跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 洪翊芳
Yi-Fang Hong
論文名稱: 小孩扶養成本及家庭資源分配—台灣實證分析
The Measurement of Child Costs and Interhousehold Resource Allocation—Evidence from Taiwan
指導教授: 劉錦龍
Jin-Long Liu
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 產業經濟研究所
Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 100
中文關鍵詞: 家庭資源分配小孩扶養教育支出彷彿無相關模型
外文關鍵詞: interhousehold resource allocation, raising cost, expenditures of education, seemingly unrelated regressing model
相關次數: 點閱:14下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究係利用行政院「家庭收支抽樣調查」進行,主要利用93-94年、98-99年、103-104年資料中之一對夫妻無子家庭、一對夫妻一子家庭、一對夫妻二子家庭,共三種家庭類型進行探討,且因各模型誤差項之間有顯著之相關性,因此特以Seemingly unrelated regressing model做為本文之估計模型,首要評估在控制其他家庭特徵下,不同類型家庭以及不同時空背景下,小孩之個數、性別、年齡(小於等於6歲)是否使家庭各商品支出金額、份額有所改變。
    最後研究結果發現到: (1)母親對於小孩教育投入中扮演著重要之角色,當母親年紀越大以及母親參與職場,將明顯使教育投入增加,但隨年代推演,母親參與勞動市場對教育支出之提升效果有減緩之趨勢。(2)近來當家庭小孩數增加時,將更加重視整體之家庭休閒活動,有別於過往的減少休閒娛樂。(3)當家庭收入成長率較高時,對於各支出項金額均有顯著提升的效果。(4)當家中只有一名小孩,且其年紀小於等於6歲時,在部份年代中將顯著使父母親菸酒檳榔支出減少。(5)最後,當家庭越富有時,家庭將愈願意投入更多的金額與份額在教育支出上,因此家庭之間之貧富差距可能使不同家庭之小孩面臨著更不平等的待遇。

    關鍵字:家庭資源分配、小孩扶養、教育支出、彷彿無相關模型


    The sample is drawn from “The Survey on Family Income and Expenditure” which investigates from Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statists. We select three types of family where are childless married couples family, nucleus family with one child and nucleus family with two children. Due to the error terms of regressions are significantly correlated between each other, we select Seemingly Unrelated Regressing method as the estimated model. By control the household characteristics to estimate the effect of number of child, gender of child and whether child’s age under 6 years old for expenditures and share of household goods under the different type of family and times.
    The results indicated that: (1) If mother have the job, family will pay more on the expenditures of education past than in the now, and the age of mother and the household expenditures of education also have significantly positive related. So the mother is an important role for the expenditures of education. (2) When the number of child increase, parents will enhance the leisure activities of household. It is different from the past. (3) The growth of household income and the expenditures of household goods have significantly positive related. (4) When there is only one child, and its age is less than or equal to 6 years old, in some of the age will significantly reduce the expenditures of tobacco, alcohol, and betel nut. (5) Finally, when the family is richer, the family will be more willing to invest more money on education spending. Therefore, the gap between the rich and the poor family may make children had unequal treatment.

    Key word: interhousehold resource allocation, raising cost, expenditures of education, seemingly unrelated regressing model

    摘要...ii 英文摘要...iii 目錄...v 圖目錄...vii 表目錄...viii 第一章 緒論...1 第一節 研究背景與動機...1 第二節 研究目的...3 第三節 研究架構圖...4 第二章 政府兒童養育補助政策...5 第一節 生育獎金...6 第二節 育兒津貼...9 第三章 文獻回顧...10 第一節 家庭特徵對於商品份額之影響分析...10 第二節 家庭特徵對於小孩之影響分析...14 第四章 實證資料與研究方法...18 第一節 實證資料來源與限制...18 第二節 研究方法與模型...20 1.研究方法...20 2.實證模型...23 第三節 模型變數設定...25 1.應變數之設定...25 2.自變數之設定...26 3.總變數設定表...27 第四節 基本敘述統計...30 1.在不同類型家庭與不同年代下之支出金額基本統計量...30 2.在不同年代下之支出金額基本統計量...35 3.在不同類型家庭與不同年代下之支出份額基本統計量...37 4.在不同年代下之支出份額基本統計量...41 第五章 實證結果分析...43 第一節 支出金額探討...43 1.於不同年代與小孩數(0、1、2個)下之商品支出金額效果。...43 2.於不同年代與小孩數下之教育支出金額效果。...56 3.在不同年代下之各商品支出金額效果。...58 4.在不同年代下之教育支出金額效果。...63 第二節 支出份額探討...65 1.於不同年代與小孩數下之商品支出份額效果。...65 2.於不同年代與小孩數下之教育支出份額效果。...77 3.在不同年代下之各商品支出份額效果。...79 4.在不同年代下之教育支出份額效果。...83 第六章 結論與未來建議...85 第一節 結論...85 第二節 未來建議...87 中文參考文獻...88 英文參考文獻...89

