| 研究生: |
施昱安 Yu-an Shih |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
基樁負摩擦力之數值模擬 Numerical analysis of negative skin friction in pile foundations |
| 指導教授: |
黃俊鴻
Jin-hung Hwang |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系 Department of Civil Engineering |
| 畢業學年度: | 98 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 101 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | FLAC 、樁 、負摩擦力 、數值分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | piles, negative skin friction, numerical analysis, FLAC |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:18 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究利用FLAC2D有限差分軟體,觀察土壤受壓密沉陷時,對基樁所產生的負摩擦力影響。模型土層之上層為軟弱黏土層,下層為承載卵礫石層。基樁承載採軸對稱分析模式,分別探討摩擦與點承兩種型式基樁之負摩擦力行為,並釐清不同的加載模式和承載條件彼此相互影響的關係。
研究結果發現,負摩擦力大小與中立點位置和樁、土間之相對位移有很大的關係,增加載重大小或加載面積造成的樁身沉陷量與下拉力(dragload)皆會變大,使中立點往下移動。若在相同條件下改變摩擦樁長,則只有樁身沉陷量會改變,土壤沉陷大小幾乎相同。點承樁與摩擦樁相比,中立點位置較靠近樁底,樁身沉陷小而造成之下拉力大,須考慮樁材強度是否足夠。
改變承載與壓縮層土層勁度比,發現在10倍勁度比內,沉陷量隨著勁度比提高而減少,下拉力增加;而超過10倍之勁度比後即無明顯變化發生。若改變地表荷重(surcharge)與樁頭荷載之加載先後順序,以先加地表荷重再加樁頭荷載的下拉力值較小,而此兩種方式之最終沉陷量差異不大,故可作為降低下拉力大小之方法之一。
This research uses finite difference program FLAC2D to observe negative skin friction behavior of a single pile. The numerical soil model consists of two layer soils, the upper compressible soft clay and the lower gravel bearing layer. The aim of this research is to find the differences of negative friction behavior between friction and end-bearing piles, and to clarify the influences of different loading patterns and bearing conditions.
The result shows that the downdrag force of a pile and neutral point location depend on the relative displacement in the interface of pile and soil. Increasing loading magnitude and area will cause more dragload and settlement, while the neutral point moves down in the meantime. Compared with friction pile, end-bearing pile has more dragload and smaller settlement, it is necessary to check the buckling potential of pile material.
By varying the stiffness ratio between compressible and bearing layers, the larger the stiffness of bearing layer, the less the pile settlement and the more the pile dragload within 10 times stiffness ratio, but there is no obvious variation when the stiffness ratio is greater than 10. Moreover, applying axial loading then surcharge will have larger dragload than the reverse loading sequence but with similar pile settlement. Therefore, changing loading sequence might be chosen to be one of the ways to reduce dragload.
1.Alonso, E.E., Josa, A., and Ledesma, A., 1984, “Negative skin friction on piles: a simplified analysis and prediction procedure,” Geotechnique, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 341-357.
2.Chow, Y.K., Lim, C.H., and Karunaratne, G.P., 1996, “Numerical modeling of negative skin friction on pile groups,” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 201-224.
3.Comodromos, E.M., Anagnostopoulos, C.T., and Georgiadis, M.K., 2003, “Numerical assessment of axial pile group response based on load test,” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 30, pp. 505-515.
4.Comodromos, E.M. and Bareka, S.V., 2005, “Evaluation of negative skin friction effects in pile foundations using 3D nonlinear analysis,” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 32, pp. 210-221.
5.Fellenius, B.H., Harris, D.E., and Anderson, D.G., 2004, “Static loading test on a 45 m long pipe pile in Sandpoint, Idaho,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 41, pp. 613-628.
6.Fellenius, B.H., 2006, “Results from long-term measurement in piles of drag load and downdrag,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 43, pp. 409-430.
7.Hanna, A.M. and Sharif, A., 2006, “Drag force on single in clay subjected to surcharge loading,” International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 29-96.
8.Indraratna, B., Balasubramaniam, A.S., Phamvan, P., and Wong, Y.K., 1992, “Development of negative skin friction on driven piles in soft Bangkok clay,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 393-404.
9.Itasca Consulting Group Inc., 2005, “FLAC, version 5.0 Itasca Consulting Group Inc.,” Minneapolis, Minn.
10.Jeong, S., Lee, J. and Lee, C.J., 2004, “Slip effect at the pile-soil interface in dragload,” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 31, pp. 115-126.
11.Lee, C.J., Bolton, M.D., and Al-Tabbaa, A., 2002, “Numerical modelling of group effects on the distribution of dragloads in pile foundations,” Geotechnique, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 325-335.
12.Leung, C.F., Liao, B.K., Chow, Y.K., Shen, R.F., and Kog, Y.C., 2004, “Behavior of pile subject to negative skin friction and axial load,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 17-26.
13.Lim, C.H., Chow, Y.K., and Karunaratne, G.P., 1993, “Negative Skin Friction on Single Piles in a Layered Half-Space,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 17, No. 9, pp. 625-645.
14.Poulos, H.G. and Davis, E.H., 1980, Pile Foundation Analysis and Design, John-Wiley, New York, U.S.A.
15.Shibata, T., Sekiguchi, H., and Yukitomo, H., 1982, “Model test and analysis of negative friction acting on piles,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 29-39.
16.中華民國大地工程學會,2001,「建築物基礎構造設計規範」,內政部營建署,臺北,第5-35~5-41頁。
17.王維漢,1997,「單樁負摩擦力之行為研究」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢。
18.吳偉特,1988,「台北盆地地盤分區土壤之工程特性」,地工技術雜誌,第22期,第5-27頁。
19.陳紀廷,2008,「點承與摩擦基樁負模擦力之模型試驗」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢。
20.游雅惠,2001,「降水引致單樁基礎負摩擦力行為之有限元素分析」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢。
21.歐晉德,1987,「基樁負摩擦力」,地工技術雜誌,18期,第24-33頁。
22.毆章煜、蕭文達,1993,「臺北粉質黏土之壓密及強度特性」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第五卷,第四期,第337-346頁。
23.盧志杰,2009,「隧道受震反映分析之研究」,博士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢。
24.謝依航,2006,「基樁負摩擦力之模型試驗」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程研究所,中壢。