| 研究生: |
謝逸君 Yi-Chun Hsieh |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
產品品牌與產品價格對消費者感官知覺之影響 |
| 指導教授: |
林建煌
Chien-Huang Lin |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系在職專班 Executive Master of Business Administration |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 91 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 品牌 、消費者自信心 、直接經驗 、味覺 、觸覺 、價格 、產品評價 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | direct experience, consumer confidence, brand, price, product evaluation, taste, tactile |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:7 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
研究將感官的來源區分成兩種情況:[有觸覺(味覺)的機會],[無觸覺(味覺)的機會] ,來探討高觸覺(味覺)消費者與低觸覺(味覺)消費者對感官知覺機會的需求程度。除此之外,亦探討兩個非知覺變數--品牌及價格,透過兩個實驗設計,來看揭露品牌和價格時,高觸覺(味覺)消費者與低觸覺(味覺)消費者對產品評價的變化。並且,本研究亦發現,雖然直接經驗可以增加購物的自信心,但就高/低觸覺(味覺)消費者而言,在消費者自信心的人格特質這一點看來,並無顯著的差異。
研究結果發現,高觸覺(味覺)消費者若能親身觸摸產品,則評價會提高;而低觸覺(味覺)消費者對於能不能透過觸覺(味覺)機會衡量產品的評價則較不受影響。並且,當有觸覺(味覺)機會提供時,若揭露品牌線索,低觸覺(味覺)消費者比高觸覺(味覺)消費者容易改變原來的評價,對知名品牌的評價提昇,不知名品牌的評價下降;而高觸覺(味覺)消費者對產品的評價則較不受影響。另外,當有觸覺(味覺)機會提供時,若揭露價格線索,低觸覺(味覺)消費者比高觸覺(味覺)消費者容易改變原來的評價,對高價格的評價提昇,低價格的評價下降;而高觸覺(味覺)消費者對產品的評價則較不受影響。本研究旨在探討消費者的感官知覺對產品衡量的重要性,藉此提供網路及無店舖銷售業者參考。
None
一、中文部分
1. 林建煌(2002),消費者行為,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
2. 陳俊宏、楊東民(2000),視覺傳達設計概論,台北:全華科技圖書
3. 楊清田(1996),造形原理導論,台北:藝風堂出版社。
4. 張春興(1995),現代心裡學,台北:台灣東華書局。
5. 羅伯特‧沃克 (2002),愛因斯坦的廚房,臉譜出版社。
二、英文部分
1. Aaker, David(1991), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, The Free Press, N.Y.
2. Adelman, P. K. (1987), “Occupational Complexity, Control, and Personal Income: Their Relation to Psychological Wellbeing in Men and Women,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72(Nov.), pp. 529-537
3. Bearden, William O., “ Consumer Self-Confidence: Refinements in Conceptualization and Measurement”, Journal of Consumer Research, 00935391, 2001, Vol. 28, Issue 1.
4. Bellizzi, J. A., H. F. Krueckeberg, J. R. Hamilton and W. S. Martin(1981),“Consumer Perception of national, Private, and Generic Brands,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.57(Apr.), pp.56-70.
5. Blascovich, Jim and Joseph Tomaka (1991), Measures of Self-Esteem, Measures of Personality and Psychological Attitudes, ed. John P. Robinson, Phillip R. Shaver, and Lawrence S. Wrightsman, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 115-160
6. Breckler , S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1984). “Cognitive Responseon Persuasion :Affective and Evaluative Determinants,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.27, pp.180-220.
7. C. Martin, C. Lange, C. Chabanet, P. Combris, S. Issanchou.(2002) “ Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: comparison with hedonic scores”, Food Quality and Preference, Vol.13, pp.597-598
8. Christine Lange, Sylvieissanchou, Pierre Combris.(2000). Expected versus experienced quality: trade-off with price. Food Quality and preference ,Vol.I1 , p297.
9. Cooper, Peter.(1969), Subjective Economics: Factors in a Psychology of Spending, Pricing Strategy, London: Staples Press, Ltd., pp.112-121
10. Curhan, Ronald C.(1974). “The Effects of Merchandising and Temporary Promotional Activities on the Sales of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables in Supermarket,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.11, pp.286-29
11. Dhar, Sanjay K. and Stephen J. Hoch (1996) “Price Discrimination Using In-Store Merchandising,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, pp.17-30
12. Dodds, William B. and Grewal (1991). “Effect of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyer’s Procduct Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vo l.28, No. 3, pp.307-319.
