跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 賴育絜
Yu-Chieh Lai
論文名稱: 企業社會責任治理對企業社會責任績效之影響
The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance
指導教授: 陳建中
Chien-Chung Chen
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計研究所
Graduate Institute of Accounting
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 44
中文關鍵詞: 企業社會責任(CSR)企業社會責任治理企業社會責任績效企業社會責任委員會董事
外文關鍵詞: corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate social responsibility governance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, board director
相關次數: 點閱:10下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,有關企業社會責任(corporate social responsibility, CSR)之議題備受關注,過去有許多文獻探討公司治理對企業社會責任績效之影響,本文以企業社會責任治理的角度出發,探討企業社會責任治理對於企業社會責任績效之影響。本研究之樣本選取2014-2017年,以達到臺灣證券交易所「上市公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法」強制揭露要求的企業,總計1084家企業爲樣本。根據研究結果顯示,公司設置負責經濟、環境和社會主題的決策之委員會對CSR績效有正向影響;此外,不論董事兼任或未兼任委員會主席,皆是較佳的CSR治理,也會對CSR績效產生正面之影響。


    In recent years, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an important issue due to the occurrences of corporate frauds and scandal. Most literature discusses the impact of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility performance. This article specifically addresses the impact of corporate social responsibility governance on corporate social responsibility performance. The sample of this study was selected from 2014 to 2017 and met the requirements of the mandatory disclosure requirements of the “Working Methods for the Preparation and Reporting of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports of Listed Companies” on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. In total, 1084 enterprises were selected as samples. The results of the study show that the companies with a CSR committee have better CSR performance. Besides, compared with companies without CSR committee, regardless the chairman of the committee is the board director or not, the company will have better CSR governance and then have a positive impact on CSR performance.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iii 目錄 iv 表目錄 vi 一、緒論 1 二、文獻探討與假說發展 3 2-1企業社會責任績效 3 2-2企業社會責任治理對企業社會責任績效之影響 6 三、研究設計 9 3-1 研究期間、樣本選取與資料來源 9 3-2 變數衡量 10 3-2-1應變數—CSR績效 10 3-2-2自變數—CSR治理 12 3-2-3控制變數 13 3-3 研究模型 14 四、實證結果 17 4-1 樣本資料敘述統計分析 17 4-2 相關係數分析 20 4-3迴歸分析 22 4-4 遞延效果分析 25 五、結論與建議 28 5-1 研究結論與貢獻 28 5-2 研究限制與建議 29 參考文獻 30

    金融監督管理委員會,台灣證券交易所,2016。上市上櫃公司治理實務守則。
    全球永續性標準理事會(Global Sustainability Standards Board),GRI Standard,2016。
    池祥萱、繆文娟與莊瀅臻,2014,企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎?來自全球 500 大公司的證據,管理學報,31(1):1-19。
    李弈靜,2017,策略性企業社會責任動機與企業社會責任績效──以臺灣強制揭露企業社會責任報告書之公司為例,國立中央大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    林怡瑄,2012,企業社會責任與股價關聯性之研究─採用 Ohlson模型,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
    祝道松,2008,環境績效對環境揭露與經濟績效的影響,當代會計,9(2):237-270。
    郭千鈺,2015,CEO 薪酬、員工薪酬與企業績效的關聯—企業社會責任的觀點,東海大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    陳振遠、王健聰,2017,公司治理對於企業社會責任、公司價值之影響,中山管理評論,25(1):135-176。
    張元、涂峻瑋與許敏政,2017,社會責任表現較佳的公司有較低的股價崩盤風險嗎?—來自上海證券交易所的證據,兩岸金融季刊,5(2)。
    許孟書、張元、陳俞如,2017,產業競爭與公司在社會責任上投入之關聯,國立彰化師範大學財務金融技術學系碩士論文。
    黃正忠,2014,CSR及企業永續治理的商業意義,證券櫃檯月刊,171:45-47。
    黃玉佩,2011,企業社會責任與經營績效之研究,長庚大學工商管理學系碩士論文。
    曾奕婷,2018,企業社會責任對公司價值之影響-短期與長期效果,國立彰化師範大學財務金融技術學系碩士論文。
    劉美纓、丁碧慧與朱奐聿,2014,企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究,2014第17屆科際整合管理研討會:17-30。
    劉哲誠,2017,企業社會責任績效與企業社會責任報告書確信選擇之關聯-以台灣為例,國立中央大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    Adams, C. A. 2002. Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 15(2): 223-250.
    Amran, A., S. P. Lee, and S. S. Devi. 2014. The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment 23(4): 217–235.
    Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row
    Cowen, S., L. Ferreri, and L. Parker, 1987, The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(2): 111-122.
    Danvila del Valle, I., J. M. Diez Esteban, and O. Lopez de Foronda. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability committee inside the board, Working paper, SSRN no. 2260382. University of Burgos, Burgos.
    Eccles, R.G., I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim. 2011. The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance. Working paper, SSRN no.1964011. Harvard Business School, Allston, MA.
    Griffin, J. J. and J. F. Mahon. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society 36(5): 5-31.
    Birindelli, G., S. Dell’Atti, A.P. Iannuzzi, and M. Savioli. 2018. Composition and activity of the board of directors: impact on ESG performance in the banking system, sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal 10(12): 1-20.
    Helfaya, A., and T. Moussa. 2017. Do Board’s corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment 26(8): 1061-1077.
    Hussain, N., U. Rigoni, and R.P. Orij. 2018. Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics 149(2): 411-432.
    Ioannou, I., and G. Serafeim. 2011. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Working paper SSRN no. 1799589. London Business School and Harvard Business School.
    Jamali, D., A. Safieddine, and M. Rabbath. 2008. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships, corporate governance. An International Review 16(5): 443-459.
    Mackenzie, C. 2007. Boards, Incentives and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case for a Change of Emphasis. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(5): 935-943.
    Mallin, C., and G. Michelon. 2011. Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research 41(2): 119-144.
    McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21(5): 603-609.
    Ricart, J. E., M.Á. Rodríguez, and P. Sánchez. 2005. Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical examination of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index leaders. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 5(3): 24–41.
    Spitzeck, H. 2009. The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 9(4): 495–505.
    Ullman, A. H. 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review 10(3): 540–557.
    Welford R. 2007. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: Issues for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14(1): 42-51.

    QR CODE
    :::