| 研究生: |
汪曉威 Shiau-wei Wang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
臺灣汽油需求影響因素之探討 |
| 指導教授: | 劉錦龍 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 產業經濟研究所 Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 54 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 汽油需求價格彈性 、所得彈性 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | gasoline price elasticity, income elasticity |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:15 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇論文旨在探討影響台灣汽油需求之因素,特別針對兩段油價趨勢相當期間的價格彈性和所得彈性做分析,且分別從總體和個體的角度研究影響汽油需求之因素,最後再比較兩者之異同。
本研究第一部分利用總體資料討論影響各縣市汽油需求之因素,蒐集2003年5月至2008年5月(共61個月)和2009年6月至2011年12月(共31個月)台灣本島各縣市汽油月消費量等資料,利用上述兩段時間的縱橫資料建立固定效果模型。第二部分利用個體資料討論影響家計部門汽油需求之因素,資料來源為交通部統計處「台灣地區自用小客車使用狀況調查」問卷資料,利用2002年、2004年、2006年、2008年、2010年的問卷資料,以加權最小平方法(WLS)分析。
實證結果發現臺灣的汽油需求價格彈性維持在約-0.35,此外在2008年油價先上升而後下降的趨勢之下,汽油需求價格彈性是變小的,約-0.27,2010年油價維持在較高時,汽油需求價格彈性是變大的,約-0.53,長期來看,近年來的汽油需求價格彈性較大。而臺灣的汽油需求所得彈性則維持在0.09~0.14之間。
This essay is aimed to discuss the reasons that influence gasoline demand in Taiwan, by analyzing the Price Elasticity and the Income Elasticity of Demand within two certain periods of time, from the Statistical Population and the Individual Economy aspects.
The first part of this essay will approach from the Statistical Population data, stating the reasons which influence monthly gasoline consumption within Taiwan by the statistics collected from May 2003 to May 2008 (61 months in total) and from June 2009 to December 2011 (31 months in total). It also generates a Fixed Effect Model by using the Panel Data within the mentioned periods. Meanwhile, the second part will approach from the Individual Economy viewpoint to portrait the causes of different household gasoline requirements, by using WLS to exam the Research of Private Automobile Usage in Taiwan, polling by Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Department of Statistics in 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010.
Although while the average Price Elasticity of gasoline demand is about -0.35, the Price Elasticity declines (-0.27) due to the increased and then decreased pricing occurred in 2008 and an increased Price Elasticity (-0.53) is also found when higher gasoline price shown in 2010. And the Income Elasticity of gasoline demand in Taiwan is about 0.09 to 0.14 in recent years.
一、 中文部分
林凱貞(2007),「陸上運輸部門之燃料需求分析:亞洲十國實證研究」,國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
徐玉珊(2009),「台灣公路油品需求之探討」,私立淡江大學經濟學系碩士班碩士論文。
陳英慧(2004),「汽油需求影響因素之探討:以台灣自用小客車為例」,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
黃琝琇、林建甫(2011),「國際原油價格衝擊對台灣石油消費量的不對稱效果」,應用經濟論叢,90 期,p55-92。
鄭瑩琦(2010),「中國汽、柴油需求之探討 - 以省份與行業別分析」,私立淡江大學經濟學系碩士班碩士論文。
經濟部能源局,「2011年之能源統計手冊」,經濟部能源局編制,p55-56。
二、 英文部分
Austin, D. 2008. “Effects of Gasoline Prices on Driving Behavior and Vehicle Markets.” Congressional Budget Office Report 2883.
Jonathan E. Hughes, Christopher R. Knittel, and Daniel Sperling. 2008. “Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand.” Energy Journal, 29(1):113-134.
Kenneth A. Small, Kurt Van Dender. 2007. “Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel:The Declining Rebound Effect.” Energy Journal, 28(1), 25-51.
Kenneth Gillingham. 2010. “Identifying the Elasticity of Driving: Evidence from a
Gasoline Price Shock in California.” Department of Management Science & Engineering and Department of Economics, Stanford University.
Kenneth Gillingham. 2011. “How Do Consumers Respond to Gasoline Price
Shocks? Heterogeneity in Vehicle Choice and Driving Behavior.” Department of Management Science & Engineering and Department of Economics, Stanford University.
Kent M. Hymel, Kenneth A. Small, and Kurt Van Dender. 2010. “Induced Demand and Rebound Effects in Road Transport.” Transportation Research Part B, 44(10):1220-1241.
Manuel Frondel, Colin Vance. 2010. “Driving for Fun? Comparing the Effect of Fuel Prices on Weekday and Weekend Fuel Consumption.” Energy Economics, 32(1):102-109.
Niovi Karathodorou, Daniel J. Graham, and Robert B. Noland. 2010. “Estimating the Effect of Urban Density on Fuel Demand.” Energy Economics, 32(1):86-92.
Rosa M. González-Marrero, Rosa M. Lorenzo-Alegría, and Gustavo A. Marrero. 2010. “A Dynamic Model for Road Gasoline and Diesel Consumption:An Application for Spanish Regions.” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2(4):201-209.
Thomas Klier, Joshua Linn. 2010. “The Price of Gasoline and the Demand for Fuel Efficiency:Evidence from Monthly New Vehicles Sales Data.” Economic Policy, 2(3):53-134.
Tomáš Havránek, Zuzana Iršová, and Karel Janda. 2012. “Demand for Gasoline Is
More Price-Inelastic than Commonly Thought.” Energy Economics, 34(1):201-207.
Zia Wadud, Daniel J. Graham, and Robert B. Noland. 2010. “Gasoline Demand with Heterogeneity in Household Responses.” Energy Journal, 31( 1):47-74.