隨著世界地球村的到來，英語已成為各國共通的國際語言之一，學習者能否具備第二語言的能力，單字量的累積是重要的基礎。在傳統的英語課堂中，教師多透過閃卡(flash cards)作為教學工具，使圖像連結對應單字的意義，運用圖像記憶法加深學生對單字的印象。因此本研究發展一套DGA(Draw, Guess, Assessment)學習模式，並開發一套英語單字學習系統－「英語自繪王MyWords」，進一步探討當圖像的產生方式交由學生連結先備經驗自行繪製時，是否能加強學生對於單字與圖像的連結與記憶，進而提升學生對於單字的習得能力，以及透過同儕互猜單字與互評的交流，能否對學生的學習動機與感受有正向影響。
本研究以桃園市某國小二年級學生為研究對象，將學生分為控制組(一般字卡教學組)及實驗組(自製字卡學習組)，進行四周的英語單字學習活動，並透過實踐與反思修改系統與活動設計，期望有助學生學習英語單字。研究結果發現，實驗組學生在單字測驗上大幅進步，且中低成就生的英語單字能力並和控制組有顯著差異，另外也瞭解到多數學生認為使用系統進行英語單字的學習能提升學習興趣，並有助於提升學生學習英語單字的信心與注意力。

Since the arrival of the global village, English is one of the common international languages. Vocabulary is not only the basis of English ability, but also the second language for students. In the traditional English classroom, teachers often use flash cards as a teaching tool to make the image link the meaning of the corresponding vocabulary, and use the graphic teaching instruction to deepen the students' impression of the vocabulary. This study designed a learning model called DGA (Draw, Guess, Assessment) and developed a English vocabulary learning system: MyWords, the purpose of this study is to further explore whether the image can be enhanced when the students are connected to the prior knowledge to draw their own vocabulary, thus supporting students' ability to acquire vocabulary. And whether students raise their learning motivate through peer-guessing and peer-assessing.
The participants were the second graders from a elementary school in Taoyuan City. This study divided students into the control group (traditional learning group) and the experimental group (self-designing learning group) to conduct a four-time English vocabulary learning activity. By practicing and revising the activity process for four weeks, we hoped that this activity could improve students English vocabulary ability. The result showed that after the activity, students get ahead in vocabulary test. Moreover, the middle and low achievers made enormous progress in English vocabulary learning and had significant difference in comparison with the control group. Students reported that self-designing, peer-guessing and peer-assessing flash cards activity was beneficial to vocabulary learning and made them a higher learning interest. Also, made them more confident and concentration in vocabulary learning.

參考文獻
中文文獻
于富雲、鄭守杰、杜明璋, & 陳德懷（2003）。網路同儕互評與評量標準來源對批判思考能力之影響。南師學報: 教育類，37(2), 1-21.
王立行（民81）。電腦輔助教學的理論與實務探討。台北市：師大書苑。
王道華（2017）。同儕互評導入英文論文寫作課程之學習歷程與成效分析（碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南市。
呂冠賢（2012）。導入同儕互評於數位故事創作（碩士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園市。
李莉珍（2008）。圖像教學對兒童創造力與語文能力影響之研究（博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
李錫津。（1987）。創造思考教學對高職學生創造力發展之影響。教育研究集刊，29，337-358。
林志成（民89年7月15日）。中研院新科院士劉炯朗理論與實用兼修。中國時報，9版。
邱惠芬（2010）。多媒體介面對國小學童學習動機、學習成就及學習保留的影響(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
吳靜吉（2002）。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。應用心理研究，15，17-42。
林麗娟（1996）。多媒體電腦圖像設計與視覺記憶的關係。教學科技與媒體期刊，28，3-12。
陳于倩（2013）。以英語圖像故事記憶模式提升國小五年級英語低成就學生字詞學習成效之補救教學應用研究（碩士論文）。朝陽科技大學，台中市。
教育部電子計算中心（1995）。電腦輔助教學（二）。台中市：資訊與教育雜誌社。
許有德 (2010)。國中英語拼字遊戲系統的設計與評估（碩士論文）。 臺灣師範大學，台北市。
許佳琪 (2011)。杜威的教育哲學對於終身學習之啟示。育達科大學報，29，163-176。
許桂敏（1994）。電腦輔助教學與傳統教學在微積分學習效果上之比較研究。國科會研究報告（編號：NSC82-0111-S011-011A），未出版。
陳智修（民103）。結合音韻教學與注意力訓練於國中學習障礙學生英語字彙之學習【原始數據】。取自http://icn.ncu.edu.tw/BrainWebsite/teach_file2/07.%20%E5%9C%8B%E4%B8%AD%E8%AA%9E%E6%96%87_%E9%99%B3%E6%99%BA%E4%BF%AE_%E3%80%8C%E6%B3%A8%E3%80%8D%E5%85%A5%E5%A5%BD%E3%80%8C%E9%9F%BB%E3%80%8D%EF%BC%9A%E7%B5%90%E5%90%88%E9%9F%B3%E9%9F%BB%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8%E8%88%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%84%8F%E5%8A%9B%E8%A8%93%E7%B7%B4%E6%96%BC%E5%9C%8B%E4%B8%AD%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E9%9A%9C%E7%A4%99%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E%E5%AD%97%E5%BD%99%E4%B9%8B%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92.pdf
許峰銘（民99）。童詩圖像教學。台北市：秀威。
黃珮緹（2017）。圖像提示之任務型教學對新北市國小五年級學童英語口說能力與學習態度影響之研究（碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學兒童英語教育學系，台北市。
陳德懷（2016 ）。明日閱讀: 明日主題學習的基礎。臺北市: 天下雜誌。
許繼德（2010）。網路輔助教學對不同認知風格的國小學童在英語學習動機與成就之影響(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院，屏東縣。
黃馨儀（2014）。圖像式字母拼讀教學法對於國小五年級補救教學學生在字母音認讀, 音素覺識及識字能力的成效研究（碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
張新仁（民79）。從資訊處理談有效的學習策略。教育學刊，9，47-66。
張淑真（2010）。電腦輔助多媒體英語流行歌曲教學對國小學童英語習得動機與成就之效益研究（碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
張瓊云（2008）。運用圖像化教學於國小文言文學習成效之研究（碩士論文）。國立臺東大學，台東市。
詹中豪（2016）。合作表現自互評對於 Web2. 0活動投入之影響（碩士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園市。
劉勝鈺（2002）使用資訊科技學習數學: 以網路同儕互評為例（碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。
蔡宛倫（2016）。行動學習應用程式在自主學習中對英語聽力及字彙能力之成效(碩士論文) 。國立交通大學，新竹市。
謝惠存（民107年5月） 設計與實作數位英語學習遊戲以促進小學低年級學生英語單字能力。李葆萍（主持人），悅趣化學習與社會。第22屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會，廣州市華南師範大學。
龐麗君（2005）。 電腦應用軟體輔助教學對臺灣國中生英語學習之效益研究（碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學, 英語學系，高雄市。

