跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許珮蓉
Pei Jung
論文名稱: 從企業型態探討創新活動行為─以家族與集團企業為例
The impcat of R&D activity on business category-take family firms and business group for example
指導教授: 洪榮華
Jung-Hua Hung
郭逸真
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 37
中文關鍵詞: 集團企業家族企業創新活動
外文關鍵詞: R&D investment, Family Firms, Business group
相關次數: 點閱:7下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 創新活動因資訊不對稱性高、風險性大,多仰賴企業內部資金進行投資。由於台灣屬於新興經濟體系國家的一份子,相較於已開發國家,市場機制不健全,法規制度薄弱,致使企業在發展創新活動的同時會受到資金上的限制,則本研究凸顯集團和家族這兩種不同的企業型態對於創新活動的差異性,集團企業可降低創新活動對於現金流量的敏感度,而家族企業則會仰賴內部資金從事創新活動,尤其在財務限制下,此關係更為顯著。


    Firms are so difficult to finance in the capital markets that they usually rely on internal funds to invest R&D projects, which often consist of high information asymmetry and high risk. Both business group and family firms have competitive advantage in capital markets, and therefore, this study investigates how the business groups and family firms in Taiwan influence R&D activities. The results support the hypothesis that contrary to family firms, business groups can mitigate the dependence on the cash flow when financing R&D investment. Moreover, this phenomenon is more obvious under the financially constrained business groups and family firms.

    論文摘要.....................................................................................................................I 英文摘要....................................................................................................................II 壹、 緒論.............................................................................................................1 貳、 文獻探討與假說推導.................................................................................4 一、 集團企業和創新活動的關係..............................................................5 二、 家族企業和創新活動的關係..............................................................8 參、 研究設計...................................................................................................11 一、 樣本篩選............................................................................................11 二、 樣本分類............................................................................................12 三、 實證模型............................................................................................15 肆、 實證結果與分析.......................................................................................19 一、 樣本敘述統計....................................................................................19 二、 基本實證結果....................................................................................21 三、 穩健性測試........................................................................................24 伍、 結論...........................................................................................................32 陸、 參考文獻...................................................................................................34