    中文參考文獻
    內政部(2017),《人口年齡分配》,2017年5月9日取自於內政部資料庫:
    http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm

    中央情報局(2015),《世界概況》,2017年4月28日取自於:
    https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%90%84%E5%9B%BD%E7%94%9F%E8%82%B2%E7%8E%87%E5%88%97%E8%A1%A8

    行政院研究發展考核委員會(2012),《我國人口生育政策之研究》,台北: 行政院研究發展考核委員會

    國家發展委員會(2016),《中華民國人口推計》,台北,國家發展委員會。

    許菁君與劉錦龍(2003),「孩童養育成本衡量-台灣的實證研究」,《人文及社會科學集刊》,15(1) :113-143

    蔡宏政(2007),¬¬¬「台灣人口政策的歷史形構」,《台灣社會學刊》,39: 65-106。

    The News Lens (2014) ,《中研院:台灣生育率全球最低 將面臨生活水準降低》,2017年4月20日取自於:
    https://www.thenewslens.com/article/9147

    Yes123(2010),《上班族棄養下一代? 》,2017年5月8日取自於:
    https://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/index_detail.asp?id=20101019113548

    英文參考文獻
    Balli, Fabrizio, and Silvia Tiezzi. 2011. “Equivalence Scales, the Cost of Children and Household Consumption Patterns in Italy. ” Review of Economics of the Household, 8(4):527-549.

    Bargain, Olivier, and Olivier Donni. 2009. “The Measurement of Child Costs: A Rothbarth-Type Method Consistent with Scale Economies.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 4654

    Bargain, Olivier, and Olivier Donni. 2009. “The Measurement of Child Costs: Evidence from Ireland.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 4672

    Bargain, Olivier, Olivier Donni, and Prudence Kwenda. 2014. “Intrahousehold Distribution and Poverty: Evidence from Côte d'Ivoire. ” Journal of Development Economics, 107:262-276.

    Bhalotra, Sonia, and Cliff Attfield. 1998. “Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Rural Pakistan: A Semiparametric Analysis. ” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 13(5):463-480.

    Bonke, Jens, and Martin Browning. 2011. “Spending on Children: Direct Survey Evidence*. The Economic Journal, 121(8):F123-F143.

    Coley, Rebekah L., Jacqueline Sims, and Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal. 2016. “Family Expenditures Supporting Children Across Income and Urbanicity Strata. ” Children and Youth Services Review, 70:129-142.

    Dunbar, Geoffrey R., Arthur Lewbel, and Krishna Pendakur. 2013. “Children's Resources in Collective Households: Identification, Estimation, and an Application to Child Poverty in Malawi. ” American Economic Review, 103(1): 438-471.

    Hori, Masahiro, Nahoko Mitsuyama, and Satoshi Shimizutani. 2016. “New Evidence on Intra-Household Allocation of Resources in Japanese Households. ” Japanese Economic Review, 67(1):77-95.

    Kornrich, Sabino, and Frank Furstenberg. 2013. “Investing in Children: Changes in Parental Spending on Children, 1972–2007. ” Demography, 50(1):1-23.

    Liu, Jin L., and Ching C. Hsu. 2004. “Economies of Scale, Gender Discrimination, and Cost of Children. ” Applied Economics Letters, 11(6):377-382.

    Mangiavacchi, Lucia, and Luca Piccoli. 2011. “Improving the Measurement of Child Welfare in the Context of Intra-Household Inequality. ” Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2):226-232.

    Pashardes, Panos. 1991. “Contemporaneous and Intertemporal Child Costs. ” Journal of Public Economics, 45(2):191-213.

    QR CODE
    :::