由於資訊科技的蓬勃發展，許多人對網路上進行學習活動抱持著肯定的態
度，並且早有許多研究對網路教學的價值持正面看法。而於網路上進行教學活
動，相較於傳統面對面的教學方式，自然有其困難度。“全民學校”為一開放之
網路教學系統，所有人皆可來此進行網路教學以及網路學習活動。雖然“全民學
校”裡所有的開課老師都擁有相當豐富的知識並且願意教授給別人，但不論在現
實生活中或虛擬的網路世界，大部分開課老師並無任何相關教學經驗。因此，
於網路上進行開課及教學活動，的確是一項重大挑戰。另外，學生於網路上自
我學習，容易造成半途中斷的現象，如何提昇學生網路學習的興趣與熱度，也
是一個重點。本研究之目的在於設計“全民學校”團隊教學機制，使每門網路課
程可組織一教學團隊，賦予不同之管理權限於該教學團隊，合作管理一門課程，
期望能減輕課程管理者之負擔；另外也提供個人自學或是學生團隊合作學習之
方式，希望降低學生網路學習之挫折感，並增進學生學習效果。系統實施結果
發現：(1)經由團隊教學，除了可以減輕老師課務管理負擔，更可以引發課程進
行朝向多元性發展，學生也有較多收穫；(2)少部分人喜歡個人於網路上獨自學
習，大部分人認為經由團隊合作學習，提昇了上網學習的興趣以及學習效果。

“School for All” is an open-ended course-offering system on web. People can
teach in “School for All”, regardless of his age and background. However, teaching
in the network is really a challenge. In fact, not all of the teachers in the “School for
All” are well trained to teach and manage a course. Some teachers have good
knowledge of subjects they teach, but they do not have any teaching experience in
the real world or on network. Besides, many students taking a course come from
different places with different backgrounds. In order to manage these students well,
teachers must use a better method of teaching. So the purpose of this study is to
design a team teaching and team learning mechanism in “School for All”. By this
method, teachers in “School for All” can manage their courses more easily and more
effectively, and students can learn better.

1.中央大學、花蓮師範學院、台灣大學，學習科技─主動社會學習及其應用，大學學術追求卓越計劃，頁347-354，民88。
2.李青蓉，建立成人網路學習者之網路學習模式，台北：非同步網路教學課程中新建製計劃─邁向網路大學教學實驗成果展，民89。
3.李春芳，協同教學法，台北：中等教育43卷3期，民81。
4.巫靜宜，比較網路教學與傳統教學對學習效果之研究，淡江大學資訊管理系，民88。
5.沈慶珩，合作學習教學策略的原理與實施，銘傳大學教育學程中心，民88。
6.吳鐵雄等，電腦網路在台灣中小學教育上之應用研究，第七屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會，高雄，民87。
7.柯啟瑤，協同教學的初步認識，台北：翰林出版，民88。
8.洪明洲，非同步網路教學課程建置的流程管理，台北：非同步網路教學課程中新建製計劃─邁向網路大學教學實驗成果展，民89。
9.高台茜等，網頁小組討論教學管理策略與同儕互動行為之探討，第五屆全球華人學習科技研討會論文集，桃園，民90。
10.陳昭秀、周倩，遠距合作學習定義、理論與科技使用之初探研究，第四屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會論文集，民84。
11.張松濱，亞卓全民學校設計與初步使用成果，國立中央大學資訊工程研究所，民89。
12.張春興，教育心理學，台北：東華書局，民85。
13.黃政傑，多元化的教學方法，台北：師大書苑，民86。
14.黃政傑，教學原理，台北：師大書苑，民86。
15.黃政傑，林佩璇，合作學習，台北：五南圖書出版公司，民85。
16.黃俊仁，網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具，國立中央大學資訊工程研究所，民89。
17.游智勝，全球資訊網上的課程系統，國立中央大學資訊工程研究所，民86。
18.楊家興，建構一個資訊網路下整合性的學習環境：虛擬學校，國立空中大學資訊與管理學系，民87。
19.賴志龍，全球資訊網課程系統與整合資料庫應用設計，國立中央大學資訊工程研究所，民87。
20.Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Skies, J., & Snapp, M., The Jigsaw classroom, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1978.
21.Chang, C. K., & Chen, G. D., Constructing collaborative learning activities for distance CAL systems, Journal of computer assisted learning, 13, 13, 2-15, 1997.
22.Chen, G. D., Ou, K. L., and Liu, C. C., Instructional Instruments for Grouping, Intervention, and Strategy Analysis on Web Group Learning Systems, Proc. International Conference on Computers in Education 99, Chi-ba, Japan, 1999.
23.Chou, C., Chang, Y.F. & Jiang, Y.Y., The developmenr of an online adaptive questionnaire for health education in Taiwan, Computers & Education, 35, 209-222, 2000.
24.Collins, P., Mudaliar, R. & Walker, D., Groupware support for student project teams, Harmony Through Working Together, Proceedings of OZCHI94, 313-314, 1994.
25.Cuseo, J., B., Cooperative learning vs. small-group discussions and group projects: The critical differences, Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 2(3), 4-9, 1992.
26.Devries, D. L., & Slavin, R. E., Teams-Games-Tournament (TGT): Review of ten classroom experiments, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 28-38, 1978.
27.Dunlap, D.R., Neale, D.C., & Carroll, J.M., Teacher Collaboration in a Networked Community, Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 2000.
28.Fisher, K., Phelps, R., & Ellis, A., Group Process Online: Teaching collaboration through collaborative process, Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 484, 2000.
29.Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T., Avoiding the industrialization of research universities: Big and little distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 48-63, 1999.
30.Hara, N., & Kling, R., Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants’ Experiences, The Center for Social Informatics Working Paper, no. WP 00-01-B1, 2000.
31.Hiltz, S. R., The Virtual Classroom : Learning Without Limits via Computer Networks, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1995.
32.Lin, C.S., Computer Network and Education Reform, Friends of Elementary Education, 49(1), 5-12, 1998.
33.Piaget, J., The language and thought of the child, Brace, New York: Harcourt, 1926.
34.Relan, A., & Gillani, B.B., Web-Based instruction and the traditional classroom: similarities and differences, In Khan, B.H.(Ed.), Web-Based Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology, 41-46, 1997.
35.Romiszowski, A.J., Web-based distance learning and teaching: revolutionary invention or reaction to necessity, In Khan, B.H.(Ed.), Web-Based Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology, 25-37, 1997.
36.Scherly, D., Roux, L., & Dillenbourg, P., Evaluation of hypertext in an activity learning environment, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16,125-136, 2000
37.Shaplin, J. T., Toward a Theoretical Relationale for Team Teaching, New York — London, 1964.
38.Sharan, S., & Sharan, Y., Small group teaching, Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology publications, 1976.
39.Shotsberger, P. G., Smith, K. B., and Spell, C. G., Collaborative Distance Education on the World Wide Web: What Would That Look Like? , Proceeding of CSCL, 1995.
40.Slavin, R. E., Cooperative Learning : theory, research, and practice (2nd ed), Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1995.
41.Slavin, R. E., Students teams and achievement division, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 39-49, 1978.
42.Slavin, R. E., Using student team learning (3rd ed.), Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1986.
43.Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, S. M., Factors influencing interaction in an online course, The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22-36, 1999.
44.Wang, C.H., Cooperative learning, The Educator, 364, 34-38, 1997.
45.Wang, W.C., Cooperative learning in Mathematics, Friends of Elementary Education, 49(4), 17-23, 1998.