英文已成為現今每一個學生必學的一門語言科目，可是在絕大部分的學生對於學習英文覺得很困難，更把最重要的發音基礎給忽略掉，導致其成為學習英語上的失敗原因之一。也礙於在非英文母語國家的環境下，無法使在學習上達到較正確的發音。所以本研究提出一個英文音素(English phoneme，EP) 的學習活動並運用電腦同儕互評 (Computer Supported Peer Assessment)來輔助對於音素認知 (Phonemic awareness) 之數位學習環境來幫助小朋友學習發音的初探研究，且運用賓果(Bingo) 讓學生在無考試的壓力之下來作學習測驗。
EP的學習流程包括五個階段：一、自我學習發音的教材，二、自我練習以及錄音，三、自我評量上傳的最佳錄音，四、匿名評量同儕的最佳錄音，五、和同儕一起討論互評的結果。最後再進行賓果(Bingo)遊戲測驗。
為了瞭解對於EP系統如何輔助學生對於音素上的有所認知、在混合了中高低學習成就表現的同儕中，進行小組內的同儕互評及同儕討論的互動及評估活動流程上的合理性，本研究共進行了八個單元的學習及評估活動。本論文將說明研究背景、動機、目的、各學習階段的設計邏輯，描述電腦輔助系統的設計與介面以及探討在評估活動中的發現，並提出一些對未來該研究工作的建議。

English has already become the required language course which every student is going to take, but most of them have difficulties when facing learning English pronunciation. Moreover, one of the failure reasons for English pronunciation – the articulation – which students usually forget is the important foundation. Yet, in the non-English speaking environments country is difficult to pronounce the English sound correctly. Therefore, this research has proposed the digital learning environment of English phoneme with Computer Supported Peer Assessment to help children to learn how to articulate correctly. Also, applying the Bingo game in testing could let pupils evaluate themselves without feeling any pressure of doing the exam.
The English Phoneme (EP) system learning flow includes five stages: (1) self-paced learning about the articulation material, (2) self-practicing and self-recording, (3) uploading the best self-recording and giving self-assessment, (4) peer-assessing the peers’ best recording, anonymously, and (5) discussing the results with peers.
Only the last stage is required to work with peers, and the previous stages (stage one to stage four) are working individually. At last, a bingo game will be used after the fifth stage in order to complete the whole EP learning activity.
Eight experimental unit activities were conducted to investigate how EP learning can assist pupils in the phonemic awareness, the effect of EP learning on student performance during peer-assessment and peer-discussion experimental unit trials, and the suitability of the experimental learning activity design to EP learning.
This thesis gives accounts for the research background, motivation, purposes and the rationales of each stage, describes the system design and interfaces, and reports and discuss the results of the eight experimental unit activities described above. Recommendations for further study are addressed in the final section of this thesis.

Adams, Marilyn Jager (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc. [ED 317 950]
Allington, R. L., & Cunningham, P. (1996). Schools that work: Where all children can read and write. New York: HarperCollins.
Allington, R. L., & Woodside-Jiron, H. (1999). The politics of literacy teaching: How “research” shaped educational policy. Educational Researcher, 28(8), 4–23.
Au, K. (1998). Constructivist approaches, phonics, and the literacy learning of pupils of diverse backgrounds. In T. Shanahan & F. Rodríguez-Brown (Eds.), 47th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1–21). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
Ayres, L. (1998). Phonological awareness training of kindergarten children: Three treatments and their effects. In C. Weaver (Ed.), Reconsidering a balanced approach to reading (pp. 209–258). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Bandura, A.(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bingo History. Retrieved on 16th April, 2007. http://www.bingobuddies.com/facts.html
Boud, D., & Lublin, J. (1983). Student self-assessment: Educational benefits within existing resources. In G. Squires (Ed.), Innovation through recession (Vol. 1, pp. 93-99). Guildford, Surrey, England: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Boves, L ., Cucchiarini, C., Neri, A., & Strik, H. (2002). The Pedagogy-Technology Interface in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441-467.
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read – A casual connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.
Calado, S. M. R. (1994). The impact of system design factors on users'' reaction to peer
feedback. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 1428.
Chiu, Chi-Huang, Wei-Ren & Yuan, Shyuan-Ming. (1998) We-based Collaborative Homework Review System. Proceedings of ICCE ’98, vol.2. 474-477.
Rafiq. Y., & Fullerton, H. (1996). Peer assessment of group projects in civil engineering. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 69-8 1.
Falchikov, N. (1989) Student self assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395-430
Falchikov, N. (1994). Learning from peer feedback marking: Student and teacher perspectives. In H. C. Foot, C. J. Howe, A. Anderson, A. K. Tolmie, & D. Warden (Eds.), Group and interactive learning(Vol.1, pp. 41 1416). Southampton, England: Computational Mechanics.
Falchikov, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking - developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175-87.
Franklin, C. A. (1981). Instructor versus peer feedback in microteaching on the acquisition of confrontation; illustrating, analogies, and use of examples; and question-asking teaching skills for pre-service science teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 3565.
