探究（inquiry）在科學教育中非常重要，融入探究教學與專題學習元素的科學探究專題屬於開放式探究，可以促使學生使用科學探究（scientific inquiry）的態度進行發掘問題、研究設計與探索、討論並產生結果，培養學生學習的自主性與問題解決的能力。為了幫助科學探究專題的進行，本研究之主要目的為開發「科學探究專題平台」，基於知識翻新理論與現場教師及數位學習教育研究者討論，並參考國內外相關系統進行系統的規劃與設計，提供學習鷹架（scaffolds）與輔助工具，幫助學生進行科學探究專題，並透過討論工具的想法圖像化呈現與學習歷程分析工具，讓學生便利地看出整體學習歷程，能夠進行反思同時調整自己的學習狀態。系統開發完成後，本研究採用「問卷調查法」（questionnaire survey）的方式，研究對象為32位教師蒐集問卷資料，評估教師對系統的整體知覺有用性、整體知覺易用性、整體使用意願以及系統提供之鷹架功能與輔助工具的知覺有用性，並收集教師建議與回饋。研究結果發現多數受測教師對於「科學探究專題平台」的整體知覺有用性、整體知覺易用性、整體使用意願以及系統提供之鷹架功能與輔助工具的知覺有用性都給予正面的回饋。最後根據本研究之結果，提出對系統的建議，做為未來研究與系統改善之參考。

Scientific inquiry is a very important part of science education. In the process of scientific inquiry project-based learning, students need to combine their experiences to discover problems and come out with their ideas and theories. During the scientific inquiry project-based learning, students can improve their learning autonomy and problem-solving ability. To support students in scientific inquiry project-based learning, the “Online Science Project Learning Platform” (OSPLP) was developed in this study. The OSPLP provides several learning scaffolds and tools based Knowledge Building Theory. For example, through the graphical presentation of ideas in discussion tools and learning process analysis tools, students can easily see the overall learning process to reflect on them and adjust their learning status. After the platform was developed, a preliminary study was conducted. The participants were 32 Taiwanese teachers. Their perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and intention of use of the OSPLP were assessed. Also, their perceived usefulness of learning scaffolds and tools was evaluated. The participant teachers expressed positive feedback and had the intention to use the system in teaching students in scientific inquiry project-based learning. Based on the results of this study, some suggestions for the platform and future research were also discussed.

呂弘暉、林惠敏（2010）。問題解決導向學習在大學通識課程之操作檢視─以《家庭與人際關係：經典劇本導讀》為例。止善，8，71-96。
林建良、黃台珠（2005）。專題導向式學習的網路知識整合教學模式之初探。「結合理論與實務之科學教學」中華民國第21屆科學教育學術研討會發表之論文，國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
林倍伊、林顯達、李佩蓉、詹雯靜、洪國財、洪煌堯（2016）。在不同模式的電腦支援協作學習環境下，師培生理解教學理論層次之差異-以 Blackboard 和 Knowledge Forum 為例。資訊社會研究，31，71-108。
洪煌堯、蔡佩真、林倍伊（2014）。透過知識創新教學理念與學習平臺以培養國小學生自然課合作學習與翻新想法的習慣。科學教育學刊，22（4），413－439。
教育部（2005）。科學教育白皮書。台北市，教育部。
教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要-自然科學領域。台北市，教育部。
陳儒晰（2012）。幼兒運用電腦軟體輔助英語識字，人際互動與電腦操作之探究。教育研究學報，46（2），67-84。
黃嘉眉（2020）。以想法為中心的合作科學探究學習平台之系統開發與初步評估（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文，桃園市。
潘淑琦（2006）。資訊融入「自然與生活科技探究」領域之行動研究─以探究教學活動設計為例。生活科技教育，39（7），87-107。
蔡宛庭（2016）。支援科學專題學習之線上學習平台開發與評估。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文，桃園市。
鄭如雯（2008）。專題式學習探析及其在教育上的啟示。學校行政雙月刊，57，147-164。
 
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naamn, R., Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419.
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and children, 46(2), 26.
Bencze, J. L., & Bowen, G. M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy.International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2459-2483.
Bybee, R. W. (2011). Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms. Science Teacher, 78(9), 34-40.
Chen, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge-building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266-288.
Dewey, J. (1910).How We Think.New York: Prometheus Books.
Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258-291.
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483-497.
Krajcik, J. S. & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), the Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge.
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 607-636.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.
Popper, K. (1979). Three worlds. University of Michigan.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society, 97, 67-98.
Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Education and technology: An encyclopedia (pp. 183-192). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the learning sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. Encyclopedia of distributed learning, 269-272.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
Wilhelm, J., Sherrod, S., & Walters, K. (2008). Project-based learning environments: Challenging preservice teachers to act in the moment. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(4), 220-233.