職場安全是一個企業存在的基礎，管理不當是造成人員工作行為不安全的主因。過去工安管理作業，雖已有制度化規範在執行，但效果無法深入，尤其是基層人員犯錯甚至受了傷還要受罰。導致工安管理成為形式化是因為職場安全規範漠視作業人員的參與，本研究探討對象的某人造纖維廠97年~104年發生5件有紀錄職災事故及6件廠外交通事故。
本研究提出導入全員參與制訂的職場安全行為規範，藉由標準作業程序的重新修訂，使基層人員感受到尊重，因而樂於參與安全管理活動；再運用主管在作業現場的安全觀察與訪談，及時發現管理中潛在問題而立即予以改善。在實施過程中，廠長要求廠內一、二級主管立下「共同追求安全文化承諾書」，強調安全管理績效不彰絕對是主管的責任，不得處罰所屬員工，並作為主管評核依據。經過員工參與的各項製程標準作業程序重新修訂及部門主管安全察訪的走動管理下，員工提出改善建議54件，明顯將人造纖維廠安全行為率由96.4%提升到98.6%，且從104年5月至106年4月為止，連續二年沒有發生職災工傷及交通事故，因而獲得公司零公傷零災害二次獎勵。研究成果顯示組織內部各個基層員工和管理階層，都應該共同肩負起確認及改善組織安全運作的責任才能保證職場安全。

The foundation for an enterprise to remain in business is workplace safety. Poor safety management leads to unsafe behaviors of working employees. Although safety management has been executed for years, the effectiveness of safety is hard to reach to result in ground employees hurt and get penalties in workplace accidents. The formality of safety management is due to negligence of full employee participation. This also led to the artificial fiber factory discussed in this study suffered 5 occupational injuries and 6 traffic accidents during 2008~2015.
This research proposes that every employee should get involved to establish the workplace behavior standard by reviewing the standard operation procedures. Such a practice will make employees feel respected and they will be more willing to participate in safety management activities. And management can discover problems and solve them immediately through observations and interviews.
Management leadership and commitment is the foundation for building safety culture. The factory leader demands each management level taking full responsibility of safety management in their responsible areas and functions. The studied factory improved its safety behavior rate from 96.4% to 98.6% based on observations, interviews and modified standard operation procedures. Employees proposed 54 improvement recommendations. Consequently, there was no occupational injury and traffic accident from May 2015 to April 2017. The results demonstrate that employees and management should both take responsibility for improving safety behaviors in the organization to ensure workplace safety.

1.蔡永銘，民國84 年，現代安全管理，台北：揚智。
2.戴基福，民國88年，我國內外資企業安全衛生文化之探討，行政院勞工委員會勞工安全衛生研究所
3.蔡永銘、朱蓓蓓，民國94年，建立全方位安全文化，塑造無災害工作環境，工業安全科技
4.陳冠華，民國95年，我國與歐美國家事業單位推動行為安全的探討與比較，國立清華大學，碩士論文p7~24
5.于樹偉，民國95年7月，安全行為與安全文化 工業安全科技論壇．
6.廖乾肇，民國100年，安全領導與安全態度對行為影響探討，交通大學碩士論文
7.吳益民，民國100年，提昇行為安全觀察對降低職業災害之研究國立交通大學，碩士論文
8.蔡永銘、朱蓓蓓，民國101年，建立安全行為理論與實務教材 中華民國工業安全衛生協會p17~21
9.傅達勳，民國101年，安全文化與行為安全研討會教材，中華壓力容器協會，台北
10.劉玉文，民國101年，安全文化與行為安全研討會教材，中華壓力容器協會，台北
11.徐順德，民國101年，安全文化與行為安全研討會教材，中華壓力容器協會，台北
12.張錦輝，民國101年，安全文化與行為安全研討會教材，中華壓力容器協會，台北
13.陳金鐘，民國101年，安全文化與行為安全研討會教材，中華壓力容器協會，台北
14.林柏森，民國101年，安全文化與行為安全研討會教材，中華壓力容器協會，台北
15.羅沐祥，民國101年，安全文化與行為安全研討會教材，中華壓力容器協會，台北
16.于樹偉，民國105年10月，英國能源協會勞工參與指南解析講義
17.于樹偉，民國105年12月，BASF-Employee Responsibilities and
Participation in PSM(巴斯夫員工參與指引)
18.陳冠華，行為安全推動機制- 經濟部工業局工業安全衛生技術輔導網站
http:// www.cesh.twmail.org/data4/59-05.pdf
19.工業技術研究院《經理人月刊》10月) https://college.itri.org.tw/
20.行政院勞工委員會，臺灣職業安全衛生管理系統指引；2007年8月（2010年 11月；擷取自行政院勞工委員會http://www.cla.gov.tw）
21.Cooper,D (1998) “Improving Safety Culture; A Practical Guide.” New York,NY:John Wiley & Sons.
22.Cooper, M.D. (2000), "Towards a model of safety culture", Safety Science, //scholar.google.com.tw/ , 05/30/2015
23.Energy Institute: Knowledge, Skills & Good Practice - Energy Institute
https://www.energyinst.org/, 06/23/2017
24.Equality Act 2010. 8th April 2010 ,11/14/2016
25.E. Scott Geller, Charles P. Pettinger, Thomas E. Boyce , Effects of Employee Involvement on Behavior-Based Safety from the session of Introduction on http://www.safetyperformance.com/,04/10/2016
26.Geller, E.S.( 2005. May )“Behavior-Based Safety and Occupational Risk Management.”, Behavior Modification, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p539-561
27.Heinrich. W. H, (1980), Industrial Accident Prevention, Fifth Edition, New York:McGraw-Hill.https://higieneyseguridaindustrial2012.wikispaces.com/file/view/Herbert+William+Heinrich.\ , 05/30/2016
28.Industrial Safety and Hygiene News (2002), "QUESTIONS & NSWERS"
,8/14/2016
29.Johnson, D. (2002), “What happened to the 'BEHAVIOR ' BUZZ?", Industrial
Safety and Hygiene News,10/24/2016
30.Jim Howe, Warning!Behavior-Based Safety Can Be Hazardous To Your Health and Safety Program! International Union , UAW Health and Safety Department , https://translate.google.com.tw/ 4/10/2016
31.Occupational Safety and Health Management System Guidelines, Council of Labor Affairs, August 2007 (November 2010; extracted from the Council of Labor Affairs: http://www.cla.gov.tw) , 6/15/2016
32.Paul Balmert , Alive and Well at The End ff The Day：The Supervisor’s Guide to
Managing Safety in Operations,published by John Wiley & Sons, Ine.Hoboken,New Jersey,2010 ,4/13/2016
32.Rause, T. R.. (2002, Aug) “Cross-Functional Improvement. “ Professional Safety, Vol. p26-27 https://tw.search.yahoo.com/search; ,05/24/2015