現今，鋼橋為設計重要橋梁的主要選擇之一。而由於橋面上鋼床鈑鋪面結構與一般道路鋪面不同，因此本研究使用有限元素分析軟體ABAQUS建立鋼床鈑鋪面三維有限元素模型，以此模擬不同的車輪軸型、車輪載重位置及鋪面材料配置等情形下之力學反應，並求取鋪面上產生的最大主張應變(MPE-T)與垂直壓應變(E33-C)來進行鋼床鈑鋪面破壞之相關分析。
研究結果顯示，對於鋼床鈑鋪面來說：(1)較佳雙層鋪面材料配置原則為將回模模數較小的鋪面材料置於面層，而較大的置於底層，藉此控制面層先產生破壞，以利維修。(2)鋪面層上MPE-T最大值受車輪載重與肋梁之相對位置影響大，而受車輪載重與橫梁之相對位置影響小；而其E33-C最大值受車輪載重、肋梁與橫梁三者間之相對位置影響。(3)當車輪載重質心在肋梁側版上方時，鋪面上產生的MPE-T最大值較其餘位置時大，其值位於胎印兩側的面層底部，可視為疲勞破壞最可能先發生位置。(4)鋪面層上E33-C分布情況受到鋪面材料配置以及整體結構對車輪載重之分配的影響而不同，如較佳雙層鋪面材料配置會集中於面層、雙輪下可能分布不均。(5)軸型不同對於不同載重位置作用下，鋪面層上MPE-T與E33-C之最大值的數值差異趨勢沒有影響，而數值大小上存在些許差值，表示雙軸雙輪之前後軸對於鋪面層上MPE-T與E33-C之最大值有互相影響，但是並不顯著。

Nowadays, the steel bridge is one of the choices for designing. Because the structure of steel deck pavement on the steel bridge is different with the general road pavement, this study used the three-dimensional finite element model of steel deck pavement to model the mechanical responses of steel deck pavement under different conditions of loading types, load positions, and pavement material combinations, and then found the maximum value of maximum principle tensile strain (MPE-T) and vertical compressive strain (E33-C) in the pavement to do the steel deck pavement damage analysis.
The results for steel deck pavement show that, for easy to maintenance, the better pavement material combination is the pavement material with greater stiffness being placed in the bottom, and lower one placed in the top to control the pavement whose surface course occurs damage first. The maximum value of MPE-T in the pavement is influenced by relative positions of loads, ribs, and floor beams. When the center of loading moves along the top of ribs, the maximum values of MPE-T in the pavement are more than the others. These values are located on the bottom of surface course and below the two sides of tires, where can be regarded as the locations where fatigue cracking occurs. The distribution of E33-C is influenced by pavement design and wheel load istribution. For example, E33-C concentrates on surface course for the better pavement material combination, and distributes unevenly for some special conditions. The front and rear axles of dual-tandem wheels do not influence with each other for the change tendency of MPE-T and E33-C in the pavement, but still cause small differences for the maximum values of them.

[1]翁逸偉，「鋼床鈑鋪面破壞分析及較適鋪面材料之探討」，博士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2011)。
[2]鄭家瑋，「鋼床鈑鋪面有限元素破壞分析及較適載重位置探討」，碩士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2012)。
[3]張瑞宏、黃偉慶、李奇瑋、楊樹榮，「柔性鋪面於反覆載重下之車轍損傷評估」，中國土木水利工程學刊，第二十一卷第二期 (民國九十八年)。
[4]Huang,Y.H., “Pavement Analysis And Design”, second edition, Prentice Hall,Inc., Upper Saddle River,New Jersey, (2004).
[5]簡天助，「剛性路面承受卡車靜態應力分析以台中電廠儲煤場道路為例」，碩士論文，成功大學土木工程研究所，台南 (2009)。
[6]張維銘，「快凝混凝土應用於剛性鋪面維修之研究」，碩士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2004)。
[7]交通部台灣區國道新建工程局，「台灣地區柔性路面厚度設計手冊研擬」(1996)。
[8]Asphalt Institute(1981), “Thickness Design - Asphalt Pavement for Highways and Streets”, Ninth, Manual Series No.1 (MS-1), The Asphalt Institute.
[9]郭廷宇，「溫度效應下高速公路柔性鋪面車轍損傷模擬」，碩士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2011)。
[10]FHWA, “Distress identification manual for Long-Term Pavement Performance Program”, Publication NO. FHWA –RD-03-031, (2003).
[11]許阿明、張春貴、周宗裕，「關渡大橋鋪面破壞狀況及維修策略探討」，台灣公路工程，第三十一卷第四期 (民國九十三年十月)。
[12]多田宏行編著， "鋼床鈑鋪裝的設計與施工"，鹿島出版會，第95~97，134~139 頁，平成2年。
[13]楊金澤，「鋼床鈑鋪面材料特性研究」，碩士論文，中華大學土木工程學研究所，新竹 (2000)。
[14]潘承緯，「GUSS 瀝青混凝土成效特性之研究」，碩士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2002)。
[15]交通部「公路橋梁設計規範」9.2.12 之「鋼橋面鈑之上部結構」，第 270~273 頁，民國九十八年12月。
[16]Design Manual for Orthotropic Steel Plate Deck Bridges, American Institute of Steel Construction, (1963).
