摘 要
本研究係對砂土試體進行圓形土槽模擬夯擊試驗，探討砂土受夯擊時垂直動應力影響之範圍，以期對動力夯實工法施工時土壤之力學行為有更進一步的瞭解。
於實驗中利用圓形土槽模擬夯擊試驗，夯擊不同相對密度之乾砂，在變換不同夯錘半徑及不同夯擊能量，包含不同夯錘質量及落距情況下，求出砂土承受夯擊瞬間，土層中之動應力分布圖，經由此動應力分布圖，期能定出較理想之無因次影響深度及寬度之值。此外，針對土層在受夯擊時產生沉陷值進行量測，探討陷坑所損耗能量與實際夯擊能量之比。
由試驗結果得知，砂土層中垂直動應力和衝擊荷載兩者之比值關係，在不同條件的情況下，如夯錘半徑、落距、夯錘質量及夯擊次數，趨勢大致相同，惟相對密度對垂直動應力和衝擊荷載兩者之比值有所影響，相對密度愈大，垂直動應力和衝擊荷載兩者之比值也愈大，表示能量能傳遞至更深層的土層中，能量於土層中消散的速度較緩慢。另外，集中因子ν隨土層深度加深有減小之趨勢，隨相對密度增加有增大之趨勢，但受夯錘質量及落距等之影響則不明顯。

ABSTRACT
In this research, to understand soil mechanical behaviors under dynamic consolidation method, dynamic compaction model tests in circular chamber were conducted to investigate the vertical dynamic stress influence range on sand.
Using dynamic compaction model tests in circular chamber to get the distribution graph of dynamic stress under the situation of changing different relative density, radius of hammer and impact energy which include the different mass of hammer and dropping distance. The value of no dimension depth and width can be test out by the distribution graph of dynamic stress. Moreover, to discuss about the ratio between the energy lose of crater and the real impact energy by measuring the depth of crater.
It can be found that the ratio between vertical dynamic stress and impact load are tend to be the same under the different situation as radius of hammer, dropping distance, mass of hammer and impact number from this research. Only relative density affects the ratio between the vertical dynamic stress and impact load. The bigger relative density is, the bigger ratio between the vertical dynamic stress and impact load could be. It proves that the energy can be spread to the deeper layer of sand and dismissed slowly. Besides, the factor of concentration is going to decrease with the depth of sand increasing but to increase with the relative density increasing. However, it is not so obviously for the factor of concentration to be affected by mass of hammer and dropping distance.

參考文獻
1.土質工學會，土質調查法，土質工學會，日本，第189~219頁
(1982)。
2.山田正俊，「動壓密工法」，軟弱地盤改良工法之相關現狀講演會
資料，第89~97頁(1982)。
3.中國冶金工業部建築研究總院，「地基處理技術－強力夯實法與振
動水沖法」，中國冶金工業出版社，中國北京，第1-138頁，
(1989)。
4.史美筠，「強夯法施工參數的確定及施工中震動影響問題」，土建
專題情報資料－軟土地基處理與強夯法，中國建築技術發展中心文
獻部，第30-33頁(1988)。
5.李嶸泰，「動力壓密工法施工引致地表振動之阻隔」，碩士論文，
國立中央土木工程研究所，中壢，第1-42頁(2000)。
6.李奕，「動壓密工法施工中能量問題探討」，碩士論文，國立台灣
海洋大學河海工程研究所，基隆，第10-35頁(1994)。
7.呂協宜，「反覆錘擊對砂土力學性質之改良機制」，碩士論文，國
立中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢，第57-98頁（1998）。
8.林鴻文，「動力壓密工法之改良效果及其力學機制」，碩士論文，
國立中央土木工程研究所，中壢，第9-58頁(1996)。
9.林耀煌，「地盤改良工法」，地工技術雜誌，第8期，第16-25頁，
(1984)。
10.阪口旭、服部征夫、西海宏，「動壓密工法基礎工事」，土質工學
會技術手帳，第5-11頁(1979)。
11.梁台北，「動力壓密工法簡介」，營建知訊，第8-15頁(1994)。
