肢體動作感應的沉浸式學習用遊戲｜國立中央大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	陳堅 Kien Tran
論文名稱：	肢體動作感應的沉浸式學習用遊戲 Body Movement Interaction: An Immersive Learning Game
指導教授：	陳國棟 Gwo-Dong Chen
口試委員:
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	資訊電機學院 - 資訊工程學系在職專班 Executive Master of Computer Science & Information Engineering
畢業學年度：	98
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	57
中文關鍵詞：	LED追蹤、遊戲式學習、肢體動作互動、數位學習
外文關鍵詞：	body movement interaction, e-learning, LED tracking, game-based learning
相關次數：	點閱：13 下載：0
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

動作感應的遊戲已逐漸盛行，目前最暢銷的代表則如任天堂的遊戲機Wii，此機讓使用者能以單手或雙手握著控制器，藉由指點和搖擺等動作來控制遊戲的進行。
這類體感式遊戲被視為能當成教學和學習的工具，此研究探討如何設計動作感應式的教學用遊戲，讓學習者能在3D立體的虛擬環境中學習，此取代滑鼠操作的肢體感應人機介面是以視訊攝影機追蹤使用者手握的LED點光源，讓使用者能以直覺的方式來操作電腦，此外並運用3D立體眼鏡讓使用者體驗具環繞音效的即時互動動畫，以提升學習者的互動經驗和學習動機，。
為了評估使用者對使用此系統的意向，此研究採用科技接受模式的問卷調查，實驗結果顯示，相對於滑鼠操作，受測者對此新的體感互動介面在使用上有較高的娛樂感和使用意願，且在統計分析結果上呈現受測者的娛樂感正向的影響他們的使用意願，此外問卷統計結果也顯示，此肢體互動設計顯著讓受測者感覺更容易使用。

Video game consoles that enable their users to use active body movements as mode of interaction are becoming more and more popular. In fact, the best-selling video game console at the time of writing this study is the Nintendo Wii, which is operated by one or two handheld controllers that gamers have to point and swing to operate their games.
On education’s point of view, active video games have been regarded as more promising teaching and learning tools on entering the 21st century. My thesis explores an immersive learning game based on 3D stereoscopic and motion tracking techniques. Instead of a mouse, we use the LED tracking technique to create a body movement interaction for users to naturally interact with the system (waving their hands). With a view to engagement and motivation, the system supplies interactive digital contents including 3D stereoscopic models and animations, real-time interaction and 3D stereo sound.
To evaluate users’ intention of utilizing the system, the questionnaire based on the technology acceptance model (TAM) were provided. According to the experimental result, perceived playfulness is a positive association with attitude toward using; and the system’s interface model is a positive association with perceived ease of use.

Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... i
摘 要....................................................................................................................................................... ii
Acknowledgements................................................................................................................................ iii
Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................iv
Table of Figures.......................................................................................................................................vi
List of tables .......................................................................................................................................... vii
Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1
Motivation .................................................................................................................................. 1
Overview of thesis ........................................................................................................................ 3
The contributions of thesis ........................................................................................................... 3
Chapter 2: Background ............................................................................................................................ 5
Related works.............................................................................................................................. 5
1 Gaming experience and Physical activity in digital game ....................................................... 5
1.1 Physical activity ............................................................................................................. 5
1.2 Gaming experience ....................................................................................................... 8
2.3 The Experience of Physical Activity .............................................................................. 12
2.3 State of the art of Physical Activity in Games ............................................................... 14
1.1.1 Microsoft’s Project Natal – ‘Kinect’ ......................................................................... 14
1.1.2 Sony Move .............................................................................................................. 18
2 Game-based learning .......................................................................................................... 21
2.1 Games and learning .................................................................................................... 21
2.2 Playing games for learning, why not? .......................................................................... 23
Advantage of using body movement interaction in video game .................................................. 24
1 Real Activity ........................................................................................................................ 25
2 Continuous Interactions ...................................................................................................... 25
3 Uninterrupted Mappings .................................................................................................... 26
4 Use of the Whole body ....................................................................................................... 26
Chapter 3: Design and Implementation system ..................................................................................... 27
System structure ......................................................................................................................... 27
Game-based Learning Environment ............................................................................................ 28
Body Movement Interaction System ........................................................................................... 28
1. Camera calibration.............................................................................................................. 29
2. Building input-interface of LED Tracking .............................................................................. 31
3D stereoscopic Displaying Techniques ....................................................................................... 32
Course Procedures and Flow ...................................................................................................... 32
Chapter 4: Experiment and results ........................................................................................................ 36
Experiment design ...................................................................................................................... 36
1 Participants and Settings ..................................................................................................... 37
2 Materials and Procedure ..................................................................................................... 38
Data analysis and results ............................................................................................................ 38
1 Perceived Usefulness (PU) & Attitude toward using (ATU)................................................... 39
2 Perceived ease of use (PE) & Interface Style (IS) & System usage (SU) ................................. 39
3 Perceived playfulness (PP) .................................................................................................. 39
Chapter 5: Conclusion ........................................................................................................................... 40
References ........................................................................................................................................... 41
Appendix .............................................................................................................................................. 45

