隨著全球暖化與氣候變遷問題日益嚴峻，環境保護已成為國際間關注的焦點，
各行各業皆需為地球永續發展貢獻一己之力。其中，導致地球暖化的主要因素之
一為二氧化碳的排放。為了促進永續發展，國際組織紛紛設立氣候相關協定，並
推動相關法規，以緩解日益嚴重的環境災害，許多學者亦針對能源議題提出多種
解決方案。此外，各國政府與企業也積極投入綠色行動並推動減碳措施，以回應
全球綠色發展趨勢。海運業作為全球貿易的重要樞紐，其對環境所造成的影響亦
不容忽視，因此相關業者正面臨降低碳排放的迫切需求。隨著減碳議題逐漸受到
重視，已有眾多文獻探討海運業之環境影響及相關減碳措施，然而，過去多數研
究多著重於替代燃料使用及降低燃油消耗等解決方案的分析，對於各項減碳措施
於實際應用上之效益比較，相關討論則相對有限。為了提供海運業者在實務上可
參考並採用的具體方法，本研究以臺灣三大海運公司—長榮海運、陽明海運及萬
海海運為研究對象，透過趨勢分析以及嶺回歸法，探討海運業所採行各項減碳措
施對碳效率的實際成效。研究結果顯示，業者普遍傾向採用營運策略之減碳措施，
且碳效率的顯著提升多來自於累積效果。於實際效益分析中，以航線優化對碳效
率的提升效果最為顯著，少數技術方法對特定公司亦具成效。此結果有助於協助
海運公司提升碳效率表現，並可作為其他業者參考之實務依據。

With the growing severity of global warming and climate change, environmental
protection has become a key international priority, urging all industries to contribute to
sustainable development. Among the main causes of global warming, carbon dioxide
emissions play a crucial role. To address this, international organizations have
established climate agreements and regulations to mitigate environmental disasters,
while governments and businesses actively pursue green initiatives and carbon
reduction strategies. As a vital link in global trade, the shipping industry significantly
impacts the environment and faces increasing pressure to cut emissions. Although many
studies have examined the shipping industry's carbon reduction efforts, most focus on
alternative fuels and fuel-saving technologies, with limited comparative analysis of the
practical effectiveness of various measures. This study investigates the real-world
impact of carbon reduction practices adopted by Taiwan’s three major shipping
companies—EVERGREEN MARINE CORP, Yang Ming Marine Corp, and Wan Hai
Lines —using trend analysis and Ridge Regression. The findings indicate that shipping
companies generally prefer operational strategies for carbon reduction, and that
significant improvements in carbon efficiency are mainly due to the cumulative effect
of existing measures. In terms of practical impact, voyage optimization demonstrates
the most notable effect, while some technical measures are also effective for specific
companies. These results provide useful guidance and practical references for other
shipping companies to enhance their carbon efficiency performance.

References
1. Azarkamand, S., Wooldridge, C., Darba, R, M., (2020). Review of Initiatives and Methodologies to Reduce CO2 Emissions and Climate Change Effects in Ports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol 17, Article no 3858.
2. Barbier, E, B., Burgess, J, C., (2020). Sustainability and development after COVID-19. World Development, vol 135, Article no 105082.
3. Christiansen, M., Fagerholt, K., Pisinger, D. (2024). 50 Years on Maritime Transportation. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, vol 14, Article no 100148.
4. Chen, Y. S., (2024). In response to global climate change goals, exploring the development strategy for decarbonizing the shipping industry in Taiwan. Ocean and Coastal Management, vol 252, Article no 107108.
5. Executive Yuan. Maritime. Retrieved from https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/A44E5E33CDA7E738/f71d5650-83bc-4b76-908d-e1fd89d72c72 (Accessed: Jan. 17,2025).
6. França, A., Lopez-Manuel, L., Sartal, A., Vázquez, X, H., (2023). Adapting corporations to climate change: How decarbonization impacts the business strategy-performance nexus. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol 32, no 8, pp. 5615-5632.
