| 研究生: |
陳維真 Wei-chen Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
發行臺灣存託憑證對原上市地股價之影響 Local Market Reaction to Cross-Listing: The case of Taiwan Depositary Receipts |
| 指導教授: |
何中達
Chung-da Ho |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融學系 Department of Finance |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 37 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 臺灣存託憑證 、事件研究法 、海外上市 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Taiwan Depositary Receipts, Event study, Cross-listing |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:12 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著國際資本市場的發展,企業籌資管道不再侷限於國內,海外上市成為另一種選擇。近年來政府推動外國企業來臺灣上市,本研究想探討外國企業來臺灣發行存託憑證的此一事件對原上市地股價有何影響。本研究採用事件研究法分析樣本公司累計異常報酬,接著以多元迴歸式檢驗影響累計異常報酬之因素,最後分析海外上市前後原上市地和臺灣地區的市場風險。實證結果顯示整體樣本在事件前異常報酬為正,事件後累計異常報酬為負,原上市地為香港的樣本公司累計異常報酬較新加坡高,電子業的累計異常報酬也比非電子業來的高,本研究認為原上市地為香港的公司多為台資企業,臺灣投資人較熟悉,因此香港股票在臺灣交易較熱絡對原上市地股價有正向影響;而臺灣為電子產業重鎮,電子產業來臺灣掛牌上市會受到較多關注和分析,對原上市地股價同樣有正向影響,歸納以上結果本研究符合投資人認可假說。多元迴歸式分析結果再次驗證電子產業累計異常報酬顯著高於非電子產業;原上市地為香港企業累計異常報酬顯著高於新加坡企業。海外上市前後原上市地和臺灣地區的市場風險則無明顯改變。
With the development of international capital markets, fund raising is no longer limited to domestic and overseas markets become an alternative. In recent years, the government promotes foreign companies listing in Taiwan. This paper examines the effects of local market reaction to cross-listing. First, this paper uses event study to examine cumulative abnormal returns, following by multiple regression to test the factor affect the cumulative abnormal returns. Finally, our study analyzes the beta of local market and Taiwan market before and after cross-listing. Empirical results show that the overall companies have positive cumulative abnormal returns before listing day and negative cumulative abnormal returns after listing day. The cumulative abnormal returns of Hong Kong companies is much more than Singapore, electronics companies is higher than non- electronics companies. This paper suggests that Taiwanese investors are more familiar with those companies from Hong Kong because most of them funded by Taiwanese enterprises. Similarly, electronic companies are recognized by Taiwanese investors because electronic industry is the largest industry in Taiwan. Our tests provide support for investor recognition hypothesis. Multiple regression analysis verifies the electronic industry and Hong Kong companies with higher cumulative abnormal return again. The beta of local market and Taiwan market before and after cross-listing has no significant change.
國外文獻
[1] Alexander, G., Eun C., and Janakiramanan, S. “Asset pricing and dual listing on foreign
capital markets: A note”, Journal of Finance 42, 151–158, 1987.
[2] Alexander, G., Eun, C., Janakiramanan, S, “International listings and stock returns: some
empirical evidence”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, 135–151, 1988.
[3] Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., “Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread” Journal of Financial
Economics 17, 223–249, 1986.
[4] Ayyagari, M. “Does cross-listing lead to functional convergence? Empirical evidence”,
working paper, 2004.
[5] Bailey, W., Karolyi, G. A., and Salva, C, “The Economic Consequences of Increased
Disclosure: Evidence from International Cross-Listings”, Journal of Financial Economics
forthcoming, 2005.
[6] Baker, H. K., Nofsinger, J. R., and Weaver, D. G, “International cross-listing and
visibility”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37, 495–521, 2002.
[7] Brown, S., Warner, J., “Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies”, Journal of
Financial Economics, 14, 3–31, 1985.
[8] Cantale, S. “The choice of a foreign market as a signal”, working paper, INSEAD,
Fontainebleu, France, 1996.
[9] Chemmanur, T. J. and Fulghieri, P, “Competition and co-operation among exchanges: A
theory of cross listing and endogenous listing standards”, Journal of Financial Economics
forthcoming, 2005.
[10] Coffee, J. “The future as history: The prospects for global convergence in corporate
governance and its implications”, Northwestern University Law Review 93, 641–708,
1999.
[11] Coffee, J. “Racing towards the top? The impact of cross-listings and stock market
competition on international corporate governance”, Columbia Law Review, 102,
1757–1831, 2002.
[12] Doidge, C. “Do changes in laws matter for ownership and control? Evidence from
emerging markets firms that list in the U.S”, working paper, University of Toronto,
Toronto, Canada, 2004a
[13] Doidge, C., Karolyi, G. A., and Stulz, R. M, “Why are foreign firms that are listed in the
U.S. worth more?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 71, 205–238, 2004.
[14] Errunza, V. and Losq, E., “International asset pricing under mild segmentation: Theory
and test”, Journal of Finance 40, 105–124, 1985.
