| 研究生: |
沈彥志 Yan-Jhih Shen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以共享螢幕及群組軟體支援一對一環境下面對面的合作網路探索 One-to-one shared-display groupware for supporting face-to-face web co-discovery |
| 指導教授: |
劉晨鐘
Chen-Chung Liu |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
資訊電機學院 - 網路學習科技研究所 Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology |
| 畢業學年度: | 97 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 69 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 合作網頁搜尋 、共享螢幕 、一對一 、群組軟體 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | shared display, groupware, one-to-one, collaborative web search |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:11 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
網際網路是一個很重要的學習環境,學習者藉由網路上各式各樣的資源來解決問題,然而學習者必須過濾篩選出有用的資訊且不迷失方向,造成學習者認知負荷超載。藉由合作學習在小組在策略的應用及工作分配上,可以有效的降低個人認知負荷,在面對面的協作過程中促進小組互動,可提升個人批判思考及反思的能力,因此面對面協作網頁搜尋是一個很重要的學習活動。本研究探討一對一環境對於合作網頁搜尋活動有什麼樣的影響,設計一套共享螢幕及群組軟體支援一對一環境下面對面網路探索的環境來進行相關實驗。受試者包含九位碩博士生,學習者使用本實驗所建置的環境進行小組合作網頁搜尋,活動全程使用攝影機紀錄小組互動過程,並使用桌面側錄軟體記錄學習者電腦的所有操作,本研究以分析著重於學習者合作的互動過程,針對學習者活動過程的螢幕操作時間比例、言語互動和知識管理過程三點進行互動分析。最後本研究結果發現,(1) 一人一機環境下可同時支援個人與小組的探索策略, (2) 一人一機的環境下,小組合作探索策略可分為分工及協作兩種,合作模式則以混合式的為佳, (3) 一人一機環境可提升學習者網頁探索的豐富度。最後須注意在一人一機環境下可能會有互動性降低的潛在問題。
Word Wide Web(WWW) is a very important learning environment, learners solve the problem with a wide range of network resources, however, learners must be filtered useful information and not lose direction, resulting in learners’ cognitive overload. Group use strategy and assign work by collaborative learning that can effectively reduce individual cognitive load. In the process of collaboration, the face-to-face can facilitate group interaction and enhance indi-vidual critical thinking and reflection skill. Therefore, face-to-face collaborative web search is a very important learning activity. This study explore what one-to-one environment affect collaborative web search, we designed a shared-display with groupware to support face-to-face web co-discovery in one-to-one environment to conduct experiment. Participants are nine graduated students, and videotape the process of group interaction and record learn-er’s operation in the computer with desktop logging software. This study analyze the process of group collaboratively interaction that include the rate of operating time, dialogue interac-tion and knowledge management. Finally, this study resulted found that (1) one-to-one envi-ronment support simultaneously the individual and the group''s exploration strategy, (2) the explore strategies can be divided into cooperation and collaboration, and a mixed-model is better collaborative model, (3) one-to-one environment can enhance the learner to explore web richness. Additionally, must be notice a potential problem that reduce group interaction in one-to-one environment.
中文部分
范姜士燻(民97)。使用資料探勘輔助學習者探索大型資料庫—學習者經驗之研究。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
英文部分
Alomyan, H., & Au, W. (2004). Exploration of instructional strategies and individual differ-ence within the context of web-based learning. International Education Journal, 4(4), 86-92.
Amershi, S., & Morris, M. R. (2008). CoSearch: A system for co-located collaborative web search. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1647-1656.
Amershi, S., & Morris, M. R. (2009). Co-located collaborative web search: Understanding status quo practices. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3637-3642.
Blaye, A. (1988) Confrontation socio-cognitive et résolution de problèmes. Doctoral disserta-tion,Centre de Recherche en Psychologie Cognitive, Université de Provence, 13261 Aix-en-
Provence, France.
Deci, E. L., & Flaste, R. (1996). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York: Putnam Publishing.
Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational ap-proaches. Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon
Ewing, J., & Miller, D. (2002). A framework for evaluating computer supported collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 112-118.
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Tech-nology Education, 7, 22-30.
Grayson, C., Jackson, C., & O''Dell, C. (1998). Horse and carriage: Benchmarking and know-ledge management. Across the Board, 35(4), 25.
Hess, B. (1999). Graduate student cognition during information retrieval using the world wide web: A pilot study. Computers & Education, 33(1), 1-13.
Hibbard, J. (1997). Knowing what we know. Information Week, 653, 46-64.
Johnson, D.W., & Jonhson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competi-tive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective, end. Ed. Columbus, OH: Mer-rill/Prentice-Hall.
Kotnour, T., Orr, C., Spaulding, J., & Guidi, J. (1997). Determining the benefit of knowledge management activities. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, October 1997, Orlando, Florida, pp. 94-99.
LENHART, A., SIMON, M., & GRAZIANO, M. (2001). The Internet and education: Find-ings of the Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
Little, D. (1991) Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Liu, C. C., & Kao, L. C. (2007). Do handheld devices facilitate face-to-face collaboration? handheld devices with large shared display groupware to facilitate group interactions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(4), 285-299.
Liu, C. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity. Computers & Education, 50(3), 627-639
Menkov, V., Neu, D. J., & Shi, Q. (2000). AntWorld: A collaborative web search tool. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, , 13-22.
Morris, M.R., “A Survey of Collaborative Web Search Practices,” Proc. 26th Ann. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2008, pp. 1657-1660.
Morris, M. R. and E. Horvitz. Searchtogether: an interface for collaborative web search. In Proceedings of UIST, pages 3–12, 2007.
Neale, D. C., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2004). Evaluating computer-supported cooper-ative work: Models and frameworks. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 112-121.
O''dell, C., Grayson, C. J., & Essaides, N. (1998). If only we knew what we know: The transfer of internal knowledge and best practice, New York:Free Press.
Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism (pp.1–11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Paul, S. A., & Morris, M. R. (2009). CoSense: Enhancing sensemaking for collaborative web search. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Compu-ting Systems, 1771-1780.
Quiroga, L. M., Crosby, M. E., & Iding, M. K. (2004). Reducing cognitive load. System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 9, 131-139
Scott, S. D., Mandryk, R. L., & Inkpen, K. M. (2003). Understanding children''s collaborative interactions in shared environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 220-228.
Tan, J. (2000). Knowledge management–just more buzzwords? The British Journal of Ad-ministrative Management, 19, 10-11.
Voorbij, H. J. (1999). Searching scientific information on the internet: A dutch academic user survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(7), 598-615
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71-95.