台灣地區因地處亞熱帶，其特殊之氣候環境為潮濕多雨，加上重車超載情況嚴重，國內目前有許多機關已經嘗試採用特殊配比之瀝青混凝土路面，如石膠泥及多孔性瀝青混凝土來改善傳統路面於台灣特殊環境因素下衍生之各種破壞，其中石膠泥瀝青混凝土鋪面，以其高粗骨材比例與高瀝青膠泥含量之特殊配比具較佳之抗車轍能力及耐久性。而多孔性瀝青混凝土具有優良之排水功能，此外其抗剝脫及抗車轍能力仍須考量。本研究為瞭解此兩種特殊配比鋪面與傳統密級配鋪面之差異，以分析材料之力學行為為討論重點，期望做為國內使用推廣之依據及運用，並使此兩種鋪面能順利落實於國內鋪面工程，提升行車安全與服務品質。
許多專家學者利用現地之落錘式撓度儀量測得鋪面之撓度，但其間之力學分析及後續之預測分析則較少進行探討，為瞭解研發及鋪設特殊配比對實際改善台灣特殊交通環境條件下之情形，先藉由實驗室模擬材料力學行為求得破壞參數，再針對各鋪面性質進行結構及績效之模擬分析。求得鋪面在車輛荷重下之績效指標，此結果將可提供鋪面管理者了解現有鋪面之績效，並作為鋪面管理維護或加鋪之依據。本研究主要得到此分析路段之石膠泥瀝青混凝土鋪面預估之養護時機為開放交通8～9年後，而多孔性瀝青混凝土鋪面則預估為開放交通4～5年後。

This thesis aims at investigating the effects of heavy vehicles and high temperature on the distress and performance of flexible pavements in Taiwan. This research collects and analysis the pavement material which contains DAC, SMA and PA. Stone Mastic Asphalt was considered have good material to resist rut and it’s durable, and Porous Asphalt has an advantage to drain flooded fields. For the purpose to catch on the different between SMA, PA and DAC, it’s important to understand the mechanics behavior of the pavement material. To expect this two pavement material can be used to promote the safety and quality of drive a vehicle in pavement construction.
Many professional scholars usually measure the pavement deflection by FWD to know the condition of the pavement. But there’s not much discussion to precede the mechanics and predict analysis of pavement material. In order to understand the situation of SMA and PA material to improve the special traffic and environment condition in Taiwan, this study is to simulate analysis which is pavement structure and performance in pavement characteristic. By using predicted index to provide management of pavement in accordance with know about the performance of the pavement. This research obtain the SMA pavement was predicted to maintain at 8 to 9 years after open to vehicular traffic. And the PA was predicted to maintain at 4 to 5 years after open to vehicular traffic.

參考文獻
1. AASHTO, Guide for Design of Pavement Structure, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offices (1986).
2. AI, Thickness Design Asphalt Pavements for Highways & Streets, Manual Series No.1, Asphalt Institute (1991).
3. Uzan, J., D.G. Zollinger, and R.L. Robert, “The Texas Flexible Pavement System (TFPS),” Vol. II Mechanistic/Empirical Model, Research Report No. 455-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (1990).
4. Dejong, D.L., and Peutz, M.G.F., and Korswagen, A.R., Computer Program, BISAR, Layered Systems under Normal and Tangential Surface Loads, Koninklijke Shell Laboratorium, External Rept. AMSR-000673, Amsterdam, Netherlands (1973).
5. Kopperman, S., G. Tiller and M. Tseng, ELSYM5, Interactive Microcomputer Version, User’s Mannual, Report No. FHWA-TS-87-206, Federal Highway Administration, U.S.A. (1986).
6. ILLI-PAVE, A Finite Element Program for Analysis of Pavement, Construction Engineering Laboratory and the Transportation Facilities Group, Department of Civil Engineering , University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois (1982).
7. Harichandran, R.S., G.Y. Baladi, and M. Yeh, Development of a Computer Program for Design of Pavement Systems Consisting of Bound and Unbound Materials, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, U.S.A. (1989).
8. Crockford, W.W., L.J. Bendana, W.S. Yang, S.K. Rhee, and S.P., Senadheera, Modeling Stress and Strain States in Pavement Structures Incorporating Thick Granular Layers, The Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, U.S.A.
9. Huang, Y.H., Pavement Analysis and Design, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, U.S.A. (1993).
10. The Asphalt Institute, Computer Program DAMA; User‘s Manual, CP-1 University of Maryland (1983).
11. 宋侑玲，陳惠華，林志棟，張其教，台灣地區交通荷重當量分析在鋪面厚度設計探討，瀝青混凝土路面及材料特性研討會，第127-145頁，(1998)。
12. 陳惠華，林志棟，張其教，宋侑玲，重車對省道與縣道路面結構之影響，瀝青混凝土路面及材料特性研討會，第273-296頁，(1998)。
13. Tseng, K.H., “The Finite Element Method to the Performance Analysis of Flexible Pavement,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, (1988).
