網路化與數位學習科技隨著資訊科學與網路科技持續的發展與創新，已讓傳統教室中的教學與學習活動做了大幅度的改變。傳統教室中藉由融入即時反饋系統(Interactive Response System)提高了師生間的互動性，這類教室回應系統(Classroom Response System)同時也可以保存學生的學習歷程，並節省測驗時間。而透過『平板型互動教學測驗系統』亦可解決學生只能透過遙控器進行單向不可逆的作答、必須等待其他同學完成作答、無法提供個別適性化的補充資料等問題，系統的特色包含縮短等待時間促進反思、提高題目的可讀性、以及作答具公開性。為評估此系統的可用性，建議本系統的合適對象、同時提供系統開發者與教學者的回饋意見，提供後續研究者參考。
然而『平板型互動教學測驗系統』運用在班級測驗雖有需多好教學上的好處，但導入上面臨現實重大挑戰，使台灣幼兒與中小學導入困難，所面臨重大挑戰如下：
1. 價格親民性：價格高，不易導入經費有限之國民中小學
2. 安全性：長時間近距離接觸平板電腦，眼睛易受傷害
3. 易維護性：電池續航力不易維持全天課程，且平板本身不防摔損，壞維修會造成課程中斷，且受制於無線網路穩定度
本研究於產業化過程中將終端載具以點讀筆與一張墊板取代，並於『環境面』、『教學面』、『學習面』所面臨CRS導入問題，進行設計、改良，實現課堂教學互動，學生不需要每人一台電腦或平版(低成本、安全)，就能達到全班互動之教學效果。並已申請了台、日、香港、中、美等國專利，除台灣專利案已獲證外，美國專利亦已獲得核准通知，亦榮獲台灣『國家發明獎』之殊榮，技術授權於育見科技股份有限公司，其目前技術商轉推廣於客戶已遍及海外20個國家，同時在大陸、東南亞的菲律賓、印尼、新加坡、馬來西亞及中東的約旦建立代理商進行市場拓展。

Networking and digital learning technologies with the persistent development and innovation of information science and network technology which have made great changes in teaching and learning activities in the traditional classroom. In the traditional classroom through the Interactive Response System has improved the interaction between teachers and students, such Classroom Response System at the same time can also save student’s learning process, and save test time. And through the "Flat-plate interaction teaching test system" can solve that students can only via remote control for one-way irreversible answer, you must wait for other students complete answer, unable to provide individual adaptive of the supplementary information and other issues, the characteristics of the system include to shorten the waiting time for reflection to improve the readability of the topic, as well as to answer with openness. To evaluate the availability of this system, this study to Taipei National Minzu Elementary School sixth grade students as the experimental object, experimental results also based on learning styles and acceptance of cross-analysis and suggest a suitable object of the system, while providing system developers and educators feedback, providing reference for the follow-up researchers.

However "Flat-plate interaction teaching test system" used in class test, although there are a lot of good teaching benefits, but it faces major challenges in the reality for import, make Taiwan children and primary and secondary school into the difficulties of import, the major challenges are as follows：
1. The price intimacy to people： The price is high not easy to import to funds is limited national primary and secondary schools.
2. Security： Prolonged close contact with the tablet eyes easily getting hurt.
3. Ease of maintenance： Battery life is not easy to maintain a full day courses and the tablet itself does not prevent damage maintenance will cause interruption of the course and subject to the stability of the wireless network.

In this study on the process of industrialization the vehicle terminal will replace by point reading pen and a pad，and in "environmental aspect","teaching aspect" and "learning aspect" facing CRS import problem to design and improvement to achieve the interaction of the classroom teaching. Students do not need a computer or sheets per person (lower cost and safety) so that can achieve the teaching effect of the class interaction. And has applied for patents in Taiwan, Japan, Hong Kong, China, United States and other countries, in addition to the Taiwan patent case has been certified, the United States patent has also been obtained approval notice, also won the Taiwan "National Invention Award" of special distinction, technology licensing to Yu jian Technology Co., Ltd., its current business technology transfer promotion for customers have been throughout 20 countries overseas, also in China, Philippines in South East Asia, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia and Jordan in the Middle East set up agents for market expansion.

