產品名稱是消費者所接收到最直接的產品資訊。適當的產品命名能引起消費
者的注意與共鳴，好的產品命名還能引發消費者正面的聯想與產品態度，不好的
產品命名則可能引起消費者的疑慮與不信任。
本研究探討產品命名方式(非典型/典型；非具體/具體屬性/具體利益)在不
同認知需求(高/低)、消費者情緒(正面/負面)，以及產品類型(高度產品涉入/
低度產品涉入)之下，對消費者的認知風險以及認知趣味性造成的影響，以及對
於消費者產品態度和購買意願的改變。研究結果顯示：
1. 「非典型」的產品命名方式會使消費者感受到較「典型」的產品命名方式更
強烈的知覺風險以及趣味性。
2. 以「典型」的方式命名時，當產品名稱為「具體屬性」，消費者的風險感受
會較產品名稱為「具體利益」時更高；而當以「非典型」的方式命名時，產
品名稱為「具體利益」，消費者的風險感受會較產品名稱為「具體屬性」時
更高。
3. 認知需求高的人對於「非典型」的產品命名方式會感受到比「典型」的命名
方式更高的風險，但也會感受到更高的趣味性。
4. 消費者在面臨「非具體」的產品命名方式時，其認知風險明顯大於在面臨「具
體屬性」產品命名方式時的認知風險。
5. 對於負面情緒的消費者而言，「具體屬性」產品命名所造成的認知趣味顯著
大於「具體利益」產品命名所造成的認知趣味。
6. 只有在產品涉入程度低的情況下，對於「非典型」產品命名所造成的認知風
險以及認知趣味性才會顯著大於「典型」產品命名的認知風險。

The product name is the first product information that consumers receive. The
appropriate product name can bring positive association and product attitude, but
the bad product name induces misgivings and distrust.
This research discusses how the products naming type (atypical/typical;
unspecific/specific attribute/specific benefit) influence the consumers’ perceived risk
and perceived playfulness, as well as the change of the consumers’ product attitude
and purchasing intention in the different need for cognition (high/low), emotion
(positive/negative), and product type (high product involvement/low product
involvement). The result shows that:
1. Atypical names will make consumers feel higher consumers’ perceived risk and
perceived playfulness than typical names.
2. When the product naming type is typical, specific attribute names will make
consumers feel higher consumers’ perceived risk than specific benefit names.
When the product naming type is atypical, specific benefit names will make
consumers feel higher consumers’ perceived risk than specific attribute names.
3. To the high need for cognition individuals, atypical names will make them feel
higher consumers’ perceived risk and perceived playfulness than typical names.
4. Unspecific names will make consumers feel higher consumers’ perceived risk
than specific attribute names.
5. To the negative emotion consumers, specific attribute names will make them
feel higher consumers’ perceived playfulness than specific benefit names.
6. Atypical names will make consumers feel higher consumers’ perceived risk and
perceived playfulness than typical names only when the product involvement is
low.