14. 劉明樓，“路面績效程式發展與驗證”，第八屆全國鋪面工程研討會，第187-196頁，(1995)。
15. 劉明樓，“柔性路面車轍與疲勞龜裂之預測”，中國土木水利工程學刊，第九卷第三期，第 417-426頁，(1997)。
16. 陳建旭，蔡攀鰲，林志憲，“解析方法應用於台灣柔性路面厚度設計”，台灣公路工程月刊，第25卷三期，第33-52頁，(1998)。
17. Owen, D.R.J., and , Fawkes A. J., “Engineering Fracture Mechanics-Numerical Methods and Applications,” Pineridge Press Limited, Swansea, U.K. (1980).
18. Kenis, W.J., Predictive Design Procedure, “VESYS User Manual- A Design Method for Flexible Pavements Using the VESYS Structural Subsystem. Proc. Fourth International Conference on Structure Design of Asphalt Pavements,” University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Vol. 1, pp. 101-130 (1977).
19. Gillespie T.D. and Sayers, M. W. and Segal, L., “Calibration of Respones-Type Road Roughness Measuring Systems,” NCHRP Report 228 (1980).
20. Sayers, M. W., “On the Calculation of IRI from Longitudinal Road Profile,” TRB (1995).
21. 高翰成，鐘偉逞，林志棟，“柔性路面多層彈性模數評估之研究”，第十屆鋪面工程學術研討會，基隆，第709-719頁 (1999)。
22. 林炳森，李泰明，吳元廷，鄒譽名，“路面評審儀應用於剛性路面之回算法”，第八屆鋪面工程研討會，中壢，第603-612頁 (1995)。
23. 黃偉慶，汪立威，“柔性鋪面彈性模數回算個案分析”，第八屆鋪面工程研討會，中壢，第623-632頁 (1995)。
24. 白建華，李朝聰，李英豪，“剛性鋪面回算程式之建立-溫氏基礎模式”，第九屆鋪面工程學術研討會，台中，第557-566頁 (1997)。
25. 周家蓓，陳又菁，“鋪面撓度值在養護整修策略上之應用”，第七屆鋪面工程學術研討會，淡水，第181-191頁 (1993)。
26. 黃偉慶，汪立威，“鋪面彈性模數之回算及敏感度分析”，第七屆鋪面工程學術研討會，淡水，第371-380頁 (1993)。
27. 梁履坦，林志棟，“回算法評估鋪面材料之回彈模數”，第七屆鋪面工程學術研討會，淡水，第395-401頁 (1993)。
28. 鄭丁興，“衝擊反應法在鋪面非破壞檢測上之應用”，第十屆鋪面工程學術研討會，基隆，第699-708頁 (1999)。
29. 張德文，胡光復，張嘉麟，“穩態撓度檢測法於台灣地區柔性鋪面之應用剖析”，第八屆鋪面工程研討會，中壢，第593-602頁 (1995)。
30. 張德文，張鴻源，黃裔炎，“穩態撓度試驗之回算研究”，第八屆鋪面工程研討會，中壢，第613-622頁 (1995)。
31. 胡光復，周家蓓，張德文，“穩態非破壞性檢測法於鋪面工程之應用”，第七屆鋪面工程學術研討會，淡水，第361-370頁 (1993)。
32. 康裕明，“鋪面結構的現場定量檢測技術之探討與展望”，第七屆鋪面工程學術研討會，淡水，第381-390頁 (1993)。
33. Uzan, J., “Resilient Characterization of Pavement Materials,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 16, pp. 453-459 (1992).
34. Lytton, R.L., “Backcalculation of Pavement Layer Properties,” Nondestructive Testing of Pavementsand Backcaculation of Moduli, ASTM STP 1026, A. J.Bush III and G.Y. Baladi, Eds., American Society for Testing and Material, Philadelphia, pp. 502-524 (1989).
35. 劉明樓，蘇珍立，黃建維，“線性與非線性回彈模式對路面破壞之影響”，八十八年電子計算機於土木水利工程學術研討會，台中，第529-537頁 (2000)。
36. 張嘉麟，“動態反算於衝擊性撓度法之應用研究”，淡江大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
37. 鐘偉逞，“應用衝擊式撓度儀觀測路面結構強度之研究”，中央大學土木工程研究所 (2000)。
38. 洪境聰，“柔性舖面現況服務力指標與預測模式建立之研究”，中央大學土木工程研究所 (2000)。
39. 姚志廷，“以國際糙度指標分析網級柔性舖面養護最適化之研究”，中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文 (2001)。
40. 交通部台灣區國道新建工程局，“台灣地區柔性路面厚度設計手冊研擬” (2001)。
41. 林志棟，“公路工程改善施工方法之研究第四輯：路基土壤阻力值之工程特性及其在路面工程上應用之研究”，台灣省公路局材料試驗所 (1981)。
42. 宋侑玲，“台灣地區柔性路面厚度因子設計交通因子分析”，國立中央大學碩士論文 (1995)。
43. 吳學禮，“鋪面、材料工程實務”，詹氏書局，(1996)。
44. 廖溪堃，“材料對石膠泥瀝青混凝土成效特性影響之研究”，國立中央大學碩士論文 (1999)。
45. Yoder, E. J., M. W. Witczak, “Principle of Pavement Design,” A Wiley Inter-sciece Publication, USA (1975).
46. 陳式毅，“路面損壞個案分析,” 台灣公路工程第十七卷第二期，第2-21頁，(1990)。
47. Von Quintus H.L., “Status Report on Development of an Asphalt Aggregate Mixture Analysis System,” Association of Asphalt Paving Technologist Vol. 58, (1989).