    1.沈中華、王建安(2000),「融資限制對公司投資的影響」,經濟論文,第28卷第1期,頁67-95
    2.林穎芬、劉維琪(2003),「從高階主管的研究探討代理理論在台灣的適用程度」,管理學報,第20卷第2期,頁365-395
    3.洪榮華、郭怡萍、李宜君(2007),「財務限制下集團企業特性對創新活動影響之研究」,財務金融學刊﹝已接受﹞
    4.倪衍森、廖容岑(2006),「家族企業負債代理成本及古禮政策之研究─以台灣上市公司為例」,管理與系統,第13卷第2期,頁153-79
    5.翁淑育(2000),「臺灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究」,輔仁大學金融所碩士論文
    6.葉銀華(1999),「家族控股集團、核心企業與報酬互動之研究─臺灣與香港證卷市場之比較」,管理評論,第18卷第2期,頁59-86
    7.鐘喜梅、劉韻僖、葉匡時(2003),「我國上市公司家族控制力與董事會運作關係之探討」,中山管理評論,第11卷第2期,頁341-365
    8.Aggarwal, R. K. and A. A. Samwick (2006), “Empire-builders and Shirkers: Investment, Firm Performance, and Managerial Incentives,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 12 pp.489-515
    9.Almedia, H., M. Campello and M. S. Weisbach (2004), “The Cash Flow Sensitivity of Cash,” Journal of Finance, 4 pp.1777-1804
    10.Ayadi O. F., B. Dufrene and C. P. Obi (1996), “Firm Performance Measures: Temporal Roadblocks to Innovation?,” Managerial Finance, 22(8) pp.18-32
    11.Bond, S. and C. Meghir (1994), “Dynamic Investment Models and The Firm’s Financial Policy,” Review of Economics Studies, 61 pp.197-222
    12.Carney, M. (2005), “Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family-Controlled Firms,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp.249-265
    13.Chauvin, K. W. and M. Hirschey (1993), “Advertising, R&D expenditure and the market value of the firm,” Financial Mangement, 22(4) pp.128-140
    14.Chrisman, J. J., J. H. Chua, and P. Sharma (2005), “Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm,” Entrepreneur Theory and Practice, pp.555-575
    15.Chung, C. N. (2001), “Markets, Culture and Institutions: The Emergence of Large Business Groups in Taiwan,1950s-1970s,” Journal of Management Studies, 38 pp.719-745
    16.Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang (2000), “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 58 pp.81-112
    17.Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan and L. H. P. Larry (2002), “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effect of Large Shareholdings,” Journal of Finance, 1(6) pp.2741-2771
    18.Claessens, S., J. P. H. Fan and L. H. P. Larry (2006), “The benefits and costs of group affiliation: Evidence from East Asia,” Emerging Markets Review, 7 pp.1-26
    19.George, R., R. Kabir and J. Qian (2005), “Is Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity a Good Measure of Financing Constraints? New Evidence from India Business Group Firms,” SSRN Working Paper
    20.Gubitta, P. and M. Gianecchini (2002), “Governance and Flexibility in Family-Owned SMEs,” Family Business Review, 15(4) pp.277-297
    21.Himmelberg, C. P. and B. C. Petersen (1994), “R&D and internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries,” The Receive of Economics and Statistics, 76 pp.38-51
    22.Hoshi, T., A. Kashyap and D. Scharfstein (1991), “Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups, ” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 pp.34-60
    23.Hosono K., M. Tomiyama, and T. Miyagawa (2004),“Corporate Governance and Research and Development: Evidence from Japan,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(2) pp.141-164
    24.Hyytinen, A. and O. Toivanen (2005), “Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth? Evidence on the role of public policy,” Research Policy ,34 pp.1385-1403
    25.Khanna, T. and K. Palepu (2000), “Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups,” The Journal of Finance, 55(2) pp.867-891
    26.Khanna, T. and J. W. Rivkin (2006), “Interorganizational Ties and Business Group Boundaries: Evidence from an Emerging Economy,” Organization Science, 17(3) pp.333-352
    27.James, H. S. (1999), “Owner as Manager, Extended Horizons and the Family Firm,” International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1) pp.41-55
    28.Lamont O., C. Polk and J. Saà-Requejo (2001), “Financial Constraints and Stock Returns,” Review of Financial Studies, 14(2) pp.529-554
    29.La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer (1999), “Corporate Ownership around the World,” Journal of Finance, 54 pp.471-517
    30.Lie, E. (2005), “Financial Flexibility, Performance, and the Corporate Payout Choice,” Journal of Business, 78(6) pp. 2179-2201
    31.Maestro, M. H.,A. D. Miguel and J. Pindado (2001), “Financial Constraints: Models and Evidence from International Data,” EFMA 2001 Lugano Meetings
    32.Mahmood, I. P. and W. Mitchell (2004), “Two Faces: Effects of Business Groups on Innovation in Emerging Economies,” Management Science, 50(10) pp.1348-1365
    33.Maurer, B. (1999), “Innovation and investment under financial constraints and product market competition,” International Journal of Industrial Organization , 17 pp.455-476
    34.Miller, D. and I. Le Breton-Miller (2006), “Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities,” Family Business Review, 19(1) pp.73-87
    35.Reyes B. M. (2004), “R&D Intensity and Financing Constraints,” Journal of Business and Economic Studies, l0(2) pp.38-53
    36.Morck, R. and B. Yeung (2003), “Agency Problems in Large Family Business Groups,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp.367-382
    37.Morck, R. and B. Yeung (2004), “Family Control and the Rent-Seeking Society,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp.391-409
    38.Shaller, H. (1993), “Asymmetry Information , Liquidity Constraints, and Canadian Investment,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 3 pp.553-574
    39.Schulze, W. S., M. L. Lubatkin, and R. N. Dino (2002), “Altruism, Agency, and the Competitiveness of Family Firms,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 4(5) pp.247-259
    40.Villalonga, B. and R. Amit (2006), “How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?,” Journal of Financial Economics, 80 pp.385-417

    QR CODE
    :::