| 研究生: |
曾俊凱 Chun-Kai Tseng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
人機協作中工作任務角色與職能的轉變:工作分析觀點 Transformation of tasks, roles and individual competences in a human machine collaboration case: A job analysis approach |
| 指導教授: | 劉念琪 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Human Resource Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2020 |
| 畢業學年度: | 108 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 81 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 工作分析 、職能 、工作雕琢 、資訊與通訊科技 、虛實整合系統 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | ALM |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:10 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要目的,在於探究技術變革下人機協作的任務、職能與角色轉變。在文獻階段,首先闡明工作分析的意義與重要性,接著探討適合本研究分析的任務與職能架構,並整理技術變革相關研究和人機協作關係與任務技能的可能轉變。研究設計以質性訪談方法對個案公司之印刷機車長進行工作分析,萃取蒐集之質性資料以獲取其中意義與脈絡。本研究發現印刷機車長具有共通的任務與職能構面,歸納績優車長採取的自主性任務、高嫻熟度技能與能力特質,對照過去的差異及轉變,並發現車長未能主動察覺管理職能的重要性。研究結果顯示,自動化技術進步對個案公司印刷機車長的影響不僅實現部分任務的替代與互補,同時使車長整體工作任務朝趨向複雜化、工作自主性與深化工作技能。本研究依研究結果於文末提出管理意涵,作為個案公司實務建議參考與後續研究方向。
The main purpose of this study is to explore the Transformation of tasks, individual competences and roles in a human machine collaboration under technological change. In the
literature stage, first clarify the significance and importance of job analysis, and then discuss the tasks and competences framework suitable for the analysis of this study, and sort out the
research related to technological change and the possible transformation of human-machine collaboration and task skills. The research design used a qualitative interview method to analyze
the work of the printing company's captain in the case company, and extracted the collected qualitative data to obtain its meaning and context. This study found that printing supervisors
have common tasks and functional aspects. They summarized the autonomous tasks, highskilled skills and ability traits adopted by the excellent printing supervisors, compared with the
past differences and changes, and found that the printing supervisors failed to actively detect the management functions. Importance. The research results show that the impact of automation
technology advancement on the printing supervisors of the case company not only realizes the replacement and complementation of some tasks, but also makes the printing supervisor's
overall work tasks tend to be more complicated, work autonomy and deeper work skills. This study proposes management implications at the end of the article based on the results of the
study, and serves as a reference for practical recommendations of case companies and followup research directions.
﹝1﹞ Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for
employment and earnings. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1043171):
Elsevier.
﹝2﹞ Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2017). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor
markets.
﹝3﹞ Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing: Prentice Hall/Pearson
Education.
﹝4﹞ Autor, D. (2013). THE “TASK APPROACH” TO LABOR MARKETS: AN
OVERVIEW.
﹝5﹞ Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent
technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly journal of
economics, 118(4), 1279-1333.
﹝6﹞ Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in
OECD countries.
﹝7﹞ Barrett, G. V., & Depinet, R. L. (1991). A reconsideration of testing for competence
rather than for intelligence. American psychologist, 46(10), 1012.
﹝8﹞ Bowles, J. (2014). The computerisation of European jobs-who will win and who
will lose from the impact of new technology onto old areas of employment? Breugel
2014. In.
﹝9﹞ Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative
research interviewing (Vol. 3): Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
﹝10﹞ Cedefop (2015). Matching skills and jobs in Europe.Insights from Cedefop’s
European skills and jobs survey.Retrieved from
https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/8088_en.pdf
﹝11﹞ Cedefop (2017). list#ESJsurvey INSIGHTS No 9 - The great divide
#ESJsurvery.Retrieved from https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-andresources/
statistics-and-indicators/statistics-and-graphs/esjsurvey-insights-no-9-
great-divide
﹝12﹞ Chouhan, V. S., & Srivastava, S. (2014). Understanding competencies and
competency modeling―A literature survey. IOSR Journal of Business and
Management, 16(1), 14-22.
﹝13﹞ Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory: Sage publications.
﹝14﹞ Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design:
Choosing among five approaches: Sage publications.
﹝15﹞ DAVID, H., FRANK, L., & RICHARD, J. M. (2003). THE SKILL CONTENT OF
RECENT TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: AN EMPIRICAL EXPLORATION.
﹝16﹞ Dessler,G.(2017),Human Resource Management 15th ed, Pearson Global Edition .
﹝17﹞ Domini, G., Grazzi, M., Moschella, D., & Treibich, T. (2019). Threats and
opportunities in the digital era: automation spikes and employment dynamics.