[1] 何榮桂，「電腦輔助教學系統中之測驗設計」，教育部中等教育 司：中等教育，第 41 卷，第 2 期，第 29-34 頁，1990。
[2] 林釗鋕，「整合式即時互動教學系統之實作與探討」，碩士論文， 未出版，朝陽科技大學資訊管理系，臺中，2007。
[3] 王郁惠，「IRS應用在班級經營之行動研究」碩士論文， 未出版，國立台北教育大學， 台北市，2007。
[4] 林姿岑， 「IRS即時反饋系統融入數學提問教學之行動研究」碩士論文， 未出版，國立彰化師範大學， 彰化，2010。
[5] 林進材，「教學研究與發展，五南圖書出版公司」，1999。
[6] 林寶山，「教學論—理論與方法，五南圖書出版公司」，1980。
[7] 張世忠，「建構教學—理論與應用，五南圖書出版公司」，2000。
[8] 張靜嚳，「傳統教學有何不妥?建構與教學」第 4 期。彰化師範 大學教育研究所，1996。
[9] 許志毅，「國小數學領域電腦化適性診斷測驗及補救教學系統之 內容開發及詴用-以“扇形”單元為例」，碩士論文，臺中師範學院， 臺中，2004。
[10] 黃光雄，「教學原理」，台北：師大書苑，1988。
[11] 榮泰生，「Amos 與研究方法」，五南圖書出版股份有限公司，初版，2007。
[12] 蔡小玲，「整合式即時回饋系統在國小六年級數學教學成效實驗 研究」，碩士論文，國立臺中教育大學數學教育學系，臺中，2008。
[13] 蔡昆穎，「國小數學領域電腦化適性診斷測驗及補救教學系統之 內容開發及詴用-以“擴分、約分”單元為例」，碩士論文，臺中師範 學院，臺中，2004。
[14] 簡茂發，「教學評量原理與方法」，台北：師大書苑，1988。
[15] 簡茂發，「多元化評量之理念與方法」，國民中學 學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會： http：//www.bctest.ntnu.edu.tw/flying/flying1-10/betweenus2-1.htm，2009。
[16] 羅綸新，「電腦輔助教學」，國立海洋大學： http：//ind.ntou.edu.tw/~tec/lol/CAI.html，2009
[17] 歐滄和，「教育測驗與評量」，台北：心理出版社，2002。
[18] 王志揚。「工業設計師人格特質與個人創造力關係之研究」。國立台北科技大學，台北市，2007。
[19] 張基成、徐郁昇。「高職學生電工機械混成式數位學習效果」。科學教育學刊，19(6)，549-579，2009。
[20] 麥孟生，「個人心理類型、自我效能及態度對電腦學習成效之影響」。國立中央大學資訊管理系碩士論文，2000。
[21] 曾維希、張進輔，「MBTI 人格類類型量量表的理理論論研究與實踐應用」。心理理科學進展，14(1)，255-260，2006。
[22] 謝尚賢，「應用網路輔助教學於土木工程教育之實例研究」。國立臺灣大學「台大工程」學刊，92，43-55，2007。
[23] 顏進雄，「論板書在現代多媒體課堂中的應用優勢與展望」。花蓮教育大學學報，25，157-176，2007。
[24] 陳惠邦，「互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考」，全球華人資訊教育創新論壇，台灣宜蘭，2006。
[25] 吳致維、林建仲，「互動式電子白板在國小教學之探討」， 生活科技教育月刊，四十二卷，頁14-25，2009
[26] 林聖學，「教室導入互動式教學平台之學習效益探討」碩士論文， 未出版，朝陽科技大學， 台中，2009。
[27] Chen， J. T.， A Study on the Relationship between Website Interface Design for Network Instruction and Learning Satisfaction based on Constructive Learning Theory， 2006.
[28] Cutrim， E.S.， Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom， Computers & Education， Vol. 50， pp 338-356， 2008.
[29] Lopez， O.S.， The Digital Learning Classroom： Improving English Language Learners' academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology， Computers & Education， Vol. 54， pp 901-915， 2009.
[30] Igbaria， M.， Guimaraes， T.& Davis， G. B.， Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model， Journal and management Information Systems， Vol. 11， pp 87-114， 1995.
[31] Adams， D. A.， Nelson， R. R. & Todd， P. A.. Perceived Usefulness， Ease of Use， and Usage of Information Technology： A Replication. MIS Quarterly， 16(2)， 227-247. ，1992.
[32] Andon， P.， Chong， K. M. & Roebuck， P.. Personality preferences of accounting & non-accounting graduates seeking to enter the accounting profession. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21(4)： 253-265，2010.
[33] Beatty， I. D. & Gerace， W. J. Technology-enhanced formative assessment： A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education & Technology.，2009.
[34] Bersin， J. The blended learning book： Best practices， proven methodologies， and lessons learned. San Francisco： Pfeiffer. ，2004.
[35] Cheung， S. L.. Using mobile phone messaging as a response medium in classroom experiments. Journal of Economics Education， 39(1)， 51-67.，2008.
[36] Cottrell， D. M.， & Robison， R. A. Case 4： Blended learning in an accounting course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education， 4(3)， 261-269. ，2003.
[37] Cross， J. Forewords. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.)， The handbook of blended learning： Global perspectives， local designs (p. 1). San Francisco： Pfeiffer. ，2006.
[38] Cruz e Costa， J.， Ojala T.， & Korhonen， J.. Mobile lecture interaction： Making technology and learning click. Presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society Conference on Mobile Learning， Algarve， Portugal. ，2008.
[39] Cutts， Q. I.， & Kennedy， G. E. Connecting learning environments using electronic voting systems. Presented at the Australasian Computing Education Conference， Newcastle， Australia. ，2005.
[40] Cutts， Q.， Carbone， A.， & van Haaster， K. Using an electronic voting system to promote active reflection on coursework feedback. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education， Melbourne， Australia. ，2004.