[17]AASHTO(2002), Standard Specifications for Highway Bridge,17th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
[18]AASHTO(1994), LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. First Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
[19]道路橋示方書，同解說(I.共通篇；II.鋼橋篇)，(社)日本道路協會，平成8年12月。
[20]鄭芝貴，「鋼床鈑鋪設改質瀝青工法成效之評估」，碩士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2001)。
[21]林澄燦，「關於鋼床鈑構造」，中華技術，第十四期。
[22]Huang, Y. H., “Pavement Analysis And Design”, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., (1993).
[23]士盟瑞其CAE團隊，「最新Abaqus實務入門引導」，全華圖書股份有限公司 出版，(2013)
[24]李奇瑋，「反覆載重下鋪面之車轍損傷評估」，碩士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2007)。
[25]楊樹榮，「路基土壤之不飽和吸力特性及反覆載重下之力學行為」，博士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2005)。
[26]茅荃、顧興宇，「鋼橋面力學分析合理有限元模型研究」，現代交通技術，第5卷第1期 (2008年2月)。
[27]HRB, “The AASHTO Road Test”, Report 5, Pavement Research, Special Report 61 E, Publication No. 954, Nation Academy of Seiences-Nation Research Council, (1962).
[28]AASHTO (1972), “AASHTO Interim guide for the design of flexible pavement structure”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
[29]AASHTO (1986), “AASHTO Guide for design of pavement structures”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
[30]AASHTO (1993), “AASHTO Guide for design of pavement structures”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
[31]ARA (2004),Inc., ERES Consultants Division “Guide for Mechanistic- Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures”, Chapter 3: Design of new and reconstructed flexible pavement”, NCHRP Project 1-37A, March.
[32]AASHTO (2008), “Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, Interim Edition”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C.
[33]Leahy,R.B., “Permanent Deformation Characteristics of Asphalt Concrete”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, (1989).
[34]Andrei, D., Witczak, M. W., and Mirza, M. W, “Development of Revised Predictive Model for the Dynamic (Complex) Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures”. Development of the 2002 Guide for the Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP 1-37A. Interim Team Technical Report.Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maryland of College Park, MD, (1999).
[35]Kaloush, K. E. and Witczak, M. W., “Development of a Permanent to Elastic Strain Ratio Model for Asphalt Mixtures”, Development of the 2002 Guide for the Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures,NCHRP 1-37 A. Inter Team Technical Report,Sept, (2000).
[36]Abaqus 6.12 Documentation.
[37]張廖年禧，「國道高速公路鋪設石膠泥及排水性瀝青混凝土成效之研究」，碩士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2004)。
[38]鄭榮輝，「國道卡車軸次與軸重的變異性分析」，碩士論文，成功大學土木工程研究所，台南 (2008)。
[39]宋侑玲，「重載交通荷重對路面損壞分析模式之建立」，博士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢(2003)。
[40]廖小媛，「以力學-經驗準則探討溫度與重車載重對高速公路柔性鋪面之影響」，碩士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢(2009)。
[41]廖啟州，「高速公路柔性鋪面溫度分布對鋪面破壞與服務年限之影響」，博士論文，中央大學土木工程研究所，中壢 (2009)。
[42]蔡攀鰲，"公路工程學"，鵬逞實業有限公司 (2003)。
[43]國立中央大學橋梁網站, http://www.cv.ncu.tw/civil/cber。
[44]JFE Steel Corporation, http://www.jfe-steel.co.jp/en/index.html。
[45]本州四國連絡橋之橋面舖裝相關資料調查研究報告書，(財)海洋架橋調查會。
[46]Phillips, B. L., Surfacing of Orthotropic Steel Deck Bridges, Country Roads Board of Victoria, Australia, (1973).
[47]ASTM D6433-99, “Stand Practice of Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys”, (1993).
[48]Hudson, S. W., and Seeds, S.B., “Evaluation of increased pavement loading and tire pressures”, Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1207, pp. 197-206, (1988).
[49]Zaghloul S. and T.White, Use of Three-Dimensional, Dynamic Finite Element Program for Analysis of Flexible Pavement, TRR1388, Transportation Research Record, pp.60-69, (1992).
[50]林宗憲、陳偉全、蔡雅芳，「卡車軸組移動之動態分析」，臺灣公路工程，第三十卷第七期 (2004)。
[51]Jun Murakoshi1, Naoki Yanadori2, and Hironori Ishii3, “Reasearch On Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Pavement For Orthotropic Steel Deck As A Countermeasure For Fatigue”, (2007-2008).
[52]ASTM D6433-99, “Standard Practice of Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys”, (1999).
[53]Shmuel L. Weissman, “The Influence of Tire-Pavement Contact Stress Distribution on the Development of Distress Mechanisms in Pavements”, Symplectic Engineering Corporation 1350 Solano Ave. #26, Albany, CA 94706 USA.
[54]Sameh Zaghloul and Thomas White, “Use of Three-Dimensional, Dynamic Finite Element Program for Analysis of Flexible Pavement”, Transportation Research Record 1388.
[55]T. Medani, M.Huurman & A.A.A.Molenaar, “Characterisation of Some Candidate Surfacing Materials for Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks”, Department of Road and Railway Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geo- Sciences, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands (2004).
[56]蔡明倫，「流動性瀝青混凝土(Guss)之工程性質」，碩士論文，成功大學土木工程研究所，台南 (2009)。
[57]Kornél Kiss, László Dunai, "Fracture mechanics based fatigue analysis of steel bridge decks by two-level cracked models", (2002).
[58]楊軍、叢菱、朱浩然、崔娟，「鋼橋面瀝青混合料鋪裝車轍有限元分析」，工程力學，第26卷第5期 (2009年5月)。