| 研究生: |
莊堯鈞 Yao-Chun Chuang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
員工工作滿意度對員工績效之關聯—以工作投入為中介 The Relationship between Employee's Job Satisfaction and Employee's Job Performance — the mediation of Job involvement |
| 指導教授: |
鄭晉昌博士
Dr. Jihn-Chang Jehng |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所在職專班 Executive Master of Human Resource Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 105 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 45 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 工作滿意 、工作績效 、工作投入 、中介 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, Job Involvement, Mediation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:13 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在知識經濟的時代裡,人力資本是企業達到追求最大利潤與永續經營目的的重要資產之一,高人力資本也就是高生產力的象徵。企業若想要在全球快速自由移動的人才獲得關鍵人才青睞,提供專業舞台、優渥薪酬福利與重視職涯發展等,都將是人才留用的重要課題。
本研究為瞭解員工的工作滿意度對員工的工作績效的關聯,並檢視工作滿意度是否會透過工作投入對員工的工作績效產生中介的效果。藉由相關學者所著的書籍、學術期刊、學術論文、網路資訊等進行相關文獻的蒐集與整理。隨後再以電子郵件與即時通訊網軟體,邀請受測者進行網路問卷填答,最後再以SPSS進行統計分析,並檢驗相關假設結果是否成立。
In the age of knowledge economy, human capital is one of the important assets for the enterprise to achieve the purpose of maximum profit and sustainable management. It’s a symbol the high productivity means the high human capital. If the enterprise wants to win the key talents in the fast and global world, provides the professional stage, generous salaries and benefits as well as the paying attention to career development, will be the subject of talent retention.
This study is to understand the employee's job satisfaction associated with the job performance of employees, and check the mediation effect whether job satisfaction will work jointly by job involvement on employees' job performance. The first step is to work on collecting and sorting related books, academic journals, papers, information from internet. Then, invite the participants to answer questionnaires by emails and app software. Finally, run SPSS for statistical analysis to check whether the result of hypotheses is sustained or not.
中文參考文獻
1.王禎松. (1998). 國軍資訊軍官個人屬性, 事業生涯, 工作滿足與組織承諾之關聯性研究: 國防管理學院教育研究所碩士論文, 未出版, 臺北.
2.余安邦. (1980). 企業組織中員工離職行為之研究. 國立臺灣大學, 台北市.
3.余德成. (1996). 品質管理人性面系統因素對工作績效之影響. 高雄: 國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文.
4.呂秀雯, & 李誠. (1999). 工作滿足, 組織承諾, 對外工作機會認知與離職意願之探討: 以 W 公司為例. 中央大學第五屆企業人力資源管理診斷專案研究成果研討會 (引用http://hr.mgt.ncu.edu.tw/conferences/05th/1-2.htm).
5.李青芬, 李雅婷, & 趙慕芬. (1998). 組織行為學. 台北市: 華泰.
6.李炳賢. (2005). 中階主管的人格特質、領導風格及情緒智力與工作績效關聯之研究-以汽車零件製造業為例. 國立成功大學, 台南市.
7.林宥均. (2016). 國軍組織變革下飛機修護人員工作壓力、工作投入與工作績效之相關性研究─以空軍某航機保修部隊基層人員為例. 逢甲大學, 台中市.
8.林建忠. (2003). 組織承諾與工作滿意之調查研究:嘉義縣市警察和消防人員之比較. 國立中正大學, 嘉義縣.
9.林澄貴. (2001). 知識管理, 工程專業人員核心能力與工作績效關係之研究-以中鋼公司為例, 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文. 中原大學.
10.林麗珠. (2015). 人力資源工作者人格特質、興趣、工作投入與工作滿意度之相關研究. 國立彰化師範大學, 彰化縣.
11.邱皓政. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析: SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析. 台北市, 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
12.徐正光. (1977). 工廠工人的工作滿足及其相關因素之探討. 中央研究院民族學研 中央研究院民族學研究所集刊, 43, 23-63.
13.張世宗. (1998). 不同激勵制度對新世代工作族群之激勵效果及對其工作滿足與組織承諾之影響:以一電腦製造公司為例. 國立中央大學, 桃園縣.
14.許士軍. (1977). 工作滿足、個人特徵與組織氣候-文獻檢討及實證研究. 國立政治大學學報, 35, 44.
15.連淑君, & 余德成. (2004). 薪資制度, 責任感與工作績效之研究, 人力資源管理學報, 第 4 卷 第 2 期: 47-59: 連結.
16.陳義勝. (1984). 組織行為. 台北市: 華泰.
