日常美學(everyday aesthetics)或日常生活的美學(aesthetics of everyday life)之相關論述雖不算新穎，但受到學者的重視並逐漸形成與藝術美學和自然美學這兩大美學下的主要領域有明顯區分的新研究領域，確實是相當晚近的事。分析美學不但多關注於藝術作品，很少注意到日常美感現象，而且它一方面從藝術語言和藝術體制等方式去切入，另一方面更試圖從非美感的東西去解釋美感經驗，日常美學則在這種作法中看到一種藝術和生活之間的斷裂，忽視了藝術與生活之間互相滋養的親密關係。本文主要循著湯瑪斯‧萊迪(Thomas Leddy)的著作 為主要的文獻整理並研究日常美學，介紹當今日常美學之發展，包括其範圍及相關理論。同時也會討論萊迪的靈光理論來解決這種斷裂，並提出理由說明解決該問題是如何有助於從美感方面改善我們的生活，最後進行檢討、反省並評論。

Although the discussion of everyday aesthetics or aesthetics of everyday life is not new, it is indeed quite recent that it has received the attention of scholars and gradually formed a new field of study that is clearly distinguishable from the two major fields under aesthetics, namely, art aesthetics and natural aesthetics. Analytical aesthetics not only focuses on works of art, but also pays little attention to everyday aesthetic phenomena. On the one hand, it approaches art in terms of art language and art institutions, and on the other hand, it tries to explain aesthetic experiences in terms of non-aesthetic things. Everyday aesthetics sees in this approach a disconnection between art and life, neglecting the intimate relationship between art and life that nourishes each other. This paper focuses on the work of Thomas Leddy as the primary reference and introduces the development of contemporary everyday aesthetics, including its scope and related theories. Also, Leddy’s theory of aura will be discussed to fix this disconnection, and this paper will also give reasons for how solving this problem can help improve our lives in terms of aesthetic. Finally, it will conclude with a review, reflection, and commentary.

參考書目
1. 中文專書:
柏愔．董曉蕾（譯），Richard J. Lane（著），《導讀鮑德里亞》（重慶：重慶大學出版社，2016/07）。

劉亞蘭，《硬美學：從柏拉圖到古德曼的七種不流行讀法》，臺北市：三民，2020/07，初版一刷。

劉悅笛，《英美分析美學史論》，台北：秀威資訊，2017/01，第一版。

許軒．崔爾雅（譯），齋藤百合子（著），《日常生活美學：擁抱美感生活的5堂課》，台北市：五南，2020/05，初版一刷。

趙偉妏（譯），Mike Featherstone（著），《消費文化與後現代主義》，台北縣永和市：韋伯文化國際，2009/11，初版一刷。

2. 英文專書:
Andrew Light and Jonathan M. Smith (eds.), The Aesthetics of Everyday Life (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).

Anne Sheppard, Aesthetics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).

Charles Baudelaire, The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays (London: Phaidon Press, 1995).

Howard Eiland & Michael W. Jennings (eds.), Selected Writings (Cambridge, MA. & London: Harvard University Press, 1991–1999), 4 vols.

Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Judgment, trans. James Meredith (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1928).

Jo Ann Boydston & Harriet Furst Simon (eds.), The Later Works, 1925-1953 Volume 10: 1934 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989).

Joseph H. Kupfer, Experience as Art: Aesthetics in Everyday Life (Albany: State University of new York Press, 1983).

Katya Mandoki, Everyday Aesthetics: Prosaics, the Play of Culture and Social Identities (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2007).

Leo Tolstoy, What is Art? (New York: The Library of Liberal Arts, 1960).

Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, trans. with notes Martin Hammond, intro. Diskin Clay (New York: Penguin Books, 2006) Book 8.

Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997).

Ossi Naukkarinen, Aesthetics of the Unavoidable–Aesthetics Variations in Human Appearance (Lahti: International Institute of Applied Aesthetics, 1998), Vol. 3.

Peg Zeglin Brand (ed.), Beauty Matters (Indiana University Press, 2000).

Robert Stecker & Ted Gracyk (eds.), Aesthetics Today: A Reader (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010).

Stephen Johnstone (ed.), Documents of Contemporary Art (London: Whitechapel Ventures, 2008).

Susan Feagin and Patrick Maynard (eds.), Aesthetics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).

Thomas Leddy, The Extraordinary in the Ordinary: The Aesthetics of Everyday Life (Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press, 2012).

Victor Papanek, Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change (London: Thames and Hudson, 1985).

Yuriko Saito, Everyday Aesthetics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).

3. 英文期刊：
D.L. Pole, "Varieties of Aesthetic Experience," Philosophy 30, no. 114 (1955): 238-48.

Edward Bullough, "'Physical Distance' as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle" in Aesthetics: A Critical Anthology, ed. George Dickie and R.J. Sclafani (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1977), 758-82 [orig. 1912].

Harold Osborne, “Education in an Affluent State,” Journal of Aesthetic Education 20, no. 4, 20th Anniversary Issue (1986): 103-07.

Jane Bennett, “‘How is It, Then, That We Still Remain Barbarians?’: Foucault, Schiller, and the Aestheticization of Ethics,” Political Theory 24, no. 4 (1996): 653-72.

Noël Carroll, "Aesthetic Experience Revisited," British Journal of Aesthetics 42, no. 2 (2002): 145-68.

Peter Kivy, “Music and the Liberal Education,” Journal of Aesthetic Education 25, no. 3, Special Issue: Philosophy of Music and Music Education (1991): 79-93.

Ingarden Roman, "Phenomenological Aesthetics: An Attempt at Defining Its Range," The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33, no. 3 (1975): 257-69.

4. 網站資料：
Carolyn Korsmeyer, Peg Brand Weiser, "Feminist Aesthetics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/feminism-aesthetics/>.

Yuriko Saito, "Aesthetics of the Everyday", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/aesthetics-of-everyday/>.

林斯諺 (2020)。〈分析美學〉，《華文哲學百科》（2020 版本），王一奇（編）。URL=http://mephilosophy.ccu.edu.tw/entry.php?entry_name=分析美學。