中文部分
1. 王維鳴，2001。虛擬社群與虛擬經驗、網路練達性、產品知識與產品資訊搜
尋成本對消費者認知風險影響之研究—以電腦遊戲軟體為例，國立中央大學
企業管理研究所碩士論文。
2. 吳統雄，1985。態度與行為研究的信度與效度：理論、反應、反省，民意學
術專刊，47-66。
3. 宋姍錞，2007。探討線上英語活動對英語學習成效之影響-利用多媒體註記
工具促進英語寫作與口說，國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士論文。
4. 周立軒，2005。網誌的使用者與使用行為之研究，元智大學資訊傳播研究所
碩士論文。
5. 林勤豐、葉明義、邱兆民，1999。「方法目的鏈」研究法建構行銷研究變數
與行銷策略之研討，中華管理評論，第2 卷第6 期，107-128。
6. 林建煌，2007。消費者行為，二版，台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
7. 林建煌，2008。行銷管理，四版，台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
8. 林彥宏，2005。網路口碑對消費者購買決策影響之探討，國立中央大學資訊
管理研究所碩士論文。
9. 高泉豐，1994。認知需求的概念與測量，中華心理學刊，第36 卷第1 期，
1-20。
10. 許舒婷，2008。產品種類及促銷活動對消費者購買量販店自有品牌意願影響
之研究，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
11. 陳姵君，2000。知覺風險對網路銀行使用意願之影響－從系統品質的角度觀
之，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
12. 陳泰佑，2000。正面情緒類別、填補機制類別對於等待時間知覺的影響，國
立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
13. 蔡佳靜，2005。比較心理對廣告效果之影響路徑探討，國立中央大學企業管
理研究所博士論文。
14. 蔡忠達，2000。涉入、消費者評估參考點與評估情境對購買評價及購買意願
之影響，國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
15. 謝明宏，2003。廣告文字與人物表情對廣告效果之影響，國立中央大學企業
管理研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
1. Arndt, J. (1967), “Word of Mouth Advertising and Informal Communication,”
Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer behavior, ed. D. F. Cox,
Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard
University, Boston, MA, 188-239.
2. Bauer, R. A. (1960), “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking,” Dynamic Marketing
for a Changing World, ed. R. S. Hancock, Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of
the American Marketing Association, 389-398.
3. Bettman, J. R. (1973), “Perceived Risk and its Components: a Model and
Empirical Test,” Journal of Marketing Research, 184-190.
4. Bless, H., G. Bohner, N. Schwarz, and F. Strack (1990), “Mood and Persuasion: a
Cognitive Response Analysis,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16,
331-345.
5. Brooker, George (1984), “An Assessment of Anexpanded Measure of Perceived
Risk ,” Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 439-441.
6. Burns, W. J., S. E. Hampson, H. H. Severson, and P. Slovic (1993), "Alcohol-
Related Risk Taking Among Teenagers: An Investigation of Contributing
Factors and a Discussion of How Marketing Principles Can Help," Journal of
Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 183-214.
7. Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1982), “The Need for Cognition,”
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
8. Cacioppo, John T., R. E. Petty, and C. F. Kao (1984), “The Efficient Assessment
of Need for Cognition,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
9. Cohen, J. B. (1983), “Involvement and You: 1000 Great Ideas,” Advances in
Consumer Research, 10, 325-328.
10. Conningham, S. M. (1967), “The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk,” Risk
Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, ed. D. F. Cox,
Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University Press, Boston,
MA, 82-108.
11. Cox, D. F. (1967), “Risk Handling in Consumer Behavior- an Intensive Study of Two Cases,” Risk-Taking and Information-Handle in Consumer Behavior, ed. D.
F. Cox, Boston: Harvard University Press, 34-81.
12. Cox, Donald F. and Stuart U. Rich (1967), “Perceived Risk and Consumer
Decision Making－The Case of Telephone Shopping,” in Risk Taking and
Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, ed. D. F. Cox, Graduate School of
Business Administration, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA, 487-506.
13. Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe, and D. Grewal (1991), “Effects of Price, Brand,
and Store Information on Buyers'' Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing
Research, 28(3), 307-319.
14. Engel, James F. and Roger D. Blackwell (1982), Consumer behavior, New York:
The Dryden Press.
15. Gardner, Mery Paila (1985), “Mood States and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of
Consuner Research, 12, 281-300.
16. Gutman, Jonathan (1982), “A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer
Categorization Processes,” Journal of Marketing, 46, 60-72.
17. Haugtvedt, Curtis P., Richard E. Petty, and John T. Cacioppo (1992), “Need
for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables
in Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 239-260.
18. Howard, John A. and Jagdish N. Sheth (1969), The theory of Buyer Behavior,
New York: John Wiley.
19. Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes, and G. B. Davis (1995), “Testing the Determinants of
Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model.” Journal of Management
Information Systems, 11(4), 87–114.
