跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 歐陽嘉
Chia Ou
論文名稱: 學習動機和社交能力對於學生在跨領域合作學習成效影響之研究與實證
An empirical study of how academic motivation and social ability influence on learning outcome in cross-disciplinary collaborative learning
指導教授: 楊鎮華
Stephen J.H. Ynag
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊電機學院 - 資訊工程學系
Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 128
中文關鍵詞: 跨領域合作學習學習動機社交能力學習成效
外文關鍵詞: learning outcomes, social ability, academic motivation, cross-disciplinary collaborative learning
相關次數: 點閱:13下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 長久以來,跨學門合作無論是在醫學、藝術、工程以及自然科學等領域之中,皆扮演著重要的角色。而進幾年來,各個學校以及教育機關也開始重視所謂的跨領域合作學習,並且藉此改變過去學校教育過於注重於單一領域合作學習的現象,進而提升學生在跨學門合作上的能力,以因應強調跨學門合作的真實世界。因此,究竟是什麼樣的因素會去影響學生的學習成效,以及學生在完成跨領域學習之後又能獲得何種能力,是值得去探討的一個議題。根據上述的原因,本研究的研究目的便是要建立出一個真實的跨領域學習環境,並從中觀察學生的學習情況,以找出影響學習成效的關鍵因素。本研究配合了教育部的“跨學門科學人才培育計劃”,以中央大學中參與該計劃的學生為研究對象,讓他們進行以專題式學習為方法的跨領域合作學習,並且以各種學習量表收集學生的學習資料,以探討和證明學習動機以及社交能力,確實會影響學生跨領域合作學習之成效。


    For a long time Cross-disciplinary collaborative learning plays an important role in many areas such as medical, art, engineering, and science. Recently many schools and educative organizations adopt this learning approach, hope it can improve the cross-disciplinary collaborative skill, experience, and knowledge of students for helping them connect with real world. Under this trend, what factors will influences students‘ learning outcome and what competence do they obtains within the learning process, are an interest topic of research. Based on this reason our research goal is to build a real cross-disciplinary collaboration learning environment to investigate what key factors will cause cross-disciplinary collaboration learning become affective? We chose the students of NCU who join the ―cross-disciplinary science personnel education plan‖ which conducted by educative ministry of Taiwan as the experiment subject. We collected and analyzed the learning data of those students for exploring and proving that the academic motivation and social ability can affect the learning outcomes of cross-disciplinary collaborative learning.

    摘要………………………………………………………………………I Abstract…………………………………………………………………II Acknowledgements…………………………………………………….III Contents………………………………………………………………...IV List of Figures………………………………………………………..VIII List of Tables…………………………………………………………...IX Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………………………………1 1.1 What is the motivation of this research topic? ............................................... 3 1.1.1 General description of current status of the research topic……………5 1.1.2 Why this research topic is important and interesting? ......................... 7 1.1.3 Who will be interested in this research topic?........................................8 1.2 Research questions…………………………………………………………...9 1.2.1 Describe what kinds of research questions in this research topic….....9 1.2.2 Significant…………………………………………………………….9 1.3 Solution………………………………………………...................................13 1.3.1 Learning Method…………………………………………………….13 1.3.2 Learning Platform…………………………………………………....15 1.3.3 E-Portfolio…………………………………………………………...16 1.4 Contribution………………………………………………………………....17 Chapter 2 Literature review…………………………………………..18 2.1 Cross-disciplinary collaboration learning……………………………………………………..18 2.2 Learning outcome…………………………………………………………...22 2.3 Academic motivation………………………………………………………..24 2.3.1 Definition and theories……………………………………………......24 2.3.2 How academic motivation affects learning outcome………………...29 2.4 Social ability………………………………………………………………...32 2.4.1 Definition and theories………………………………………………32 2.4.2 How social ability affects learning outcome………………………...35 2.5 Learning approach…………………………………………………………..37 2.5.1 Various learning approaches…………………………………………37 2.5.2 Comparison of various approaches on cross-disciplinary collaboration learning……………………………………………………………....39 2.6 Learning platform…………………………………………………………...45 2.6.1 Project-based learning and e-portfolio system………………………45 2.6.2 Various systems……………………………………………………...47 2.6.3 Comparison of various systems with our system……………………48 2.6.3.1 Strength, Weakness……………………………………………51 Chapter 3 Method and Solutions……………………………………..54 3.1 Research design……………………………………………………………..54 3.1.1 Research architecture and hypothesis………………………………..54 3.1.2 Definition of variable………………………………………………...55 3.2 Research tool………………………………………………………………..56 3.2.1 Questionnaire…………………………………………………………56 3.2.1.1 Academic motivation scale…………………………………...56 3.2.1.2 Social ability scale……………………………………………58 3.2.1.3 Learning outcome toward CCL scale………………………...59 3.2.2 Learning platform……………………………………………………62 3.3 Research subject……………………………………………………………..62 3.4 Research procedure………………………………………………………….62 3.5 Data collection and analysis