17.智庫百科. (2013). 明尼蘇達滿意度量表. from http://wiki.mbalib.com/w/index.php?title=%E6%98%8E%E5%B0%BC%E8%8B%8F%E8%BE%BE%E6%BB%A1%E6%84%8F%E5%BA%A6%E9%87%8F%E8%A1%A8&oldid=1065090
18.黃建達. (1999). 員工激勵偏好、工作滿足與離職傾向調查--以L公司為例. 中央大學第五屆企業人力資源管理診斷專案研究成果研討會 (引用http://hr.mgt.ncu.edu.tw/conferences/05th/1-1.htm).
19.黃國隆. (1982). 領導方式, 工作特性, 成就動機, 內外控, 專斷性與教師工作滿足的關係. 教育與心理研究, 198206 (5期)(國立政治大學教育學院 ), 47-76.
20.廖素華. (1978). 國小校長領導方式, 教師人格特質與教師工作滿足的關係. 未出版碩士論文, 國立政治大學, 台北市.
21.蔡坤宏. (1999). 工作滿足與離職意圖關係之回顧: Meta 分析. 管理評論, 私立輔仁大學, 6(1), 21-36.
22.鄭伯壎. (1977). 領導行為研究:領導方式、環境因素及人格特性對工作滿足的影響. 臺灣大學心理學研究所.
23.戴千惠. (2015). 以領導風格為干擾變項,探討組織承諾與工作投入的關係. 國立中央大學, 桃園縣.
24.謝宛廷. (2013). 國中代理代課教師壓力、生涯韌性、工作滿意度、工作投入度之相關研究. 國立彰化師範大學, 彰化縣.
西文參考文獻
1.Argyris, C. (1973). Personality and organization theory revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly, 141-167.
2.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
3.Black, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. (1997). Participative decision-making: An integration of multiple dimensions. Human Relations, 50(7), 859-878.
4.Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71.
5.Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of international business studies, 33(2), 203-221.
6.Campbell, D. J., M.D. Dunnette,L.M. Hough (Eds.). (1990). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press., vol.1.
7.Chughtai, A. A. (2008). Impact of job involvement on in-role job performance and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9(2), 169.
8.Goldthorpe, J. H., Lockwood, D., Bechhofer, F., & Piatt, J. (1968). Tlie Affluent Worker. Industrial Attitudes and Behavior: London: Cambridge University Press.
9.Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ.
10.Gouldner, A. (1959). Organizational Analysis. Sociology Today. RK Merton, L. Broom and LS Cottrell, Jr: New York, NY, Basic Books.
11.Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Har-court Brace Jovanovich: Inc.
12.Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper Brothers.
13.Jex, S. M. (1998). Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice: Sage Publications Ltd.
14.Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of management journal, 33(4), 692-724.
15.Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American sociological review, 124-143.
16.Kane, K. A., & Ungar, A. (1976). Divergent changes in the rate of development of pressure in the left ventricle and in the performance of the heart as a pump. Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences, 61(1), 35-44.
17.Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of applied psychology, 67(3), 341.
18.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action: Harvard Business Press.
19.Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1966). The social psychology of organizations.
20.Lassk, F. G., Marshall, G. W., Cravens, D. W., & Moncrief, W. C. (2001). Salesperson Job Involvement: A Modern Perspective a New Scale. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 21(4), 291-302.
21.Lawler III, E. E. (1973). Motivation in work organizations.
22.Lee, T. W. (1988). How job dissatisfaction leads to employee turnover. Journal of Business and psychology, 2(3), 263-271.
23.Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1, 1297-1343.
24.Lodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of applied psychology, 49(1), 24-33.
25.Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
26.McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2000). Organizational Behavior. NewYork. America.
27.Morse, N. C. (1953). Satisfactions in the white-collar job.
28.Motowidlo, S., & Van Scotter, J. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of applied psychology, 79(4), 475-480.
29.Nunnally Jr, J. (1978). Jr. Psychometric Theory: New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of applied psychology, 79(2), 224.
31.Porter, L., & Lawler, E. (1968). Managerial Attitudes and Performance, Homewood, 111., Richard D. Irwin: Inc.
32.Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1965). Properties of organization structure in relation to job attitudes and job behavior. Psychological bulletin, 64(1), 23-51.
33.Price, J. L. (1972). Handbook of organizational measurement.
34.Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
35.Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
36.Schmidt, F. L., VISWESVARAN, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Reliability is not validity and validity is not reliability. Personnel Psychology, 53(4), 901-912.
37.Smith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. (1963). Cornell studies of job satisfaction. Unpublished manuscript.
38.Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes.
39.Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley&Sons.
40.Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., & England, G. W. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation.
41.Wikipedia. Work engagement. from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_engagement