| 研究生: |
任師萱 Shih-Hsuan Jen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
員工對主管的信任與工作投入、組織公民行為之關聯性探討-以心理狀態為中介變項 The Relationship Between Employee’s Trust in Supervisor and Employee’s Job Involvement, Employee’s Organizational Citizenship Behavior - Psychological Condition as the Mediator Variables |
| 指導教授: |
陳明園
Ming-Yuan Chen |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 人力資源管理研究所 Graduate Institute of Human Resource Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 110 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 50 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 信任 、心理意義 、心理可得性 、心理安全感 、工作投入 、組織公民行為 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Trust, Psychological meaningfulness, Psychological availability, Psychological safety, Job involvement, Organizational citizenship behavior |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:8 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要研究員工對主管的信任,對於員工工作投入與員工組織公民行為之影響,並以員工的心理狀態(心理意義、心理可得性、心理安全感)作為中介效果。透過問卷調查法,以目前在台灣地區的從業人員為主要調查對象,共計207份問卷作為統計分析資料。研究結果顯示:(1)員工對主管的信任與心理意義有顯著正向影響效果;(2)員工對主管的信任與心理可得性有顯著正向影響效果;(3)員工對主管的信任與心理安全感有顯著正向影響效果;(4)心理意義與工作投入有顯著正向影響效果;(5)心理可得性與工作投入無顯著正向影響效果;(6)心理安全感與工作投入有顯著正向影響效果;(7)心理意義與組織公民行為有顯著正向影響效果;(8)心理可得性與組織公民行為有顯著正向影響效果;(9)心理安全感與組織公民行為有顯著正向影響效果。透過員工角度探討與直屬主管之間的信任關係,進而產生的心理狀態,期望提升員工自身工作投入的程度並且提高員工的組織公民行為。
This research elaborates the influence of employee’s trust in supervisor on employee’s job involvement and employee’s organizational citizenship behavior. The psychological condition (psychological meaningfulness, psychological availability, psychological safety) are the mediator variables in the research. This study investigates the employees who work in Taiwan, and there are 207 questionnaire samples for statistical analysis. The research shows that: (1) Employee’s trust in supervisor has significant positive impact on employee’s psychological meaningfulness. (2) Employee’s trust in supervisor has significant positive impact on employee’s psychological availability. (3) Employee’s trust in supervisor has significant positive impact on employee’s psychological safety. (4) Psychological meaningfulness has significant positive impact on job involvement. (5) Psychological availability has nonsignificant impact on job involvement. (6) Psychological safety has significant positive impact on job involvement. (7) Psychological meaningfulness has significant positive impact on organizational citizenship behavior. (8) Psychological availability has significant positive impact on organizational citizenship behavior. (9) Psychological safety has significant positive impact on organizational citizenship behavior. Through the perspective of the employee, the trust relationship between employee and supervisor forms the psychological condition (psychological meaningfulness, psychological availability, psychological safety) to improve employee’s job involvement and employee’s organizational citizenship behavior.
[1] Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York, NY: Wiley.
[2] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
[3] Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
[4] Bliese, P. D., & Hanges, P. J. (2004). Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 74, 400–417. DOI:10.1177/1094428104268542
[5] Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implication for theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560–569. DOI:10.5465/AMR.1982.4285240
[6] Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83–93. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
[7] Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1, 185–216. DOI:10.1177/135910457000100301
[8] Brower, H. H., Lester, S.W., Korsgaard, M. A., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35, 327–347. DOI:10.1177/0149206307312511
[9] Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 358–368. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358
[10] Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[11] Christian MS, Garza AS, Slaughter JE. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 64, 89–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
[12] Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
[13] Colquitt, J., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
[14] Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 563–576. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266 (200005)21:5<563: AID-SMJ99>3.0.CO;2-0
[15] De Jong, B. A., & Elfring T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549. DOI:10.1007/s12529-010-9077-x
[16] Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 55, 869–884. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
[17] Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–455. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.445
[18] Dirks, K. T (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004–1012. DOI:10.1037//0021-9010.85.6.1004
[19] Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4): 450–467. DOI:10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640
[20] Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628. DOI:10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.611
[21] Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. DOI:10.2307/2666999
[22] Edmondson AC, Lei Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
[23] Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1 22. DOI:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
[24] Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. DOI:10.1002/job.322
[25] Gerstner, G. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827–844. DOI:10.1037//0021-9010.82.6.827
[26] Gibbard, G. S., Hartman, J. J., & Mann, R. D. (1974). Analysis of groups. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[27] Hackman, J. R. (1986). The psychology of self-management in organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
[28] Harvey, S., Kelloway, E. K., & Duncan-Leiper, L. (2003). Trust in management as a buffer of the relationships between overload and strain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 306–315. DOI:10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.306
[29] Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
[30] Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships (187–220). Newbury Park, NY: Sage.
