本研究探討基於FSVL學習策略輔以行動學習輔具於情境英語單字學習環境對EFL學生在學習動機和成效上的影響。本研究所發展的行動學習輔具是整合單字學習策略和情境式學習理論來幫助EFL學生在情境中進行英語單字學習。本研究的實驗參與者為80位EFL學生和1位授課教師，實驗設計分為FSVL學習策略輔以行動學習輔具於情境式英語單字學習環境和FSVL學習策略輔以傳統學習輔具於情境式英語單字學習環境，並利用訪談，測驗和ARCS動機問卷來取得研究結果。最後研究結果顯示FSVL學習策略輔以行動學習輔具於情境式英語單字學習環境相較於FSVL學習策略輔以傳統學習輔具於情境式英語單字學習環境之學習動機與成效表現較為顯著。

This study explored the effect that applying the 5-step vocabulary learning (FSVL) strategy and a mobile learning tool in a situational English vocabulary learning environment exerted on learning motivation and outcomes for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. The mobile learning tool developed in this study assisted EFL students with learning English vocabulary in real-life situations by integrating a vocabulary learning strategy and the situated learning theory. Overall, 80 EFL students and 1 teacher participated in this study. Regarding the experiment design, 2 learning methods were implemented. The first involved employing the FSVL strategy and the mobile learning tool in a situational English vocabulary learning environment, and the other method involved employing the FSVL strategy and traditional learning tools in a situational English vocabulary learning environment. Data were collected by conducting interviews and tests, and administering the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction motivation questionnaire. The results showed that the learning motivation and outcomes of the students who used the FSVL strategy and mobile learning tool in a situational English vocabulary learning environment were superior to those of the students who used the FSVL strategy and traditional learning tools in a situational English vocabulary learning environment.

Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. Journal of American Psychologist, 30(8), 821-828.
Ballou, K. (2009). Language learner experiences in an online virtual world. The JALT CALL Journal, 5(2), 61-70
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the cultural of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Brown, C., & Payne, M. E. (1994). Five essential steps of processes in vocabulary learning. Paper presented at the TESOL Convention. Baltimore MD, USA.
CEFR. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Language: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg/Cambridge: Council of Europe/Cambridge University Press.
Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning, 33(3), 343-377.
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University.
Chen, C. M., & Hsu, S. H. (2008). Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supporting effective English learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 153e180.
Chen, Y.S., Kao, T.C., Sheu, J.P., & Chiang, C.Y . (2002). A Mobile Scaffolding-Aid-Based Bird -Watching Learning System. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02), 15-22.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning system for natural science course. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618–1627.
Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform, 121-138.
Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: a study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222–241
Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-learning-a New Stage of Е-Learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies-CompSysTech, 1-4 June 2004.
Harley, S. (1993). Situated learning and classroom instruction. Educational Technology, 33(3), 46-51.
Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haynes, M. (1984). Patterns and perils of guessing in a second language. Paper presented at the TESOL, 83, 163-176.
Hay, K. (1993). Legitimate peripheral participation, instructionism, and constructivism: Whose situation is it anyway. Educational Technology, 33(3), 33-38.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(3), 23-48.
Huang, Y. M., Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273-282.
Huang, C.S.J., Yang, S.J.H., Su, A.Y.S. (2012). Applying Hebbian Theory to Enhance Search Performance in Unstructured Social-like Peer-to-Peer Networks. ETRI Journal, 34(4), 591-601
Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Shih, J. L., Huang, S. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A decision-tree-oriented guidance mechanism for conducting nature science observation activities in a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 53-64.
Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., Chu, H. C., Kinshuk, & Chen, C. Y. (2012). A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a science park. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 931–947.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1983). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning experiences on social development. Exceptional children.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of Text, Audio, and Graphic Aids in Multimedia Instruction for Vocabulary Learning. Journal of educational technology & society, 11(3), 114-126.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228.
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?. Applied linguistics, 19(2), 255-271.
Lee, S. H., & Muncie, J. (2006). From receptive to productive: Improving ESL learners' use of vocabulary in a postreading composition task. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 295-320.
Liu, T., & Chu, Y. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.
McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning: multiple perspectives. Situated learning perspectives, 5-17.
Oskarsson, M. (1975). The Relationship Between Foreign Language Proficiency and Various Psychological Variables.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Payne, J. W. (1994). Thinking aloud: Insights into information processing. Psychological Science, 5, 241-248
Pressley, M. (1977). Imagery and children's learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective. Review of Educational Research, 47, 585-622.
Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1334-1347.
Shih, J. L., Hwang, G. J., & Chu, Y. C. (2010). The development and instructional application of u-library on butterfly and wetland ecology for context-aware ubiquitous learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 4(3), 253–268.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge university press.
Sun, K. T., Huang, Y. M., & Liu, M. C. (2011). A WordNet-Based Near-Synonyms and Similar-Looking Word Learning System. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 121-134.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217-228.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership. Educational Technology, 33(3), 16-21.