永續營建的推動，在世界各國已逐漸蔚為潮流，在臺灣亦漸為政府、學術單位及民間業者所重視。為了提供營建各領域參與者可以共同描述一個國家在永續營建推動成效的工具，本研究應用最大值－最小值模糊德菲法及模糊層級分析法，透過國際專家問卷方式，建立了國家層級的永續營建評估指標架構，包含總體表現－面向－核心群組－指標類別－指標等五個階層。總體表現係以永續營建指數來呈現，其下共包含環境、社會及經濟等3大面向、10個核心群組、33個指標類別，並決定出各面向、核心群組及指標類別的權重，可為各國在永續營建評估上加以應用，並依據該國家的特性及需求建立本土性的評估指標。
　　本研究在所建立完成的永續營建指標架構下，依臺灣的特性及需求建立適合臺灣的永續營建評估指標共77項，同時進行評估指標的實證，惟受限於指標統計資料的完整性，僅能蒐集到55項指標的統計資料，據以進行指標的向上合成與永續營建指數的計算，以及分析個別指標、指標類別、核心群組、面向、以及總體成效的發展趨勢。研究結果顯示，有15項指標、4項指標類別及2項核心群組處於持續向下發展的背離永續趨勢，應特別關注並加強相關政策及措施的推動。
　　在各面向及永續營建整體成效的發展趨勢方面，除經濟永續指數在2008及2009年稍有下降外，其餘環境永續指數及社會永續指數均為上升趨勢。合成的永續營建指數自2005年起，呈現逐年微幅上升的發展趨勢，顯見臺灣在永續營建的推動上，經由55項指標的整體評估，呈現出邁向永續的正向發展成果。

　　To keep pace with global trends in sustainable development, the construction industry worldwide also needs to examine their practices for sustainability. In Taiwan, the government, academia and construction industry have been placed importance on promotion of sustainable construction. In order to provide a tool for all parties in the industry to describe a nation’s performance on sustainable construction, a framework for the assessment of state-level sustainable construction is established. The framework consists of five layers, from bottom to top: the indicator; the indicator category; the core cluster; the theme; and the overall performance. The max–min fuzzy Delphi method is employed to identify the proper items of each layer. In addition, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is applied to determine the weight of items in each layer. Finally, a framework consists of 3 themes, 10 core clusters, and 33 indicator categories are established. And countries worldwide can apply the framework to establish appraisal indicators refer to local constraints, specific features and national priorities.
　　Following the established framework, 77 proper indicators are selected for each category in the framework, and data of the 55 indicators are collected respectively from a nation’s statistical databank in Taiwan. Sustainable construction index aggregated step-by-step from the indicators, the indicator categories, the core clusters and the themes is computed to assess Taiwan’s progress in sustainable construction. The results show that there are 15 indicators, 4 indicator categories and 2 core clusters are in constant decreasing trends. The related policies need to pay attention and modify. Besides the decreasing trend of theme “economy” in 2008 and 2009, theme “environment” and “society” are in increasing trends. Sustainable construction index aggregated from indexes of theme “environment”, “society”, and “economy” also shows an increasing trend since 2005.

1.WCED, Our common future, Oxford University Press, 1987.
2.Kibert, C.J., “Forward: Sustainable Construction at the Start of the 21st Century”, International Electronic Journal of Construction, pp.1-7, 2003.
3.張益誠，「應用因子分析方法為臺灣地區建構永續發展趨勢評估指標系統」， 國立台灣大學，博士論文，民國90年。
4.Gyadu-Asiedu,W., Scheublin, F.J., and Van Egmond, E.L.C., “Performance assessment for sustainable construction: lest we forget about the client”, In: L. Bragança, ed. Portugal SB07 sustainable construction, materials and practices: challenge of the industry for the new millennium, pp.341-347, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press under the imprint Delft University Press, 2007.
