| 研究生: |
古禮權 Li-Chaun Ku |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
基於目標設定理論之班級兒童閱讀學習環境建置與評量 Development and Evaluation of a Children Reading Environment in Classroom Based on Goal Setting Theory |
| 指導教授: |
楊接期
Jie-Chi Yang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
資訊電機學院 - 資訊工程學系在職專班 Executive Master of Computer Science & Information Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 114 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 網路學習環境 、目標設定理論 、資訊融入教學 、兒童閱讀 、評量 、班級同儕合作學習 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Goal setting theory, Internet learning environment, Classmate cooperative learning, Computer Integrated Instruction, children reading, Evaluation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:12 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
「資訊融入教學」與「e-learning」是目前在教育與學習上的新趨勢,我們可利用電腦網路科技不受時間、地點限制的特性,來強化教育與學習雙方面的效果。本研究即是針對「目標設定理論」整理出相關之原理原則,並據以建置一個優質的網路閱讀學習環境--「兒童閱讀計畫網站」,提供教師在推廣班級兒童閱讀時一個強力的網路輔具,並讓學生能利用其來完成閱讀,進而以有效的閱讀來達成更有效率的學習。
系統設定流程分為四個模組:目標設定模組、書籍管理模組、計劃公佈模組與評量輸入模組。系統架構則分成學生介面與老師介面,學生介面的主要功能有訂定、編輯修改自己的閱讀計劃,查閱班級同學之閱讀計劃(公佈者),輸入、編輯修改閱讀完成之評量資料,發表意見交流,瀏覽公佈欄、瀏覽排行榜(Billboard)等;老師介面之功能則著重在管理班級學生閱讀狀況方面,除了擁有學生介面所有功能之外,更加入便於老師管理之功能,主要有建立及管理閱讀主題與閱讀目標、管理班級同學之閱讀計劃、管理書籍、管理意見交流與公佈欄以及全班學生閱讀狀況統計等。
本研究以實施於小學班級兒童閱讀為主,期望藉由班級同儕的合作學習來加強同學的閱讀成效,並實地實施班級閱讀活動之推廣與針對學生閱讀行為及閱讀狀況方面來探討與評量。
“Computer Integrated Instruction” and “ e-learning” are the trends of teaching and learning. To strengthen both of the effects of teaching and learning, we can take advantage of the characteristics of computer internet technology which can be widely used without any space and time restriction. This research is based on the goal setting theory . According to the principles sorted from the theory, we build a high quality internet learning and reading environment, “children reading-plan website”, which can be used as an powerful internet-aid tool by teachers to popularize classroom reading as well as by students to finish reading assignment.
The process of the system includes four models: goal setting model, books managing model, reading plan notifying model and reading evaluating model. The structure can be divide into two parts, student interface and teacher interface. The functions of student interface are: organizing their own reading plans, checking reading plans of other classmates, editing their comments on the reading material, exchanging opinions on the discussion board, browsing the bulletin board and Billboard. The purpose of teacher interface is mainly focus on supervising class students’ progress. In addition to the same functions as the students’, teacher interface has more management functions, such as building the theme and goal of reading, supervising students’ reading plan, gathering statistics of reading condition on-line, and controlling the books databank, the discussion board and bulletin board.
This research is mainly focus on elementary school classroom reading. We expect that by learning through cooperation, children can get the most benefits from reading. The research will help teachers take classroom reading into practice and attempt the honest evaluation of the system.
[1]王順興(民90)。網路上目標設定環境的建置--以閱讀網站為例。國立中央大學碩士論文。
[2]古禮權(民 92)。兒童閱讀計劃網站之建構。GCCCE2003。
[3]計惠卿(民90)。以網路學習環境作為落實課程統整的著力點。教育研究資訊,10(2),65-86。
[4]教育部(民89)。全國兒童閱讀運動實施計畫。教育部。
[5]陳德懷(民90)。學習科技-主動社會學習及其應用,從台灣到全世界。大學學術追求卓越研究計畫計畫書。
[6]陳裕斌(民92)。網路契式學習環境的設計與建置。國立中央大學碩士論文。
[7]陳得人、李大偉(民90)。國民小學融入式科技教育之實驗研究。教育研究資訊,10(2),125-144。
[8]許慧貞(民89)。上閱讀課囉!。天衛文化圖書有限公司,p94-103。
[9]程炳林(民90)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類。
[10]黃政傑(民86)。教學原理。師大書苑。
[11]齊若蘭、游常山、李雪莉(民92)。閱讀--新一代的知識革命。天下雜誌股份有限公司。
[12]鄭夙珍(民91)。小組探究教學結合網路學習成效初探。教育研究資訊,10(5),111-136。
[13]謝忠豪(民92)。主題探索式資訊融入教學之初探。教育研究資訊,11(2),91-112。
[14]蕭英勵(民91)。輔導孩子健康使用電腦網路之策略。教育資料與研究,47,75-79。
[15]鐘添騰(民91)。國民小學閱讀指導教學之行動研究。教育研究資訊,10(1),161-188。
[16]Bonk,C.J.&Cummings,J.A. (1998). A dozen recommendations for placing the student at the center of web-based learning, Educational Media International, 35(2), p82-89.
[17 ]Botterill, C. (1977). Goal-setting and performance on an endurance task。 Paper presented at the conference of the Canadian Association of Sports Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
[18]Chris Roebuck. (1996). Constructive Feedback : Key to Higher Performance and Commitment. Long Range Planning, 29, 328-336.
[19]Cummings, L. L. and Schwab, D. & Rosen, M. (1971). Performance and knowledge of results as determinants of goal setting。 Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 526-530,
[20]Edward A. Merritt and Florence Berger. (1998). The value of setting goals. CORNELL hotel and restaurant administration quarterly.
[21]Erez, M. (1977). Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal setting-performance relationship,Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 624-627.
[22]F. Layne Wallace, Susan R. Wallace. (2001). Electronic office hours: a component of distance learning.Computer &Education, 37, 195-209.
[23]Flora Chia-I Chang. (2002). Intelligent assessment of distance learning. Information Sciences, 14, 105-125.
[24]House, W. C. (1973). Performance expectancies and affect associated with outcomes as a function of time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 277-288.
[25]Jie Chi Yang, Chih Hung Lai, Tak Wai Chan and Tzu Chien Liu. (2002). Development of a web-based learning environment based on the concept of goal setting theory. International conference on engineering education, Auguest 18-21, 2002, Manchester, U.K.
[26]Kala Chand Seal, Zbigniew H.Przasnyski. (2001). Using the World Wide Web for teaching improvement. Computer & Education, 36, 33-40.
[27]Locke, E. A., Cartledge, N. and Koeppel, J. (1968). Motivational effects of knowledge of results: A goal setting phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 474-485,
[28]Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. (1990). A theorem of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffes, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
[29]Manuel London, James W. Smither. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Review 12(2002), 81-100.
[30]Mark Grabe, Ellen Sigler. (2002). Study online : evaluation of an online study environment. Computer & Education, 38, 375-383.
[31]Mesch, D. J., Farh, J. L., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1994). Effects of feedback sign on group goal setting, strategies, and performance. Group and Organization Management, 19, 309-333.)
[32]Reil, M. (1990). Cooperative learning across classroom in electronic learning circles. Instructional Science, 19(6), 445-466.
[33]Steers, R. M. and Porter, L. W. (1974). The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 434-452.