為了檢驗學習者之學習成效，普遍的方式即是使用測驗。一般測驗對於沒有深度內在學習動機之學習者會略顯無趣造成學習者進行測驗後不再學習甚至不想進行測驗來檢視學習成效。本研究探討如何以遊戲性方式呈現測驗提升學習者興趣，進而增進學習動機，因此會達成三點目的，建立研究用的數位學習模式，以此模式設計遊戲性測驗，並驗證遊戲性測驗的是否能提升學習動機。
以軍訓教育學科作為應用，以Keller ARCS 動機模式為主架構，結合遊戲設計原則以及數位遊戲學習特點建立遊戲數位學習模式來進行遊戲性測驗之規劃，尋找實驗者進行前測與後測的答對率比較來驗證學習者是否有獲得知識。
研究創造一個新的遊戲數位學習模式，以此模式所設計的系統讓學習者獲得了知識並且提升了的學習動機，也驗證了遊戲數位學習模式應用於學科上的可行性。

For the reason to examine the learning effect of the students, the most common way is using a test. But a common test is boring to the student who didn’t have deep inner learning motivation, so it will cause student doesn’t have idea of learning after test, the worst situation is that the student even doesn’t do the test.
How to promote student’s learning interest and effect by using Game-Based Test will be explored in this research. Three goals will be achieved, establish a digital learning method and using this method to design Game-Based test to make sure the knowledge will be obtained by learner.
The subject of Military training education will be applied in the research, using Keller’s ARCS Motivation Theory as the main architecture, integrate the Game Theory and Digital Game-Based learning features to design the Game-Based test.
The pre-test and post-test will be done by experimenter to verification system’s effectiveness.
A brand new Digital Game-Based learning architecture will be created, using this architecture to promote student’s learning interest and effect, also verify the effectiveness of digital game learning method.

參考文獻
中文文獻
林崇德(1995)。高中生心理學。臺北：五南。
張春興(1994)。現代心理學。臺北：東華。
陳麗純(2008)。以ARCS 動機模式分析大學生圖書館利用教育之學習動機。天主教 輔仁大學圖書資訊學系碩士班碩士論文。台灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
游嘉智(2009)。擴增實境行動遊戲設計研究-以古蹟寺廟導覽為例。大同大學工業 設計研究所碩士論文。台灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
楊正平(2001)。從民間教育與軍事教育介面之觀點探討我國軍訓教育的功能。龍 華科技大學學報第十八期。
楊子慧(2010)。ARCS動機教學模式對科技大學學生學習動積極學習成就影響之研 究:以「資訊科技與社會」學科為例。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文。 台灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
楊玉麟(2006)。數位學習教學策略在學習成效上之研究。國立中央大學資訊管理 研究所碩士論文。台灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
總結多年經驗 深入分析遊戲設計的8條原則。(2013)
From:http://www.mofang.com.tw/INnews/10000054-26586-1.html#ixzz4ofyn22is

英文文獻
Ames, C. (1990). Motivation: what teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91, 409–21.
Anderson, L. W. (1999). Rethinking Bloom’s Taxonomy: Implications for testing and assessment. ED 435630.
Bandura, A. (1986) . Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
Csikszentmihalyi,M .(1975).BEYOND BOREDOM AND ANXIETY, 48-50
Dörnyei, Z.(2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fabricatore, C., Nussbaum, M., & Rosas, R. (2002). Playability in action videogames: A qualitative design model. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 311-368.
Jacobson, T. E., & Xu, L. (2002). Motivation student in credit-based information literacy courses: Theories and practice. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2 (3), 423-441.
Keller J.M.(1987a).Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn.Performance and Instruction,8, 1-7.
Keller, J. M.(1987b). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction,9-10, 1-8.
Kramer,W.(2000).What Makes a Game Good? From:http://www.thegamesjournal.com/articles/WhatMakesaGame.shtml/.
Maehr, M.L.,& Meyer, H.A.( 1997). Understanding motivation and schooling： Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to go. Education Psychology Review , 9, 371-409.
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4) ,370–96.
Prensky, M. (2007). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stipek, D.(1995).Effects of different instructional approaches on young children’s achievement and motivation. Child Development , 66 (1), 209-223.
Zagal, J. P., Nussbaum, M., Rosas, R. (2000). A model to support the design of multiplayer games. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 9(5), 448-462.