5.黃榮堯等人，「97年度建立永續公共工程指標系統之研究專案研究計畫」成果報告，行政院公共工程委員會，民國97年12月。
6.Ishikawa, A., et al., “The max–min delphi method and fuzzy delphi method via fuzzy integration”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(2), pp.241-253, 1993.
7.Wang, Y.M., Elhag, T.M.S., and Hua, Z., “A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(23), pp.3055-3071, 2006.
8.李永展，林士堅，黃慶銘，「台北市永續發展指數之建構及應用」，建築學報，第65期，1-26頁，2008年9月。
9.Hill, R.C. and Bowen, P.A., “Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment”, Construction Management and Economics, 15(3), pp.223-239, 1997.
10.Bourdeau, L., “Agenda 21 on sustainable construction”, CIB Report Publication 237, 1999a.
11.Wyatt, D.P., “Recycling and Serviceability: The Twin Approach to Securing Sustainable Construction”, In: Proceedings of First International Conference of CIB TG 16 on Sustainable Construction, pp.69-78, Tampa, Florida, 6-9 November 1994.
12.Kibert, C.J., “Principles of sustainable construction”, In: Proceedings of First International Conference of CIB TG 16 on Sustainable Construction, pp. 1-9, Tampa, Florida, USA, 6-9 November 1994.
13.Huovila, P., “Sustainable construction in Finland in 2010”, Vtt Building Technology, National report, 1998.
14.Plessis, C.D., et al., “Agenda 21 for sustainable construction in developing countries”, Pretoria, South Africa: CSIR Building and Construction Technology, 2002.
15.陳韶賜、周鼎金、游本志，「推動綠營建工程評估審議制度及評估指標之研究」研究報告，行政院公共工程委員會，民國90年11月。
16.黃榮堯、郭瓊瑩，「綠營建政策推動策略及藍圖之研究」研究報告，行政院公共工程委員會，民國91年11月。
17.Bourdeau, L., “Sustainable development and the future of construction: a comparison of visions from various countries”, Building Research & Information, 27(6), pp.354-366, 1999b.
18.Guy, B. and Kibert, C.J., “Developing indicators of sustainability: US experience”, Building Research & Information, 26 (1), pp.39–45, 1998.
19.The Confederation of International Contractors’ Associations (CICA), “Industry as a partner for sustainable development – Construction”, United Kingdom, 2002.
20.Ugwu, O.O., MM. Kumaraswamy, A. Wong, and ST. Ng, “Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP) Part 1. Development of indicators and computational methods”, Automation in construction, 15(2), pp.239-251, 2006.
21.Raynsford, N., “The UK’s approach to sustainable development in construction”, Building Research and Information, 27(6), pp.419-423, 1999.
22.Kersey, J.R., “Sustainable construction – implementing targets and indicators”, CIRIA C633, 2004.
23.Woodall, R. & Crowhurst, D., “Biodiversity indicators for construction projects”, CIRIA W005, 2003.
24.Werner, P., Henseling, K.O., Luetzkendorf, T., Delimann, D., Fritsche, U.R., “Criteria and Indicators for Environmentally Sustainable Construction and Housing – An ongoing research project in Germany –”.
25.Augenbore, G., et al., “Sustainable construction in the United States of America – a perspective to the year 2010” [online]. Georgia Institute of Technology, College of Architecture, Construction Research Center, 1998. Available from: http://www.p2pays.org/ref/14/13358.htm [Accessed 17 February 2010].
26.Bart A.G. Bossink, “A Dutch public-private strategy for innovation in sustainable construction”, Construction Management and Economics, 20, pp. 633-642, 2002.
27.Kaixun Sha, Xiaoheng Deng and Cunbin Cui, “Sustainable construction in China: status quo and trends”, Building Research & Information, 28(1), pp. 59-66, 2000.
28.財團法人台灣建築中心，2011年7月1日取自 http://www.tabc.org.tw/tw/modules/news/article.php?storyid=279。
29.行政院公共工程委員會，「永續公共工程－節能減碳政策白皮書」，台北市，民國97年。
30.黃榮堯，陳屏甫，「永續公共工程評估指標與案例手法」，土木水利會刊，第三十八卷第一期，53-58頁，民國一○○年二月。
31.United Nations, Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. 3rd ed. New York: United Nations, 2007.