20. Isen, A. and T. Shalker (1982), “The Effect of Feeling State on Evaluation of
Positive, Neutral and Negative Stimuli: When you „Accentuate the Positive‟ Do
you „Eliminate the Negative‟?” Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 58-63.
21. Kaplan, L. B., G. J. Szybillo, and J. Jacoby (1974), “Components of Perceived
Risk in Product Purchase: a Cross Validation,” Journal of Applied Psychology,
59(3), 287-291.
22. Kotler, Philip (1997), Marketing Management-Analysis, Planning, Implementation,
and Control, 9, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, 313-314.
23. Kuvaas, B. and G. Kaufmann (2004), “Impact of Mood, Framing, and Need for
Cognition and Decision Maker‟s Recall and Confidence,” Journal of Behavioral
Decision Making, 17, 59-74.
24. Lieberman, Alicia F., Mary C. Blehar, and Mary D. Salter Ainsworth (1977),
“Early Face-to-Face Interaction and Its Relation to Later Infant-Mother
Attachment,” Society for Research in Child Development, 48, 182-194.
25. Mandel, N. (2003), “Shifting Selves and Decision Making: The Effects of
Self-Construal Priming on Consumer Risk-Taking,” Joumal of Consumer
Research, 30, 30-40.
26. Meloy, Margaret G. (2000), “Mood-Driven Distortion of Product Information,”
Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 345-359.
27. Miller, E. G. and B. E. Kahn (2005), “Shades of Meaning: The Effect of Color
and Flavor Names on Consumer Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1),
86-92.
28. Mitchell, V. W. and P. Boustani (1993), “Market Development Using New
Products and New Customers: a Role for Perceived Risk,” European Journal of
Marketing, 27(2), 17-32.
29. Moon, J. W. and Y. G. Kim (2001), “Extending the TAM for a World-
Wide-Web Context,” Information and Management, 38(4), 217-230.
30. Perry, M. and B. C. Hamm (1969), “Canonical Analysis of Relations between
Socioeconomic Risk and Personal Influence in Purchase Decisions,” Journal of
Marketing Research, 6, 351-354.
31. Peter, J. P., and L. X. Tarpey Sr. (1975), "a Comparative Analysis of Three
Consumer Decision Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29-37.
32. Robertson, T. S., J. Zielinski, and S. Ward (1984), "Low-Commitment Consumer
Behavior," Journal of Advertising Research, 19-24.
33. Roselius, T. (1971), “Consumer Rankings of Risk Reduction Methods,” Journal
of Marketing, 35, 56-61.
34. Severson, Herbert H., Paul Slovic, and Sarah Hampson (1993), “Adolescents
Perception of Risk: Understanding and Preventing High Risk Behavior,” Journal
of Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 177-182.
35. Shaver, Phillip, Judith Schwartz, Donald Kirson, and Cary O‟Connor (1987),
“Emotion Knowledge: Further Exploration of a Prototype Approach,” Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (6), 1061-1086.
36. Srull, T. (1983), “Affect and Memory The Impact of Affective Reactions in
Advertising on the Representation of Product Information in Memory,” in
Journal of Advances in Consumer, 10, ed. Richard Bagozzi and Alice Tybout,
Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 520-525.
37. Veloutsou, C. and X. Bian (2008), “a Cross-National Examination of Consumer
Perceived Risk in the Context of Non-Deceptive Counterfeit Brands,” Journal of
Consumer Behaviour, 3-20.
38. Wright, Peter (1976), “Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying versus Optimizing,”
Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 60-67.
39. Wu, Tsung Wen, Ralph L. Day, and David B. Mackay (1988), “Consumer Benifit
Versus Product Attribute,” Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics, 27,
88-113.
40. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1986), “Conceptualizing Involvement,” Journal of
Advertising, 15(2), 4-14.
41. Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1981), “How Consumer Evaluation Processes Differ
between Goods and Services,” in Journal of Services Marketing, ed. J. H.
Donnelly and W. R. George, American Marketing Association, 186-190.