Gaskins, I. W., Gaskins, J. C., & Gaskins, R.W. (1991). A Decoding Program for Poor Readers--And the Rest of the Class, Too! Language Arts, 68, 3, 213-225.
Gaskins, I.W., Gaskins, J.C., Gaskins, I.W. (1992). A decoding program for poor readers-and the rest of the class, too! Language Arts, 68, 213-225.
Harris, Theodore L., and Richard E. Hodges (1995). The Literacy Dictionary: The Vocabulary of Reading and Writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. [ED 385 820]
Jacobs, G. (1989). Miscorrection in peer feedback in writing class. Journal of language Teaching and Research in Southeast Asia, 20, 68.
Kelly, G. (2000). How to Teach Pronunciation. Charlbury, Oxfordshire, UK: Bluestone Press.
Learning First Alliance (2000). U. S. Department of Education, Teaching the Alphabetic Code: Phonics and Decoding Retrieved November 17, 2006, from http://www.readingrockets.org/articles/275
Lin, S. S. -J., & Liu, E. Z.–F. (2000). Learning effects of Web-based peer assessment for students with various thinking styles. Paper presented at the 2000 annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA.
Lin, S. S. –J., Liu, E. Z. –F., & Yuan, S. –M. (2000). Web-Based Peer Assessment: Does Attitude Influence Achievement? Paper presented at the 2000 annual meeting of Frontiers in Education held by IEEE, USA.
Liu, E. Z. –F., Lin, S. S. –J., & Yuan, S. –M. (2002). To propose a reviewer dispatching algorithm for networked peer assessment system. Paper presented at the ICCE 2002 conference, Auckland, New Zealand. (Published by IEEE Computer Society Press)
Mendonca, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer-review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769.
Ministry of Education, ROC (2006). Guidelines of the Grade 1-9 Curriculum - the English learning curriculum. Retrieved on 4th December, 2006. http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/EJE/EDU5147002/9CC/9CC.html?UNITID=271&CATEGORYID=845&FILEID=147654&open
Moats, L.C. (1998). Teaching decoding. American Educator, Spring/Summer, 42-49, 95.
Moats, L.C. (2001, October 27). A blueprint for professional development for teachers of reading and writing: knowledge, skills, and learning activities. Presentation at A Symposium on the National Reading Panel Report and Teacher Presentation. Los Angeles, CA.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Rockville, MD: NICHD.
Obah, T. Y. (1993). Learning from others in the ESL writing class. English Quarterly, 25, 8.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980). Review of the books "Piaget and Knowing. Studies in Genetic Psychology" by Beryl A. Geber, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1979 & "Education et développement social de l''enfant" by Christiane Vandenplas-Holper, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 1979. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10(4), 433-438.
Phonetics: The Sounds of English and Spanish. Retrieved on 14th October, 2006. http://www.uiowa.edu/~acadtech/phonetics/english/frameset.html
Pierce, Michelle (1997). Improving elementary pupils’ motivation. (Eric Document Reproduction Service. No. ED 412002)
Ramsey, P. G., Wenrich, M. D., Carline, J. D., Inui, T. S., Larson, E. B., & Logerfo. J. P. (1996). Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practicing physicians. Academic Medicine, 71, 364-370.
Rosner, J. (1974). Auditory analysis training with prereaders. The Reading Teacher, 27, 379-384.
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309-1324.
Shawn M. Glynn, Russell H. Yeany, & Bruce K. Britton.A Constructive View of learning Science. The Psychology of learning science. LEA Publishers, 1991
Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1999). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and coassessment. Learning Environment Research, 1, 293–319.
Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 443–454.
Smit, U., & Dalton, C (2000). Motivational patterns in advanced EFL pronunciation learners. IRAL, 38 (3/4): 229-246.
Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: a case study from psychology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 71–81.
Stahl, S. (1997). Instructional models in reading: An introduction. In S. Stahl & D. A. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading (pp. 1–29). Mahwah, NH: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, Keith E. (1993-94). Romance and Reality (Distinguished Educator Series). The Reading Teacher, 47(4), 280-91. [EJ 477 302]
Taipei City Government Educational Department (2002), Taipei City Elementary English Teaching Curriculum Guidelines. Taipei City: Ministry of Education
http://www.tp.edu.tw/law/law_03.jsp
Topping, K. (1998) Peer Assessment Between Pupils in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276
Weaver, C. (1998c). Toward a balanced approach to reading. In C. Weaver (Ed.), Reconsidering a balanced approach to reading (pp. 11–74). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Whalen, S. & Csikszentntmihalyi, M. (1991). Putting flow theory into educational practice: The Key School’s flow activities Room. (ED338381)
Wibel, H.W. (1991). Reflection through writing. educational leadership, 48(6), 45-46.
Witbeck, M. C. (1976). Peer correction procedures for intermediate and advanced ESL composition lessons. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 321-326.
Yopp, Hallie Kay (1992). Developing Phonemic Awareness in Young Children. The Reading Teacher, 45(9), 696-703. [EJ 442 772]
Zhao, Y. (1998). The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4(4), 311-345.