 98(4), 1347-1369.
    Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H.(2001). The patent paradox revisited: An analysis of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 101-128.
    Hu, W., Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T., & Watanabe, T. (2020). Determinants of patent infringement awards in the US, Japan, and China: A comparative analysis. World Patent Information, 60, 101947.
    Isik, O., Unal, E. A., & Unal, Y. (2017). The effect of firm size on profitability: evidence from Turkish manufacturing sector. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 6(4), 301-308.
    Jaffe, A, B., & Lerner, J.. (2011). Innovation and its discontents: How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Kafouros, M., Aliyev, M., & Krammer, S. M. (2021). Do firms profit from patent litigation? The contingent roles of diversification and intangible assets. Research Policy, 50(6), 104263.
    Kim, T., Maskus, K. E., & Oh, K. Y. (2009). Effects of patents on productivity growth in Korean manufacturing: a panel data analysis. Pacific Economic Review, 14(2), 137-154.
    Kline, P., Petkova, N., Williams, H., & Zidar, O. (2019). Who profits from patents? rent-sharing at innovative firms. The quarterly journal of economics, 134(3), 1343-1404.
    Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2001). Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 129-151.
    Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). "Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms."
    Lerner, J.(1994).The importance of patent scope : Empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), 319-333
    Li, X. (2024). Patent infringement litigation, executive team risk appetite and corporate innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, forthcoming.
    Loukil, K. (2016). Foreign direct investment and technological innovation in developing countries. Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 31-40.
    Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2013). A meta‐analysis of the relationships of age and tenure with innovation‐related behaviour. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 86(4), 585-616.
    Nickell, S. J. (1996). Competition and corporate performance. Journal of political economy, 104(4), 724-746.
    Nwanji, T. I., Howell, K. E., Faye, S., Otekunrin, A. O., Eluyela, D. F., Lawal, A. I., & Eze, S. C. (2020). Impact of foreign direct investment on the financial performance of listed deposit banks in Nigeria. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(2), 323.
    Reitzig, M., Henkel, J., & Heath, C. (2007). On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed”. Research Policy, 36(1), 134-154.
    Rochina-Barrachina, M. E., Mañez, J. A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2010). Process innovations and firm productivity growth. Small Business Economics, 34, 147-166.
    Schliessler, P. M. (2015). Patent litigation and firm performance: the role of the enforcement system. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(2), 307-343.
    Shapiro, C. (2000). Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting. Innovation Policy and The Economy, 1, 119-150.
    Slatnick, B. L., Truche, P., Wu, K. C., Crum, R., Yang, A., Durgin, J., ... & Demehri, F. R. (2022). Trends in surgical patents held by surgeons from 1993 to 2018. Annals of Surgery, 276(6), 1107-1113.
    Sung, H. C. (2006). Empirical Study of Patent Infringement Litigation in Taiwan. Technology Law Revier, 3, 249.
    Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305.
    Tekir, G. (2020). Huawei, 5G network and digital geopolitics. International Journal of Politics and Security, 2(4), 113-135.
    Wagner, J. (2012). Exports, imports and profitability: First evidence for manufacturing enterprises. Open Economies Review, 23, 747-765.
    Wei, S. J., Xie, Z., & Zhang, X. (2017). From “made in China” to “innovated in China”: Necessity, prospect, and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 49-70.
    Xiong, A., S. Xia, Z.P. Ye, D. Cao, Y. Jing and H. Li (2020), Can innovation really bring economic growth? The role of social filter in China, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 53, 50-61.
    Yang, C. H. (2022). How artificial intelligence technology affects productivity and employment: firm-level evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 51(6), 104536.
    Zhou, D., Peng, J., & Gao, X. (2021). Examining export trade and corporate innovation: A multiphase difference-in-differences method. China Journal of Accounting Research, 14(2), 207-230.
    Ziedonis, R. H. (2004). Patent litigation in the semiconductor industry. In Cohen, W.M. & Merrill, S.A. (eds). Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy, The National Academies Press, Washington D.C., US.

    QR CODE
    :::