簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
關靈峰 Ling-Fung Kwan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
台灣選擇權市場法人交易獲利與風險承受的關係 The relationship between trading profits and subsequent risk taking by institutional investors on Taiwan option market |
| 指導教授： |
張傳章
Chuang-chang Chang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別： |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱： |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系 Department of Finance |
| 畢業學年度： | 100 |
| 語文別： | 英文 |
| 論文頁數： | 32 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 交易獲利 、風險承受 、賭資效應 |
| 外文關鍵詞： | trading profit, risk taking, house money effect |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：5 下載：0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇論文延伸Liu et al.(2010)探討造市者投資交易獲利與風險承受程度關係的模型，並且在計算模型變數時考慮投資人過去的存貨與不同種類法人持有部位的時間。本文將法人交易者分為投信、外資、自營商、與造市者四種，並且發現外資為台灣選擇權市場最大的贏家。此外，我們進一步研究各種法人是否存在賭資效應，結果發現外資與投信有顯著的賭資效應，而造市者與自營商並沒有存在此現象。我們推論造市者及自營商沒有賭資效應的主因與其投資獲利及交易成本有關。
This study extends Liu et al. (2010) research in the trading profits and the subsequent risk taking by market makers for Taiwan option market, and considers investors’ inventory-before and holding period. This study distinguishes institutional investors from security investment trust, foreign institutions, dealers and market makers. We find that foreign institutions are the biggest winner in Taiwan option market, and we test whether institutional investor existed house money effect. We find that foreign institutions and security investment trust existed notable house money effect, but market makers and dealers do not. We also give the reasons why these two types of investors did not notable and we infer that it’s about to investor’s trading consequences and trading costs.
Barberis, N., M. Huang, T. Santos, (2001), Prospect Theory and Asset Prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1): 1-53.
Barberis, N., W. Xiong, (2009), What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of Long-Standing Preference-Based Explanation. Journal of Finance 64 (2): 751-784.
Chevalier, J., and G. Ellison, (1997), Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives. Journal of Political Economy 105 (6): 1167-1200.
Coval, J. D., T. Shumway (2005), Do Behavioral Biases Affect Prices? Journal of Finance 60 (1): 1-34.
Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer and A. Subrahmanyam (1998), ‘Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions’, Journal of Finance, 53: 1839-85.
Grinblatt,M., Keloharju,M., (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. Journal of Finance 64, 549-578.
Haigh, M, J. List, (2005), Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Finance 9(1): 523-535.
Keasey, K., P. Moon, (1996), Gambling with the House Money in Capital Expenditure Decisions: An Experimental Analysis. Economic Letters 50 (1): 105-110.
Locke, P.,S. C. Mann,( 2005), Professional Trader Discipline and Trade Disposition. Journal of Financial Economics 76 (2): 401-444.
Liu, Yu-Jane, Chih-Ling Tsai, Ming-Chun Wang and Ning Zhu (2010) “Prior Consequence and Subsequent Risk Taking: New Field Evidence from the Taiwan Futures Exchange, ” Management Science, Vol. 56 No. 4(SSCI) pp.606~620
Odean, T. (1998), ‘Volume, Volatility, Price and Profit when all Traders are Above Average’, Journal of Finance, 53: 1887-934.
Shefrin, H. and M. Statman (1985), ‘The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Finance, 40: 777-90.
Thaler, R., E. Johnson, (1990), Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice. Management Science 36 (6): 643-660.
Weber, M., H. Zuchel, (2005), How Do Prior Outcomes Affect Risk Attitude? Comparing Escalation of Commitment and the House-Money Effect. Decision Analysis 2 (1): 30-43.