method………………………………………...63 3.5.1 Data collection method……………………………………………………63 3.5.2 Data analysis method……………………………………………………...63 Chapter 4 System implementation……………………………………64 4.1 Implementation environment……………………………………………64 4.1.1 Hardware and Software platforms…………………………………...64 4.1.2 Implementation language & tool…………………………………….64 4.2 System architecture………………………………………………………….65 4.2.1 High-level system design and analysis………………………………65 4.2.2 Low-level system design and analysis……………………………….68 4.3 System demo………………………………………………………………...70 4.3.1 Scenarios for illustrating system functionalities……………………..70 4.3.2 User interface, execution result, print screen, etc……………………72 4.4 Experience learned from the implementation……………………………….75 4.4.1 Difficulties and possible solutions…………………………………...75 Chapter 5 Results and Discussion…………………………………….76 5.1 Academic motivation scale………………………………………………….76 5.1.1 Item analysis…………………………………………………………76 5.1.2 Exploratory factor analysis…………………………………………..77 5.1.3 Reliable analysis……………………………………………………..78 5.2 Social ability scale…………………………………………………………..79 5.2.1 Item analysis…………………………………………………………79 5.2.2 Exploratory factor analysis…………………………………………..80 5.2.3 Reliable analysis……………………………………………………..81 5.3 Learning outcome toward CCL scale……………………………………….81 5.3.1 Item analysis…………………………………………………………81 5.3.2 Exploratory factor analysis…………………………………………..84 5.3.3 Reliable analysis..................................................................................86 5.4 Correlation analysis…………………………………………………………87 5.4.1 The analysis of academic motivation and learning outcome toward CCL………………………………………………………………….87 5.4.2 The analysis of social ability and learning outcome toward CCL…..89 5.4.3 Summary..............................................................................................90 Chapter 6 Conclusion and future research…………………………...92 References………………………………………………………………96 Appendix………………………………………………………………110

    Ackerman, D. B. (1989). Intellectual and practical criteria for successful curriculum integration. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Cross-disciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. (pp. 25–38). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Ackerman, D. B., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Integrating thinking and learning skills across the curriculum. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Cross-disciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. (pp. 77–96). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Adam, S. (2004). Using learning outcomes. A consideration of the nature, role,
    application and implications for European education of employing ''learning outcomes'' at the local, national and international levels. University of Westminster, June 2004.
    Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van
    Nostrand.
    Anat, Y. & Nir, E. (n. d.). The affect of disciplinary identity on cross-disciplinary
    learning during scientific group meetings. Retrieved February 9, 2009, from
    Weizmann Institute of Science, Department of Science Teaching Web site:
    http://www.fi.uu.nl/en/CCLs2008/292/paper292.pdf.
    Augar, N., Raitman, R. & Zhou, W. (2004) Teaching and learning online with
    wikis. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Philips (Eds), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ascilite Conference (pp. 95–104). Perth, 5–8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/ augar.html.
    BAI, Yun-hong. (2008). On appropriately assessing students‘ learning outcomes. Sino-US English Teaching, 5(11), 15-20.
    Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4. New York: Academic Press, pp. 71-81.
    Barrett, H., (2001). Electronic Portfolios – A chapter in Educational Technology; An Encyclopedia, Retrieved December 17, 2008, from http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios/encycentry.pdf.
    Beaver, D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration and its study. Scientometrics, 52, 365-377.
    Benjamin, R. S., & De, W. M. (2006). Psychology ePortfolios Enhance Learning,
    Assessment, and Career Development. In A. Jafari & C. Kaufman (Eds.),
    Handbook of research on ePortfolios (pp. 520-531). Hershey: Idea Group
    Reference.
    Boix, M. V. (2005). Assessing Student work at Disciplinary Crossroads. Change, 37
    (January/February), 14–21.
    Bologna Working Group on Qualifications Frameworks. (2005). A Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area. Bredgade: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
    Bong, M. (2001) Role of self-efficacy and task-value in predicting college students‘ course performance and future enrollment intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 553–70.
