在日常生活中，我們隨處都能看到許多的廣告，在廣告中經常有模特兒出現以吸引消費者，此外有時會搭配廣告詞使廣告更加豐富。因此本研究想探討廣告中的模特兒的動作表情(例如笑容、眼神、手勢等等)、廣告模特兒和產品的互動性、廣告標語會如何影響消費者的廣告態度、了解意願以及產品態度。本研究採實驗研究法進行四個實驗，以大學生為研究對象，主要研究結果如下：
一、證實在感性廣告訴求下有較高的廣告態度、了解意願以及產品態度，相對於理性廣告訴求時。
二、證實對於低風險知覺者，笑和眼神有交互作用，廣告模特兒在眼神直視時笑比不笑有較高的廣告態度、了解意願以及產品態度；對於高風險知覺者，笑和眼神沒有交互作用。
三、證實廣告模特兒手勢張開有較高的廣告態度和產品態度，相對於手勢交叉時。
四、證實在低涉入情境下，廣告模特兒笑比不笑有較高的廣告態度；在高涉入情境下，笑容沒有顯著差異。
五、證實廣告模特兒與產品互動有較高的廣告態度、了解意願以及產品態度，相對於廣告模特兒與產品無互動時。
六、證實在送禮的購買目的訴求下，廣告中模特兒與產品有互動會有較高的廣告態度、了解意願以及產品態度；在自用的購買用途訴求下，廣告中模特兒與產品有無互動對廣告態度、了解意願、產品態度沒有顯著差異。

In our daily life, we see lots of advertisements everywhere. There are models in advertisements to attract consumers, sometimes appearing with advertising slogans to rich it.
Therefore, this research want to know how the model’s gesture, facial expression in advertisements (e.g. Smile, eye contact and arm gesture), the interaction between model and products, advertising slogan to influence consumers’ attitude toward advertisement, willing to know product, and attitude toward product. This research developed four experiments with experimental design, and used college students to be research subjects. The results indicate that:

1.The advertisement with emotional appeal has higher attitude toward advertisement, willing to know product, and attitude toward product.
2.For low-risk perceivers, smile and eye contact have interaction effect. When the model is direct eye contact, smile have higher attitude toward advertisement, willing to know product, and attitude toward product than model is not smile. For high-risk perceivers, smile and eye contact do not have interaction effect.
3.When the model in advertisement is open arm, there are a higher attitude toward advertisement, and attitude toward product, compare to the model with close arm.
4.In low-involvement situation, the model with smile has higher attitude toward product, compare to the model with no smile. In high-involvement situation, smile doesn’t have significant effect on attitude toward advertisement, willing to know product, and attitude toward product.
5.When the model has an interaction with products, there are higher attitude toward advertisement, willing to know product, and attitude toward product, comparing to the model doesn’t have an interaction with products.
6.For the advertisement with gift-giving appeal, when the model has an interaction with products, there are higher attitude toward advertisement, willing to know product, and attitude toward product. For the advertisement with self-use appeal, whether the model has an interaction with product or not, there are no significant influence on attitude toward advertisement, willing to know product, and attitude toward product.