7. Finch, W., H., Finch M., E., H., (2017). Multivariate Regression with Small Samples: A Comparison of Estimation Methods. General Linear Model Journal, vol 43, no 1, pp. 16-30.
8. Grubb, M., (2003). The economics of the Kyoto Protocol. World Economics, vol 4, no 3, pp. 143-189.
9. Huang, Y, A., Weber, C, L., Matthews, H, S., (2009). Categorization of scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprises carbon footprinting. Environmental Science & Technology, vol 43, no 22, pp. 8509-8515.
10. Hertwich, E, G., Wood, R., (2018). The growing importance of scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions from industry. Environmental Research Letters, vol 13, Article no 104013.
11. International Maritime Organization (IMO). Fourth Greenhouse Gas Study 2020. Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/Environment/Pages/Fourth-IMO-Greenhouse-Gas-Study-2020.aspx (Accessed: Jan. 18,2025).
12. International Energy Agency (IEA). International Shipping. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/energy-system/transport/international-shipping (Accessed: Jan. 18,2025).
13. Issa, M., Ilinca, A., Martini, F., (2022). Ship energy efficiency and maritime sector initiatives to reduce carbon emissions. Energy, vol 15, Article no 7910.
14. Kuhlman, T., Farrington, J., (2010). What is Sustainability?. Sustainability, vol 2, no 11, pp. 3436-3448.
15. LaRocco, L, A., (2021). Suez Canal blockage is delaying an estimated $400 million an hour in goods. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/25/suez-canal-blockage-is-delaying-an-estimated-400-million-an-hour-in-goods.html (Accessed: Jan. 17,2025).
16. Lin, S, C., Chang, H, K., Chung, Y, F., (2022). Exploring the Impact of Different Port Governances on Smart Port Development Strategy in Taiwan and Spain. Sustainability, vol 14, Article no 9158.
17. Lau, H, C., Tsai, S, C., (2024). Net Zero by 2050: A Tale of Three Economics. Energy Fuels, vol 38, pp. 21079-21094.
18. Mallouppas, G., Yfantis, E, A., (2021). Decarbonization in shipping industry: A review of research, technology development, and innovation proposals. Marine Science and Engineering, vol 9, Article no 415.
19. Maritime and Port Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.motcmpb.gov.tw/Article?siteId=1&nodeId=333 (Accessed: Jan. 18,2025).
20. Malakhov, M, M., Dai, B., Shen, X, T., Pan, W., (2024). A bootstrap model comparison test for identifying genes context-specific patterns of genetic regulation. The Annals of Applied Statistics, vol 18, no 3, pp. 1840-1857.
21. NASA Global Climate Change. NASA Global Climate. Retrieved from https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/ (Accessed: Jan. 19,2025).
22. NASA. Retrieved from https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/?intent=121 (Accessed: Jan. 19,2025).
23. NASA. NASA Sea Level. Retrieved from https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/?intent=121 (Accessed: Jan. 19,2025).
24. Ozbiltekin-Pala, M., Kazancoglu, Y., Karamperidis, S., Ram, M., (2024). Managing the risks against carbon neutralization for green maritime transport. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol 457, Article no 142478.
25. Port of Rotterdam. Smart Infrastructure. Retrieved from https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/port-future/smart-infrastructure (Accessed: Jan. 17,2025).
26. Pearce, D., Markandya, A., Barbier, E. B., (1989). Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan.
27. Psaraftis, H, N., Kontovas, C, A., (2010). Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol 15, no 8, pp.458-462.
28. Papadis, E., Tsatsaronis, G., (2020). Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy, vol 205, Article no 118025.
29. Panda, R., Maity, M., (2021). Global warming and climate change on Earth: duties and challenges of human beings. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, vol 14, no 1, pp.122-125
30. Rogelj, J., Elzen, M., Fekete, H., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., Meinshausen, M., (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2˚C. Nature, vol 543, pp.631-639.