    Boud, D. and Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of PBL. London: Kogan.
    Bravo, C., Redondo, M. A., Ortega, M., & Verdejo, M. F. (2006). Collaborative environments for the learning of design: A model and a case study in Domotics. Computers and Education, 46(2), 152-173.
    Brophy, J. E. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivation students to learn. Education leadership, 45, 40-48.
    Chau, J.(2007). A Developer‘s Challenges on an ePortfolio journey. In ICT:
    Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore
    2007.[Online] Available: http://www. ascilite. org.au/conferences/perth07/
    procs/Chau
    Cizek, G. J. (1997). Learning, achievement, and assessment: Constructs at a crossroad. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment. New York: Academic Press.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ―what‖ and ―why‖ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
    Diana, R., Veronica, B. M., Marc, C., & Julie, T. K. (2007, March). Cross-disciplinary
    Education at Liberal Arts Institutions. SSRC. Retrieved from
    http://www.evergreen.edu/washcenter/resources/upload/2006_ssrc_whitepaper.p df.
    Diehl, W., Grobe, T., Lopez, H., & Cabral, C., (1999). Project-based Learning: A
    Strategy for Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA: Center for Youth Development
    and Education, Corporation for Business, Work, and Learning.
    Dockett, S., & Tegel, K., (1995). Situation based learning in early childhood teacher
    training. Teaching Review, 3(1), 40-44.
    Dockett, S., & Tegel, K., (1996). Identifying dilemmas for early childhood educators.
    Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 3, 20-28.
    Dunkin, M., Schraw, G., & Bendixon, L., (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Paper presented at the Annual Neeting of the
    American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
    ECTS USERS'' GUIDE. (2004). Retrieved March 29, 2009, from http://bologna.hrdc.bg/pdf/sem/01_06/supporting/ECTS%20USERS%20GUIDE%202004.doc
    Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms
    (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Eisinger, U., Gutdeutsch, R., & Hammeral, C. (1992). Historical Earthquake
    Research – an Example of Cross-disciplinary Cooperation between Geophysicists
    and Historians. In: GUTDEUTSCH, R., GRÜNTHAL, G. & MUSSON, R.
    (eds.), Historical Earthquakes in Central Europe 1(Wien), 33–50.
    European Network for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. (2004). Transnational
    European Evaluation Project. Helsinki: ENQA
    Field, M., Lee, R., & Field, M. L. (1994). Assessing cross-disciplinary collaboration learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 58, 69–84.
    Garrison, D. R. (1993). Quality and theory in distance education: theoretical consideration. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge.
    Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses: tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29–35.
    Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2000). Looking in classrooms (8th ed.). New York:
    HarperCollins.
    Graham J and Honari M (1991). Human Ecology and Health Advancement.
    Journal of Human Ecology 2(1 – 2), 107 – 216.
    Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147–166.
    Guanawardena, C. N., Lowe, X., Constance, A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of educational computing research, 17(4), 397–431.
    Gulbahar, Y., & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementing project-based learning and
    e-portfolio assessment in an undergraduate course. Journal of Research on
    Technology in Education, 38(3), 309-327.
    Gusfield, J. R. (1975). The community: A critical response. New York: Harper Colophon.
    Harasim, L. (1991) Teaching by computer conferencing. In A. J. Miller (Ed.), Applications of computer conferencing to teacher education andhuman resource development (pp. 23–33). Proceedings from an international symposium on computer conferencing at the Ohio State University. Columbus, OH. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 337705).
    Harper-Marinick, M. (2001). Engaging students in Problem based learning. Maricopa
    Center for Learning and Instruction. Available at: http://mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/ forum/spr01/t11.html.
    Hartmann, D., Baßler, B., Zindel C., Rings S., Breer H., Schilling1 D., et al. (2003).
    MR Colonography as an Cross-disciplinary Cooperative Project –Initial Findings
    at the Ludwigshafen Teaching Hospital. Electromedica, 1, 58-63.
    Heffner T. S. and Rentsch J. R.(2001). Organizational Commitment and Social
    Interaction: A Multiple Constituencies Approach, Journal of Vocational Behavior 59, 471–490.
    Helic, D., Maurer H., & Scerbakov, N. (2004). Discussion Forums as Learning
    Resources in Web-Based Education. In Advanced Technology for Learning, l(1),
    8-15.
    Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 136–177). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    Heslin, P.A., & Klehe, U.C. (2006). Self-efficacy. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, 2. 705-708.
