隨著臺灣市區道路路網發展成熟，各道路主管機關面臨龐大的道路養護面積與養護經費等問題，如何在有限資源達到最大的養護成效，成為一項重要的議題。以臺北市為例，其現行巡查維護作業中缺乏一套客觀的破壞查報標準，且過去道路養護作業係待鋪面破壞至一定程度時，再採取方正銑鋪或局部刨鋪方式進行缺失改善，容易導致道路結構破壞、路面不平整以及重複刨鋪之環境汙染與經費浪費等問題。因此，本研究將試驗道路北側導入預防性養護觀點進行破壞查報及維護作業，即鋪面破壞初期便進行缺失改善，同時採用新式修補材料與工法以及封層工法等進行鋪面修復，避免方正銑鋪破壞道路結構以及重複刨鋪耗費經費等問題，達到及早預防鋪面缺失之目標，相較於試驗道路南側維持現行巡查維護作業，試驗道路北側之養護方式在維持或改善PCI值及IRI值較具有成效。此外，本研究亦針對試驗道路北側剝脫路段，分別採用噴霧封層及稀漿封層進行養護，藉由現地追蹤檢測得知，不管是噴霧封層或稀漿封層針對剝脫破壞皆具有良好養護成效，其鋪設完工後至少9個月內皆未有剝脫或細微裂縫等破壞產生。最後本研究根據交通部國道高速公路局「高速公路養護手冊」定義之各項輕級或中級破壞作為修復判定標準之建議，彙整新式修補材料與工法以及封層工法的應用與成效，提出以預防性養護導入市區道路巡查維護作業之策略初擬，期許提供相關道路主管機關改善現行巡查制度及鋪面養護之參考。

As the network in urban roads of Taiwan has been well-developed, the administrations face difficulties of the huge maintenance funding. How to achieve the maximum maintenance effect with limited resources has become an important topic. In the case of Taipei city, the inspection and maintenance operations are lacked of objective criteria for distress rating. In the past, the pavement distress was repaired by milling and maintenance treatment. It’s lead to the destruction of the road structure easily, even cause environmental pollution and waste of funds. The preventive maintenance was adopted to the inspection and maintenance operations in this research. Also, use the repair materials and seal treatment instead of rehabilitation treatment to achieve the timely maintenance and preservation activities. Compared with the currently inspection and maintenance operations, applied preventive maintenance to the inspection and maintenance operations is more effective improvement in PCI and IRI value. In addition, fog seal and slurry seal are selected to evaluate assessment of field application and their performance, such as BPN and MPD. By short term performance results, we know that the fog seal and slurry seal both have improved the stripping distress at least 9 months. According to the result of the repair materials and seal treatment results and the preventive maintenance is helpful for urban road service quality. Based on above, the research proposed a preventive maintenance strategic for Taipei City Hall to the inspection and maintenance operations in urban road system.

ASTM Standard. D6433-16 (2016). “Standard Practice of Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys”, American Society of Testing and Materials, ASTM International, Pennsylvania, USA.
ASTM Standard. E303-93 (2013). “Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester”, American Society of Testing and Materials, ASTM International, Pennsylvania, USA.
ASTM Standard. E1845-15 (2015). “Standard Practice for Calculating Pavement Macrotexture Mean Profile Depth”, American Society of Testing and Materials, ASTM International, Pennsylvania, USA.
ASTM Standard. E2157-15 (2015). “Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Macrotexture Properties Using the Circular Track Meter”, American Society of Testing and Materials, ASTM International, Pennsylvania, USA.
ASTM Standard. E1926-08 (2015). “Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Texture Drainage Using an Outflow Meter”, American Society of Testing and Materials, ASTM International, Pennsylvania, USA.
Asphalt Emulsion Manufacturers Association (2009). Recommended Performance Guidelines for Emulsified Asphalt Slurry Seal, AEMA, Washington, DC.
Asphalt Institute (1996). Asphalt in Pavement Maintenance: MS-16, AI, Kentucky, USA.
Brennen Urbanek, DingXin Cheng, Brandon Fraser, & Lerose Lane (2013). “2013 Caltrans Fog or Rejuvenating Seal Pilot Projects in Northern California (No. CP2C-2013-101)”, California Pavement Preservation Center, California.
D. G. Peshkin, T. E. Hoerner, & K. A. Zimmerman (2004). “Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications”, National Cooperation Highway Research Program Report 523, Washington, DC.
Douglas D. Gransberg, & Daivd M. B. James (2005). “Chip Seal Best Practice: A Synthesis of Highway Practice”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
D. G. Peshkin, K. L. Smith, A. Wolters, & J. Krstulovich (2011) “Preservation Approaches for High-Traffic-Volume Roadways”, Strategic Highway Research Program, Report S2-R26-RR-1 Washington, DC.
Frank B. Holt, & Wade L. Gramling (1991). Pavement Management Implementation, American Society of Testing and Materials, ASTM International, Pennsylvania, USA.
