| 研究生: |
彭冠穎 PENG, KUAN-YING |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
多事業部制轉型為整合型功能性組織 之分析─以H公司轉型為例 Analysis of the Transformation from Multi-Divisional Structure to Integrated Functional Organization: A Case Study of H Company |
| 指導教授: | 王存國 |
| 口試委員: | |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階主管企管碩士班 Executive MBA Program |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 55 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 組織轉型 、多事業部制 、整合型功能性組織 、變革管理 、資源整合 、決策效率 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | organizational transformation, business unit, integrated functional organization, change management, resource integration, decision-making efficiency |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:50 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探討H公司從多事業部制(Business Unit, BU)轉型為整合型功能性組織的歷程,旨在剖析其背後的驅動因素、組織設計策略與轉型成效。企業面對高科技產業環境劇變、跨國營運需求擴大與內部資源協作困難等挑戰,往往需透過組織結構調整以提升營運效率與市場應變能力。本研究採質性個案研究方法,透過蒐集公司內部資料、組織流程紀錄與跨部門運作觀察,運用主題分析與比較分析法進行資料歸納與解釋。研究發現,轉型主要動因包括資源配置重疊、決策權限分散與跨部門協作低效。H公司透過設立六大核心職能中心、標準化決策流程、導入數據平台與強化橫向溝通,改善原BU架構之運作瓶頸,並在專案執行效率、資訊透明度及顧客回應速度上展現初步成果。然而,轉型過程中亦面臨員工對權責重新劃分與文化變遷的適應困難。研究建議,企業進行組織轉型時,應將制度設計、流程重建與文化溝通同步納入變革藍圖,並透過階段性策略與支持機制,確保轉型穩定落實與長期運作成效。
This study explores the organizational transformation of Company H from a Business Unit (BU) structure to an Integrated Functional Organization. The purpose is to analyze the drivers behind the transformation, the organizational design strategies applied, and the effectiveness of the implemented changes. In the context of an increasingly dynamic high-tech industry and the challenges of global operations, organizations must restructure to improve internal efficiency and responsiveness. This research adopts a qualitative case study approach. Data were collected from internal corporate documentation, operational workflows, and cross-functional observations. Thematic and comparative analysis methods were employed to interpret and synthesize the findings. The study reveals that the key drivers for transformation included overlapping resource allocation, fragmented decision-making authority, and inefficient cross-departmental collaboration. By establishing six functional centers, standardizing decision-making processes, adopting digital platforms, and reinforcing horizontal communication, Company H addressed the limitations of its previous BU structure. Initial results showed improvements in project execution efficiency, information transparency, and customer responsiveness. However, the transformation process also encountered challenges related to employee adaptation to redefined responsibilities and shifts in organizational culture. The study concludes that successful transformation requires the simultaneous coordination of system design, process reengineering, and cultural alignment, supported by phased strategies and transition mechanisms to ensure long-term sustainability.
中文文獻
1.林亭汝、沈永祺、謝學儀與游雅雯(2010)。台灣印刷電路板產業經營績效之探討:SCP產業組織理論之應用。《臺灣企業績效學刊》,3(2),151-181。
2.游舒帆(2021)。公司部門組織架構有哪些?四種常見的組織架構與優缺點。取https://bizthinking.com.tw/2021/07/01/organization-architecture/
英文文獻
1.Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293-315.
2.Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523-549.
3.Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (2002). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
4.Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
5.Burnes, B. (2004). Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Dynamics. London, England: Pearson Education.
6.Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London, England: Tavistock Publications.
7.Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2018). The science of organizational design: Fit between structure and coordination. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1–13.
8.Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 429–448.
10.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
11.Daft, R. L. (2015). Organization Theory and Design. Toronto, Canada: Cengage Learning Canada Inc.
12.Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging "resistance to change." The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 25-41.
13.Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
14.Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2004). How P&G tripled its innovation success rate. Harvard Business Review, 82(6), 60-72.
15.Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
16.Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2004). Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation: An introduction. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 340-349.
17.Fujimoto, T. (1999). The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18.Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
19.Galbraith, J. R. (2002). Designing Organizations: An Executive Guide to Strategy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing Organizations: Strategy, Structure, and Process at the Business Unit and Enterprise Levels. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
21.Gerstner, L. V. (2002). Who Says Elephants Can’t Dance? Leading a Great Enterprise Through Dramatic Change. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
22.Gulati, R. (2007). Silo busting. Harvard Business Review, 85(5), 98-108.
23. Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organisation. Researh Policy, 29(7-8), 871–893.
24.Immelt, J. R. (2017). How I remade GE. Harvard Business Review, 95(5), 42-51.
25.Kim, H. (2020). Strategic transformation of Samsung. Journal of Business Strategy, 41(1), 3-15.
26.Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
27.Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
29.Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
30.Lines, R. (2004). Influence of participation in strategic change: Resistance, organizational commitment and change goal achievement. Journal of Change Management, 4(3), 193–215.
31.Maljers, F. A. (1992). Inside Unilever: The evolving transnational company. Harvard Business Review, 70(5), 46-52.
32.McKinsey & Company. (2023). The state of organizations 2023. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-state-of-organizations-2023
33.Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structure of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783-794.
35.Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
36.SEMI Taiwan. (2023). SEMICON Taiwan 2023 highlights: Shaping the future of microelectronics. Retrieved from https://www.semi.org/tw/semicon-taiwan-2023
37.Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20-24.
38.Siggelkow, N. (2011). Firms as systems of interdependent choices. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 1126-1140.
39.Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29.
40.Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171-222.
41. Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. (2001). Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization: Roles of the broker and steward. European Management Journal, 19(3), 254-267.
42.Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (2007). The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production—Toyota’s Secret Weapon in the Global Car Wars That Is Now Revolutionizing World Industry. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
43.Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44.Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.