[41] Davis， F. D. Perceived Usefulness， Perceived Ease of Use， and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly， 13(3)， 319-340. ，1989.
[42] Eshel， A.， & Menahem， I. . Public response system with SMS： A pioneering methods for in-class lecturer-students communication. Presented at the 2nd Chais Research Center Conference， Israel. ，2007.
[43] Fan， K.-Y. D.， & van Blink， C. D. A comparison and evaluation of personal response systems in introductory computer programming. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference， Chicago， Illinois. ，2006.
[44] Fies， C. H. (2005). Classroom response systems： What do they add to an active learning environment? Accessed October 10， 2007.
[45] Fies， C.， & Marshall， J. . Classroom response systems： A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology， 15(1)， 101-109. ，2006.
[46] Furnham， A.， Dissou， G.， & Sloan， P. . Personality and intelligence in business people： A study of two personality and two intelligence measures. Journal of Business and Psychology， 22(1)， 99-109. ，2007.
[47] Ganger， A. C.， & Jackson， M.. Wireless handheld computers in the preclinical undergraduate curriculum. Medical Education Online， 8(3). 2003;8：3. ，2003.
[48] Greer， L.， & Heaney， P. J.. Real-time analysis of student comprehension： An assessment of electronic student response technology in an introductory earth science course. Journal of Geoscience Education， 52(4)， 345-351. ，2004.
[49] Gülbahar， Y.， & Madran， R. O. Communication and collaboration， satisfaction，equity， and autonomy in blended learning environments： A case from Turkey. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning， 10(2)， 117-138. ，2009.
[50] Hodges， L. Engaging students， assessing learning： Just a click away. Essays on Teaching Excellence， 21(3). ，2010.
[51] Hofmann， A. Developments in blended learning. Economics and Organization of Future Enterprise， 1(1)， 55-62. ，2008.
[52] Jackson， M.， Ganger， A. C.， Bridge， P. D.， & Ginsburg， K. Wireless handheld computers in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Medical Education Online， 10(5). ，2005.
[53] James， M. C. The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in peer instruction. American Journal of Physics， 74(8)， 689-691. ，2006.
[54] Lopez-Herrejon， R. E.， & Schulman， M. Using interactive technology in a short Java course： an experience report. Presented at the Ninth SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education， Leeds， UK. ，2004.
[55] López-Pérez， M. V.， Pérez-López， M. C.， & Rodríguez-Ariza， L.. Blended learning in higher education： Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education， 56(3)， 818-826. ，2011.
[56] Lund， A.. Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface，2001.
[57] Maier， S. F.， & Seligman， M. E. P.. Learned helplessness： theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology， General， 105， 3-46. ，1976.
[58] Mazur， E. Peer instruction： a user's manual Upper Saddle River， NJ： Prentice-Hall. ，1997.
[59] McCaulley， M. H. The Myers longitudinal medical study， MonorgraphII， paper prepared as part of the final report： Application of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to medicine and other health professions， ERIC ED 211597. ，1977.
[60] McDermott，P.A.，& Beitman，B.S..Standardization of a scale for the study of children’s learning style： structure，stability，and criterion validity.Psychology in the Schools，21，5-14. ，1984.
[61] Myers， I.B. and M.H. McCaulley. Manual： A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator， Palo Alto： Consulting Psychologists Press. ，1985.
[62] Paschal， C. B. Formative assessment in physiology teaching using a wireless classroom communication system. Advances in Physiology Education， 26(4)， 299-308. ，2002.
[63] Pelgrum， ”Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education： results from a worldwide educational assessment”， Computers & Education， Vol. 37， pp163-178， 2001.
[64] Preszler， R.W.， Dawe， A.， Shuster， C.B.， & Shuster， M. . Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education， 6(1)， 29-41.，2007.
[65] Purchase， H. C.， Mitchell， C.， & Ounis， I. . Gauging students’ understanding through interactive lectures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science， 3112. ，2004.
[66] Roselli， R. J.， & Brophy， S. P. . Exploring an electronic polling system for the assessment of student progress in two biomedical engineering courses. Presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition， Montreal， Canada. ，2002.
[67] Seligman， M. E. P. . Helplessness. San Francisco： W. H. Freeman. ，1975.
[68] Simpson， V.， & Oliver， M. . Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now： A comparison of research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology， 23(2)， 187-208. ，2007.
[69] Singh， H. . Building effective blended learning programs. Education Technology， 43(6)， 51-54. ，2003.
[70] Skinner， B.F. . The shame of American education. American Psychologists， 39， 941-945，1984.
[71] Usta， E.， & Ozdemir， S. M. An analysis of students’ opinions about blended learning environment. Paper presented at the International Educational Technology (IETC) Conference. Nicosia， Turkey. ，2007.
[72] Vaughan， N.， & Garrison， D. R. Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. The Internet and Higher Education， 8(1)， 1-12.，2005.
[73] Wallace， S.， & Yu， H. The Effect of Culture on Usability： Comparing the Perceptions and Performance of Taiwanese and North American MP3 Player Users. Journal of usability Studies， 4(3)， 136-14，2009