| 研究生: |
朱俊傑 Chun-Chieh Chu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
基於租稅因素評估跨國企業境外投資目的地之模糊多準則決策制訂 Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making for Assessing Multinational Enterprises’ Outbound Investment Destinations on the Basis of Tax Factors |
| 指導教授: |
許秉瑜
Ping-Yu HSU |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 69 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 租稅要素 、跨國企業 、境外投資 、多準則決策 、模糊VIKOR 、模糊語意偏好 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | tax factors, multinational enterprise, outbound investment, multicriteria decision-making, fuzzy VIKOR, fuzzy linguistic preference |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:23 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
租稅是跨國企業(MNE)選擇海外投資市場的重要考量因素。跨國企業海外投資決策受到多種因素的影響,租稅因素在海外投資決策中相較其他因素為具優先考量地位。本研究因此發展一項架構,以評估影響MNE海外投資決策的租稅因素相對重要性,利用文獻探討與專家的見解,建立評估層面及準則。為應對多準則决策的複雜性,本研究採用模糊語言偏好關係方法。隨後,研究應用模糊VIKOR方法對專家决策组提出的替代方案進行排名。最後,本研究將該方法應用於臺灣跨國企業投資的候選海外市場(越南、馬來西亞和印尼)的案例研究,提供了模型的實務示範。總之,本研究對臺灣跨國企業對外直接投資應用模糊VIKOR的比較分析,為參與選擇跨國投資地主國策略的學術界和產業界提供系统的方法。
Taxes are a crucial consideration in a multinational enterprise’s (MNE)’s choice of overseas market to invest in. Taxes are affected by a variety of factors, and these factors are prioritized vis-à-vis each other in such investment decision-making. The present study thus developed a framework for evaluating the relative importance of tax factors affecting the outbound investment decisions of MNEs, using insights from the literature and expert interviews to establish evaluation criteria. To address the complexities of multicriteria decision-making, this study employed fuzzy linguistic preference relations. The study subsequently applied the fuzzy Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) approach to rank the alternatives proposed by the expert decision-making group. Finally, this study applied this methodology to a case study of candidate overseas markets (Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia) for Taiwanese firms to invest in, providing a practical demonstration of the model. In conclusion, the present study’s comparative analysis of the application of fuzzy VIKOR to foreign direct investment by Taiwanese MNEs offers a systematic approach for both academic and industry practitioners involved in strategic host country selection for multinational investments.
Akcigit U., Hanley D. and Stantcheva, S. “Optimal taxation and R&D policies”. Econometrica, Vol.90(2), pp.645–684, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA15445
Azémar, C. and Delios, A.,“Tax competition and FDI: The special case of developing countries”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol 22(1), pp.85–108, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2007.02.001
Azémarand, C.and Dharmapala, D. , “Tax sparing agreements, territorial tax reforms, and foreign direct investment”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol 169, pp.89–90, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.10.013
Bacchetta, P. and Wincoop, E. V., “Can information heterogeneity explain the exchange rate determination puzzle?” , American Economic Review, Vol 96(3), pp.552–576, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.552
Bellman, R. E. and Zadeh, L.A. “ Decision making in a fuzzy environment”, Management Science, Vol 17(4), pp.141–164, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
Beer, S. , de Mooij, R. and.Liu, L. , “ International corporate tax avoidance: A review of the channels, magnitudes, and blind spots“, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol 34(3), pp.660–688, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12305
Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., Brooks, R. and Do, H. X. , “ ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels”, Economic Modelling, Vol 121, Article 106203, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106203
Buckley, J..J., “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis“, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol 17(3), pp.233–247, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
Buettner, T., Overesch, M. and Wamser, G., “Anti profit-shifting rules and foreign direct investment”, International Tax and Public Finance, Vol 25, pp.553–580, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9457-0
Chatterjee, P. and Charkraborty, S., “A comparative analysis of VIKOR method and its variants”, Decision Science Letters, Vol. 5, pp.469–486, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.5.004
Chen, S.-J. and Hwang, C.-L. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Methods and Applications., Springer., 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4
Chen, F. , Zhou, X.-C..and Cao, Y.-Y. , “Unintended consequences: How anti-avoidance policy lead to corporate tax avoidance“, SSRN, 2023.
Christians, A. ,“Take MAP with a grain of salt: Sifto and the legal nature of competent authority agreements”, Tax Notes International, Vol 86, pp.81–83, 2017.
Chyz, J.A., Gal-Or, R., Naikerand, V. and Sharma, D. S., ” The association between auditor provided tax planning and tax compliance services and tax avoidance and tax risk”, The Journal of American Taxation Association, Vol 43(2), pp. 7–36. https://doi.org/10.2308/JATA-19-041
Damak-Ayadi, S., Sassi, N. and Bahri, M.,” Cross-country determinants of IFRS for SMEs adoption“, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol 18(1), pp.147–168, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2018-0118
Devereux, M. P. and Griffith, R.” Taxes and the location of production: Evidence from a panel of US multinationals”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol 68(3), pp.335–367, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00014-0
Dharmapala, D.and Hines, J.,” Which countries become tax havens”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol 93(9–10), pp.1058–1068, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.07.005
de Mooij, R.A. and Ederveen, S., “Taxation and foreign direct investment: A synthesis of empirical research“, International Tax and Public Finance, Vol 10, pp.673–693, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026329920854
Desai, M. A.and Dharmapala, D. “Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives“, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 79(1), pp.145–179, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
Drucker, J.: Google 2.4% rate shows how $60 billion lost to tax loopholes. October 22, 2010, Bloomberg News. Retrieved from: Google 2.4% rate shows how $60 billion is lost to tax loopholes | Daily Business Review
Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, E., Chiclana, F. and Luque, M., “ Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations“, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 154(1), pp.98–109, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7
Hagon,T.:$250m tax bill puts Toyota in the red, September 9, 2023, Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/business/250m-tax-bill-puts-toyota-in-the-red-20100705-zxl6.html#ixzz2xjqra22U/.
Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. L. and Saavedra, D., “The taxman cometh: Does tax uncertainty affect corporate cash holdings?”, Review of Accounting Studies, Vol 22, pp.1198–1228, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9398-y
Hsu, M., Lee, J., Leon-Gonzalez, R. and Zhao, Y., “Tax incentives and foreign direct investment in China”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol 26(9), pp.777–780, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1495817
Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan: Approved FDI projects accumulated since 1952., April 17, 2024. Retrieved from: https://investtaiwan.nat.gov.tw。
Kuzniacki, B., “The limitation on benefits (LOB) provision in BEPS action 6/MLI: Ineffective overreaction of mind-numbing complexity – Part 1“, Intertax, Vol 46(1), pp.68–79, 2018. https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2018007
Lu, S.-T. , Hsieh, T.-Y., Lee, J.-S.and Tzeng, G.-H., “A decision support system for planning and design tender selection in public buildings”. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Electronic Business, pp. 215–217, Hong Kong, China, December 19–21, 2001.
Mahmoudi, A., Sadi-Nezhada, S. and Makui, A., “An extended fuzzy VIKOR for group decision-making based on fuzzy distance to supplier selection”, Scientia Iranica, Vol 23(4), pp.1879–1892, 2016. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2016.3934
Moser, T.,” The Provisions of the EU anti-tax avoidance directive regarding controlled foreign company rules: A critical review based on the experience with the German CFC legislation”, Intertax, Vol 45(10), pp.606–623. https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2017052
Merlo, V., Riedel, N. and Wamser, G., ” The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the location of multinational firms’ foreign affiliates“, Review of International Economics, Vol 28(1), pp.35–61, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12440
Mintz, J. M. and Weichenrieder, A. J., Holding companies and ownership chainsin indirect side of direct investment: Multinational company and finance and taxation., MIT Press. ,pp.77–120, 2010. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014496.001.0001
Mosquera Valderrama, I. J. and Burgers, I. J. J., “Review of anti-avoidance measures of a general nature and scope –General anti-avoidance rules“, Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol 73(10), 2019. https://doi.org/10.59403/2ch63ny
Sarfo, N. A.: Microsoft engaged in tax avoidance, report says. Tax Notes Today International. October 17,2022. Retrieved from: Microsoft Engaged in Tax Avoidance, Report Says | Tax Notes
Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.-H., “Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction“, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol 17(3), pp.211–220, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8667.00269
Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.-H., “ Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS“, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 156(2), pp.445–455, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.-H., “ Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods“, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 178(2), pp.514–529, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
Picciotto, S. ,“ Problems of transfer pricing and possibilities for simplification”, Institute of Development Studies, ICTD working paper No 86, 2018. https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/problems-of-transfer-pricing-and-possibilities-for-simplification/
Prebble, J. and Hikaka, G. “Autopoiesis and general anti-avoidance rules“, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol 21(7), pp.545–559, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2009.07.001
Regulatory governance for development and growth: Malaysia’s experience with good regulatory practices, World Bank Group,2019. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/993771569259958518/pdf/Regulatory-Governance-for-Development-and-Growth-Malaysias-Experience-with-Good-Regulatory-Practices.pdf
Saaty, T. L. ,“A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol 15(3), pp.234–281, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty, T. L. The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
Schanz, D., A. Dinkel, and Keller, S. ” Tax attractiveness and the location of German-controlled subsidiaries“, Review of Managerial Science, Vol 11, pp.251–297, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0190-3
Shieh, W.-S., Ou, J.-N. and Wang, J.-C., ” The impact of anti-thin capitalization rules on capital structure in Taiwan“, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol 6(11), pp.142–159, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n11p142
Suh, Y., Park, Y. and Kang, D.,” Evaluating mobile services using integrated weighting approach and fuzzy VIKOR“, PLoS ONE, Vol 14(9), Article e0222312, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217786
Tzeng, G.-H., Lin, C.-W. and Opricovic, S.,” Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation”, Energy Policy, Vol 33(11), pp.1373–1383, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014
Wang, T.-C. and Chen, Y.-H., “Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP”, Information Sciences, Vol 178(19), pp.3755–3765, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.028
Wang, T.C. and Chen, Y.H., ” Incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations under uncertain environment”, Information Fusion, Vol 11(2), pp.201–207, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2009.05.004
Zadeh, L. A.” The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning“, Information Sciences, Vol 8(3), pp.199–249, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5