31. Rony, Z, I., Mofijur, M., Hasan, M, M., Rasul, M, G., Jahirul, M, I., Ahmed, S, F., Kalam, M, A., Badruddin, I, A., Khan, T, M, Y., Show, P, L., (2023). Alternative fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from marine transport and promote UN sustainable development goals. Fuel, vol 338, Article no 127220.
32. Serra, P., Fancello, G., (2020). Towards the IMO’s GHG Goals: A critical overview of the perspectives of challenges of the main options for decarbonizing international shipping. Sustainability, vol 12, Article no 3220.
33. Sheikh, W., Chowdhury, M, M, H., Mahmud, K, K., (2023). A comprehensive performance measurement model for maritime Logistics: Sustainability and policy approach. Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol 14, Article no 101097.
34. Stenzel, A., Waichman, I., (2023). Supply-chain data sharing for scope 3 emissions. Npj Climate Action, vol 2, Article no 7.
35. UN Trade & Development (UNCTAD). Review of Maritime Transport 2021. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2021 (Accessed: Jan. 18,2025).
36. UN Trade & Development (UNCTAD). Review of Maritime Transport 2024. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2024 (Accessed: Jan. 17,2025).
37. Wang, T., Cheng, P., Zhen, L., (2023). Green development of the maritime industry: Overview, perspectives, and future research opportunities. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol 179, Article no 103322.
38. World Resources Institute (WRI) & World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), (2011). Greenhouse gas protocol corporate value chain (Scope 3) accounting and reporting standard. Retrieved from https://ghgprotocol.org/ (Accessed: Mar. 8, 2025)
39. Yusup, M, F, B., (2023). Sustainable Shipping Practices: A review of Environmental Initiatives in the Maritime Industry. Maritime Technology and Society, vol 2, no 3, pp.140-142.
40. Zhang, A., Alvi, M, F., Tay, H, L., Wang, J, X., Gong, Y., (2022). Carbon neutrality drivers and implications for firm performance and supply chain management. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol 32, no 4, pp. 1966-1980.
41. Zhao, Q., Fleming, R, M., (2025). Evaluating global progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 7 over space and time by a more comprehensive energy sustainability index. Energy Strategy Reviews, vol 57, Article no 101626.
42. Zhang, Y., & Politis, D, N., (2022). Ridge regression revisited: Debiasing, thresholding and bootstrap. The Annals of Statistics, vol 50, no 3, pp. 1401–1422.
43. 朱寶萱（2023）。海上巨龍的擺尾－談海運產業如何因應淨零轉型。台灣經濟研究月刊第46卷第9期。111-120。
44. 邱雅莉 (2023)。國際海運減碳趨勢與貨櫃運輸因應探討。交通部運輸研究所。網址： https://www.iot.gov.tw/uploads/asset/data/66610e5b0857771c1370a95a/國際海運減碳趨勢與貨櫃運輸因應探討.pdf
45. 呂錦山 (2011) 。通往世界之路--貨櫃航運。科學發展月刊第468期。12-17。
46. 環境部氣候變遷署（2024）。2024年中華民國國家溫室氣體排放清冊報告。網站：https://www.cca.gov.tw/information-service/publications/national-ghg-inventory-report/12003.html　（上網日期：2025年1月18日）
47. 長榮海運股份有限公司（2024）。永續報告書。網站：https://csr.evergreen-marine.com/csr/tw/jsp/CSR_Report.jsp （上網日期：2025年3月20日）
48. 陽明海運股份有限公司（2024）。永續報告書。網站：https://esg.yangming.com/esg/sustainability_report/1/ （上網日期：2025年3月20日）
49. 萬海航運股份有限公司（2024）。永續報告書。網站：https://esg.wanhai.com/wanhai/index （上網日期：2025年3月20日）