本研究以自我學習調整理論為架構，透過管理教練技能的五構面：開放性溝通、開放性溝通、團隊取向、尊重個體、多元接受性、促進發展，欲探討員工認所認知到的管理教練技能對於員工後設認知的影響，解此瞭解兩者之間的關聯性。
　　本研究以台灣北部具有直屬主管的部屬為研究對象，問卷發放方式採紙本發放，總共發放240份，回收235份問卷，其中有效問卷總計228份，有效樣本回收率為95%。運用SPSS20.0進行分析，結果發現於下：
一、部屬所認知到管理教練技能與其後設認知並無關聯性。
二、部屬所認知到管理教練技能越高，部屬認知的自我意識越高。
三、當主管越尊重個體時，部屬認知的信心也會提高。
　　根據本研究結果，當部屬感受到主管管理教練技能越高時，其認知的自我意識也會提高。因此，建議企業內應重視並透過管理教練技能提升員工之認知自我意識，以能產生學習成效。建議後續研究者可採兩階段施測比對進行研究，並針對管理教練技能量表後設認知量表之開發。

　　Based on the Self-Regulated Learning Theory, the purpose of this study is to explore the relationship of employee perception to managerial coaching skill and metacognition of the five dimensions of managerial coaching skill: open communication, team approach, respect individual, accept diversity and facilitate development. In addition, we also examined the relation of employee perception to managerial coaching skill and employee metacognition.
　　This study collected empirical data from the employees who have direct supervisor in north Taiwan. The questionnaire was initiated by paper distribution. A total 240 questionnaires were distributed, 235 were returned, 228 were completely, and the return rate is about 95%. The results were processed by using SPSS20.0.Below are the major findings revealed from the questionnaire.
　　　I.Managerial coaching skills is not associated with metacognition.
　　　II.Subordinates tend to have higher cognitive self-consciousness when they feel that they are being properly coached to achieve their direct supervisor.
　　　III.Subordinates tend to have higher cognitive confidence when they feel their direct supervisor respect themself.
　　According to the findings of this study, when a subordinate feels that his/her supervisor demonstrates a higher level of management coaching skills, the subordinate’s cognitive self-consciousness is much higher. We suggest the enterprises should establish managerial coaching system in the organization to provide coaching function, and then help their employee to have higher cognitive self-consciousness and learning performance.

一、中文部分
丁宗平. (2012). 部屬認知之管理教練技能對部屬職涯自我管理的影響-以職涯復原力為中介變項，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
王金國. (2001). 成功學習之關鍵~ 自我調整學習.課程與教學季刊,5(1).145-164.
王茜穎. (2008). 亞洲金飯碗 要到哪裡找？.商業週刊,2008-01月號.
王郅皓. (2011). 管理教練技能對員工工作投入之影響―以員工情緒智力為中介變項,
國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
卓立芬. (2011). 管理教練技能, 自我效能與工作滿意關聯性之研究, 國立中央大學人力資
源管理研究所碩士論文.
吳欣倫. (2010).教練制度導入成效影響因素之探討，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩
士論文.
胡永崇. (1995). 後設認知策略教學對國小閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解成效之研究, 國立彰化師
範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文.
洪瑋齡. (2012). 管理教練技能對員工工作投入之影響─ 以員工心理賦能為中介變項.
中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班學位論文, (2012 年).
紀淑漪. (2012). 現代加州管理顧問公司. 線上檢索日期：2013年4月11日. 網址：
http://www.cmi-learning.com.tw/show.php?r=7&c=36&n=77.
陳茂祥. (2001). 自我導向學習理論及其在成人教育上的啟示,朝陽學報第六期.
陳朝益. (2010). 幫員工自己變優秀的神奇領導者.大寫出版.
陳朝益, & 陳錦春. (2012). 翻滾吧，MIT人才！：台灣不能再等的領導轉型.大寫出版.
陳怡君. (2011). 部屬認知之管理教練技能對部屬個人工作投入的影響―以工作滿足為
中介變項,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
郭敏珣. (2012). 台灣管理教練技能量表初建構,國立中央大學人力資源研究所.
黃雅雯. (2012). 管理教練技能對員工工作投入之影響—以員工職場個人學習為中介變
項，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
張景媛. (1990). 回饋方式目標設定與后設認知對國小學生數學作業表現及測試焦慮之影
響. 教育心理學報, (23), 189-206.
張景媛. (1994). 國中生數學學習歷程統整模式之研究. 教育心理學報, (27), 141-174.
張景媛. (1997). 國中生之正負向情緒與其後設認知, 學習動機關系之研究. 教育心理學報,
(29), 51-76.
張春興. (1991). 現代心理學: 現代人研究自身問題的科學. 臺灣東華.
張春興. (1996). 現代心理學：三化取向的理論與實現. 臺灣東華.
張麗艷. (2008). 企業教練影響員工績效的實證研究.中國人力資源開發(215) ,23-26.
楊宗仁. (1991). 後設認知的緣起及其理論.資優教育(38), 16-25.
楊卓翰. (2012). 曾幾何時 台灣竟淪為新加坡負面教材, 今周刊799期, 2012年4月11日.
經濟部中小企業處. (2013). 101年中小企業重要統計表,2013年5月31日.
http://www.moeasmea.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=11156&ctNode=689&mp=1
劉子琦, & 盧思勛. (2011). 台灣中小企業家族型態接班問題之研究-以中部地區某製造業
為例. 中小企業發展季刊(22), 2011年12月, 11-24.
劉佩雲. (1990). 自我調整學習模式之驗證.國立政治大學教育與心理研究所(23), 173-206.
劉錫麟. (1988). 統合認知與數學問題解決教學.台灣區省市立師範學院七十六學年度教學
研究學術研討會論文集, 29-46.
鍾素梅. (2003). 「後設認知」在教學上的應用與啟示.2013年5月3日,取自：
http://www.nani.com.tw/teacher_share/article/D_3_9_92_135.doc‎
鍾聖校. (1990). 認知心理學. 心理出版社.
韓宜靜. (2011). 大學生負向情緒、後設認知與網路成癮之關係研究. 國立台南大學諮商與
輔導學系碩士論文.
蘇玉凰. (2004). 高中生英文閱讀理解之後設認知策略使用量表之編製. 成功大學教育研究
所學位論文, (2004 年), 1-64.