12.章致一、李建生，「動壓密工法改良案例」，土木工程技術，第
7期，第61-68頁(1996)。
13.康裕明、吳一民，「落體震源的特性探討」，第六屆大地工程學
術研討會論文集，第255-263頁(1995)。
14.范維垣、史美筠、裘以惠，「關於強夯法加固地基的幾個問題」
，地基處理學術會議論文選集，第7-15頁(1980)。
15.張惠文、溫年通、李嶸泰，「砂土承受夯擊時之波動傳遞與阻隔
效果」，中華民國力學學會第23屆全國力學會議論文集，新竹市
，第354-361頁(1999)。
16.黃建順、鍾毓東，「土壤改良－動力壓密法」，地工技術雜誌，
第4期，第73-87頁，(1983)。
17.廖哲明，「動態應力作用下砂土層之應力分佈」，博士論文，國
立成功大學土木工程研究所，台南，第35-69頁(1999)。
18.鳴海直信，「最近軟弱地盤工法設計施工例－動力壓密工法」，
月刊建設，第69-78頁， (1987)。
19.潘少昀、黃子明，「動力壓密工法在海埔新生地地盤改良工程之
應用」，第六屆大地工程學術研討會論文集，第1071-1082頁，
(1995)。
20.鍾毓東、葉嘉鎮、吳偉康、余明山，「深層夯實改良應用於新生
地之案例」，地工技術雜誌，第51期，第67-78頁(1995)。
21.Barkan, D. D., Dynamic of Bases and foundation, McGraw-
Hill, New York, pp.25-56 (1962)
22.Das, M. B., Principles of Geotechincal Engineering, PWS Publishing
Company, Boston, pp.85-91 (1994).
23.Federal Highway Administration, "Ground Improvement by Dyna-
mic Compaction," Ground Improvement Technology Manual, U.S.
Department of Transportation, pp.125-160 (1995).
24.Hansbo, S., "Dynamic Consolidation of Soil by a Falling Weight,"
Ground Engineering, Vol.11, No.5, pp.27-36 (1978).
25.Head, K. H., "Effective Stress Tests," Manual of Soil Laboratory
Testing, Vol.3, ELE-International Limited, pp.184-196 (1986).
26.Heukelom, W., and Foster, C. R., "Dynamic Testing of Pavements,"
Journal of the Structural Division, Proceedings of the ASCE, pp.1-28
(1960).
27.Jessberger, H. L., and Beine, R. A., "Heavy Tamping : Theoretical
and Practical Concepts," Proceedings of the 10th ICSMFE, Stockholm,
pp.695-699 (1981).
28.Jessberger, H. L., and Godecke, H. J., "Theoretical Concept of
Saturation of Cohesive Soils by Dynamic Consolidation," Procee-
dings of the 9th ICSMFE, Tokyo, pp.449-451 (1977).
29.Lukas, R. G., "Geotechnical Engineering Circular No.1－Dynamic
Compaction," U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, pp.255-316 (1995).
30.Leonards, G. A., Gutler, W. A., and Holtz, R. D., "Dynamic Compa-
ction of Granular Soils," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering
Division, ASCE, Vol.106, No.GT1, pp.35-44 (1980).
31.Mayne, P. W., Jones, J. S., and Dumas, J. C., "Ground Response to
Dynamic Compaction," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE,
Vol.110, No.6, pp.757-774 (1984).
32.Menard, L. and Broise, Y., " Theoretical and Practical Aspects of
Dynamic Consolidation," Geotechnique, Vol.25, No.1, pp.3-18
(1975).
33.Mitchell, J. K., "State of the Art Report on Soil Improvement,"
Proceedings of the 10th ICSMFE, Stockholm, Vol.4, pp.509-521
(1981).
34.Woods, R. D., "Screening of Surface Waves in Soils," Journal of the
Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Proceedings of the ASCE,
Vol.94, No.SM4, pp.951-979 (1968).