在資訊系統相關文獻中，將系統開發專案中的軟體廠商、導入顧問、使用者和資訊人員列為專案成功的重要關係人。在大型資訊系統的開發過程中，資訊人員與使用者通常維持密切的夥伴關係，而且對於一般資訊系統的規劃、評選、導入及後續維護，通常資訊人員的興趣是高於使用者的，但針對特定需求的資訊系統，有時使用者比資訊人員還熱衷參與資訊系統開發的活動，例如與修正後第七號公報「合併財務報表」相關的合併財務報表系統。此系統是一個資訊架構簡單，且不需要與現有企業資源規劃系統緊密結合的資訊系統，其具有特定的需求與特定使用者的特性。
本研究探討的資訊系統遴選專案之個案案例，符合上述特定需求和特定使用者的資訊系統特性，本研究將從使用者對資訊系統的滿意度、使用者與資訊部門的互動關係以及使用者主導權的心理層面等觀點，來探討這個個案。藉由此合併財務報表系統遴選專案的實例觀察，說明使用者主導權如何影響資訊系統遴選結果，並依據研究發現推導出研究命題。

In relevant empirical literatures of information system(IS), the interpersonal relationship between software vendor, business consultant, end-user and information technology(IT) personnel has been widely recognized as one of the most important determinants of the success in the IS development. During the large-scale IS development, usually IT professionals establish a close partnership with end-user, and furthermore, IT personnel are more interested than end-user in the IS planning, software selection, project implementation, and follow-up maintenance. But, in regard to the IS, which demanded for specific requirement, sometimes end-user is eager to participate in the activities of IS development than IT personnel: for instance, the financial consolidation system which is in response to the revised 7th statement ‘Consolidated Financial Statements.’ It’s an IS with simple infrastructure and has no need to tightly integrate with existing ERP system, it has the characteristics of demanding for specific requirement and specific end-user.
The case of IS selection project in the research, is conform to the IS characteristics which described above demanding for specific requirement and specific end-user, therefore the research will proceed from the viewpoints of user satisfaction, the interaction between end-user and IT personnel, and the psychological of user ownership. By way of observing the real case of IS selection, the research will explain how the user ownership influence on the outcome of IS selection. The research propositions will be suggested based on the research findings.

中文文獻
1. ______(2004)，「合併財務報表」，財務會計準則公報，財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。
2. Pagano, R. R.著；潘中道、郭俊賢譯(2000)，「行為科學統計學」，台北﹕雙葉書廊有限公司。
3. Yin, R. K.著(1994)；尚榮安譯(2001)，「個案研究」，台北﹕弘智文化。
4. 皮世明、許通安、范錚強(2001)，「影響資訊系統服務品質的因素研究」，資訊管理研究，第三卷第一期，1-24頁。
5. 林芳在、郭倉義(2004)，「製造業資訊部門的服務品質之研究」，中華民國品質學會第四十屆年會暨第十屆全國品質管理研討會。
6. 林則孟、黃思明、黃明達、陳銘崑、呂執中、范錚強、邱光輝(2006)，「製商整合e化個案集」，台北﹕財團法人光華管理策進基金會。
7. 許晉龍(2002)，「資訊管理」，台北﹕儒林圖書公司。
8. 湯宗泰(2000)，「資訊科技引進之企業轉型策略﹕組織與績效」，商管科技季刊，第一卷第二期，375-398頁。
9. 廖元模(2005)，「使用者主導權的概念、成因及影響的實徵研究」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
10. 蔡福隆(2000)，「以社會系統觀點探討資訊系統使用與發展策略」，2000年科技與管理學術研討會論文集，365-373頁。
11. 薛崴立(2003)，「企業內人員對資訊部門評價之探討—以個案銀行為例」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
英文文獻
1. Basile, A., Papa, L. J. and Johnston, R. (2002), “Leading High-End Accounting Software,” The CPA Journal, pp. 27-33.
2. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1994), “Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude,” MIS Quarterly, 18(1), pp. 59-82.
3. Burkman, J. R. (2002), “End-User Expectation Incongruencies and Integrated Information Systems: Effects on Satisfaction and Trust,” ProQuest Infromation and Learning Company, pp. 1-124.
4. Dewulf, G. and Meel, J. V. (2002), “User participation and the role of information and communication technology,” Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 4(3), pp. 237-247.
5. Etsten, D. (1998), “TCO finds the Strike Zone,” Academic Research Library, pp. 97.
6. Franz, C. R. (1985), “User Leadership in the Systems Development Life Cycle: A Contingency Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 2(2), pp. 5-25.
7. Gallivan, M. J. and Keil, M. (2003), “The user-developer communication process﹕a critical case study,” Info Systems J, 13, pp. 37-68.
8. Kotler, P., Ang, S. H., Leong, S. M. and Tan, C. T. (2003), “Marketing Management-An Asian Perspective,” 3rd Ed., Singapore:Prentice Hall.
9. Kujala, S. (2003), “User involvement﹕a review of the benefits and challenges,” Bejaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), pp. 1-16.
10. McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T. and Wetherbe, J. C. (1994), “The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors,” MIS Quarterly Minneapolis, 18(4), pp. 427-451.
11. McKeen, J. D. and Guimaraes, T. (1997), “Successful Strategies for User Participation in Systems Development,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(2), pp. 133-150.
12. Montazemi, A. R., Cameron, D. A. and Gupta, K. M. (1996), “An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Software Package Selection,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), pp. 89-105.
13. Nath, R. and Lederer, A. L. (1996) “Team Building for IS Success,” Information System Management, 13(2), pp. 32-37.
14. Pendse, N. (2006), “The OLAP Report Market share analysis,” Optima Publishing Ltd, http://www.olapreport.com/market.htm
15. Scheraga, D. (2002), “CIOs Get User-Friendly,” Chain Store Age, pp. 55-56.
16. Szajna, B. and Scamell, R. W. (1994), “The Effects of Information System User Expectations on Their Performance and Perceptions,” MIS Quarterly, 17(4), pp. 493-516.