| 研究生: |
廖庭緯 Ting-Wei Liao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以離心模型模擬傾斜砂層在側潰時之動態反應 Centrifuge Modeling on Responses of Inclined Sandy Slope During Lateral Spreading |
| 指導教授: |
洪汶宜
Wen-Yi Hung |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 176 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 土壤液化 、離心模型振動台試驗 、側向滑移 、圓錐貫入試驗 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | soil liquefaction, centrifuge shaking table test, lateral spreading, cone penetration test |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:10 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
當地震發生,地下水位高的砂質地盤易產生土壤液化,並伴隨著相關複合式災害,例如土層中維生管線破裂、地表不均勻沉陷與上部結構傾倒等,影響週圍居民的生命財產安全,因此自日本新瀉大地震以後,各國學者積極投入在土壤液化引致的相關議題上。
2014 年開始的國際合作之土壤液化詴驗分析計畫Liquefaction Experiment and Analysis Projects, LEAP),主要目的是在世界上不同物理模型研究團隊所進行相同原型(Prototype)的離心模型詴驗,再將結果提供數值模型團隊做驗證及校正。本研究為 2017 年 LEAP 國際合作研究計畫內容進行高品質的土壤液化與側向滑移詴驗,詴體配置為 5 度緩坡飽和砂層,探討因受震導致土壤液化引致土壤側潰之行為,透過水平色砂層、地表位移計與垂直埋設麵條觀察土層變形情況,利用微型圓錐貫入詴驗比較液化前後土壤沿深度之阻抗,不同埋設深度的加速度計與孔隙水壓計記錄砂土層因液化導致土壤側潰過程之土壤反應。
試驗結果顯示:(1)輸入震動方向與坡面的坡向反相會導致加速度具突波的現象;(2)地表土壤受震發生側潰會向斜坡之下坡處移動,特別是在中間高程偏下坡處之土壤位移量會較大;(3)受震後土壤剖面側向位移隨深度愈深而愈小,在地表下深度 3.0 m 就沒有側向移動; (4)錐尖阻抗隨著貫入深度的增加而增加,沿伸度增加之阻抗值約為1100 kPa/m。
Following the observations from liquefaction-related damage during
earthquakes conducted on sandy ground with high ground water level, such as critical
infrastructure failures or structure failure due to differential settlement resulting in
threaten local residents`s life and property safety, it has provided significant insights
into the liquefaction phenomenon after Niigata earthquake.
In 2014, there was a project called the Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis
Projects (LEAP), which aims to calibrate and validate the centrifuge modeling and
numerical modeling. This study refers to the LEAP_2017_UCD project for
corresponding research and conducted a series of high quality centrifuge modeling
tests to investigate lateral spreading after shaking. By different sensors to observe
deformation of soil deposit, including horizontal color thin layers, surface markers
and spaghetti. Using mini cone penetration test on the specimen to detect the
resistance induced by shaking, but also setting accelerometers and pore water
transducers were used to record the responses of soil deposit induced by liquefaction.
According to the test results: (1) It has prominent amplitude of spikes appear in
the phase of positive acceleration due to the direction of input base motion is opposite
to the direction of slope dip. (2) The soil on the ground surface move toward the
downslope after shaking, especially located at middleslope to downslope have lager
displacement. (3) The level of lateral spreading decreases along the depth of strata
until the depth of 3.0 m do not have any movement. (4) The cone tip resistance along
the depth increase and the ratio of the cone tip resistance to the depth is 1100 kPa/m.
[1] Taylor, R. N. “Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology,” Hall & Wester, London.
(1995).
[2] Kutter, B. L., Carey, T. J., Hashimoto, T., Zeghal, M., Adboun, T., Kokkali, P.,
Madabhushi, G., Haigh, S., Burali d’ Arezzo, F., Madabhushi, S., Hung, W. Y.,
Lee, C. J., Chegn, H. C., Iai, S., Tobita, T., Zhou, Y. G., Chen, Y., Sun, Z. B. and
Manzari, M. T. “Leap-GWU-2015 Experiment Specifications, Results, and
Comparisons,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. (2017).
[3] Tobita, T., Ashino, T., Ren, J. and Iai, S. “Kyoto University LEAP-GWU-2015
tests and the importance of curving the ground surface in centrifuge modelling,”
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. (2018).