﹝18﹞ Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to
negotiated text. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(6), 645-672.
﹝19﹞ Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible
are jobs to computerisation? Technological forecasting and social change, 114, 254-
280.
﹝20﹞ Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (1998). The origins of technology-skill complementarity.
The Quarterly journal of economics, 113(3), 693-732.
﹝21﹞ Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded
theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research, 17(4), 364.
﹝22﹞ Graetz, G., & Michaels, G. (2018). Robots at work. Review of Economics and
Statistics, 100(5), 753-768.
﹝23﹞ Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170
﹝24﹞ Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation.
Journal of basic and clinical pharmacy, 5(4), 87.
﹝25﹞ Klenert, D., Fernandez-Macias, E., & Anton, J.-I. (2020). Do robots really destroy
jobs? Evidence from Europe. Retrieved from
﹝26﹞ Koch, M., Manuylov, I., & Smolka, M. (2019). Robots and firms.
﹝27﹞ Lorenz, M., Rüßmann, M., Strack, R., Lueth, K. L., & Bolle, M. (2015). Man and
machine in industry 4.0: How will technology transform the industrial workforce
through 2025. The Boston Consulting Group, 2.
﹝28﹞ Matthes, B., Christoph, B., Janik, F., & Ruland, M. (2014). Collecting information
on job tasks—an instrument to measure tasks required at the workplace in a multitopic
survey. Journal for Labour Market Research, 47(4), 273-297.
﹝29﹞ McLeod, J. (2011). Qualitative research in counselling and psychotherapy: Sage.
﹝30﹞ Palmer, H., & Valet, W. (2001). Job analysis: Targeting needed skills. Employment
relations today, 28(3), 85.
﹝31﹞ Primoff. E .• & Fine. S. (1988). A history of job analysis. In S. Gael (Ed.). Thejob
analysis handbook/or business. industry and government. vol. 1. New York: john
Wiley and Sons.
﹝32﹞ Pissarides,C. (2019,December,16). Over half of the world's jobs are replaceable by
a robot - is yours?.Retrieved form
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/12/automation-4ir-technology-robotwork-
career
﹝33﹞ Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative
research in accounting & management.
﹝34﹞ Sanchez, J. I. (1994). From documentation to innovation: Reshaping job analysis to
meet emerging business needs. Human Resource Management Review, 4(1), 51-74.
﹝35﹞ Sanchez, J. I. (2000). Adapting work analysis to a fast‐paced and electronic
business world. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 207-215.
﹝36﹞ Singh, P. (2008). Job analysis for a changing workplace. Human Resource
Management Review, 18(2), 87-99.
﹝37﹞ Schneider, B., & Konz, A. M. (1989). Strategic job analysis. Human Resource
Management, 28(1), 51-63.
﹝38﹞ Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Batjtsta, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B.,
Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The practice of competency modeling. Personnel psychology,
53(3), 703-740.
﹝39﹞ Spencer Lyle, M., & Spencer Signe, M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for
superior performance. New York.
﹝40﹞ Stevens, G. W. (2013). A critical review of the science and practice of competency
modeling. Human Resource Development Review, 12(1), 86-107.
﹝41﹞ Stewart, G. L., & Carson, K. P. (1997). Moving beyond the mechanistic model: An
alternative approach to staffing for contemporary organizations. Human Resource
Management Review, 7(2), 157-184.
﹝42﹞ Taylor, F. W. (1998). The principles of scientific management. 1911. In: New York:
WW Norton & Co.
﹝43﹞ Twede, D.(2007). The History of Corrugated Fiberboard Shipping
Containers.Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237446686_The_History_of_Corrugate
d_Fiberboard_Shipping_Containers
﹝44﹞ Waschull, S., Bokhorst, J., Molleman, E., & Wortmann, J. (2019). Work design in
future industrial production: Transforming towards cyber-physical systems.
Computers & Industrial Engineering.
﹝45﹞ Willis TowersWatson(2018,February,7). The future of work: Debunking myths and
navigating new realities.Retrieved form https://www.willistowerswatson.com/-
/media/WTW/Insights/2018/02/the-future-of-work-debunking-myths-and69
navigating-new-realities-wtw.pdf?modified=20180316154144
﹝46﹞ Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees
as active crafters of their work. Academy of management review, 26(2), 179-201.
﹝47﹞ 李彭、萬達主編(2014) ,紙箱生產技術,北京,印刷工業出版社。
﹝48﹞ Babbie, E.著, 林佳瑩審閱,蔡毓智譯 (2013), 研究方法:基礎理論與技巧,
台北市,雙葉書廊有限公司。