台灣科學園區的設立是建立在以技術密集的高科技工業，推動台灣整體創新發展為 前提下而成立，因此，台灣科學園區大多以電子業出口導向之廠商為主；然而，近年來 全球經濟陷入低迷，重創許多出口導向型國家，因此，本研究欲針對台灣電子上市上櫃 公司，探討2010-2016年台灣科學園區近年來園區內外廠商，在研發創新與生產績效上 之比較。此外，隨著全球化經濟與知識技術的迅速擴散，進一步探討園區內外廠商在專 利發明上，是否有國際合作之表現。
實證結果顯示，園區內廠商在研發專利上，對於總要素生產力之影響為正向顯著， 尤其是在專利表現上，園區內廠商更是明顯優於園區外，表示園區內廠商在研發創新上 仍舊具有優勢，且對於企業的總要素生產力也有十足的影響；此外，考量了專利研發國 際合作上之評估，對於園區內的總要素生產力同樣有高度正向顯著之影響，但園區外廠 商則為負向顯著，而這有可能是因為專利畢竟屬於各國企業的獨家技術，相對來說較為 隱私，因而園區外廠商在專利研發國際合作才可能呈現負相關，然而，科學園區內或許 存在著一些保護或合作機制，因而園區內廠商則呈現正向顯著關係。

The establishment of the Taiwan Science Park is based on the premise of intensive high-tech industries and the promotion of Taiwan’s overall innovation and development. According to the present situation, most of the Taiwan Science Parks are mainly electronics-oriented export-oriented manufacturers. However, the global economy has been trapped in recent years. Many export-oriented countries were heavily damaged. Therefore, this study is intended to target Taiwan’s e-listed companies to explore the comparison between R&D innovation and production performance of Taiwan’s in and outside Science Park manufacturers from 2010 to 2016. In addition, with the rapid diffusion of globalized economy and technology, it is further explored whether there are international cooperation in the invention of patents in and outside the park’s manufacturers.
The empirical results show that in the R&D and patents, the manufacturers in the park have a positive effect on the total factor productivity. Especially in the performance of patents, the manufacturers in the park are obviously better than the outside of the park. It means that the companies in the park still have advantages in research and innovation, and they also have a full impact on the total factor productivity of the company. In addition, considering the assessment of international cooperation in patent research and development, it also has a highly positive and significant effect on the total factor productivity in the park, but the manufacturers outside the park are negative. This may be because patents are exclusive technologies of companies in all countries and are relatively private. Therefore, the manufacturers outside the park may have negative correlations in international cooperation in patent research and development. However, there may be some protection or cooperation mechanisms in the science parks, so that the firms in the park are showing a positive relationship.

英文部分：
Bonaccorsi, A., Thoma, G. 2007. “Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology.” Research Policy, 36(6), 813-831.
Chen, Y. and Chen, B. 2012. “Patent Indicators as Output Variables of DEA to Evaluate the Efficiency of the Computer Communication Equipment Industry in United States.” Applied Economics 44, pp.1429-1432.
Chen, C., Huang, Y., and Lin, B. 2012. “How firms innovate through R&D internationalization? An S-curve hypothesis. ” Research Policy, 41:9, 1544-1554.
Deeds, DL, DeCarolis, D., Coombs, J. 2000. “Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: an empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms.” Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 211–229.
Denisova, Y. and Goylo, G. 2012. Open Innovation in Science Parks: The Influence of Geographic Proximity and Other Factors on Firms’ Collaboration. Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations, EBSCOhost (accessed 11 January 2016).
Griliches, Z. 1981. “Market Value, R&D, and Patents.” Economics Letters, 7, 183-187.
Guo, Y. and Verdini, G. 2015. “The role of geographical proximity in the establishment and development of science parks – evidence from Nanjing, China.” Asian Geographer, 32 (2). pp. 117-133.
Hirschman, A. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press
Hall, B., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. 2005. “Market value and patent citations.” Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16-38.
Iwasa, T. and Odagiri, H. 2004. “Overseas R&D, Knowledge sourcing and Patenting: An emperical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US.” Research Policy, 33, 807-828.
Rahko, J. 2016. “Internationalization of corporate R&D activities and innovation performance.” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 25, issue 6, 1019-1038
Kaplan, R., and Norton, D. 1992. “The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance.” Harvard Business Review, (1-2): 71-79.
Kung, S. F. 1995. “The Role of Science Park in the Development of High Technology Industry, with Special Reference to Taiwan.” Unpublished Cambridge University Ph.D. Thesis.
Lerner, J. 1994. “The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis.” RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), 319-333.
Löfsten, H., and Lindelöf, P. 2001. “Science Parks in Sweden-Industrial Renewal and Development?” R&D Management, 31(3), 309-322.
Massey, D., Quintas, P., and Wield, D. 1992. “High Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, Science and Space.” Routledge, London.
O'Brien, J. P. 2003. “The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation.” Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 415-431.
Riahi-Belkaoui, A. 1996. “Internationalization, Diversification Strategy and Ownership Structure: Implications for French MNE Performance.” International Business Review, Vol. 5, No.4, pp. 367-376.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (Redvers Opie, Trans. ) . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Solow, Robert M. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics.
Sougiannis, T. 1994. “The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D.” The Accounting Review, 69, 44-69.
Sher, P. J. and Yang, P. Y. 2005. “The Effects of Innovative Capabilities and R&D Clustering on Firm Performance: The Evidence of Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry.” Technovation, 25(1):33-43.
Singh, J. 2008. “Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output.” Research Policy, 37, 77-96.
Trajtenberg, M. 1990. “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations.” The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187.
Westhead, P., and Storey, D.J. 1995. “Links between Higher Education Institutions and High Technology Firms.” Omega International Journal of Management Science, 23(4), 345–360
Xu, X., Xia, Y., and Li, C. 2017. “Influence of Chinese entrepreneurial companies’ internationalization on independent innovation: Input incentive effect and efficiency improvement effect.” China Journal of Accounting Research, Volume 10. Issue 3, Page 247
Yang, Chih-Hai, Kazuyuki Motohashi and Jong-Rong Chen. 2009. “Are New Technology-Based Firms Located on Science Parks Really More Innovative? Evidence from Taiwan,” Research Policy, 38(1), 77-85.
中文部分：
呂清松（1997），「科學園區對地方發展之論爭與臺灣實證:新竹科學園區個案研究」，國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
李國鼎、陳木在（1987），「我國經濟發展策略總論」，期刊論文，台北：聯經出版事業有限公司。
林婷鈴（2003），「廠商研發創新與行銷專屬之最適資源配置與演進」，國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所。
黃則智（2002），「專利、研發支出與廠商市值─半導體產業之實證研究」，國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所。
楊志海、陳忠榮（2002），「研究發展、專利與生產力─臺灣製造業的實證研究」，經濟論文叢刊30（1），27-48。
劉定焜、陳忠榮、黃盈棠（2009），「採用電子商務對台灣製造業總要素生產力的影響」，經濟論文叢刊 37（3），269-300。
黃政仁、闕伶倫（2014），「企業創新能力與國際化程度對創新績效及企業績效之影響：以台灣電子資訊業為例」，台北：會計評論第59期，頁107。