[4] Carey, T., Hashimoto, T., Cimini, D. and Kutter, B. L. “LEAP-GWU-2015
centrifuge test at UC Davis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. (2018).
[5] Manzari, M. T., Ghoraiby, M. E., Kutter, B. L., Zeghal, M., Abdoun, T., Arduino,
P., Armstrong, R. J., Beaty, M., Carey, T., Chen, Y., Ghofrani, A., Gutierrez, D.,
Goswami, N., Haigh, S. K., Hung, W. Y., Iai, S., Kokkali, P., Lee, C. J.,
Madabhushi, S. P. G., Mejia L., Sharp, M., Tobita, T., Ueda, K., Zhou, Y. and
Ziotopoulou, K. “Liquefaction experiment and analysis projects (LEAP):
Summary of observations from the planning phase,” Soil Dynamics and
Earthquake Engineering. (2017).
[6] Zeghal, M., Goswami, N., Kutter, B. L. Manzari, M. T., Abdoun, T., Arduino, P.,
Armstrong, R., Beaty, M., Chen, Y. M., Ghofrani, A., Haigh, S., Hung, W. Y., Iai,
S., Kokkali, P., Lee, C. J., Madabhushi, G., Tobita, T., Ueda, K., Zhou, Y. G., and
Ziotopoulou, K. “Stress-strain response of the LEAP-2015 centrifuge tests and
numerical predictions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. (2018).
[7] Hung, W. Y., Lee, C. J. and Hu, L. M. “Study of the effects of container boundary
and slope on soil liquefaction by centrifuge modeling,” Soil Dynamics and
Earthquake Engineering. (2018).
[8] Zhou, Y. G., Sun, Z, B. and Chen, Y. M. “Zhejiang University benchmark
centrifuge test for LEAP-GWU-2015 andliquefaction responses of a sloping
ground,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. (2018).
[9] Popescu, R. and Prevost, J. H “Centrifuge validation of a numerical model for
dynamic soil liquefaction,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 12,
pp.73-90. (1993).
[10] Popescu, R. and Prevost, J. H “Comparison between VELACS numerical 'class A'
predictions and centrifuge experimental soil test results,” Soil Dynamics and
Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 14, pp.79-92. (1995).
[11] Popescu, R. and Prevost, J. H “Reliability assessment of centrifuge soil test results,”
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 14, pp.93-101. (1995).
[12] Yang, T. and Sato, T. “Analytical study of saturation effects on seismic vertical
amplification of a soil layer,” GeÂotechnique, Vol. 2, pp.161-165. (2001).
[13] Okamura, M. and Soga, Y. “Effects of pore fluid compressibility on liquefaction
resistance of partially saturated sand,” Soil and Foundation, Vol. 46, pp.695-700.
(2006).
[14] Yoshimi, Y., Tanaka, K. and Tokimatsu, K. “Liquefaction resistance of a partially
satureated sand,” Soil and Foundation, Vol. 29, pp.157-162. (1989).
[15] Okamura, M. and Inoue, T. “Preparation of fully saturated models for liquefaction
study,” Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, Vol. 12, pp.39-46. (2012).
[16] Kramer, S. L. “Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering,” Prentice Hall, New Jersey
(1996).
[17] 李崇正,「離心模型試驗在大地工程之應用」,地工技術雜誌,第 36 期,第
76-91 頁(1991)。
[18] 李崇正、陳慧慈、洪汶宜、蔡晨暉、陳婷、涂奕峻、謝孟修,「預振技術在
單樁離心模型振動台試驗系統識別的應用」,第十五屆大地工程學術研究討
論會,9 月 11-13 日,雲林,台灣 (2013)。
[19] 郭玉潔,「探討積層板試驗箱進行動態離心模型試驗之邊界效應」,碩士論文,
國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園 (2009)。
[20] 王崇儒,「利用彎曲元件探查離心砂土模型剪力波速剖面及其工程上的應用」,
碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園 (2010)。
[21] 呂昕澔,「以離心模型模擬離岸風機單樁受單向反覆水平側推行為」,碩士論
文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園 (2014)。
[22] 胡林楙,「基盤土壤液化引致的側潰對上方土堤的影響及其改善對策」,碩士
論文,國立中央大學土木工程學系,桃園 (2017)。
[23] 黃俊學,「基盤土壤液化對上方土堤位移的影響」,碩士論文,國立中央大學
土木工程學系,桃園 (2016)。