48. SHRP Quarterly Report A-003, Performance-Related Testing and Measuring of Asphalt-Aggregate Interaction and Mixtures. Quarter 2 of 1991. Instititute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, California (1992).
49. SHRP Quarterly Report A-005, Performance Medels and Validation of Test Results, Texas Transportation Instititute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (1993).
50. Kennedy Thomas W., “Superior Performing Asphalt Pavements (Superpave) The Product of the SHRP Asphalt Research Program”, Report A-410, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (1994).
51. Harrigan E.T.,R.B. Leahy and J.S. Youtcheff, “The SUPERPAVE Mix Design System Manual of Specifications,” Test Methods,，Report no. SHRP-A-379, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (1994).
52. Cominsky, Ronal, “Technical Summary: Level 1 Mix Design,” Report no. SHRP-A-408, Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (1994).
53. 王劍能，吳學禮，“新舊馬歇爾與SHRP配合設計方法之比較”，第十屆鋪面工程研討會，第533-542頁，(1999)。
54. 劉守益，“多孔性瀝青混凝土成效評估”，國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，中壢，(1996)。
55. 陳偉全，陳聰達，“排水性鋪面技術之探討”，1998年瀝青混凝土路面及材料特性研討會，中壢，第217-240頁(1998)。
56. Monismith, C. I., and Tayebali, A. A., “Pavement deformation considerations in Asphalt Concrete Pavement sections,” AAPT, Vol. 57. pp. 414-446. (1988).
57. Maillick, R. B., Ahlrich, R., and Brown, E. R., “Potenyial of dynamic creep to predict rutting,” ASTM STP1265, 99.194-213. (1955).
58. Zienkiewicz O.C. and Pande G.N., “Some Useful Forms of Isotropic Yield Surfaces for Soil and Rock Mechanics, Finite Element in Geomechanics,” G. Gudehus (Editor), Chap. 5, Wiley, Inc., Chichester, U.K., (1977).
59. Iron, B. M., “A Front Solution Program,” Int. J. Num. Mech. Eng., Vol-2, pp.5-32 (1970).
60. Letto, A.R., “A Computer Program for Function Optimization Using Pattern Search and Gradient Summation Techtiques,” Report for Master of Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, (1968).
61. Roscoe, K.H. and Burland, J.B., “On the Generalized Stress Strain Behavior at ‘Wet’ Clay,” J. Heymam and J.A. Leckie (Editors), Engineering Plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp.535-609 (1968).
62. Roscoe, K.H. and Schofield, A.N., “Yielding of Clay in State Wetter than Critical,” Geotechnique, Vol.13, No. 3, pp.211-240 (1963).
63. Vermeer, P.A., “A double hardening model for sand,” Geotechnique, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 413-433 (1978).
64. Kenis, W.J., “Predictive Design Procedure, VESYS User Manual- A Design Method for Flexible Pavements Using the VESYS Structural Subsystem,” Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Structure Design of Asphalt Pavements, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Vol. 1, pp. 101-130 (1977)。
65. Rauhut, J.B., J.C. O''Quin and W.R. Hudson, “Sensitively Analysis of FHWA Structural Model VESYS II,” Vol. 2, Federal Highway Administration Report, No. FHWA-RD-76-23, Washington, D.C. March (1976)。
66. Liu, M.L. , “Numerical Prediction of Pavement Distress by Using the Geotechnical Constitutive Law,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University ,College Station, Texas (1993)。
67. Liu, M.L., “Modified Vermeer Plasticity Model for Sand and Asphalt Concrete,” The 8th National Conference on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C., pp. 373-380 (1994).
68. Monismith, C.L., and McLean D.B., “Structural Design Considerations,” Proceedings, Association of Asphalt Paving Technologist, Cleve-land, Ohio (1972).
69. Rauhut, J.B., J.C. O''Quin and W.R. Hudson, “Sensitively Analysis of FHWA Structural Model VESYS II,” Vol. 2, Federal Highway Administration Report, No. FHWA-RD-76-23, Washington, D.C., (1976).
70. Harr, E., “Reliability Based Design in Civil Engineering,” McGraw-Hill, New York, New York (1987).
71. Bashar A. O. and Darter M. I., “Effect of Pavement Deterioration Types on IRI and Rehabilitation,” Transportation Research Record 1505, pp.57-63 (1995).