| 研究生: |
陳韋伶 Wei-Lin Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
不同焚化爐底碴物化性質比較分析 Analysis on the Physical and Chemical Property of bottom ash from Diverse Incinerator |
| 指導教授: |
林志棟
Jyh-Dong Lin |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 112 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 物理性質 、貯存時間 、焚化爐底碴 、化學性質 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Incinerator bottom ash, storage period, physical change, chemistry |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:5 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
根據環保署統計台灣地區焚化爐產生灰渣量,在民國92年度達1,051,602公噸,這些灰渣目前幾乎完全採取掩埋方式處理。未來焚化爐數量增加中,因此尋求合理經濟有效的資源化處理方法是刻不容緩之工作。
本研究主要材料取自於樹林、新店、八里三座焚化爐焚化後再經鶯歌某資源處理廠處理之底碴,底碴依焚化後處理程序不同分為:焚化爐底碴、初級資源化處理底碴及水洗底碴,前兩者經過4.5個月貯存堆置,堆置方式分為露天堆置及室外水池兩種,於貯存期間觀察其物化性質之改變;就物理性質而言,於貯存前、後進行篩分析、比重、洛杉磯磨損率等試驗,結果顯示:貯存前後之底碴,其物理性質並無任何改變;而各家焚化爐間經單因子變異數分析結果為:顯示無顯著差異。化學性質方面,各家焚化爐之化學性質趨勢幾乎相同;於貯存期間定期取樣進行pH值、水溶性氯離子、毒物溶出、化學成分及礦物晶相鑑定等分析,比較其相關性;結果顯示:貯存過程中pH值有些微下降之趨勢、降雨使得氯鹽含量降低,廚餘分類回收更降低底碴中大量的氯鹽,而毒物溶出、化學成分及礦物晶相鑑定於貯存期間觀察並無差異,但由於此一部份涉及取得樣本數量之考量,故國內應針對焚化爐底碴化學性質檢驗樣本之取樣數多寡另行研究。
另一方面針對初級資源化處理底碴進行加州承載比四天浸水回脹試驗及砂漿棒體積變化量試驗,瞭解其應用之可行性;結果顯示:底碴應用於道路工程是可行的技術,而砂漿棒體積變化量試驗結果顯示,底碴對於鹼骨材反應而言,是屬於活性粒料,故應用在水泥混凝土工程方面尚有疑慮。
According to the statistics from the Environmental Protection Administration, ash discharged by incinerators has been amounted to 1,051,602 tons by the year 2003. Burying is the strategy used to deal with them for the time being. However, as the construction of incinerators increases, the demand for economically effective way to recycle the waste is worth immediate attention.
Materials in this research are mostly obtained from the waste discharged by three incinerators of Shulin、Shindian、and Bali. Before being applied to this research, these waste also went through the recycling plant in Yingko. Varied from different operations, these Bottom ash are further divided into three categories: Incinerator bottom ash、bottom ash of elementary beneficial clearout and bottom ash of wet-clean. The previous two divisions undergoes a 4.5 month of storage period - either alfresco stack or outside in water. Observing its changes on physical change & chemistry during the storage period , we have discovered that abrasion test before and after the storage period reveal that its physical property had never changed. In addition, the ANOVA demonstrates that differences among three incinerators not distinct. On the other hand, judged from their chemical property , the Bottom ash of three incinerators are actually quite similar. Successive tests and analysis of PH level, chlorate, Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedures, XRF and X-ray diffraction unfold that the pH level tend to go down as time goes by and that rainfall and recycling of kitchen leftovers greatly reduce the amount of chlorate contained in Bottom ash ,while the conclusion of Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedures, and analysis of XFR and X-ray diffraction remain unchanged during this storage period. Nevertheless, based on the consideration of sample quantity, more researches should be done on the chemical property of incinerator Bottom ash.
Moreover, to realize its practicability, CBR & Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method) will also be operated on the Bottom ash produced by bottom ash of elementary beneficial clearout. The outcome tells us that bottom ash being utilized to the road-construction is feasible. On the contrary, concerning Alkali-Aggregate Reaction, Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method) proves Bottom ash is classified as active aggregate with which we should hesitate in applying to civil engineering.
[1] 行政院環保署資源回收(焚化)廠興建工程處首頁,http://ww2.epa.gov.tw/swims/,2003.05.14。
[2] 行政院環境保護署,93年度垃圾焚化飛灰資源化處理再利用技術論壇,2004.3.11。
[3] Chimenos, J.M., Segarra, M., Fernandez, M.A., Espiell, F. “Characterization of the bottom ash in municipal solid waste incinerator.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol.64, pp. 211-222 (1998).
[4] Chang, M.B., Huang, C.K., “Characteristics of chlorine and carbon flow in two municipal waste incinerators in Taiwan.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol.128, No. 12, (2002).
