| 研究生: |
吳曼瑄 Man-Hsuan Wu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
組織資源對跨世代員工留任意願之影響-以工作投入為中介變項 The Impact of Organizational Resources on Cross-Generational Employees’ Retention Intentions: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement. |
| 指導教授: |
陳明園
Ming-Yuan Chen |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Human Resource Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 62 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 組織資源 、工作靈活度 、數位資源 、職涯發展支持 、工作價值觀契合 、工作投入 、留任意願 、Z 世代 、跨世代管理 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Organizational Resources, Digital Resources, Career Development Support, Work Flexibility, Value Congruence, Work Engagement, Retention Intention, Generation Z, Cross- Generational Management |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:21 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
「面對勞動市場快速變遷與世代交替,企業留才策略日益受到重視。尤其在Z世代(1995–2005年出生)逐步成為職場主力後,如何因應不同世代員工對工作資源與職場體驗的多元需求,已成為人力資源管理的重要課題。本研究旨在探討組織所提供之資源對員工留任意願的影響,並以「工作投入」為中介變項,進一步分析不同世代間的差異。
本研究選取四項具代表性的組織資源構面:工作靈活度、數位資源、職涯發展支持與工作價值觀契合,透過問卷調查蒐集台灣地區在職員工資料,最終取得有效樣本共312份。研究工具包含各變項之成熟量表,並採用SPSS及PROCESS統計軟體進行敘述統計、信效度分析、中介效果分析與跨世代樣本分組分析。研究結果顯示:(1) 四項組織資源皆對留任意願產生顯著正向關係;(2)四項組織資源皆透過工作投入對留任意願產生部分中介效果;(3) 非Z世代(X世代與Y世代)在各項中介模型中展現較高影響力,特別在職涯發展支持與工作價值觀契合構面;(4) Z 世代雖在組織資源與留任意願之間呈現顯著直接效果,但中介效果普遍較弱,顯示其對工作投入的反應相對保留,組織資源不一定能有效轉化為實質的工作參與。
本研究實證結果驗證社會交換理論與資源保存理論於世代管理議題之適用性,亦突顯Z 與非 Z 世代對組織資源的回應存在明顯差異。建議企業依據世代特性規劃留才策略,對 Z 世代強調彈性與自主參與,對非 Z 世代則以制度設計與投入強化為核心,提升組織穩定與人才留任。
In response to the rapidly changing labor market and generational transitions, employee retention strategies have become increasingly critical for organizations. As Generation Z (born between 1995 and 2005) gradually becomes the dominant workforce, addressing the diverse needs of employees from different generations regarding work resources and workplace experiences has emerged as a key issue in human resource management. This study aims to examine the impact of organizational resources on employees’ retention intention and further explores the mediating role of job involvement, with a focus on intergenerational differences.
This research investigates four representative dimensions of organizational resources: job flexibility, digital resources, career development support, and person–organization value fit. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey targeting employed individuals in Taiwan, resulting in a total of 312 valid responses. The study utilized well-established scales for each construct and conducted descriptive statistics, reliability and validity analysis, mediation analysis, and multi-group analysis across generations using SPSS and PROCESS statistical software.
The results indicate that:
(1) All four organizational resource dimensions have a significantly positive relationship with retention intention;
(2) Each of the four resources exerts a partial mediating effect on retention intention through job involvement;
(3) Non-Z generations (i.e., Generation X and Y) show stronger effects across the mediation models, especially in the areas of career development support and person–organization value fit; and
(4) although Generation Z showed significant direct effects between organizational resources and retention intention, the mediating effects of work engagement were generally weaker, indicating a lower tendency to translate resources into active engagement.
These findings support the applicability of Social Exchange Theory and Conservation of Resources Theory in the context of generational workforce management. The study highlights the necessity for organizations to tailor retention strategies based on generational characteristics—emphasizing flexibility and autonomy for Generation Z, while reinforcing structured support and engagement for non-Z generations to enhance organizational stability and long-term talent retention.
中文文獻
Cheers雜誌編輯部(2023年)。〈員工為何選擇留下來?留才關鍵不只是薪水,還有這 4 件事〉。《Cheers快樂工作人》。取自 https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5099579
吳庭芸、林宜玄(2023)。員工體驗與敬業度對留任意願之影響。《管理研究學報,23》,1–32。https://doi.org/10.6626/MR.202312_23.0001
郭芊雅(2023)。Z世代工作價值觀與工作投入之關係研究:以組織承諾為中介變數(碩士論文)。中原大學。
張偉豪, & 鄭時宜. (2012). 與結構方程模型共舞 : 曙光初現/ 張偉豪, 鄭時宜著. (初版.). 前程文化.
英文文獻
Amos, E. A., & Weathington, B. L. (2008).An analysis of the relation between employee–organization value congruence and employee attitudes. The Journal of Psychology, 142(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.142.6.615-632
Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900107
Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414–435.