13. Dransfield, E., Zamora, F., & Bayle, M.C.(1998). “Consumer selection of steaks as influenced by information and price index.” Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 9(5), pp.321-326.
14. Forcht, K. A. & Wex, R. (1996), “Doing Business on the Internet: Marketing and Security Aspects,” Information Management of Computer Security, Vol. 4(4), 3-9.
15. Frederick Sachs(1988), The Sciences, The New York Academy of Sciences.
16. Friestad, Marian and Peter Wright (1994), “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.21(June), pp. 1-31
17. Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe and William B. Dodds (1991). “Effect of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluation.,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.XXVIII(Aug.), pp.307-319
18. Hauser, John R. and Birger Wernerfelt (1990), “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.16(March), pp. 383-408
19. Jacob Hornik(1992), “ Tactile Stimulation and Consumer Response,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.19, 449-450.
20. Jocoby, J, Szybillo G. J., & Busato-Schach J(1977), “Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situations, “Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 3(March),pp. 209-216.
21. Kotler, P. (1999), How to Create, Win, & Dominate Markets, N.Y.: Free Press.
22. Luce, Mary Frances (1994), Emotion and Consumer Choice: An Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Negative, Task Induced Emotion in Consumer Decision Domains, unpublished dissertation, Department of Business Administration, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
23. Millar. M. G., Tesser, A. (1986). “Thought-Induced Attitiude Change: The Effects of Schema Structure and Commitment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51, pp.259-269.
24. Monroe, Kent B. and Susan M. Petroshius (1981). Buyers’ Perception of Price: An Update of the Evidence, Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, 3rd ed., IL:Scott, Foresman and Company, pp.43-45
25. Monroe, R. Krishnan.(1985). Perceived Quality: How Consumer View Stores and Merchandise, New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Murray, J.M., & Delahunty, C.M. (2000). “ Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of cheddar cheese.” Food Quality and Preference, Vol.II (5), pp.419-435
27. Park, C. Whan, David L. Mothersbaugh, and Lawrence Feick (1994), “Consumer Knowledge Assessment,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.21(June), pp.71-82
28. Peck, Joann and Terry L. Childers (2002), Individual differences in Haptic Information Processing: On the Development., Need for Touch Scale, Working paper, Department of Marketing, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
29. Peracchio, Laura A. and Alice M. Tybout (1996),” The Moderating Role of prior Knowledge in Schema-Based Product Evaluation.” Journal of Consumer Research,Vol. 23(Dec.),pp.177-191
30. Punj, Girish N. and Richard Staelin (1983), “ A Model of Consumer Information Search Behavior for New Automobiles,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9(March), pp.366-380
31. Rao, Akshay R. and Kent B. Monroe(1988), “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15(September), pp.253-264.
32. Ratneshwar, S., Cornelia Pechmann, and Allan D. Shocker (1996), “Goal-Derived Categories and the Antecedents of Across-Category Consideration,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.23(Dec.), pp. 240-250
33. Richins, Marsha L. (1983), “Analysis of Consumer Interaction Styles in the Marketplace,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.10(June), pp. 73-84
34. Shapiro, Benson P.(1968) ”The Psychology of Pricing,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.46, pp.14-25
35. Shimp, Terence A. and William Bearden(1982), “Warrant and other Extrinsic Cue Effect on Consumer Risk Perception, “Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, No. 1. pp.38-46.
36. Simon, Marji(1970), “Influence of Brand Names on Attitudes,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 3(June),pp. 56-61.
37. Smith, Robert E. (1982), The Structure and Influence of Confidence, working paper, Indiana University
38. Solheim, R. (1992). “ Consumer liking for sausages affected by sensory quality and information on fat content.” Appetile, Vol.19, pp. 285-292.
39. Underhill, Paco (1999), Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping ,New York: Simon and Schuster.
40. Wood, Wendy and Brian Stagner (1994), Why Are Some People Easier to Influence than Others? , Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives, ed. Sharon Shavitt and Timothy C. Brock, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 149-174
41. Wright, Peter L. (1975), “Factors Affecting Cognitive Resistance to Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.2(June), pp. 1-9