                                

1. Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Kim, W.W., Darshak, P. (2007). Does Body Movement Engage You More in Digital Game Play? and Why?. Aﬀective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, Springer, LNCS 4738, 102-113 Brown, E., Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion. Proceedings CHI 2004, 1297-1300.
2. Brown, J. (2002). Learning in the digital age. Paper presented at the Internet & the University Forum 2001, Aspen, CO. Cairns, P., Cox, A., Berthouze, N., Dhoparee,S., & Jennett, C. (2006). Quantifying the experience of immersion in games. Cognitive Science, Vancouver.
3. Chen, J. (2007). Flow in games (and everything else), Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 31-34. doi: 10.1145/1232743.1232769. Cheng, K., Cairns, P. A. (2005). Behaviour, realism and immersion in games. Proceedings CHI 2005, 1272-1275.
4. Cheng, K., Cairns, P. A. (2005). Behaviour, realism and immersion in games. Proceedings CHI 2005, 1272-1275.
5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
7. Ermi, L., Mäyrä, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: analysing immersion. In S. de Castell & J. Jenson (Eds.), Changing views: worlds in play, Selected Papers DiGRA conference, 15-27.
8. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002, December). Games, motivation and learning. Simulation & Gaming; An Interdisciplinary Journal of Theory, Practice and Research, 33, 4, 43–56.
9. Graves, L., Stratton, G., Ridgers, N. D., Cable, N. T. (2007). Comparison of energy expenditure in adolescents when playing new generation and sedentary computer games: cross sectional study, BMJ, 335, 1282-1284.
10. Graves, L.E., Ridgers, N.D., Stratton, G. (2008). The contribution of upper limb and total body movement to adolescents’ energy expenditure whilst playing Nintendo Wii. Eur .J. Appl. Physiol.
11. Hillier, A. (2008). Childhood overweight and the built environment: making technology part of the solution rather than part of the problem, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 615(I), 56-82.
12. Ijsselsteijn, W., Riva, G. (2003). Being there: the experience of presence in mediated environments In G. Riva, F. Davide, & W. Ijssel-steijn (Eds.), Being There: Concepts, Eﬀects and Measurements of User Presence in Synthetic Environments (pp. 3-16). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
13. Isabel Wanderley, Judith Kelner, Nacha Costa and Veronica Teichrieb, (2000). A Survey of Interaction in Mixed Reality Systems, Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, 2000
14. Lanningham-Foster, L., Jensen, T. B., Foster, R. C., Redmond, A. B., Walker, B. A., Heinz, D., et al. (2006). Energy expenditure of sedentary screen time compared with active screen time for children, Pediatrics, 118(6), 1831-1835.
15. Maja Pivec. (2007) Editorial: Play and learn: potentials of game-based learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 38 No 3 2007. 387-393.
16. Malone, T.W. (1981) What makes computer games fun? Byte 6 , 258-277, 1981
17. McCarthy, J., Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. McMahan, A. (2003). Immersion, engagement and presence, The Video Game Theory Reader, 67-86.
19. Pfeffer, J. (1982) Organizations and Organization Theory, Pitman, Boston, MA, 1982
20. Radner, R. and Rothschild, M. On the Allocation of Effort. (1975) Journal of Economic Theory (10), pp.358-376, 1975
21. Schein, E.H. (1980) Organizational Psychology, third edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1980
22. Shaw, D., Gorely , T., Corban, R. (2005) Sport and Exercise Psychology. BIOS Scientiﬁc Publishers
23. Sweetser, P ., Wyeth, P . (2005) Gameﬂow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games, Comput. Entertain., 3(3), 1-24.
24. Vroom, V.H. (1964) Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York, NY. 1964
25. Xie, L., Antle, A., Motamedi, N. (2008). Are Tangibles More Fun? Comparing Children’s enjoyment and Engagement Using Physical, Graphical and Tangible User Interfaces. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, 2008
26. Z. Zhang. (2000) A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(11):1330-1334, 2000.

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文