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376.
Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1982). A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 350–360
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons.
Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500401
Costanza, D. P., Badger, J. M., Fraser, R. L., Severt, J. B., & Gade, P. A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Danziger, N., Rachman‐Moore, D., & Valency, R. (2008). The construct validity of Schein’s Career Anchors Orientation Inventory. Career Development International, 13(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810849506
Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891
Egerová, D., Komárková, L., & Kutlák, J. (2021). Generation Y and Generation Z employment expectations: A generational cohort comparative study from two countries. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 24(3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-03-006
Gregory, B. T., Albritton, M. D., & Osmonbekov, T. (2007).The mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationships between P–O fit, job satisfaction, and turnover intention. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106293772
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2008). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 57(3), 265–278.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
Indroputri, I. A., & Sanjaya, R. (2024). Digital transformation in human resource management and its role in Gen Z career development: A systematic literature review. Petra International Journal of Business Studies, 7(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.9744/petraijbs.7.1.48-56
Jena, L., & Nayak, U. (2024). Organizational career development and retention of millennial employees: The role of job engagement and organizational engagement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(4), 778–796. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-07-2022-0323
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341
Kossek, E. E., & Michel, J. S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 535–572). American Psychological Association.
Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Bravo, J. (2011). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational support for development: The critical role of career opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021452
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Michielsen, M., & Moeyaert, B. (2009). Employee retention: Organisational and personal perspectives. Vocations and Learning, 2(3), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-009-9024-7
Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139–S157. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1913
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
Masuda, A. D., Poelmans, S. A. Y., Allen, T. D., Spector, P. E., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L., ... & Lu, L. (2012). Flexible work arrangements availability and their relationship with work-to-family conflict, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison of three country clusters. Applied Psychology, 61(1), 1–29.
Masri, H. A., & Jabeen, F. (2023). Digital talent and employee retention: The role of employee engagement as a mediator. International Journal of Organizational Analysis.
McNall, L. A., Masuda, A. D., & Nicklin, J. M. (2010). Flexible work arrangements, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work-to-family enrichment. The Journal of Psychology, 144(1), 61–81.
Merican, N., Monil, M., Rafie, U. N., & Tajuddin, D. (2022). The effect of career planning, talent management and training development towards employee retention. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 165–173. https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/14318/the-effect-of-career-planning-talent-management-and-training-development-towards-employee-retention.pdf
Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Baharom, M. N. R., & Harun, H. (2014).
Person–organization fit and turnover intention: The mediating role of employee engagement. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 6(3), 205–209.
Naz, S., Li, C., Nisar, Q. A., Khan, M. A. S., Ahmad, N., & Anwar, F. (2020). A study in the relationship between supportive work environment and employee retention: Role of organizational commitment and person–organization fit as mediators. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020924694. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020924694
Ozkan, M., & Solmaz, B. (2015). The Changing Face of the Employees – Generation Z and Their Perceptions of Work (A Study Applied to University Students). Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00876-X
Popaitoon, Patchara. 2022. 「Fostering Work Meaningfulness for Sustainable Human Resources: A Study of Generation Z」. Sustainability 14(6):3626. doi: 10.3390/su14063626.
Price, J.L. (1997). Handbook of organizational measurement. International Academic Publishers. International Academic Publishers.
Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. M. (2013). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67(4), 413–440.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Shao, Zhen, Xixi Li, Yumei Luo & Jose Benitez. 2024. 「The Differential Impacts of Top Management Support and Transformational Supervisory Leadership on Employees’ Digital Performance」. European Journal of Information Systems 33(3):334–60. doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2022.2147456.
Shockley, Kristen M., Heather Ureksoy, Ozgun Burcu Rodopman, Laura F. Poteat & Timothy Ryan Dullaghan. 2016. 「Development of a New Scale to Measure Subjective Career Success: A Mixed-Methods Study: Subjective Career Success」. Journal of Organizational Behavior 37(1):128–53. doi: 10.1002/job.2046.
Steil, A. V., de Cuffa, D., Iwaya, G. H., & Pacheco, R. C. dos S. (2020). Perceived learning opportunities, behavioral intentions and employee retention in technology organizations. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(3), 189–202
Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
Wang, Q. (Emily), Myers, M. D., & Sundaram, D. (2013). Digital natives and digital immigrants: Towards a model of digital fluency. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(6), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y
Wang, Guifang, Zuraina Dato Mansor & Yee Choy Leong. 2024. 「Linking Digital Leadership and Employee Digital Performance in SMEs in China: The Chain-Mediating Role of High-Involvement Human Resource Management Practice and Employee Dynamic Capability」. Heliyon 10(16):e36026. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36026.
Willie, M. (2024). Leveraging digital resources: A resource-based view perspective. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 5(1), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v5i1.415