32.Zhao, J. and Johannes, B.O., “Indicator system and evaluation framework for sustainable development”, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(4), pp.492-497, 1999.
33.Yasuyoshi, M., “Technology development and sustainable construction”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 12 (4), pp.23-27, 1996.
34.徐村和，「模糊德菲層級分析法」，模糊系統學刊，第4卷第1期，59-72頁，1998年。
35.王小璘 劉若瑜，「由景觀生態學觀點探討都市基質環境之永續利用－以台中市東區及南屯區為例」，設計學報，第6卷第2期，1-22頁，2001年。
36.葉政黌，「道路建設綠營建評估指標系統之研究」， 國立中央大學，碩士論文，民國93年。
37.Buckley, J.J., “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, pp.233-247, 1985.
38.Runkler, T.A., “Extended defuzzification methods and their properties”, In: Proceedings of the fifth IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Vol. 1, pp.694-700, New Orleans, LA, USA, 1996.
39.Rao, D.H. and Saraf, S.S., “Study of defuzzification methods of fuzzy logic controller for speed control of a dc motor”, In: Proceedings of the 1996 international conference on power electronics, drives and energy systems for industrial growth, Vol. 2, pp.782-787, New Delhi, India, 1996.
40.劉若瑜，「由生態設計觀點評估都市基質之研究— 以台中市東區及南屯區為例」，東海大學，碩士論文，民國89 年。
41.Center for Universal Design, “About UD” [online], College of Design, North Carolina State University, 2008. Available from: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm [Accessed 17 February 2010].
42.Lawlor, D., “Sustainable design begins with universal design” [online], American Society of Interior Designers, 2009. Available from: http://www.asid.org/designknowledge/aa/inplace/active/sustainableuniversal.htm [Accessed 17 February 2010].
43.姜善鑫等人編著，揭開福爾摩沙的面紗：臺灣的自然地理，第一版，行政院文化建設委員會中部辦公室，台灣台中，民國89年。
44.臺灣的生物多樣性。2010年11月21日取自http://www.dyu.edu.tw/~lphsu/htm/Taiwan/3.htm。
45.李至倫，「枯水季臺灣地區之缺水危機」，財團法人國家政策研究基金會，2002。2010年11月21日取自http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SD/091/SD-B-091-040.htm。
46.林俊全，臺灣的天然災害，遠足文化事業股份有限公司出版，台北，民國93年。
47.姜渝生，「中南部區域產業空間策略規劃」研究報告，行政院經濟建設委員會，民國97年。
48.陳重安，「從營造業之現況探討『營造業法』草案之經營模式」，朝陽科技大學，碩士論文，民國92年。
49.葉俊榮等人，永續臺灣向前指，詹氏書局，臺灣台北，民國92年。
50.AggRegain, “Sustainability in construction” [online], AggRegain website, 2007. Available from: http://www.aggregain.org.uk/sustainability/sustainability_in_construction/index.html [Accessed 17 February 2010].
51.維基百科，「臺灣人口」，2011年3月20日取自http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%A3#cite_note-2。
52.中國評論學術出版社，「臺灣概況」，2011年3月20日取自http://www.chinareviewnews.com/crn-webapp/cbspub/secDetail.jsp?bookid=4819&secid=4845。
53.Esty, D. C., M. A. Levy, T. Srebotnjak, A. de Sherbinin, C. H. Kim, and B. Anderson, “Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index”, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven, US., 2006.
54.Yale Center of Environmental Law and Policy, Center of International Earth and Science Information Network (YCELP), “2005 Environmental Sustainability Index”, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies & Yale Law School, US., 2005.
55.Barrera-Roldán, A. and A. Sald´ıvar-Valdés, “Proposal and application of a Sustainable Development Index”, Ecological Indicators, No.2, pp.251-256, 2002.