    Hicks W. D. (1984) .The process of entering training programs and its affects on training outcomes, Dissertation Abtracts, 44, p.3564.
    Hiltz, S. R. (1994) The Virtual Classroom: Learning without Limits via Computer Networks. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Hsu, M. H., Chen, I. Y., Chiu, C.M., Ju, T. L. (2007), "Exploring the antecedents of team performance in collaborative learning of computer software", Computers & Education, 48(4), 700-18.
    Jafari, A., & Kaufman, C. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Research on ePortfolios.
    Hershey: Idea Group Reference.
    Janet, D. W. & Cheryl, L. L. (2002). A REVIEW OF PROBLEM-BASED
    LEARNING. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 1(20), 16-26.
    Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: Does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037-1065.
    Johansson F., (2004). The Medici Affect. Breakthrough Insights at the Intersection of
    Ideas, Concepts, and Cultures. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
    Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition:
    Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
    Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Stanne, M. B. (1985). Affects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 668–677.
    Jones, B.F., Rasmussen, C.M., & Moffit, M. C. (1997). Real-life Problem Solving: A
    Collaborative Approach to Cross-disciplinary collaboration learning. Waschington, DC:
    American Psychological Association.
    Judi, W., & Carole, O. (2000). Health and Academia: In Partnership for
    Cross-disciplinary Training. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 6(4), 98-103.
    Kara, C., & Sarena, D. S. (2005). Cross-disciplinary Models of Service-Learning in
    Higher Education. Retrieved February 19, 2009, from
    http://www.servicelearning.org/
    Kauchak, D. P. & Eggen, P. D. (1998) Learning & teaching: Research Based Methods (3rd ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Klaus, E., (2006). A board game for cross-disciplinary training and dialogue. Berlin
    Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change.
    Klein, J.T. (1996). Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and
    Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA.: University Press of Virginia
    Knapczyk, D. R., & Rodes, P. G. (1996). Teaching social competemmce: A
    practical approach for improving social skills in srudents at-risk. Pacific
    Grove, Ca: Brooks/Cole.
    Kreijens, K, Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W. & Van Buuren, H. (2005).
    Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176–192.
    Lampert, M., (1985). How do teachers manage to teach?. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178-194.
    Lana, I., Deborah, C., George, M., & Ronald, P. (2002). Cross-disciplinary collaboration learning: Process and Outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 27(2), 95-111.
    Lattuca, L. (2001). Cross-disciplinary Research and Teaching among College and
    University Faculty, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
    Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2000). Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: a review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40(3), 41–45.
    Makaram, S. (1995). Interprofessional cooperation. Medical Education
    29(Supplement1), 65-69.
    Mathur, S. R. (1998). Social skills intervention with students with emotional and behavioral problems: A quantitative synthesis of single subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 23, 193-201.
    Marilyn, D. (2006). E-Portfolios—An Affective Tool?. Universitas, 2(2), 1-7.
    Mary, W. (2004). The challenge of cross-disciplinary collaboration in addressing the
    social determinants. Australian Social Work, 57(4,), 381-393.
    Maureen, M., Tanya, D., Terry, L., & Patrick, K. (2007). Engineering Design
    Process –An Cross-disciplinary Approach. International Conference on
    Engineering Education.
    McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (April, 1986). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Association Convention, Cincinnati, OH.
    McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Willingness to communicate and interpersonal communication. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly, Personality and interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    McMahon, T. (2006) Teaching for more affective learning: Seven maxims for practice. Radiography, 12(1), 34-44.
    McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
    Mdredge F. E. (1952).Culture and Society. New York:Prentice Hall.
    Moorey, S., P. Hughes, P. Knynenberg and A. Michaels, 2000. The problem solving scale in a sample of patients referred for congitive therapy. Behav. Congnitive Psychother., 28(2): 131-138.
    Moursund, D. (1999). Project-based learning using information technology. Eugene,
    OR:International Society for Technology in Education.
    Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity in web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2), 31–39.
    Oliver, K., & Bob, W. (2005) Promoting cross-disciplinary collaboration learning in a practical
    environment using the formula SAE competition. ASEE/AaeE 4th Global Colloquium on Engineering Education.
    Ormrod, J. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed). Columbus, OH: Merrill
    Ormrod, J. E. (2003). Educational psychology: Developing learners(4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
    Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Developing Learners (5th ed.), "glossary". N.J., Merrill: Upper Saddle River (companion website)
    Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Affective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Poon, S.K., Reed, S. and Tang, C. (1997). Problembased learning in distance
    education. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Modern Industrial Training, Jinan,China. 593600.
    Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
    Ramirez, M. (2008). notes from interview.
    Reil, M. (1996). The Internet: A land to settle rather than an ocean to surf and a new “place” for school reform through community development. Retrieved October 19, 2003 from
    http://www.globalschoolhouse.org/teach/artCCLes/netasplace.html.
    Riger, S. & Lavrakas, P. (1981). Community ties patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 55-66.
    Robert Springer. (n. d.). Community: Influencing Learning Outcomes and Retention.
    Retrieved April 3, 2009, from http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/heri/web_examples/elon_yfcy.pdf
    Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an Instrument to Measure Classroom Community. Internet and Higher Education 5, 197-211.
    Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    SEEC, NICCAT, NUCCAT. (2001). Credit and Qualifications – Credit Guidelines for Qualifications in England Wales and Northern Ireland. Retrieved March 29, 2009, form http://www.nicats.ac.uk/doc/summ_guidelines.pdf.
    Serruya, M. D., Hatsopoulos, N. G., Paninski L., Fellows M. R., & Donoghue, J. P.
    (2002). Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature, 416, 141–142.
    Sharan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning, motivation to learning, and academic
    achievement. N.Y.: Harcout, Brace.
    Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events?: Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325–339.
    Sheldon, M. E. (1971). Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing
    commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 143–150.
    Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
    Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
    Small, R. V. & Gluck, M. (1994) The relationship of motivational conditions to
    affective instructional attributes: A magnitude scaling approach. Educational
    Technology, 8(34), 33-40.
    Smith, B. L. and MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is Collaborative Learning? In
    Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education, 10-29, A. S.
    Goodsell, M. R. Maher and V. Tinto ed. , University Park, PA, National Center
    on Postsecondary Teaching.
    Sobral DT. (2004). What kind of motivation drives medical students‗ learning quests?. Med Educ, 38(9), 950-957.
    Society of college, National and University Libraries. (2004). Learning Outcomes and Information Literacy. London: The Higher Education Academy.
    Soller, A. L., & Lesgold, A., Linton, F., Goodman, B. (1999). What makes peer interaction affective? Modeling affective communication in an intelligent CSCL. In Proceedings of the 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium: Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems (pp. 116–123). Cape-Cod, MA.
    Song, K., Scordias, M., Huang, C., & Hoagland, C. (2004). Implementing e-portfolios
    in a university: An enterprise solution. Paper presented at the Society for
    Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE) Conference, Atlanta,
    Georgia, http://www.aace.org/dl/files/SITE2004/paper_3014_7985.pdf.
    Steers, R. M., and Porter, L. W., Motivation and work behavior, 3 rd ed, New York : McGraw-Hill, 1983.
    Stowe, D. & Eder, D. (2002). Cross-disciplinary program assessment. Issues in
    Integrative Studies 20, 77-101.
    Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. 2007. The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 17-27.
    Tegel, K. and Dockett, S. (1994). ―Tanya has to fix them–she alives them with a stick‖: Critical thinking in early childhood. In: Chen, S. E., Cowdroy, R. E., Kingsland, A. J. and Ostwald, M. J. (eds.) Reflections on problem based learning. Sydney: Australian Problem Based Learning Network.
    Thorsteinsdottir, O. (2000). External research collaboration in two small science
    systems. Scientometrics, 49, 145-160.
    Thomas, J.W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael,
    CA: Autodesk. http://www.k12reform.org/foundation/pbl/research.
    Thomas, J.W., Mergendoller, J.R., & Michaelson, A., (1999). Project-based Learning:
    A Handbook for Middle and High School Teachers. Novato, CA: The Buck
    Institute for Education.
    Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic affects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260.
    Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19–31.
    Veenman, S., Kenter, B., & Post, K. (2000). Cooperative learning in Dutch primary
    classrooms. Educational Studies, 26(3), 281-302.
    Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29.
    Wagner, E. D. (1997). Interactivity: from agents to outcomes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 19-26.
    Wang, S. L. & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1589–1598.
    Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.
    Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students‘ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning & Individual Differences, 11, 281-301.
    Yang, C., Tsai, I., Cho, M., Kim, B. & Laffey, J. (2006). Exploring the relationships between students'' academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 9 (4), 277-286.
    Zhang, S., & Fulford, C. P. (1994). Are interaction time and psychological interactivity the same thing in the distance learning television classroom. Educational Technology, 34(6), 58–64.
    Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly connected handheld computers. Computers and Education, 42, 289–314.

    QR CODE
    :::