摘要
本研究採用Ohsaki所提出的相位角產生方式和三角級數法，透過改變產生亂數的種數，建立十個能包絡日本兩種不同功能的岩盤設計反應譜的人工地震。所產生的人工地震則用來進行盆地地形和側向非均勻土層的彈塑性受震反應分析，並與相對應的一維土層模式的結果做比較。之後再以一維和二維土層模式所得的地表地震動進行一棟十樓建築物歷時分析，以最大層間變位角為參數，探討結構物受震反應。
研究的結果發現，在盆地地形的分析例中，於強震作用下，使用一維模式將會低估地表地震動反應與最大層間變位；而受到弱震作用時，在邊坡場址使用一維土層分析的結果比較保守，但在盆地中央則會低估地表受震反應。在側向不均勻土層例中，二維土層模式的地表受震反應大於一維土層模式。產生人工地震的種數對於層間變位角有相當大的影響；此外，規範中建議的使用多個人工地震產生的最大層間變位角之平均值來代表結構性能的作法，會受到所選取的樣本的影響，有必要做進一步的檢討，我們的建議是應該要加上標準偏差的規定。

ABSTRACT
In this study, the concept proposed by Ohsaki to generate artificial earthquake is adopted. By varying seed numbers, ten artificial earthquakes which envelop Japan two-level bedrock design spectrum are generated. These ten artificial earthquakes are then used as input for the response analysis of a two-dimensional basin, a soil stratum with lateral inhomogeneity and associated 1D model. Each of the computed surface ground motion are then served as input to a ten-story steel building and the maximum story drift ratio are computed.
For a basin subjected to strong bed-rock motion, the 1D model underestimates the surface motions and the maximum story drift ratio of the building; however, when the bed-rock motion is weak, the 1D analysis gives higher responses near the edge of basin, while the response of this trend is reversed in the middle of the basin. The results of 2D analysis are larger than those of 1D model on soil stratum with lateral inhomogeneity. The seed number has significant effect on maximum story drift ratio. On the other hand, the results of currently adopted average process given in the code are affected by how samples are chosen and a clear guideline should be developed. We suggested that a specification on Standard Deviation should be imposed.

參考文獻
1.FEMA 368,NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Requlation for New Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000.
2.王俊銘，「符合設計譜人工地震之相位角對樓版反應譜之影響」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，民國八十九年六月。
3.大崎順彥，「新‧地震動解析入門」，鹿島出版社，1999（日文）。
4.Ohsaki, Y., “On the Phase Significance of Phase Content in Earthquake Ground Motions,” Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.7, pp.427-439, 1979.
5.黃俊才，「考慮地震引致地下水位變動的土壤結構互制分析」，博士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢，民國八十三年六月。
6.王明輝，「不規則地盤之二維非線性受震反應分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢，民國八十五年六月。
7.Carr A. J.，“ RUAUMOKO-Inelastic Dynamic Analysis,” 9 University of Canterbury Department of Civil Engineering，15 March 2000.
8.Hamburger, R.O., “Implementing Performance Based Seismic Design in Structural Engineering Practice,” Proceedings of 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2121,Acapulco,Mexico,1996.
9.Bertero,V.V.,”The Need for Multi-Level Seismic Design Criteria,” Proceedings of 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2120, Acapulco, Mexico, 1996.
10.歐陽毅，「功能設計法之層間變位檢核需求探討」，碩士論文，私立中原大學土木工程學系，民國九十年七月。
11.羅俊雄、鄧崇任、簡文郁、柴駿甫、廖文義，「容量設計法應用於建築結構耐震設計之探討（期中報告）」，內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告，民國九十年六月。
12.Peter Fajfar, M. EERI ,”A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Base Seismic Design,” Earthquake Spectra, Volume 16 ,No. 3,August 2000.
13.Farzad Naeim and Marshall Lew ,”Deficiencies of Design Spectrum Compatible Accelerograms,” The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, Vol. 3,275-283,1994.
14.The Research Subcommittee on the Earthquake Ground motion，”Design Ground motion in the Revised Enforcement Order of the Building Standard,” October 2001.
15. ，“ ”, ,pp. 621-622, October 1987.
16.FEMA 273,NEHRP Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
17.Pappin, J.W., Lubkowski, Z.A. and King, R.A., “The Significance of Site Response Effects on Performance Based Design,” Proceedings of 11 th World Conference on Earth -quake Engineering ,Paper No. 1192 Auckland New Zealand ,January 2000.
18.「建築物耐震設計規範及解說」，內政部建築研究所，民國九十年七月。
19.郭人瑞，「盆地地形受震反應之二維分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢，民國八十六年六月。
20.侯政成，「盆地地形之非線性受震反應」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，中壢，民國八十七年六月。
21.裴廣宇，「側向非均勻土層之地表受震反應」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程系，中壢，民國九十一年六月。
22.Akiyoshi, T., Fuchida, K. and Fang, H. L., “Absorbing Boundary Conditions for Dynamics Analysis of Fluid-Saturated Porous Media,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.13, pp.387-397,1994.
23.陳護升，「含加勁阻尼裝置鋼構架之設計與分析」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系，民國八十三年六月。
24.Moczo, P. Labak, P. and Rovelli, A., “Effects of the Lateral Heterogeneity beneath Roman Colosseum on Seismic Ground Motion,” Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria,pp.377-383,1994.
25.羅俊雄、溫國樑、簡文郁、鄧崇任等，「考慮區域近斷層效應及均佈危害度之設計地震力需求」，，內政部建築研究所研究計畫成果報告，民國八十九年十月。
26.Juin-Fu Chai , Chin-Hsiung Loh and Tadanobu Sato,”Modeling of Phase Spectrum to Design Ground Motion”, Journal of Chinese Institute of Engineers, Vol.25, No.4 ,pp. 447-459,2002.
27.A.J. Anastasiadis and N.S. Klimis, “Effect of Soil Non-Linearities and Site Characteristics on Evaluation of Site Coefficients,” All rights reserved 12 th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper Reference 498.Greece,2000.
28.胡聿賢，「地震工程學」，地震出版社，1988。
29.謝舜傑，「建築耐震法規有關性能式耐震規定之探討」，結構工程雜誌，第十六期，第19～35頁，民國九十年九月。
30.邱宏智，「場址對地震波的效應」，地工技術雜誌，第27期，第 92-104頁，民國七十八年九月。
31.陳正興，「未固結土壤對地震波放大效應之實例研究」，地工技術雜誌，第30期，第32-59頁，民國七十九年六月。