本研究探討含斜撐構材之鋼管混凝土柱基礎接合耐震行為，藉由七組試體之軸向力與側向力組合載重試驗，探討埋置深度(Depth)、錨定螺桿(Anchor bolts)及錨定頭型加強鋼筋(T-headed bars)等參數與含斜撐柱基礎接合行為之關係。
研究結果顯示，含斜撐之柱基礎因斜撐加入致使基礎主要受軸向力控制，而非一般由彎矩控制，軸向拉力對基礎耐震行為之影響較其受軸向壓力時為大。當基礎受拉時，基礎內之三種抵抗機制將同時承受力量。當基礎埋置深度不足時，基礎混凝土會以應力錐型式碎裂，此時錨定頭型加強鋼筋會因無混凝土媒介，以致無法發揮其強度，然因錨定螺桿與鋼管混凝土柱底板之接合作用，基礎仍可繼續發揮其抗拉強度。實驗結果亦顯示，錨定頭型加強鋼筋與錨定螺桿對基礎強度發揮之貢獻，隨埋置深度增加而減低。

Concrete-filled tubes (CFT) have been studied for years, and have been proven to be effective structural forms that possess significant strength and ductility. Such performance is achieved through interaction between the steel and the concrete, because occurrence of tube buckling is delayed by in-filled concrete support and the compressive strength of concrete is also enhanced by the tube confinement. Current studies on the behavior of CFT are mostly focused on their compressive or beam-column responses. Information on the behavior of their column base connections is still limited. This study is focused on the evaluation of column base connection with brace member one side of the column.
Test results show that the seismic performance of column base connections with braces is governed by the combined lateral and axial tension. Resistance of base connection can be evaluated by the strength sum of the three component mechanisms: concrete bearing, anchor bolts and T-headed bars. Foundation concrete was found to fail in stress cone when insufficient CFT embedded depth was adopted. It is also found that strength requirements for T-headed bars and anchor bolts reduce when the embedded depths increase.

1.Furlong, R. W.（1967）, “Design of steel-encased concrete beam-columns”, Joumal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, ST5.
2.Furlong, R. W.（1968）, “Design of steel-encased concrete beam-columns”, Joumal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, ST1.
3.Ninakawa, T. and Sakino, K.（1996）, “Inelastic behavior of concrete filled circular steel tubular columns subjected to uniform cyclic bending moment”, Proc. 11th World Confer. Earthquake Eng., Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 1385.
4.Jaspart, J.P. and Vandegans, D. （1998）, “Application of the component method to column bases”, J. Construct. Steel Res., 48, pp. 89-106.
5.Pertold, J., Xiao, R.Y. and Wald, F.（2000）, “Embedded steel column bases Ⅱ.Design model proposal “, J. Construct. Steel Res., 56, pp. 271-286.
6.Yam, M.C.H and Cheng, J.J.R. (2002), “Behavior and design of gusset plate connections in compression”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 58 , pp. 1142-1159.
7.Sheng, N. ,Yam, C.H and Iu, V.P. (2002), “Analytical invertigation and the design of the compressive strehgth of steel gusset plate connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 58, pp. 1473-1493.
8.徐健一、陳正平 (1987)，“鋼構件在混凝土結構體上之錨定設計”，Journal of Strictural Enineering Vol.2, No3, July, pp. 11-25.
9.American Concrete Institute (1995), Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary, ACI 318-95, Detroit, Michigan.
10.American Institute of Steel Construction (1994), Manual of Steel Construction-Load and Resistance Factor Design , Second Edition, Edition, Chicago, IL.
11.Architectural Institute of Japan (1987), AIJ Standards for Structural Calculation of Steel Reforced Concrete Structures, Tokyo, Japan.
12.李豐安（1994），“鋼管混凝土矩形柱之最大強度分析”，國立交通大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，彭耀南教授指導。
13.王徵文（1995），“矩形鋼管混凝土梁柱極限強度之研究”，國立交通大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，翁正強教授指導。
14.陳誠直、傅正堯，“鋼管混凝土柱之強度與耐震行為研究”，第四屆結構工程研討會論文集，民國八十七年九月，pp. 1899-1906，台北，台灣。
15.林草英、黃建銘、陳璽宇（1993），“鋼管混凝土柱單向偏心載重之結構行為”，中國土木水利工程學刊，5（4），pp. 377-386。
16.林草英、黃建銘（1989），“鋼柱內填注鋼筋混凝土之軸向承壓強度”，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，台北。
17.林育詳（2001），“中空雙鋼管混凝土柱與基礎接合耐震行為研究”，國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，蔡克銓教授指導。
18.魏希賢（2002），“中空雙鋼管混凝土柱埋入型基礎接合耐震行為研究”，國立台灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，蔡克銓教授指導。
19.林煥文（2002），“鋼管混凝土柱基礎耐震行為研究”，國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，許協隆教授指導。