Federal Highway Administration (1999). Materials and Proceduresfor Sealing and Filling Cracks in Asphalt-Surfaced Pavements, FHWA, Washington, DC.
Gayle King, & Helen King (2008). “Spray Applied Emulsion Preventive Maintenance Treatments: FHWA Research Study”, 1st Sprayed Sealing Conference, Australia.
Hao Wang, & Zilong Wang (2013). “Evaluation of Pavement Surface Friction Subject to Various Pavement Preservation Treatments”, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 48, pp.194-202.
International Slurry Surfacing Association (2001). “Recommended Performance Guidelines For Micro-Surfacing”, ISSA A143.
Jeong Hyuk Im, & Y. Richard Kim (2015). “Performance Evaluation of Fog Seals on Chip Seals and Verification of Fog Seal Feld Tests”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 11, pp.872-880.
Joseph Ponniah, Seyed Tabib, Becca Lane, & Chris Raymond (2010). “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Mix Types to Reduce Noise Level at the Tire/Pavement Interface”, Advances in Pavement Design and Construction Session of 2010 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada.
Michael S. Mamiouk, & John P. Zaniewski (1998). “Pavement Preventive Maintenance: Description, Effectiveness, and Treatments”, Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation and Maintenance, ASTM STP 1348, pp.121-135.
R. Gary Hicks, Stephen B. Seeds., David G. Peshkin, & Daleiden, J. (2000). Selecting a Preventive Maintenance Treatment for Flexible Pavements, Washington, DC: Foundation for Pavement Preservation.
Son, H. J., Kim, Y. J., Baek, J. E., Lim, J. K., & Kim, B. I. (2015). “Field Performance Evaluation of Micro-surfacing Method and Polymer Slurry Seal Method Used in National Highway”, International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.17-24.
Shakir Shatnawi, & Brian D. Toepfer (2003). “Fog Seal Guidelines”, State California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), California, USA.
Shu Zhibiao, & Guo Yanqing (2010). “Algorithm on Contourlet Domain in Detection of Road Cracks for Pavement Images”, Algorithms & Computational Technology, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.15-25.
Wenbing Song, Xin Chen, Timothy Smith, & Adel Hedfi (2006). “Investigation of Hot Mix Asphalt Surfaced Pavements Skid Resistance in Maryland State Highway Network System”, Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
Yong-Joo Kim, Jae-Kuy Lim, Hyeon-Jang Son, Sooahn-Ahn Kwon, Jae-Cheng Hong, & Hyun-Jin Shin. (2013). “Field Evaluation of Surface Treatments on Existing Asphalt Pavement in National Highway”, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 723, pp.745-752.
Zaniewski, J. P., & M. S. Mamlouk (1996). “Pavement Maintenance Effectiveness—Preventive Maintenance Treatments”, Participant's Manual, Report FHWA-SA-96-027. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation.
公益社団法人日本道路協会，舗装調査・試験法便覧，2007年。
公益社団法人日本道路協会，舗装の維持修繕ガイドブック2013，2013年。
交通部國道高速公路局，「高速公路養護手冊」，交通部臺灣區國道高速公路局技術規範，2017年。
呂佳玲，「市區道路平坦度評估準則之探討」，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學土木工程學系，2003年。
朱宏偉、項琴、唐樹名，「路面預防性養護的研究現狀及發展趨勢」，中外公路，第二十八卷，第六期，第88-91頁，2008年。
李國楨，「以國際摩擦指標評估鋪面抗滑性之研究」，碩士論文，中華大學土木工程學系，2006年。
吳俊明，「台灣現行修補材料運用於柔性鋪面表層裂縫與坑洞修補之耐久性初步探討」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，2016年。
林濬哲，「鋪面養護再生劑之效能探究」，碩士論文，中華大學土木工程學系，2005年。
林嘉宏，「鋪面紋理與摩擦力關聯性之初步研究」，碩士論文，逢甲大學交通工程與管理所，2008年。
林釗傑，「機場跑道剛性鋪面抗滑值與胎屑清除之研究—以臺灣桃園國際機場為例」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，2010年。
林昆虎，「市區道路網級鋪面管理架構建立之研究-以臺北市為例」，博士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，2015年。
范良鑫，「噴霧封層應用於橋面版鋪面可行性之研究」，碩士論文，國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系，2008年。
張孟孔、陳建旭、許阿明，「評估鋪面平坦度檢測指標之探討」，台灣公路工程，第三十三卷，第七期，第320-362頁，2007年。
陳韋伃，「以車載藍光雷射建構國道鋪面抗滑值與二維紋理之關聯模型」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，2016年。
曾志煌、張昭芸，全國鋪面管理系統建置規劃，中華民國政府出版品，2011年。
經濟部標準檢驗局，「慣性剖面儀量測鋪面縱向剖面試驗法(CNS 15046)」，中華民國國家標準，2014年。
劉建志，「平坦度檢測儀器適用性比較與規範」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，2011年。