[15] Eun, C. and Janakiramanan, S. “A model of international asset pricing with a constraint
on the foreign equity ownership”, Journal of Finance 41, 1015–1124, 1986.
[16] Faff, R. W., Hodgson, A., Saudagaran, S., “International cross-listings towards more
liquid markets: the impact on domestic firms”, Journal of Multinational Financial
Management, 12 365–390, 2002.
[17] Foerster, S. R. and Karolyi, G. A, “International listings of stocks: The case of Canada
and the U.S.”, Journal of International Business Studies 24, 763–784, 1993.
[18] Foerster, S., Karolyi, A, “The effects of market segmentation and illiquidity on asset
prices: evidence from foreign stocks listing in the U.S.”, Unpublished working Paper,
University of Western Ontario, 1996.
[19] Foerster, S. Karolyi, A, “The effects of market segmentation and investor recognition on
asset prices: Evidence from foreign stocks listing in the United States”, Journal of
Finance 54, 981–1013, 1999.
[20] Fuerst, O, “A theoretical analysis of the investor protection regulations argument for
global listing of stocks”, working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 1998.
[21] Howe, John, and Katherine Kelm, “The stock price impact of overseas listings”,
Financial Management 16, 51–56, 1987.
[22] Howe, John, and Jeff Madura, “The impact of international listings on risk: Implications
for capital market integration”, Journal of Banking and Finance 14, 1133–1142, 1990.
[23] Jayaraman, N., Shastri, K., and Tandon, K, “The impact of international cross listings on
risk and return: Evidence from American depositary receipts”, Journal of Banking and
Finance 17, 91–103, 1993.
[24] Kadlec, G., McConnell, J. “The effect of market segmentation and illiquidity on asset
prices: evidence from exchange listings”, Journal of Finance, 49, 611–636, 1994.
[25] Karolyi, G. Andrew, “The world of cross-listing and cross-listings of the world:
Challenging conventional wisdom”, Review of Finance, 10, 99-152, 2006.
[26] Korczak P, Bohl MT, “Empirical evidence on cross-listed stocks of Central and Eastern
European companies”, Emerging Markets Review, 6, 121-137, 2005.
[27] Lang, M., Lins, K., and Miller, D. P, “ADRs, analysts and accuracy: Does cross-listing in
the U.S. improve a firms information environment and increase market value?”, Journal
of Accounting Research 41, 2003.
[28] Lang, M., Lins, K., and Miller D. P,” Concentrated control, analyst following and
valuation: Do analysts matter most when investors are protected least?” Journal of
Accounting Research, 42, 581–623, 2004.
[29] Lee, I, “The impact of overseas listings on shareholder wealth: The case of the London
and Toronto stock exchanges”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 18,
583–592, 1991.
[30] Lee, I, “Dual listings and shareholders’ wealth: Evidence from UK and Japanese firms”,
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 19, 243-252, 1992.
[31] McConnell, J., Dybevik, H., Haushalter, D., and Lie, E, “A survey of evidence on
domestic and international stock exchange listings with implications for markets and
managers”, Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 4, 347–376, 1995.
[32] Merton, R., “Presidential address: a simple model of capital market equilibrium with
incomplete information”, Journal of Finance, 42, 483–510, 1987.
[33] Miller, D. P. “The market reaction to international cross-listing: Evidence from
depositary receipts”, Journal of Financial Economics,51, 103–123, 1999.
[34] Moel, A. “The role of information disclosure on stock market listing decisions: The case
of foreign firms listing in the U.S.”, working paper, Harvard Business School,
Cambridge, MA, 1999.
[35] Reese, W. A. J. and Weisbach, M. S. “Protection of minority shareholder interests,
cross-listings in the United States, and subsequent equity offerings”, Journal of Financial
Economics 66, 65–104, 2002.
[36] Siegel, J. “Can foreign firms bond themselves effectively by submitting to U.S. law?”
Journal of Financial Economics, 75(2), 319–360, 2005.
[37] Stapleton R. and Subrahmanyam, M, “Market imperfections, capital market equilibrium
and corporate finance”, Journal of Finance, 32, 307–319, 1977.
[38] Stulz, R. M, “A model of asset pricing”,Journal of Financial Economics, 9 383-406,1981.
[39] Stulz, R. M. “Globalization, corporate finance, and the cost of capital”, Journal of
Applied Corporate Finance, 12, 8–25, 1999.
[40] Torabzadeh, K., Bertin, W., and Zivney, T, “Valuation effects of international listings”,
Global Finance Journal 3, 159–170, 1992.
[41] Tribukait, H. “The invisible enforcer? Price behavior of Mexican firms cross-listed on
the NYSE around earnings announcements”, working paper, Harvard Economics
Department,Cambridge, MA, 2002.
國內文獻
[1] 沈中華、李建然,事件研究法,華泰出版社,台北,2000年。
[2] 洪裕弘,臺灣企業在海外上市對原公司股票之影響,成功大學國際企業研究所,2007年。
參考資料
[1] 臺灣證券交易所
[2] 經濟新報資料庫