[5] 立德管理學院資源管理學系, http://mail.leader.edu.tw/~tlhwu/research-report/9014006/, 93.05.15.
[6] 台北縣環境保護局,http://mail.tpepb.gov.tw/indexupper.asp,2004.03.10。
[7] Chimenos, J. M., Segarra, M., Fernandez, M. A., Espiell, F., “Characterization of the bottom ash in municipal solid waste incinerator.” Journal of Hazardous Material, A:64, 211-222 (1999).
[8] 張祉祥,「都市垃圾焚化底灰燒結資源化之研究」,中央大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文 (1998)。
[9] 何啟華,「垃圾焚化灰燼之大地工程特性」,中央大學土木工程研究所,碩士論文 (1993)。
[10] Wiles, C. C., “ Municipal solid waste combustion ash :
State-of-the-knowledge.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 47, pp. 325-344, (1996).
[11] Pera, J., Coutaz, L., Ambroise, J., Chababbet, M., “Use of incinerator bottom ash in concrete.” Cement and Research, Vol.27, pp. 1-5 (1997).
[12] Johnson, C.A., Brandenberger, S., Baccini, P., “Acid neutralizizing capacity of municipal solid waste combustion ash.” Enviromental Science & Technology, Vol.29, No.1, pp. 142-147 (1995).
[13] Meima, J.A., Comans, R.n.J., “Application of surface comolexation / municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash.” Enviromental Science & Technology, Vol.32, No.5, pp. 688-693 (1998).
[14] 廖錦聰,「從日本的經驗談台灣焚化灰渣資源化方向」,一般廢棄物焚化資源化技術與實務研討會,台北市,第29-42頁 (1996)。
[15] 張旭彰,「都市焚化灰渣熔融處理操作特性之研究」,國立中央大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文 (1992)。
[16] 詹炯淵,「垃圾焚化飛灰管理對策之研究」,國立台灣大學環境工程學研所,碩士論文 (2001)。
[17] 趙永楠,「以動態/半動態溶出程序評估都市垃圾焚化底灰長期穩定特性之研究」,國立台灣大學環境工程學研所,碩士論文 (2003)。
[18] 張祖恩、蔡敏行、蔡尚行、林建榮、張國益、蔡樹鴻,「台灣地區都市垃圾焚化威渣物化組成與溶出特性探討」,一般廢棄物焚化資源化技術與實務研討會,台北市,第227-246頁 (1996)。
[19] 曾迪華、李釗,「焚化底渣特性及資源化再利用之研究」,民間廠商委託計劃,期末報告,中壢市 (2003)。
[20] Pfrang Stotz, G., Reichelt, T. , “Municipal solid waste combustion ash : characteristics and the use in road construction.” Proceedings of the International Symposium organized by the Concert Technology Unit, UK , pp.235-246 (2000).
[21] 林錫鈞、林志棟、姚志廷、蔣子平,「應用於道路工程之焚化底灰貯存時間最佳化探討」,鋪面工程學術研討會論文集,第129-168頁(2003)。
[22] Van der Sloot, H.A., “Present status of waste management in Netherlands.” Waste Management, Vol.16, pp. 375-383 (1996).
[23] Lapa, N., Barbosa, R., Morais J., Mendes, B., Mehu, J., Santos Oliveira, J. F., “Ecotoxicological assessment of leachates from MSWI bottom ashes,” Waste Management, Vol. 22, pp. 583-593 (2002).
[24] 環署廢字第0920042276A 號公告,「一般廢棄物卅垃圾焚化
廠焚化底渣再利用管理方式」,行政環境保護署首頁,2003。
[25] 黃浩梁,「焚化底渣特性及其再利用管理系統之研究」,國立中央大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文 (2003)。
[26] 蔡樹鴻,「都市垃圾焚化灰渣資源化處理之基礎研究」,成功大學資源工程研究所,碩士論文 (2003)。
[27] 行政院環保署環境檢驗所,http://portal.taipeilink.net/cgi-bin/dir,2004/01/31。
[28] 楊金鐘、吳裕民,「垃圾焚化灰渣穩定化產物再利用之可行性探討」,一般廢棄物焚化資源化技術與實務研討會論文集,台北市,第43-58頁 (1996)。
[29] 王鯤生、江康鈺、葉宗智、林仕敏,「都市垃圾焚化灰渣中金屬物種分析與溶出特性之研究」,第十一屆廢棄物處理技術研討會論文集,高雄,第68-76頁 (1996) 。
[30] 何寬宏,「垃圾焚化底渣吸附鉻酸離子之可行性研究」,國立成功大學環境工程研究所,碩士論文(2000)。
[31] 林信一、陳清南、楊萬發,「垃圾焚化灰渣之特性、管理現況與未來展望」,一般廢棄物焚化資源化技術與實務研討會,台北市,第29-42頁 (1996)。