[31] House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–338. DOI:10.2307/2391905
[32] House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds). (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[33] Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118
[34] Judd, C.M.,&Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimatingmediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619. DOI:10.1177/0193841X8100500502
[35] Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724. DOI:10.2307/256287
[36] Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45, 321–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500402
[37] Kanungo, R.N. (1982), “Measurement of job and work involvement”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67 No. 3, pp. 341-349.
[38] Konovsky, A. M., Pugh, D. S. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656–669. DOI:10.2307/256704
[39] Kramer, R.M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
[40] Lee, F. (1997). When the going gets tough, do the tough ask for help? Help-seeking and power motivation in organizations. Organizational Behaviors and Human Decision Process, 72, 336–363. DOI:10.1006/obhd.1997.2746
[41] Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142.
[42] Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985. DOI:10.2307/2578601
[43] Li, A. N., & Tan, H. H. (2012). What happens when you trust your supervisor? Mediators of individual performance in trust relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 407–425.
[44] Li, N., Liang, J., & Crant, J. M. (2010). The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2): 395–404. DOI:10.1037/a0018079
[45] Lodahl, T.M. and Kejner, M. (1965), “The definition and measurement of job involvement”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 24-33.
[46] MacDuffie, J. P. (1997). The road to ‘root cause’: Shop-floor problem-solving at three assembly plants. Management Science, 43, 479–502. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.43.4.479
[47] MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. DOI:10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.83
[48] MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
[49] March, J. G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
[50] May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37. DOI:10.1348/096317904322915892
[51] May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
[52] Mayer, R.C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The Effect of the Performance Appraisal System on Trust for Management: A Field Quasi-Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
[53] Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874–888. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803928
[54] Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. DOI:10.2307/258792
[55] McAllister, D. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59. DOI:10.2307/256727
[56] McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 23–63. DOI:10.1080/21515581.2011.552424
[57] Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[58] Moorman, R.H. and Blakely, G.L. (1995), “Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 127-142
[59] Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behaviors in organizations. New York, NY: Academic Press.
[60] Nelson, D., & Sutton, C. D. (1990). Chronic work stress and coping: A longitudinal study and suggested new directions. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 845–858. DOI:10.2307/256295
[61] Organ, D.W. (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
[62] Organ, D.W. (1990), “The subtle significance of job satisfaction”, Clinical Laboratory Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 94-98.
[63] Organ, D.W. and Konovsky, M. (1989), “Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 157-164.
[64] Organ, D.W. and Lingl, A. (1995), “Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior”, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 135 No. 3, pp. 339-350.
[65] Organ, D.W., Podsakoff, P.M. and MacKenzie, S.B. (2006), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[66] Parker, C. P., Dipboye, R. L., & Jackson, S. L. (1995). Perceptions of organizational politics: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management, 21, 891–912. DOI:10.1016/0149-2063(95)90046-2
[67] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[68] Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. DOI:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
[69] Premeaux, S. F., & Bedeian, A. G. (2003). Breaking the silence: The moderating effects of selfmonitoring in predicting speaking up in the workplace. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1537–1562. https://doi.org/bgbfzb
[70] Rabindra N. Kanungo (1982). Measurement of Job and Work Involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 341-349.
[71] Riipinen, M. (1997), “The relationship between job involvement and well-being”, The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 131 No. 1, pp. 81-89.
[72] Rogers, C. R. (1958). The characteristics of a helping relationship. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 37, 6–16. DOI:10.1002/j.2164-4918. 1958.tb01147.x
[73] Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
[74] Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404. DOI:10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
[75] Sanchez-Burks, J. (2005). Protestant relational ideology: The cognitive underpinnings and organizational implications of an American anomaly. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 265–305.
[76] Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediator of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 863–871. DOI:10.1037/a0022625
[77] Schyns, B., & Day, D. (2010). Critique and review of leader-member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19(1), 1–29. DOI:10.1080/13594320903024922
[78] Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9–32. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.23463672
[79] Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (290–312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[80] Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1089–1121. DOI:10.2307/256928
[81] Vroom, V. H., &MacCrimmon, K. R. (1968). Toward a stochasticmodel of managerial careers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1), 26–46. DOI:10.2307/2391260
[82] Walumbwa FO, Schaubroeck J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior:Mediating roles of ethical leadership andwork group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1275–1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015848
[83] Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513–530. DOI:10.2307/259292
[84] Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1–26. DOI:10.1177/014662168500900101
[85] Williams, M. (2007). Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 32, 595–621. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351867
[86] Williams, J., &MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 23–51. DOI:10.1080/10705510701758166
[87] Wong, Y.-T., Ngo, H.-Y., & Wong, C.-S. (2003). Antecedents and outcomes of employees’ trust in Chinese joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 481–499. https://doi.org/fhw3rq
[88] Woods, S. A., & Sofat, J. A. (2013). Personality and engagement at work: The mediating role of psychological meaningfulness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2203–2210.
[89] Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. DOI:10.2307/259118