中文部分
1.林建煌，2014。行銷管理，六版，華泰文化事業有限公司。
2.祝鳳岡，1996。廣告理性訴求策略之策略分析，廣告學研究，第八集，國立政治大學廣告學系，1-26頁。
3.祝鳳岡，1995。廣告感性訴求策略之策略分析，廣告學研究，第五集，國立政治大學廣告學系，85-112頁。
英文部分
1. Aaker, D. A., & Norris, D. (1982),“ Characteristics of TV Commercials Perceived as Informative,”Journal of Advertising Research, 22(2), 61-70.
2.Adams, R. B., & Kleck, R. E. (2003), “Perceived Gaze Direction and the Trocessing of Facial Displays of Emotion,” Psychological Science, 14(6), 644–647.
3.Baudouin, J. Y., Gilibert, D., Sansone, S., & Tiberghien, G. (2000), “ When the Smile is a Cue to Familiarity,” Memory, 8(5), 285–292.
4. Bauer, R. A. (1960), “ Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking,” in Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, ed. R. S. Hancock, Chicago:American Marketing Association, 389-398.
5. Belk, R. W. (1975), “Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2(3), 157-164.
6. Belk, R. W. (1982), “Effects of Gift-giving Involvement on Gift Selection Strategies,” Advances in Consumer Research, 9(1), 408-412.
7. Burgoon, M. (1989), “Messages and Persuasive Effects,” in Message Effects in Communication Science, ed. J. J. Bradac, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 129-164.
8. Campbell, M. C., & Goodstein, R. C. (2001), “The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers’ Evaluations of Product Incongruity: Preference for the Norm,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 439–449.
9. Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988), “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210-224.
10. Cox, D. F., ed. (1967), “Risk Handling in Consumer Behavior - An Intensive Study of Two Cases,” in Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior ed. D. F. Cox, Boston: Harvard University Press, 34-81.
11. Caballero, M. J., & Pride, W. M. (1984), “Selected Effects of Salesperson Sex and Attractiveness in Direct Mail Advertisements,” The Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 94-100.
12. Chaiken, S. (1979), “Communicator Physical Attractiveness and Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 37(8), 1387-1397.
13. Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994), “A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-handling Activity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 119-134.
14. Harrigan, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1983), “Physicians’ Head and Body Positions as Determinants of Perceived Rapport,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13(6), 496–509.
15. Hayes, S. C., Gifford, E. V., & Ruckstuhl Jr., L. E. (1996),“ Relational Frame Theory and Executive Function: A Behavioral Approach,” in Attention, Memory, and Executive Function, ed. G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor, Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Co, 297-305.
16. Houston, M. J., & Rothschild, M. L. (1978), “Conceptual and Methodological Perspectives on Involvement,” in Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, ed. S. C. Jain, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 184-187.
17. Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991), “Value-expressive Versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal,” Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 23–33.
18. Kanfer, F. H., & Karoly, P. (1972), “ Self-control: A Behavioristic Excursion into the Lion’s Den,” Behavior Therapy, 3(3), 398–416.
19. Knapp, M. L. (1978), Social Intercourse: From Greeting to Goodbye, Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
20.Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. M. (1985), “ Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A social Adaptation Perspective,” Journal of consumer research,11(4), 954-961.
21. Kotler, P., (2000), Marketing Management: Millenium Edition, 10th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
22. Krugman, H. E. (1965), “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 349-356.
23. Lau, S. (1982), “The Effect of Smiling on Person Perception,” The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(1), 63–67.
24. Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1961), “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 25(6), 59-62.
25. Lobmaier, J. S., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2008), “Emotional Expression Modulates Perceived Gaze Direction,” Emotion, 8(4), 573–577.
26. Lutz, R. J. (1991), “The Role of Attitude Theory in Marketing,” in Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, ed. H.H. Harold & T.S Robertson , Scott Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL, 317-339.
27. Lutz, K. A., & Lutz, R. J. (1977), “ Effects of Interactive Imagery on Learning: Application to Advertising,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 493–498.
28. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989), “An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context,”Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65.
29. Mick, D. G., & Demoss, M. (1990), “Self-gifts: Phenomenological Insights from Four Contexts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 322-332.
30. Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981), “Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude ? ” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318-332.
31. Moore, F., Sandage, C. H., & Fryburger, V. (1976), “Advertising Theory and Practice,” Journal of Marketing, 40(1), 113-123.
32. Mueller, B. (1987), “Reflections of Culture: An Analysis of Japanese and American Advertising Appeals, ” Journal of Advertising Research, 27(3), 51-59.
33. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000), “ Self-regulation and Depletion of Limited Resources: Does Self-control Resemble a Muscle,” Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259.
34. Otta, E., Lira, B. B. P., Delevati, N. M., Cesar, O. P., & Pires, C. S. G. (1994), “ The Effect of Smiling and of Head Tilting on Person Perception,” The Journal of Psychology, 128(3), 323–331.
35. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
36. Petroshius, S. M., & Crocker, K. E. (1989), “An Empirical Analysis of Spokesperson Characteristics on Advertisement and Product Evaluations,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17(3), 217-225.
37. Poor, M., Duhachek, A., & Krishnan, H. S. (2013), “How Images of Other Consumers Influence Subsequent Taste Perceptions,” Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 124–139.
38. Pönkänen, L. M., & Hietanen, J. K. (2012), “Eye Contact with Neutral and Smiling Faces: Effects on Autonomic Responses and Frontal EEG Asymmetry,”Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 475-484.
39. Reece, M. M., & Whitman, R. N. (1962), “Expressive Movements, Warmth, and Verbal Reinforcement, ” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(3), 234–236.
40. Reis, H. T., Wilson, I. M., Monestere, C., Bernstein, S., Clark, K., Seidl, E. Radoane, K. (1990), “What is Smiling is Beautiful and Good,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(3), 259–267.
41. Severson, H. H., Slovic, P., & Hampson, S. (1993), “Adolescents Perception of Risk: Understanding and Preventing High Risk Behavior,” Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 177-182.
42. Sherry, J. F. (1983), “ Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 157-168.
43. Stone, R. N., & Grønhaug, K. (1993), “Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline,” European Journal of Marketing, 27(3), 39–50.
44. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
45. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986), “Conceptualizing Involvement,” Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 4–34.