跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黎彥成
Yan-cheng Li
論文名稱: 採用ESG篩選準則對投資績效影響之研究
The Impact of ESG Screening on Portfolio Performance
指導教授: 邱慈觀
Tzu-kuan Chiu
口試委員:
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融學系
Department of Finance
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 44
中文關鍵詞: 企業社會責任社會責任指數永續性指數社會責任型投資ESG篩選
外文關鍵詞: ESG Screening, Socially Responsibility Investment(SRI), Sustainability Index, CSR
相關次數: 點閱:15下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究使用單因子模型及多因子模型以檢驗道瓊永續性美國指數(Dow Jones Sustainability Index United States; DJSI US)此一採用ESG (Environment, Social, Governance)篩選準則來挑選成分股的永續性指數是否存在異常報酬,並藉此推論若投資人採用此種ESG篩選準則進行選股,是否將使其投資組合之績效表現產生顯著異於大盤水準的情形。
    本研究的研究結果發現,無論是在單因子模型、Fama and French三因子模型及Carhart四因子模型下,都並未檢驗出DJSI US存在有顯著之異常報酬;即便在考慮2007年之次貸風暴可能造成的結構性轉變後,仍然得到相同之結論;然而,本研究發現在長期間可能發生重大危機事件的情況下,DJSI US所承擔的系統風險顯著地較市場投資組合來得低。因此,本研究的結論為,若投資人採用ESG篩選準則以進行選股,則其所建構之投資組合的績效表現將無異於大盤水準,但其所承擔之系統風險將較大盤為低,因而能得到更為穩定的績效表現。


    By using the single-factor model and the multi-factor model to calculate the abnormal return of Dow Jones Sustainability Index United States (DJSI US), the goal of this study is to examine whether the portfolio performance of investor will be affected by the adoption of ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) criteria in the stock-picking process.
    The results of this study find that no matter what kind of models have been used, single-factor or multi-factor, there have no abnormal returns in DJSI US. Even after considers the possible structure change which caused by US Subprime Mortgage Crisis in 2007, the results are still unchanged. However, this study finds that when we consider a longer period which consists one or more big negative event, then the systematic risk of DJSI US will be less than the level of market portfolio. Therefore, the conclusion of this study is that if investors use the ESG criteria to choose stocks, then the portfolio performance will have same level compare to the market portfolio. However, it will have less systematic risk than the market portfolio, and receive more stable portfolio performance.

    中文摘要 英文摘要 目 錄 表 次 第一章 緒論 1.1 研究背景 1.2 研究動機與目的 1.3 文獻回顧 第二章 樣本資料介紹 2.1 研究對象選取與分析 2.2 資料來源與樣本篩選 第三章 研究設計 3.1 研究方法與研究假說 3.2 變數定義 3.3 實證模型 第四章 實證結果分析 4.1 報酬、標準差與Sharpe ratio 4.2 單因子模型下之實證結果 4.3 多因子模型下之實證結果 4.4 結構性轉變檢定 4.5 考慮結構性轉變下之實證結果 第五章 結論與建議 5.1 結論 5.2 研究建議 參考文獻

    【1】Bauer, R., K. Koedijk and R. Otten (2005), International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style, Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 1751-1767.
    【2】Carhart, M. (1997), On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Finance 52, 57-82.
    【3】DiBartolomeo, D. and L. Kurtz (1999), Managing Risk Exposures of Socially
    Screened Portfolios, Northfield Information Services, Boston.
    【4】Diltz, J. D. (1995), The private cost of socially responsible investing. Applied
    Financial Economics,.5: 69-77.
    【5】Efron B., et Tibshirani, R.(1993), An Introduction to the Bootstrap, New York: Chapman and Hall.
    【6】Fama, E. and K. French (1993), Common risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds, Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-56.
    【7】Garz, H., C. Volk and M. Gilles (2002), More Gain than Pain - SRI: Sustainability Pays Off, WestLB Panmure.
    【8】Geczy, C., R. Stambaugh and D. Levin (2004), Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds, Wharton School Working Paper.
    【9】Godfrey, L.G.and Orme, C. D. (2000),Controlling the significance levels of prediction error tests for linear regression models. Econometrics Journal, 3, 66–83.
    【10】Godfrey, L. G. and Orme, C. D. (2002), Using bootstrap methods to obtain
    nonnormality robust Chow prediction tests. Economics Letters, 76, 429–436.
    【11】Hamilton, S., H. Jo and M. Statman (1993), Doing Well While Doing Good?
    The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds, Financial
    Analysts Journal, November/December 1993, 62-66.
    【12】Jegadeesh, N. et and Titman, S. (1993), Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency, Journal of Finance, 48, 65-91.
    【13】Jemel, H., Arbelaez, H. and Cousin, J. G. (2006), Does Social Responsibility
    Deter Shares from Higher Returns? An European Empirical Study, SSRN working paper.
    【14】Kosowski, R., Timmermann, A., Wermers, R. and White, H. (2006), Can mutual fund “stars” really pick stocks? New evidence from a bootstrap analysis. Journal of Finance 61, 2551-2595.
    【15】Mallin, C., B. Saadouni and R. Briston (1995), The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 22, 483-496.
    【16】Paparoditis, E., and D. N. Politis (2005), Bootstrap hypothesis testing in regression models, Statistics and Probability Letters, 74, 356–365.
    【17】Sauer, D. (1997), The Impact of Social-Responsibility Screens on Investment
    Performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity
    Fund, Review of Financial Economics 6, 23-35.
    【18】Schröder, M. (2003), The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments:
    Investment Funds and Indexes, Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 18, 122-142.
    【19】Statman , M. (2000), Socially Responsible Mutual Funds, Financial Analyst Journal 56, 30–39.
    【20】Volk, C. and Garz, H. (2003), Inside SRI - Update ‘‘More Gain than Pain’’& A
    Fresh Look at New Index Structures, WestLB Panmure.

    QR CODE
    :::