| 研究生: |
吳佳珍 Jia Zhen Wu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
國安基金第七次護盤對航空雙雄股價與股價報酬率之影響-運用Ohlson模型 The Effect of the 7th round of National Stabilization Fund intervention on the stock prices and returns of the two major airlines in Taiwan, Eva Air and China Airlines-An Application of Ohlson Model |
| 指導教授: |
黃泓人
Hong-ren Huang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系在職專班 Executive Master of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 53 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 國安基金 、護盤期間 、Ohlson評價模型 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | National Stabilization Fund, Providing Supports Period, Ohlson equity valuation model |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:24 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文是分析自國安基金成立以來多次護盤事件中以第7次護盤政策,在研究期間探討護盤政策對於國內外發生重大事件、引起投資人信心低落導致股市大跌,國家安定金融基金操作策略多以透過買入大型權值股以穩定台灣股票市場,其中因新冠疫情肆虐影響全球供應鏈導致全世界股市大跌許多國家紛紛執行鎖國政策導致航空業者受到巨大的衝擊,全球多個航空業紛紛面臨倒閉的危機,我國也限制外國旅客進出衝擊航空產業,在嚴峻的環境下若國安基金護盤政策對於航空股有正面影響,相信其他產業及台灣股票市場的跌勢能獲得緩解,投資人恐慌心理能夠受到有效的控制。因此本次研究檢測航空業雙雄-華航及長榮航股價報酬率及股價,應用Ohlson評價模型對財務面資訊,如:每股盈餘、負債比率,流動比率,股東權益報酬率…等,及非財務面變數,如十大股東持股率、台股加權指數、美元匯率…等。在國安基金第七次護盤事件中,檢測航空業雙雄股價報酬率及股價在護盤政策下之影響。研究發現在護盤期間對個股報酬率並無直接的影響,而台股加權指數對個股報酬率在護盤期間有顯著的正向影響。而利用Ohlson評價模型進行實證,結果財務資訊對華航股價在非護盤期間及護盤期間皆有正面影響;對於長榮航空的財務變數中負債比率在護盤期間與其他時間有顯著正向影響。
This article analyzes the 7th round of market stabilization policies implemented by the National Stabilization Fund (NSF) during multiple market turbulence events since its establishment. During the research period, the study examines the impact of the stabilization policies on the domestic and global stock markets, particularly during significant events that cause a decline in investor confidence. The NSF's operational strategy focuses on stabilizing the Taiwan stock market by buying weighted stocks. However, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the global supply chain, leading to a global stock market crash. Many countries have implemented lockdown policies, causing significant impacts on the aviation industry. Airlines around the world face the risk of bankruptcy, and Taiwan also restricts foreign tourists, negatively affecting the tourism industry. This is a moment for comprehensive corporate health checks during negative impacts.
This study uses the Ohlson valuation model to evaluate financial information such as earnings per share, debt ratio, current ratio, and return on equity…etc., as well as non-financial variables such as the top ten shareholders' ownership ratio, the Taiwan Capitalization Weighted Stock Index, and the USD exchange rate…etc. The study examines the impact of the stabilization policies on the stock prices of Taiwan's two major airlines during the NSF's 7th round of market stabilization policies. The study found that individual stock returns were not directly affected during the stabilization period, but the Taiwan Capitalization Weighted Stock Index had a significant positive impact on individual stock returns and stock price. The empirical analysis using the Ohlson valuation model shows that financial information has a positive impact on China Airlines' stock prices both before and during the stabilization period. For EVA Air, the debt ratio had a significant positive impact during the stabilization period and other periods.
中文文獻
﹝1﹞ 馬黛、詹傑仲與胡德中 (2002),政府干預股市的理論與實證分析:台
灣股市的護盤實例,財務金融學刊,第10 卷,第3 期,頁 107-145。
﹝2﹞ 黃柏凱、臧大年、何加政與張元晨 (2006),“國安基金以期貨維護現貨
策略之分析”,管理學報,第23 卷,第1 期,頁125-147
﹝3﹞ 陳振遠、張智堯、王蘭芬與李文智 (2004),“應用Ohlson 會計評價模型探究
公司治理之價值攸關性—以台灣上市公司電子業為例”,臺大管理論叢JUN.
2005,第十五卷,第二期,P123-P142。
﹝4﹞ 袁同心,(2011),“財務比例、公司治理與總體經濟對財務危機公司股價之關聯
性─運用Ohlson模型”,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
﹝5﹞ 李庸三(Yung-San Lee);李建興(Jen-Sin Lee) (2012),“國安基金法規精進方
案與個股資訊應用之探討”,人文與社會學報, 3(1), 2012,P.1-21。
﹝6﹞ 陳達勳(2001),“市場情緒與股票報酬之研究”,國立政治大學國際貿易學系碩士
論文。
﹝7﹞ 彭昭揚(2007),“台灣生技產業公司價值衡量-Ohlson模型之應用”,東吳大學企業
管理學系碩士論文。
﹝8﹞ 王虹雯(2015),“公司治理、投資人情緒與股票報酬關聯性之研究-採用 Ohlson
模型”, 國立中正大學國際經濟所碩士論文。
﹝9﹞ 黃欣儀(2011),“研發支出、信用評等與總體經濟變數對半導體公司價值的影響
﹝10﹞ 鄭謂靜(2018),“影響航空公司經營績效的總體因素探討”淡江大學財務金融
學系碩士在職專班
英文文獻
﹝1﹞ Aboody, D. Market Valuation of Employee Stock Options. Journal of Accounting
and Economics. 22(1-3). 1996: 357-391.
﹝2﹞ Barth, M., M. Clement, G. Foster and R. Kasznik Brand Values and Capital Market
Valuation. Review of Accounting Studies. 3(1-2). 1998: 41-68.
﹝3﹞ Chen, C. Y. Investment Opportunities and Relation Between Equity Value and
Employees’ Bonus. Journal of Business Financial and Accounting. 30(7-8). 2003:
941-973.
﹝4﹞ Easton, P. D. Accounting Earnings and Security Valuation: Empirical Evidence of
The Fundamental Links. Journal of Accounting Research. 34(23). 1985: 54-77.
﹝5﹞ Easton, P. D. and T. S. Harris. Earnings as an Explanatory Variables for Returns.
Journal of Accounting Research. 29(1). 1991: 19-36.
﹝6﹞ Francis, J., P. Olsson, and D. R. Oswald. 2000“Comparing the accuracy and
explainability of dividend, free cash flow, and abnormal earnings equity value
estimates” Journal of Accounting Research38, pp.45-70.
﹝7﹞ Ohlson, J. A. Earnings, Book Value and Dividends in Equity Valuation.
Contemporary Accounting Research. 11(2). 1995: 661-667.
﹝8﹞ Oswald, S. L. and J. Jahera, Jr. The Influence of Ownership on Performance: An
Empirical Study. Strategic Management Journal. 12(4). 1991: 321-326.
﹝9﹞ Pengguo Wang.,2021.“A Modified Ohlson (1995) Model and Its Applications”
European Accounting Review DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2021.1993949
﹝10﹞ Young-Soo Choi,2010, Residual Income-based Equity Valuation: Augmentation of
Ohlson (1995) Model and its Validity, Labert .