二、英文部分
Alexander, P. A. (1995). Superimposing a situation-specific and domain-specific perspective on
an account of.. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 189-193.
Blanchard, K., & Shula, D. (1995). Everyone's a Coach. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan
Publishing House, 27.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy
makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and instruction, 7(2), 161-186.
Brockett, R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1985). Bridging the theory–practice gap in self‐directed
learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1985(25), 31-40.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today.International journal of
educational research, 31(6), 445-457.
Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. A Comprehensive Guide to Theory
and Practice. Jossey-Bass, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310.
Capzzoli, T. (1993). DEVELOPING PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYEES. Supervision,54(10), 16-17.
Carrell, P. L. (1988). SLA and classroom instruction: Reading. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 9(1), 223-242.
Evered, R. D., & Selman, J. C. (1989). Coaching and the art of management. Organizational
Dynamics, 18(2), 16-32.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The nature of intelligence, 12,
231-235.
Fournies, F. F. (1978). Coaching for improved work performance. Van Nostrand Reinhold
Company.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity(pp. 457-457).
New York: Free Press.
Gordon, J. (1996). Tracks for learning: Metacognition and learning technologies.Australian
Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 46-55.
Heslin, P. A., Vandewalle, D., & Latham, G. P. (2006). KEEN TO HELP?
MANAGERS'IMPLICIT PERSON THEORIES AND THEIR SUBSEQUENT EMPLOYEE COACHING. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 871-902.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown.
Kehr, H. M., Bles, P., & Rosenstiel, L. V. (1999). Self-regulation, self-control, and management
training transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 487-498.
Kitchner, K. S. (2009). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition.Human
development, 26(4), 222-232.
Krazmien, M., & Berger, F. (1997). The coaching paradox. International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 16(1), 3-10.
Lindner, R. W. (1993, July). Self-regulated learning, metacognition and the problem of transfer.
In 48th International Correctional Education Association Annual Conference, Chicago
July.
Longenecker, C. O., & Pinkel, G. (1997). Coachingto win at work. MANAGE-DAYTON-, 48,
19-21.
McLean, G. N., Yang, B., Kuo, M. H. C., Tolbert, A. S., & Larkin, C. (2005). Development and
initial validation of an instrument measuring managerial coaching skill. Human Resource
Development Quarterly, 16(2), 157-178.
Nunally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory, 2nd.
Park, S. (2007). Relationships among managerial coaching in organizations and the outcomes
of personal learning, organizational commitment, and turnover intention. ProQuest.
Peterson, D. B., & Little, B. (2005). Invited reaction: Development and initial validation of an
instrument measuring managerial coaching skill. Human Resource Development
Quarterly, 16(2), 179-184.
Redshaw, B. (2000). Do we really understand coaching? How can we make it work
better?. Industrial and Commercial training, 32(3), 106-109..
Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1996). Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: The S-REF
model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(11), 881-888.
Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire:
Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy,42(4), 385-396.
Spada, M. M., Nikčević, A. V., Moneta, G. B., & Wells, A. (2008). Metacognition, perceived
stress, and negative emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1172-1181.
Yu, L. (2007). The benefits of a coaching culture. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 6.
Zeus, P., & Skiffington, S. (2000). The complete guide to coaching at work. McGraw-Hill
Australia.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing
student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American educational research
journal, 23(4), 614-628.