英文文獻
Aggarwal, J. C. (2009). Landmarks In The History Of Modern Indian Education, 6E. India: Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd.
Atkinson, R. C., & Hansen, D. N. (1966). Computer-assisted instruction in initial reading: The Stanford project. Reading Research Quarterly, 2(1), 5-25. doi: 10.2307/747037
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in secondary schools. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 12(3), 59-68. doi: 10.1016/0747-5632
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
Bruner, J. S.（1966）.Toward a theory of instruction. Combridge , Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(4), 1-21. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674863507
Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. Oxford, England: W. W. Norton.
Chan, T. W (2017) Interest-Driven Creator Theory: Towards a Theory of Learning Design for Asia in the 21st Century
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Journal of Educational psychology review, 3(3), 149-210. doi: 10.1007/BF01320076
De Guerrero, M. C., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68.
Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Free Press.
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of educational research, 70(3), 287-322.
Fletcher-Flinn, C. M., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(3), 219-241.
Forness, S. R., Kavale, K. A., Blum, I. M., & Lloyd, J. W. (1997). Mega-analysis of meta-analyses: What works in special education and related services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(6), 4. doi: 10.1177/004005999702900601
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467. doi: 10.1177/1046878102238607
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.
Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry‐based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693-705.
Graddol, D. (2006). English next. London: British council.
Heber, M. (1981). Instruction versus conversation as opportunities for learning, London: Academic Press.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1989). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. New York: Cmilan publishing.
Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. P. (1995). Teaching with technology. Teaching: Theory into practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hicks, B.,Hyde, D.(1973).Teaching about CAI. Journal of Teacher Education,24(2),120-125. doi: 10.1177/002248717302400209
Isaksen, S. G., & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and innovation management, 19(2), 73-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00558
James, W. (1890). The Principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab) use them. Medical Education, 38(12), 1217-1218.

Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. New Jersey: Practice Hall.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2.
Kramsch, C., & Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford University Press, 44(2), 431.
Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of picture in prose in HA Hougton, DM Willows (Eds), The psychology of illustrations, Vol. 1: Basic Research (pp. 51-86). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking‐styles. Journal of computer assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of second language writing, 18(1), 30-43.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Shiah, R. L. (1997). Can computers teach problem-solving strategies to students with mild mental retardation? A case study. Remedial and Special Education, 18(3), 157-164.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Shiah, R. L. (1997). Can computers teach problem-solving strategies to students with mild mental retardation? A case study. Remedial and Special Education, 18(3), 157-164. doi: 10.1177/074193259701800304
Merrill, P.F. & Hammons, K. and et. al. (1996). Computer in education. New York: Simon & Schuster Company.
Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Beekelaar, R., & Hamid, A. (1992, June). Making processes visible: Scaffolding learning with reasoning-congruent representations. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 103-110). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81.
Murdock Jr, B. B. (1965). Signal-detection theory and short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(5), 443.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L (1990). Language learning strategy: What every teacher should know. New York: Heinle dan Heinle Publishers.
Palfrey, J. G., & Gasser, U. (2011). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. Retrieve from www.ReadHowYouWant. com.
Paulsen, M. F. (1995). Moderating educational computer conferences. Computer mediated communication and the online classroom, 3, 81-89.
Pierson, H. D., Fu, G. S., & Lee, S. Y. (1980). An analysis of the relationship between language attitudes and English attainment of secondary students in Hong Kong. Language Learning, 30(2), 289-305.
Provenzo Jr, E. F., Brett, A., & McCloskey, G. N. (2004). Computers, curriculum, and cultural change: An introduction for teachers (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reutzel, D., & Cooter Jr, R. B. (2012). Teaching children to read: The teacher makes the difference (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillian.
Rieber, L. P. (1995). A historical review of visualization in human cognition. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 45-56.

Roblyer, M. D., Castine, W. H., & King, F. J. (1988). Introduction. Computers in the Schools, 5(3-4), 11-16.
Sipple, C. J., & Sipple, R. J. (1980). Computer dictionary. New York: Howard W. Sams & Co.
Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. N. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19(2), 73-74. doi: 10.3758/BF03337426
Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 25(2), 149-169. doi: 10.1080/713611428
Visser, J., & Keller, J. M. (1990). The clinical use of motivational messages: An inquiry into the validity of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instructional Science, 19(6), 467-500. doi: 10.1007/BF00119391
Willows, D. M., Borwick, D., & Hayvren, M. (1981). The content of school readers. Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Professional School Psychology, 1(4), 313-315.